Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package task-spooler
* Package name: task-spooler
Version : 0.7.2-1
Upstream Author : Lluís Batlle i Rossel vi...@vicerveza.homeunix.net
* URL :
* Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com [120226 02:03]:
The new standard allows any all in the Architecture field.
Please explain this new feature. What does it do and under what circumstances
should it be used?
It's for the Architecture field of the .dsc. As that field is
automatically
Hi,
Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
On 02/12/2012 05:49 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Stephen M. Webbstephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
* There are files licensed under the GFDL in tutorial/example.
[...]
I have reworded debian/changelog for clarification and added a
Fantastic, thanks very much Bernhard, I think that's the explanation we're all
needed.
Regards,
Dmitry.
On Sunday 26 February 2012 22:02:15 Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Paul Elliott pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com [120226 02:03]:
The new standard allows any all in the Architecture field.
I just wanted to thank you sincerely for all the hard work of yours which is
so very useful for all of us.
Thank you, Arno and Nicolas! Good work.
Cheers,
Dmitry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Dear mentors,
Could any of you share experience of having your own private build server?
I'm thinking of something which could build uploaded source for as many
architectures as possible on amd64 host, and ideally put the results to
'reprepro'-managed tree.
The goal is to simplify package
I have two things.
The lintian version is not up2date it doesn't know the new standard version
3.9.3
He doesn't recognise closing of itp BUG in the wnpp package, he see it as an
error.
With kind regards,
Bas van den Dikkenberg
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: onlyjob
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-25, 22:43:
+ ... except with autoconf-dickey it doesn't, so use autotools-dev's
dh_ commands; bump build-depends to autotools-dev (= 20100122.1)
accordingly. (Yes, even though it says Do NOT in the autools-dev
README.Debian.gz.)
Hi,
Thank you for the announcement. I am glad to see these improvements.
It is really great!
Few negative moments which I am recently faced with [1]:
1) Error Package closes bugs in a wrong way.
Your script processes wnpp pseudo-package in wrong way.
2) Package has lintian warnings:
-
Hi,
it looks like gnash is no longer on mentors.d.n, probably it was removed
because unstable has a higher version (might be a bug in debexpo).
Could you make the package available somewhere else? Also consider to
update the Git branch as well.
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Le 26/02/2012 à 14:15, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru écrivit :
Hi,
Thank you for the announcement. I am glad to see these improvements.
It is really great!
Few negative moments which I am recently faced with [1]:
1) Error Package closes bugs in a wrong way.
Your script processes wnpp
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 660955 RFS: gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg/4.6.2-1 [ITP] -- documentation for
GCC 4.6
Bug #660955 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg/4.6.2-1 --
documentation for GCC 4.6
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg/4.6.2-1 [ITP]
tag 658426 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Daniel Martí danielmarti.deb...@gmail.com writes:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc
the .orig.tar.gz you used differs from the one currently in the archive:
Files:
6ef8024579061b77c835ec950dfdb8ee
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 658426 + moreinfo
Bug #658426 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] --
Cyrillic fonts for X
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
658426:
On 02/26/2012 02:34 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
it looks like gnash is no longer on mentors.d.n, probably it was removed
because unstable has a higher version (might be a bug in debexpo).
Could you make the package available somewhere else? Also consider to
update the Git branch as well.
I
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:20:46 +0100
with message-id 87y5rpptfl@deep-thought.43-1.org
and subject line Re: Bug#660774: RFS: gnash/0.8.10-3~bpo60+1 [DM uploads to bpo]
has caused the Debian Bug report #660774,
regarding RFS: gnash [DM uploads to bpo]
to be marked as done.
This
tag 659083 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org writes:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmoto/xmoto_0.5.9-1.dsc
You do not include the full license text for src/glext.h in the
copyright information.
Have the patches been forwarded upstream?
You use
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 659083 + moreinfo
Bug #659083 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: xmoto -- 2D motocross platform game
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
659083:
Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org writes:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minidlna/minidlna_1.0.24+dfsg-1.dsc
The package was removed due to a bug in the new debexpo version. Could
you upload it again?
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 02:54:46PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
The last change is from 2011-08-04. Maybe you forgot to push the
changes?
It was neither updated nor tagged as I said. Sorry. Pushed.
--
Gabriele
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors.
A new upstream version of quickrdp is released and I have packaged it
for Debian.
I would be happy if someone would sponsor my package.
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/quickrdp
Alternatively, one
On 02/26/2012 06:35 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I think it is fine to just document that it is released under a GFDL
license (any version) and add a note that we assume there are no
invariant sections, no front cover and no back cover texts.
