Bug#792156: cuba/3.0+20111124-3: review

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, can you please update to the latest upstream and fix the lintian warnings? thanks! G. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWBXdZAAoJEPNPCXROn13Z6DQP/iAGXJNJMN5JukBlWtmzj6j6

Re: Suggestion of new program: execute mathematical set operations on lists

Hi, a quick googling returns me this link [1] seems that python natively do some sort of this python3 >>> a = set([3, 3, 2, 5, 1]) >>> a {1, 2, 3, 5} >>> b = set([5, 90, 2, 7]) >>> b {90, 2, 5, 7} >>> a | b {1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 90} >>> a & b {2, 5} >>> [1]

Re: No host ftp.upload.debian.org found in config

loaded and don't see a sign. S.V.R.S.N. Shashank about.me/shashank.computers We’ve created the greatest collection of shared knowledge in history. Help protect Wikipedia. Donate now: https://donate.wikimedia.org On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamag

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi Cesar, >I go on with the remaining issues. I don't know which remaining issues you are talking about... anyway I can find one for you: rm ../eviacam_2.0.1.orig.tar.gz uscan --debug --force-download dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa "dpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to po/ar.gmo: binary

Bug#782074: RFS: ublock/1.1.1+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- general-purpose lightweight ads, malware, trackers blocker

Hi Matthew, it is fine to track the origin, but I would add a -origin suffix, to keep it in sync with upstream name, and to avoid collisions in case somebody else wants to package the fork too. Moreover lintian is showing a lot of warnings, can you please fix them? sorry, but I lack of time

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi Guilhem > >I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses? (Yes >I read section 3.3 of the policy, it didn't help me understanding.) for two reasons, don't make people upset, and because he is a DD :) >GPL vs MIT is not my choice, as debian/initramfs/* was originally

Bug#799529: RFS: shc/3.8.9b-1 new upstream release

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, lets review: changelog: please be more verbose: e.g bump std-version, -add patches -remove patches -refresh patches -drop README.source changelog: -shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=medium +shc (3.8.7-2) unstable; urgency=low well your previous uploader uploaded with

Re: No host ftp.upload.debian.org found in config

Hi Sabniveesu, >I was unaware of the other packager when I started working on this, weeks ago. >Yesterday I contacted him and now eevrytyging is settled. sorry for that, I tried to check if somebody else was working on it, and I found he was the only one. (one ITP that was inactive and some

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi again, >Making people upset was certainly not my intention. And it's precisely >because I don't have upload rights that I didn't put my name in the >Uploaders fields. Anyway I don't care either way, so if it's less >controversial to swap the addresses I'll do that. I guess maintainer is a

Bug#799498: RFS: neko/2.0.0-4

Hi Andy, the packaging looks good. I did two builds with DH_VERBOSE=1 in a sid chroot (the unstable and mentors versions) I did a meld between them, and I see some "issues" -"Wall" flag has disappeared (I guess not a real problem here :) ) - many lines are like this one gcc -O3 -DEAPI

Bug#799498: RFS: neko/2.0.0-4

5 at 5:54 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> wrote: Hi Andy, > > > >the packaging looks good. > >I did two builds with DH_VERBOSE=1 in a sid chroot >(the unstable and mentors versions) > >I did a meld between them, and I see some "i

Re: No host ftp.upload.debian.org found in config

are you a DD or a DM? otherwise you might want to put on mentors dput mentors file.changes. btw the correct command is to use the alias, I'm not sure it works with the url cheers, G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"Sabniveesu Shashank" Date:Thu, 24 Sep, 2015

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

> > >Not sure how to change this. I think this string comes from here [1]. > >[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634840 hint: https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#retitle >OK. I want to maintain this feature available for win32 and manually builds. I >could add a

Re: Modifying the environment variables of a parent process

Hi Markhazy, first I guess this isn't the right place, but well, the damage is done :) TLTR; you have a cdiv code that gives in output two numbers, real and the imaginary part you want to store them into bash variables. so, why can't you do a simple bash script for doing this? I see a

