Bug#890481: RFS: fcitx-cloudpinyin/0.3.6-1

[Boyuan Yang]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-input-met...@lists.debian.org

Dear mentors and debian-input-method members,

I am looking for a sponsor for team package "fcitx-cloudpinyin"

 * Package name: fcitx-cloudpinyin
   Version : 0.3.6-1
   Upstream Author : Weng Xuetian 
 * URL : https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-cloudpinyin
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : utils

  It builds those binary packages:

fcitx-module-cloudpinyin - Flexible Input Method Framework - cloudpinyin 
module

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/fcitx-cloudpinyin

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fcitx-cloudpinyin/fcitx-cloudpinyin_0.3.6-1.dsc

  Git packaging repository:

http://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-ime/fcitx-cloudpinyin.git

...and I'm looking for a DD to help migrate this repository to Salsa platform 
under
Debian group.

  Changes since the last upload:

 fcitx-cloudpinyin (0.3.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * New upstream release.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.3.
   * Bump debhelper compat version to v11.
   * Remove trailing spaces in d/changelog and d/rules.
   * d/control: Use debian-input-method maillist in maintainer field.
   * d/control: Use Salsa platform in Vcs fields.
   * d/rules: Use "dh_missing --fail-missing".

--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#890480: RFS: groonga/8.0.0-1

[Kentaro Hayashi]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga"

* Package name: groonga
  Version : 8.0.0-1
  Upstream Author : Groonga Project 
* Url : http://groonga.org/
* Licenses: LGPL-2.1
  Section : database

It builds those binary packages:

  * groonga
  * groonga-server-common
  * groonga-server-gqtp
  * libgroonga-dev
  * libgroonga0
  * groonga-tokenizer-mecab
  * groonga-token-filter-stem
  * groonga-plugin-suggest
  * groonga-bin
  * groonga-httpd
  * groonga-doc
  * groonga-examples
  * groonga-munin-plugins

To access further information about this package, visit the following URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/groonga

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/groonga/groonga_8.0.0-1.dsc


More information about groonga can be obtained from
http://groonga.org/

Changes since last upload:

  * New upstream release.


pgpyZ5Kh49gvA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: GPLv3 source code with license check for some build configuration, DFSG ok?

[Ben Finney]

This seems to be a good use of the ‘debian-legal’ discussion forum.

Can you reply to this thread – note the Cc to ‘debian-legal’, please
subscribe there to follow if you like – with a copy of the exact text
granting license (“you may such-and-such under conditions so-and-so”).

More questions follow.

Thomas Preud'homme  writes:

> ultracopier's source code has a license check when built in ultimate
> mode. However the source code is readily available, licensed under
> GPLv3 and I plan to ship a non ultimate build into Debian. Is that ok
> according to DFSG and thus ok to distribute in Debian?

You'll need to explain more of what “ultimate mode” means.

Especially we need to know what change in program behaviour would be had
by some recipient choosing to disable that check and redistribute it to
others.

> I would say yes because the build Debian would distribute wouldn't be
> restricted in use and its source code would be readily available and
> free to be modified.

Note that the freedoms of the DFSG must be available to every Debian
recipient, whether direct or indirect. If not, the work is not DFSG-free.

> I'm less sure about the ultimate edition (note that this would not
> affect Debian). GPLv3 says:
>
> "You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the […]

That is a significant concern, yes.

If the recipient can simply ignore the additional restriction, and there
is no effective change to the program behaviour, then that is not really
an effective restriction and we may as well just patch out the non-free
check.

If the recipient cannot simply ignore the additional restriction, then
to some extent the restriction makes the work non-free. Some other
resolution would be needed; plausibly, this would exclude the work from
Debian.

When you can describe more we can judge the conditions better.

-- 
 \“No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep |
  `\up.” —Jane Wagner, via Lily Tomlin |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney

Re: GPLv3 source code with license check for some build configuration, DFSG ok?

[Paul Wise]

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:

> ultracopier's source code has a license check when built in ultimate mode.