I have modified the debian/copyright file as
On 02/26/2012 06:35 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
I think it is fine to just document that it is released under a GFDL
license (any version) and add a note that we assume there are no
invariant sections, no front cover and no back cover texts.
I have modified the debian/copyright file as
Hi,
Stephen M. Webb stephen.w...@bregmasoft.ca writes:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc
The new lintian version made me aware of another problem I had missed:
E: libatlas-cpp-0.6-dev: arch-dependent-file-not-in-arch-specific-directory
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-25, 22:43:
+ ... except with autoconf-dickey it doesn't, so use autotools-dev's
dh_ commands; bump build-depends to autotools-dev (= 20100122.1)
accordingly. (Yes, even
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package roxterm
* Package name: roxterm
Version : 2.5.2-1
Upstream Author : Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk
* URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net
* License :
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 554155 with 658114
Bug #554155 [wnpp] ITP: mysql-sandbox -- manages multiple, sandboxed instances
of mysql servers on the same machine
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 554155: 658114
block 654892 with 658032
Bug
Hi,
have you tried contacting the MySQL maintainers (CCed)? Maybe on of
them is interested in this package.
Mateusz Kijowski mateusz.kijow...@gmail.com writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mysql-sandbox.
* Package name: mysql-sandbox
Version : 3.0.24-1
Why priority extra?
Sorry, my bad. I've changed it to optional.
You build depend on debhelper (= 9.0.0), but debhelper doesn't
use such versioning scheme anymore. Even if did, debhelper (= 9)
would be both shorter and more friendly to backporters.
I didn't know that. Fixed.
Debian Policy
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-25, 22:43:
+ ... except with autoconf-dickey it doesn't, so use autotools-dev's
dh_ commands; bump
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-26, 17:49:
* Fix hyphen-used-as-minus-sign warning from lintian.
This patch...
* New patch 03-allow-echoing-compilation-commands.patch, which enables
printing of compilation commands by default.
...and this patch have Forwarded headers
Hmm, yes, that can be a problem. Unfortunately, it's currently
hardwired into the Makefile at configure time; this is likely related
to a desire to work with a wider range of Make implementations than is
usual?
I did that a different way (there's a macro which I normally use for most
scripts).
Dear mentors, dear TeX maintainers:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package tth.
* Package name: tth
Version : 4.03+ds-1
Upstream Author : Ian Hutchinson ihu...@mit.edu
* URL :http://hutchinson.belmont.ma.us/tth/
* License : GPL-2+
Section
Dear mentors,
I have an interesting problem on my hands:
The package I need to build have optional build dependency (libgpm-dev)
which is not available on all platforms.
If I just put it to Build-Depends, package will FTBFS on some platforms.
So idea is to specify an optional (soft)
See section 7.1 of debian-policy for examples on how to do that (you
probably want linux-any for the arch):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi Paul,
Thanks for quick reply.
On Monday 27 February 2012 13:00:32 Paul Wise wrote:
See section 7.1 of debian-policy for examples on how to do that (you
probably want linux-any for the arch):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
Indeed it probably could be
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 01:42:28PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Indeed it probably could be written as
Build-Depends: libgpm-dev [linux-any]
But the obvious drawback would be the requirement to know all architectures
where this package is available.
In this case Build-Depends
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-26, 17:49:
* Fix hyphen-used-as-minus-sign warning from lintian.
This patch...
* New patch 03-allow-echoing-compilation-commands.patch, which enables
printing of compilation
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
* Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com, 2012-02-26, 17:49:
* Fix hyphen-used-as-minus-sign warning from lintian.
This patch...
* New patch
Hi Craig,
Thak you for sharing your experience.
On Monday 27 February 2012 14:09:21 Craig Small wrote:
That's the problem I have with mudlet.
libluajit-5.1-dev [amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-i386],
liblua5.1-0-dev [!amd64 !armel !i386 !kfreebsd-i386],
Very interesting and
Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org writes:
On Monday 27 February 2012 14:09:21 Craig Small wrote:
Specifically to your testing, valgrind testing should probably be
opportunistic, so test if valgrind is available and don't otherwise. I
think dejagnu does it that way.
OK, so for really
Hi Russ,
On Monday 27 February 2012 15:28:51 Russ Allbery wrote:
Even with valgrind, personally I'd just list a specific set of
architectures on which valgrind is required, even if you also
opportunistically test for its existence. There's no reason to allow
*not* running valgrind tests on
Dmitry Smirnov only...@member.fsf.org writes:
It makes perfect sense for complete (working) test suits.
I had an experience with valgrind only recently when upstream introduced
yet-to-be completed tests which are failing everywhere so far.
I'm already ignoring tests failure using override
43 matches
Mail list logo