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

I guess something like (checked for override_dh_auto_configure: on codesearch.debian.net) override_dh_auto_configure: dh_auto_configure -- --disable-update or something similar cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 23 Settembre 2015 16:34, Cesar Mauri ha scritto: > hint: >

Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"Ghislain Vaillant" <ghisv...@gmail.com> Date:Tue, 22 Sep, 2015 at 19:33 Subject:Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1 On 22/09/15 17:32, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I would appreciate a lintian warning instead of a broken documentation > &g

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

ening-no-fortify-functions' and `binary-without-manpage'. I think `hardening-no-fortify-functions' has to do with `dpkg-buildflags' in `debian/rules'. About man page, is it essential? Cheers, Alex 2015-09-22 22:07 GMT+08:00, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it>: > Hi again, &g

Re: Suspicious file changes in -dbg between old and new packages

Hi Niels, >The debug package needs a strictly equal dependency on the original >package, such as: "foo (= ${binary:Version})". That is orthogonal to >the usage of build-ids (that is, you must use the strictly equal with or >without build-id based debug paths). sure, I guess lintian even

Re: Suspicious file changes in -dbg between old and new packages

Hi Niels, >If the old and the new binary have the same build-id, they can reuse the >same debug symbols - regardless of the debug symbols are installed by >name or by build id. :) > so the __TIME__ __DATE__ macros are not used, but *might* be used and not during the build-id computation, but

Re: Suspicious file changes in -dbg between old and new packages

Hi Thomas, >And why does it still work when i install back 1.4.0-2 ? well, if -2 and -3 didn't change symbols (e.g. you didn't patch the source code), why shouldn't it work? (I'm not sure to know how exactly the build.ids are mapped to the binary code, but I guess they work as long as

Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1

> >I still don't get what the recommended solution is. So far, I have been >(wrongly?) following what Lintian suggested to do with embedded jquery. I would appreciate a lintian warning instead of a broken documentation e.g. look at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360

Re: Suspicious file changes in -dbg between old and new packages

Hi, >So it is explainable that symbol loading works between >fewly different package versions. >I would still like to know how i managed to break it. >Just to be able to avoid this in future. as said before, the debug package should depend on binary:Version binary package. e.g. Package:

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi Cesar, >> maybe run "debconf-updatepo" in the clean target, to avoid forgetting of >> updating translations. > >Done nack :) you did it correctly, but that way dh_clean is never called :) override_dh_clean: debconf-updatepo dh_clean this is what I meant. "#634840

Bug#799770: RFS: pyfftw/0.9.2+dfsg-3

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Ghislain, the packaging looks good, however: 1) watch file: what about using this one? http://pypi.debian.net/pyFFTW/watch 2)+ * d/control: bump standards version, no changes required. I would also mention "3.9.6" somewhere they are nitpicks, the packaging looks

Bug#799768: RFS: ismrmrd/1.3.1-1

Control: merge -1 799767 Control: owner -1 ! Hi Ghislain, the packaging looks good, however I have some nitpicks/issues: rules file: "-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr" is this really needed? AFAIK it should be the default inside a dh build. (please check) "--builddirectory=$(BUILDDIR)" same

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi again, some lintian stuff http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/eviacam/2.0.1-5/lintian cheers, G.

Bug#799498: RFS: neko/2.0.0-4

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, quick review: 1) please bump debhelper and compat level to 9 (bonus points for converting the package to multiarch) 2) please drop useless build-dependencies (such as quilt and maybe some others, e.g. pkg-config?) 3) rules file, can you please convert in plain dh_

Bug#799557: RFS: progress/0.9-1 -- Coreutils Progress Viewer

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Zhou the packaging looks fine, I have found just an issue: Vcs-Git: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/cdluminate-guest/progress.git this seems to be wrong. (it might be good as VCS-Browser, but VCS-Git needs a git:// protocol I guess) can you please add them both?