What is the difference between ultimate mode and normal modes?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

GPLv3 source code with license check for some build configuration, DFSG ok?

[Thomas Preud'homme]

Hi there,

TL;DR: ok to distribute GPLv3 code with license key check for an existing build 
configuration 
that does not have that license check?

ultracopier's source code has a license check when built in ultimate mode. 
However the 
source code is readily available, licensed under GPLv3 and I plan to ship a non 
ultimate build 
into Debian. Is that ok according to DFSG and thus ok to distribute in Debian? 
I would say 
yes because the build Debian would distribute wouldn't be restricted in use and 
its source 
code would be readily available and free to be modified.

I'm less sure about the ultimate edition (note that this would not affect 
Debian). GPLv3 says:

"You may not impose any further restrictions on the exercise of the 


I think the license key check is such a further restriction. So even though I 
could not find any 
written restriction in redistribution of an ultimate editon, neither in the 
source, nor on the 
website of the software project that the license check link to, I would say it 
fails to respect the 
GPL. It does not even prevent redistribution of the license key itself as far 
as I could see but 
that shouldn't change the decision either.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#890461: RFS: igmpproxy/0.2.1-1

[Pali Rohár]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "igmpproxy"

 * Package name: igmpproxy
   Version : 0.2.1-1
   Upstream Author : Pali Rohár 
 * URL : https://github.com/pali/igmpproxy
 * License : BSD-3-clause and GPL-2+
   Section : net

It builds those binary packages:

  igmpproxy  - IGMP multicast routing daemon

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/igmpproxy


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/igmpproxy/igmpproxy_0.2.1-1.dsc

More information about igmpproxy can be obtained from 
https://github.com/pali/igmpproxy.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release
  * Update Standards-Version to 4.1.3
  * Update to debhelper 10
  * Use https links in copyright

Regards,
 Pali Rohár


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#890458: RFS: udftools/2.0-1

[Pali Rohár]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"

 * Package name: udftools
   Version : 2.0-2
   Upstream Author : Pali Rohár 
 * URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : otherosfs

It builds those binary packages:

  udftools   - tools for UDF filesystems and DVD/CD-R(W) drives

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/udftools


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/udftools/udftools_2.0-2.dsc

More information about udftools can be obtained from 
https://github.com/pali/udftools.

Changes since the last upload:

 * Fix installation in chroot (Closes: #890224)

Regards,
 Pali Rohár


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#890225: reopening RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1

[Jeremy Bicha]

Control: reopen -1

Sorry about the typo.

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

Bug#890225: marked as done (RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:15:04 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#890225: fixed in vala 0.39.91-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #890225,
regarding RFS: flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
890225: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890225
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flake8-polyfill"

* Package name: flake8-polyfill
  Version : 1.0.2-1
  Upstream Author : Ian Cordasco 
* URL : https://gitlab.com/pycqa/flake8-polyfill
* License : MIT
  Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python3-flake8-polyfill - polyfill package for Flake8 plugins

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/flake8-polyfill

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flake8-polyfill/flake8-polyfill_1.0.2-1.dsc

Packaging repository:

  https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/flake8-polyfill

Debomatic:

  
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/flake8-polyfill/1.0.2-1

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream version 1.0.2
  * Update copyright years
  * Drop superfluous nocheck guards
  * Fixup whitespacing in rules file
  * Point VCS URIs to salsa.debian.org
  * Bump the debhelper version to 11
  * Bump the standards version to 4.1.3
  * Add missing Enhances relationship

