Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2014 04:24:22 +
with message-id e1xax3o-0005eu...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: museek+/2:0.2+git20140306.e92f562d-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #741007,
regarding RFS: museek+/2:0.2+git20140306.e92f562d-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+
* Package name: museek+
Version : 2:0.2+git20140306.e92f562d-1
Upstream Author : Adam Cécile gand...@le-vert.net and others
* URL :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.13+svn.20070906.r740-1
of my package museek+.
It builds these binary packages:
mucous - Python/curses client for museekd
murmur - PyGTK2 client for Museekd, the P2P Soulseek Daemon
museekd- Client for the SoulSeek
Hi!
On 9/6/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.13+svn.20070906.r740-1
of my package museek+.
Uploaded.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
Thanks Nelson,
Nothing to say about this package? I'm sure there are some things that
could be improved.
Can I consider you as my sponsor for all packages now ?
Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit :
Hi!
On 9/6/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the
A small question about this package.
As you may have noticed, it provides a binary package named 'murmur'.
This binary package was build from another source package before, but it
has been merged into museek+ distribution.
I guess the old murmur source package will be removed once some nightly
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.12-1
of my package museek+.
This new version is a bugfix release with important fix in the core software.
The packaging has been improved to remove scons call in clean rules and make
the package build on kfreebsd.
It builds these
Le samedi 16 septembre 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
This is the third post of this RFS, please consider checking and
sponsoring museek+.
It's really a great software.
Thanks in advance.
* Package name :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
This is the third post of this RFS, please consider checking and
sponsoring museek+.
It's really a great software.
Thanks in advance.
* Package name : museek+
Version : 0.1.11-1
Upstream Author : Hyriand
On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from
http://puzzle.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/museek-plus/museek+-0.1.11.tar.bz2
differs in several places from
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from
On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
I don't know why but the upstream tarball I just downloaded from
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
I don't know why but the upstream
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 14:20, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Christoph Haas wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 12:22, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
On (03/09/06 22:21), Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
Some comments on the packages.
* The descriptions are a little terse.
* Add a full stop after initial release in debian/changelog.
* Are you sure you want gamin used
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package museek+.
* Package name : museek+
Version : 0.1.11-1
Upstream Author : Hyriand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daelstorm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SeeSchloss [EMAIL
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:01:22 +0200, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello mentors,
I finally made the last changes on my museek+ packaging and I guess it's
ready for an upload.
* Package name: museek+
Version : 0.1.11
Upstream Author : Daelstorm [EMAIL
Hello mentors,
I finally made the last changes on my museek+ packaging and I guess it's ready
for an upload.
* Package name: museek+
Version : 0.1.11
Upstream Author : Daelstorm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.museek-plus.org/
* License : GPL
Hi!
On 6/10/06, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Margarita Manterola wrote:
Your package does weird things, related to the fact that it uses scons
for building. For example, it checks for build-dependencies at clean
time:
# Run scons -c for cleaning
scons
I updated my package to the latest upstream release :
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-packages/museek+/museek+-0.1.10/
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-packages/museek+/museek+_0.1.10-1.dsc
I'm still looking for a sponsor ;-)
Thx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On 6/7/06, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody is interrested in sponsoring me ?
Your package does weird things, related to the fact that it uses scons
for building. For example, it checks for build-dependencies at clean
time:
# Run scons -c for cleaning
scons
Margarita Manterola wrote:
On 6/7/06, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody is interrested in sponsoring me ?
Your package does weird things, related to the fact that it uses scons
for building. For example, it checks for build-dependencies at clean
time:
# Run scons -c for
* Margarita Manterola [Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:22:49 -0300]:
I noticed this because I can't build your package with my pbuilder if
I don't install the build-dependencies OUTSIDE the pbuilder. I hadn't
encountered such behaviour in any other package.
Next time, try doing it without debhelper
Le_Vert wrote:
Lukáš Lalinský a écrit :
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
* museek-python-bindings : Python bindings for the C++ daemon
I think the name of this package should be python-museek.
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload museek+. Museek+ is a client for the
SoulSeek network (like Nicotine, already in Debian) but it's in
client/server mode.
Museek+ provides 5 packages :
* museekd : the daemon, written in C++
* museeq : A C++/Qt GUI
* mucous : A Python/Curses GUI for
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
* museek-python-bindings : Python bindings for the C++ daemon
I think the name of this package should be python-museek.
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-package_names
--
Lukáš Lalinský
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Lukáš Lalinský a écrit :
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
* museek-python-bindings : Python bindings for the C++ daemon
I think the name of this package should be python-museek.
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-module_packages.html#s-package_names
Package
27 matches
Mail list logo