Re: Multi-Arch and debian/control

>I would still appreciate an active DD in the team. you might consider applying for DM and ask somebody to give you upload permissions :) cheers G.

Re: Multi-Arch and debian/control

well, if nobody gives upload rights what is the difference? :) I agree DM is not exactly from newcomers, but well, maybe DC then? cheers, G. Il Lunedì 21 Settembre 2015 17:52, Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> ha scritto: * Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it>, 20

Re: Multi-Arch and debian/control

>Therefore i did not ITA the other two bug pairs after my sponsor >showed me what i did wrong with the first attempt. > >Is it appropriate to ITA them while it is not clear whether >any adoption will actually happen ? >As said, it depends on decisions by old and new friends whom >i do not want

Re: Multi-Arch and debian/control

it :) (at least people had months to speak up, and nobody complained) (and BTW if you loose interested in them, please just open an Orphan package by yourself) cheers! G. Il Lunedì 21 Settembre 2015 16:20, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> ha scritto: Yes Il Lun

Re: Multi-Arch and debian/control

Yes Il Lunedì 21 Settembre 2015 16:13, Thomas Schmitt ha scritto: Hi, > leving them open is just "wrong" I'd say :) I take this as a clear instruction and send mails to 79614{5,6,7}-d...@bugs.debian.org. Have a nice day :) Thomas

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

fferent license? the other stuff looks good, but for sure I need to build and test it :) cheers, G. Il Lunedì 21 Settembre 2015 16:53, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> ha scritto: Hi Helmut, Gerrit gave him permission to comaintain, do you want to followup with

Bug#790125: RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client

Hi Helmut, Gerrit gave him permission to comaintain, do you want to followup with the review? I can do a review in the next 2-3 days if needed, cheers, G. Il Domenica 20 Settembre 2015 14:45, Guilhem Moulin ha scritto: Hi Helmut & Gianfranco, By the way if you don't

Re: Looking for sponsor to upload a fix to Midori

Hi, next time you might want to just open an RFS bug. Anyway, I sponsored the debdiff, it was looking fine to me. (you forgot to tag the previous version in your repo, please do) cheers, Gianfranco Il Sabato 19 Settembre 2015 17:37, Sergio Durigan Junior ha

Bug#799094: RFS: node-kerberos/0.0.14-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Hi: control/compat: debhelper and compat: please set to 9 control: priority: optional patches: debian.patch is not a good patch name, maybe "change-path or similar might be" (the patch might be even split in two, since it does two different things) rules: I see some

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi Alex, > > >I grape the source from . I >think I find a problem with the build dependencies, the build >dependencies contain `libopencv-dev | libcv-dev'. I first choose to >install `libcv-dev', but I get a build failure. After that, I choose >to

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi Cesar, lets review: d/changelog: please remove the space before ")" d/rules: usually it is better to use dh-autoreconf instead of autotools-dev, because the first is a superset (this means a change on control file too, and the drop of autotools-dev) d/control: please run "wrap-and-sort"

Bug#782074: (no subject)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:14:14 +0300 Marius Gavrilescu wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > I see you are packaging uBlock (by chrisaljoudi). You should > consider packaging uBlock Origin (by gorhill, the original author) > instead, as

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- Panda3D free 3D engine SDK

Hi, wonderful! In the meanwhile: rules: - please switch the rules file to debhelper calls :) -"install -m 644 debian/shlibs debian/panda3d1.9.0/DEBIAN/shlibs" this seems wrong maybe rename the file in libpanda3d1.9.0.shlibs, but it should be picked up automagically. all the

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

> >> Oh, I didn't know that :( . Will it really be a problem (I didn't see any >> tool called ck yet)? The problem is that our users now share some artifacts >> in this format and they use this name (in scripts or internal calls), >> so changing this name now will be a nightmare :( ... > >I'm not

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

roc...@gmail.com> ha scritto: I'm there now, could you upload ? :) Sergio Benjamim On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:17:03 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> wrote: > Hi Sérgio, did you get accepted in the pkg-games team? > > I can't see you > https://a