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: vala
Source-Version: 0.39.91-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vala, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 890...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeremy Bicha  (supplier of updated vala package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:39:08 -0500
Source: vala
Binary: valac valac-0.40-vapi vala-0.40-doc libvala-0.40-0 libvala-0.40-dev 
valadoc libvaladoc-0.40-0 libvaladoc-data libvaladoc-0.40-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 0.39.91-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jeremy Bicha 
Description:
 libvala-0.40-0 - C# like language for the GObject system - library
 libvala-0.40-dev - C# like language for the GObject system - development 
headers
 libvaladoc-0.40-0 - API documentation generator for vala (library)
 libvaladoc-0.40-dev - API documentation generator for vala (devel files)
 libvaladoc-data - API documentation generator for vala (data)
 vala-0.40-doc - C# like language for the GObject system - documentation
 valac  - C# like language for the GObject system
 valac-0.40-vapi - C# like language for the GObject system - vapi files
 valadoc- API documentation generator for vala
Closes: 890225
Changes:
 vala (0.39.91-1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Jeremy Bicha]
   * New upstream development release (Closes: #890225)
   * Add new symbols
 .
   [ Rico Tzschichholz]
   * Have libvaladoc-0.40-dev depend on libvala-0.40-dev
   * Have libvaladoc-0.40-dev Provide libvaladoc-dev
Checksums-Sha1:
 fb15e40f2e631d470d237b832e3c920896a8de16 2623 vala_0.39.91-1.dsc
 f1884baae61330905506de701f5f4ab01a4d631f 3328276 vala_0.39.91.orig.tar.xz
 e33bda820495b5261fa4715b61b0a1206e406955 32348 vala_0.39.91-1.debian.tar.xz
 74a441556e2d5182966b4a81d3bb0d95bc66d7f9 10249 vala_0.39.91-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 805f25bab1e6726581a44652d1f5a2139f58903b1f26360d00b6cc6038bd964b 2623 
vala_0.39.91-1.dsc
 6e10a007c55ccf782cbb39a47779f79e2aa0e2c44e797f8f5517b03af76166c4 3328276 
vala_0.39.91.orig.tar.xz
 5942b72613cc25854e0d5799958b7f2888e0e7dc7e86e12c790b25725fd02089 32348 
vala_0.39.91-1.debian.tar.xz
 

Bug#890225: Bug #890225 in vala marked as pending

[Jeremy Bicha]

Control: tags -1 -pending

Oops, I meant to mark #890255 as pending instead. Sorry about that!

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

Bug#890449: RFS: engauge-digitizer/10.4+ds.1-2

[Tobias Winchen]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer"

 * Package name: engauge-digitizer
   Version : 10.4+ds.1-2
  Upstream Author : Mark Mitchell 
 * URL : https://github.com/markummitchell/engauge6
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : science

 It builds those binary packages:

engauge-digitizer - interactively extracts numbers from bitmap graphs or 
maps
 engauge-digitizer-doc - engauge-digitizer user manual and tutorial

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/engauge-digitizer

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/engauge-digitizer/
engauge-digitizer_10.4+ds.1-2.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:
   
 [ Helmut Grohne ]
  * Fix FTCBFS: Let dh_auto_configure pass cross flags to qmake.
(Closes: #889801)

  [Tobias Winchen]
  * Update to ch compat 10
- Drop --parallel from dh $@
  * Install icons in usr/share/icons instead of usr/share/pixmaps\
- Install SVG icon using engauge-digitizer.install


Bests,
   Tobias Winchen

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#888526: marked as done (RFS: dxf2gcode/20170925-7 [ITP] -- converts 2D drawings to G-code for CNC machines)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:33:48 -0700
with message-id 
and subject line found a sponsor!
has caused the Debian Bug report #888526,
regarding RFS: dxf2gcode/20170925-7 [ITP] -- converts 2D drawings to G-code for 
CNC machines
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
888526: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear Mentors/Sponsors,

I am looking for a Sponsor for my package "dxf2gcode":

https://mentors.debian.net/package/dxf2gcode

It builds a single binary-all package also named dxf2gcode.

