Bug#841032: RFS: golang-github-hlandau-dexlogconfig/0.0~git20160722.0.055e2e3-1 [ITP]

2016-10-17 Thread Peter Colberg
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:55:48PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 839981 by -1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package > "golang-github-hlandau-dexlogconfig": > > git clone >

Bug#841031: RFS: golang-github-hlandau-buildinfo/0.0~git20160722.0.b25d4b0-1 [ITP]

2016-10-17 Thread Peter Colberg
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 11:55:08PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 839980 by -1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-github-hlandau-buildinfo": > > git clone >

Bug#840992: RFS: golang-github-hlandau-goutils/0.0~git20160722.0.0cdb66a-1

2016-10-17 Thread Peter Colberg
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "golang-github-hlandau-goutils": > > git clone >

Re: Packaging upstream snapshot, merging error

2016-10-17 Thread Elías Alejandro
Thanks Andrey, I've found my error. Downloaded zip from upstream git repo, it has a .gitignore file which should be removed because already there's another under collab-maint repo. Best regards. Elias Alejandro

Re: Packaging upstream snapshot, merging error

2016-10-17 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:28:56PM -0300, Elías Alejandro wrote: > gbp:debug: ['git', 'merge', '--no-summary', '--no-edit', > 'upstream/0.2.5_git20161017'] > gbp:error: Automatic merge failed. If your new upstream cannot be merged into master this either means there is a debian/ in the upstream

Packaging upstream snapshot, merging error

2016-10-17 Thread Elías Alejandro
Dear all, I want to package an upstream snapshot from a git repository, however I get errors importing with Basically first I download the directory from upstream git repository, and renamed to package~git20161017 and then compress it as package~git20161017.orig.tar.gz I take this new tarball to

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode/0:20160910.debfc6d.vpo-1

2016-10-17 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Kiwamu, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:07:51AM +0900, Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > E: The Debian version 20160910.debfc6d.vpo cannot be used as an ELPA > version. > See dh_elpa(1) HINTS for how to deal with this. > debian/rules:7: recipe for target 'binary' failed > > How to fix it? As the

Re: [ANOUNCE] Debtemplate

2016-10-17 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Dmitry, On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 07:53:53AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > I anounce it to resolve following questions: > > - Is it useful for anyone but me? > - Should it be packaged as native Debian package? Looking forward to this. -- Sean Whitton

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode/0:20160910.debfc6d.vpo-1

2016-10-17 Thread Kiwamu Okabe
Hi Sean, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > It sounds like you can just add this to d/rules: > > override_dh_auto_install > /bin/true I try to do that: ``` $ git diff | cat diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index

Bug#840424: Could you fix the error that is found by verilog-mode testing on Debian?

2016-10-17 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear Kiwamu, On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:53:44PM +0900, Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > And my xemacs version on the Debian is following: > > $ xemacs --version > XEmacs 21.4 (patch 24) "Standard C" [Lucid] (x86_64-linux-gnu, Mule) > of Fri Sep 16 2016 on debutante I didn't realise that you were

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode/0:20160910.debfc6d.vpo-1

2016-10-17 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Kiwamu, It sounds like you can just add this to d/rules: override_dh_auto_install /bin/true -- Sean Whitton

Re: [buildd] unexpected FTBFS on amd64 buildd «binet»

2016-10-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:10:57AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 18:57 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > [...] > > You should fix your package so that it works on the lowest supported  > > hardware of each port. > > Right. > > > Autobuilding is only a small part of the problem,

Bug#841070: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions-remove-dropdown-arrows/7-1, ITP: 829071 -- removes drop down, arrows from panel on GNOME shell

2016-10-17 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extensions-remove-dropdown-arrows": * Package name: gnome-shell-extensions-remove-dropdown-arrows Version : 7-1 Upstream Author : Martin Pöhlmann

Bug#841066: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions-pixelsaver/1.9-1, ITP: 829089 -- pixel saver extension for GNOME shell

2016-10-17 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-pixelsaver": * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-pixelsaver Version : 19-1 Upstream Author : Amaury Séchet * URL :

Bug#841065: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions-dashtodock/55-1, ITP: 829185 -- dash-to-dock extension for GNOME shell

2016-10-17 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extensions-dashtodock": * Package name: gnome-shell-extensions-dashtodock Version : 55-1 Upstream Author : Michele * URL :