Bug#983713: Bug#983712: RFS: lebiniou/3.55.0-1 -- user-friendly, powerful music visualization / VJing tool

2021-06-09 Thread Olivier Girondel
On 6/9/21 8:48 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Olivier, just for some quick feedback, As we are currently frozen and an upload to unstable of a new upstream version is a bit out of scope right now: Do you want to target experimental or do you want wait for the bullseye

Bug#960049: RFS: libatl/2.2.2-1 [ITP] -- Binary representation of lists of name/value pairs

2021-06-09 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Kyle, I'm currently looking over (old) RFS bugs… And this one is very old :( Sorry for that … So, before looking into it, can you confirm that you still interested in maintaining this library? Other than that, I prefer to sponsor only based on .dsc-files, preferable

Bug#983712: RFS: lebiniou/3.55.0-1 -- user-friendly, powerful music visualization / VJing tool

2021-06-09 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Olivier, just for some quick feedback, As we are currently frozen and an upload to unstable of a new upstream version is a bit out of scope right now:  Do you want to target experimental or do you want wait for the bullseye release? It seems that upstream has

Bug#983053: marked as done (RFS: sanlock/3.8.3-1 -- Shared storage lock manager)

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Jun 2021 20:38:25 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: sanlock/3.8.3-1 -- Shared storage lock manager has caused the Debian Bug report #983053, regarding RFS: sanlock/3.8.3-1 -- Shared storage lock manager to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#981982: RFS: codelite/15.0+dfsg-1 [QA] -- Powerful and lightweight IDE

2021-06-09 Thread Tobias Frost
Hi David, (Note: Due to the freeze, an upload to unstable is currently out of scope. You might either want to wait for bullseye's release or target experimental for now) Thanks for the updated package… Some questions though: - d/control: - I see in the diff - that you start Depend: on

Bug#981702: RFS: privacybadger/2021.2.2-1 -- browser extension automatically learns to block invisible trackers

2021-06-09 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi John, On Tue, 02 Feb 2021 19:11:34 -0500 John Scott wrote: >    * Friendly takeover back into the WebExt team. I can't find any documentation about that have been ACKed by the current maintainer. (CCing Jonas so that he can response/confirm, to put it on record

Bug#971594: Asciidoc new package. Check why those existed

2021-06-09 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags -1 moreinfo  Hi Leon, I'm not sure about the status of this RFS / it seems that there is some confusion… So lets try to untangle this… What I can see from the diff is that the only package dropped is vim-ascidoc. This looks sane to me, and due to the fact that vim depends on

Bug#969180: marked as done (RFS: facerec/1.0 [ITP] -- A Face Authentication system for ubuntu)

2021-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:28:37 +0200 with message-id <3d36c2eef1c1a29a313194eadd5e1211e99ac9e8.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: facerec/1.0 [ITP] -- A Face Authentication system for ubuntu has caused the Debian Bug report #969180, regarding RFS: facerec/1.0 [ITP] -- A