More info is available at upstream's wiki here: 

https://sourceforge.net/p/dxf2gcode/wiki/Home/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-5-rt-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 20170925-1

I am closing this bug because it has been sponsored by Sébastien
Villemot of the Debian Science team.  The package dxf2gcode_20170925-1
is currently in the NEW queue:

https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/dxf2gcode_20170925-1.html

Thanks to all the reviewers and mentors who helped me get it to this point:

* Sébastien Villemot
* Juhani Numminen
* Andreas Tille
* Boris Pek
* and the friendly folks in #debian-science and #debian-mentors


-- 
Sebastian Kuzminsky--- End Message ---

Bug#890225: Bug #890225 in vala marked as pending

[jbicha]

Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #890225 in vala reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/vala/commit/4314044121cc6edbe5db3243a5e6e1a8529c7864


releasing package vala version 0.39.91-1

Closes: #890225



(this message was generated automatically)
-- 
Greetings

Bug#890437: RFS: fgetty/0.7-3

[Dmitry Bogatov]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fgetty"

* Package name : fgetty
  Version  : 0.7-3
  Upstream Author  : Felix von Leitner 
* Url  : https://www.fefe.de/fgetty
* Licenses : GPL-2+
  Programming Lang : C
  Section  : admin

 fgetty is a small, efficient, console-only getty for Linux.  It is derived
 from mingetty but hacked until it would link against diet libc to produce
 the smallest memory footprint possible for a simple yet complete getty.
 .
 fgetty includes a login program that supports the checkpassword
 authentication interface, and also a checkpassword program that uses the
 standard C library interface to passwd and shadow.

It builds those binary packages:

  * fgetty

This package succesfully builds on debomatic machine:

  https://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#unstable/fgetty/0.7-3
 
Please note, that package is maintained with dgit(1) tool
using dgit-maint-merge(7) workflow. For more information about how to
sponsor this package, see dgit-sponsorship(7).

  Git repository: https://salsa.debian.org/iu-guest/fgetty.git
  Git branch: master

With /bin/sh following commands should suffice:

  $ git clone https://salsa.debian.org/iu-guest/fgetty.git fgetty
  $ cd fgetty
  $ make -f debian/rules get-orig-source # 'gbp buildpackage' is fine
  $ dgit sbuild


Changes since last upload:

  * Acknowledge NMU
  * Bump debhelper version to 11
  * Install upstream changelog
  * Remove forgotten debian/fgetty.lintian from source package
  * Use DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS instead DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. Later
is meant to be used by user, rebuilding package.
  * Update Vcs-* fields in debian/control.
  * Update standards version to 4.1.3 (no changes needed)
  * Use secure URL when in debian/changelog `Format` field

Regards,
  Dmitry Bogatov

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

[Sean Whitton]

Hello,

On Wed, Feb 14 2018, Sean Whitton wrote:

> If you do this, please upload using `dgit push-source` since Dmitry is
> using a dgit-based workflow.
>
> (you can just run `dgit push-source` and it should do everything for
> you)

Oh, plus --overwrite since the last upload to unstable was not made with
dgit.

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

[Sean Whitton]

Hello Gianfranco,

On Wed, Feb 14 2018, kact...@gnu.org wrote:

> Hello! Gianfranco, could you please consider building and, probably,
> sponsoring this package? We have issue, that it FTBFS on Sean's setup,
> but builds on mine and on debomatic. As debomatic admin notified,
> debomatic is not out-of-date {updated this sunday}.
>
>   https://salsa.debian.org/iu-guest/inotify-tools

If you do this, please upload using `dgit push-source` since Dmitry is
using a dgit-based workflow.

(you can just run `dgit push-source` and it should do everything for
you)

-- 
Sean Whitton


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#887659: RFS: urlwatch/2.7-1 [ITA]

[Maxime Werlen]

Thanks, I'll look into it.

Le 13 févr. 2018 06:03, "Paul Wise"  a écrit :

> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 07:29 +0100, Maxime Werlen wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your time reviewing my packages.
>
> Thanks for adopting urlwatch!
>
> > I've tried to fix as much issues as I'm capable.
>
> There is only the blocker of ftp-masters accepting minidb now.
>
> It would be nice to fix these extra issues at some point:
>
> Upstream released 2.8 on 2018-01-28.
>
> The upstream thpinfo.com website has a broken TLS certificate:
>
> The certificate is only valid for thp.io
> The certificate expired on 22/03/17 04:52.
>
> I would suggest switching Debian copyright/control to thp.io
> and or contacting upstream about fixing their TLS certificate.
>
> I would suggest wrapping debian/watch between the URL and regex.
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>

Bug#889968: RFS: inotify-tools/3.14-4

[KAction]

> > [2018-02-12 13:07] Sean Whitton 
> >> > Last version is at bacef877c2f9293f9e1fd624b32d5306d7bc3c27 Maybe,
> >> > you could try again?
> >>
> >> Still FTBFSs.  Log attached.
> >>
> >> I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date.
> >
> > Stange. Just did 'sbuild-update -udcar', and still fails to reproduce.
> > I have same version of build-essential, by the way.
> >
> > Added debomatic admin into CC, maybe he has any opinion about
> > situation.  If not, I could remove sanitize support, although I am not
> > so happy with it. Or maybe you could tar.gz your chroot and upload
> > somewhere?
> 
> I tried deleting and rebuilding my chroot and disabling ccache and
> tmpfs, and I tried building on my i386 machine, again after rebuilding,
> disabling ccache and disabling tmpfs.
> 
> In all cases the package FTBFS.  I attach my i386 log..
> 
> I'm not sure how to proceed.  I can't upload this if I can't build it,
> and my configuration seems sufficiently standard that even if you are
> able to build it, we shouldn't upload.  Maybe we should try disabling
> sanitize support for now.

I understand your concerns, Sean. I invited Gianfranco into thread,
maybe he would sponspor instead.  Ah, another absurd idea. What about
your building package on debomatic? Maybe for some reason your source
package, generated from git repository, differs from mine? Also, could
you please try to run binaries, built by debomatic? Do they crash?

Hello! Gianfranco, could you please consider building and, probably,
sponsoring this package? We have issue, that it FTBFS on Sean's setup,
but builds on mine and on debomatic. As debomatic admin notified,
debomatic is not out-of-date {updated this sunday}.

https://salsa.debian.org/iu-guest/inotify-tools

Bug#890382: RFS: libbusiness-isin-perl/0.20-1 [ITP]

[Laurent Baillet]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libbusiness-isin-perl"

 * Package name: libbusiness-isin-perl
   Version : 0.20-1
   Upstream Author : David Chan 
 * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Business-ISIN
 * License : GPL-1+ or Artistic
   Section : perl

  It builds those binary packages:

libbusiness-isin-perl - validate International Securities
Identification Numbers

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/libbusiness-isin-perl


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libb/libbusiness-isin-perl/libbusiness-isin-perl_0.20-1.dsc

  More information about libbusiness-isin-perl can be obtained from
https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/Business-ISIN.

I've been using this simple perl module in production since its
release more than 15 years ago and still works as expected according
to ISO 3166


  Regards,
   Laurent Baillet

Bug#890379: RFS: python-jsonrpc/1.10.8-1 [ITP]

[Ghislain Vaillant]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-jsonrpc"

* Package name: python-jsonrpc
  Version : 1.10.8-1
  Upstream Author : Kirill Pavlov 
* URL : https://github.com/pavlov99/json-rpc
* License : Expat
  Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  python-jsonrpc-doc - documentation for json-rpc
  python3-jsonrpc - Python implementation of JSON-RPC 1.0 and 2.0 (Python 3)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-jsonrpc

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

  dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-jsonrpc/python-jsonrpc_1.10.8-1.dsc

Packaging repository:

  https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/modules/python-jsonrpc

Debomatic build:

  
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/python-jsonrpc/1.10.8-1

Changes since the last upload:

  * Initial release. (Closes: #879050)

Regards,
Ghislain Vaillant

Bug#890376: RFS: tilde/0.4.0-1

[Gertjan Halkes]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tilde"

* Package name: tilde
  Version : 0.4.0-1
  Upstream Author : Gertjan Halkes 
* URL : https://os.ghalkes.nl/tilde.html
* License : GPLv3
  Section : editors

It builds those binary packages:

  tilde - Intuitive text editor for the terminal

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/tilde

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tilde/tilde_0.4.0-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.

The new upstream releases handles editing files in unmodifiable directories
better, and adds some more menu entries for actions that were already
available through short-cuts.

Regards,
  Gertjan Halkes