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

0) > > Cheers > > Le 2015-09-16 09:24, Gianfranco Costamagna : >> Hi Geoff >> >>>>> 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly >>> I don't get what you mean. >> >> >> exactly what I wrote :) >> >> dget -x >> http://

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

BTW I guess many people would agree about merging the qt code into the main mupen64plus package :) cheers, G. Il Giovedì 17 Settembre 2015 9:46, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it> ha scritto: Well, I spotted another issue :( sorry for that Copyright (c) 201

Re: RFS: eviacam

uot;. > > Cheers, > Alex > > 2015-09-17 3:38 GMT+08:00, Cesar Mauri <ce...@crea-si.com>: >> Hi Gianfranco (and all), >> >> I just filled a RFS bug [1]. Package seems know to be lintian clean (version >> 2.0.1-5). >> >> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

w.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Regards, Cesar El 17/09/2015 a las 17:16, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió: > Hi, can you please fix also this lintian pedantic? > P unversioned-copyright-format-uri > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ > > (sorry, due to lack of

Bug#799205: RFS: eviacam/2.0.1-5 [ITP] -- webcam based mouse emulator

Hi, can you please fix also this lintian pedantic? P unversioned-copyright-format-uri http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ (sorry, due to lack of time I can't review it properly now) cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 16 Settembre 2015 20:57, Cesar Mauri ha scritto: Package:

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

Hi Geoff >>> 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly >I don't get what you mean. exactly what I wrote :) dget -x http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpd-sima/mpd-sima_0.10.0-2.dsc dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpd-sima/mpd-sima_0.13.1-1.dsc debdiff

Re: RFS: eviacam

Hi Cesar, please open an RFS bug and fix the lintian stuff shown on mentors.d.o page. + Buildsystem: Package uses debhelper with an old compatibility level – Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution – Watch file is not present after that I'll have a look at it. cheers, G. Il

Bug#799022: RFS: mgba/0.3.0 [ITP] -- Game Boy Advance emulator

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Sérgio, 1) changelog: please do not mention "Bug" (nitpick) 2) sed 's/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/g well, using -DLIBDIR= in cmake configure will simplify a lot this stuff I guess. look e.g.

Bug#798990: RFS: webdeploy/1.0-1 ITP #798716 -- deploy files via FTP

Hi Daniel, (please upload on mentors.debian.net next time) 1) changelog: you need to open an ITP bug and set the target distribution to unstable. 2) control: std-version should be 3.9.6 3) copyright should be in dep5 format https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/

Bug#787328: RFS: mpd-sima/0.13.1-1

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Geoff, lets review: 1) you dropped 0.10.0-2 entry from changelog 2) entry 0.10.0-1 is targeted wrongly 3) bump compat level not mentioned in changelog 4) according to setup.py install_requires=['python-musicpd>=0.4.1', 'requests>= 2.0.2'], so I guess there is no need to

Re: Seeking help with submission of package

Hi, please open an RFS bug if you need a sponsor. Handling requests from debian-mentors mail list is not easy. cheers, Gianfranco Il Domenica 13 Settembre 2015 16:37, マイリノデイヴィッド ha scritto: Hello ChangZhuo, Thank you for the quick reply! I will make those

Re: Seeking help with submission of package

Hi ChangZhuo, I didn't find any more copyright issue in the package. Actually I can ask ftpmasters to reject, but I looked at the RFS log, and every copyright issue seemed fixed to me. did I miss anything important? cheers, G.

Bug#798976: RFS: dhcpcd5/6.9.3-1 [ITA] -- DHCPv4, IPv6RA and DHCPv6 client with IPv4LL support

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, please change the changelog: the bugs are not fixed by Debian packaging, but from upstream new release. I would change it that way + * New upstream release + - Fix Multiplication of IPv6 addresses for upstream (Closes: #791582) + - Fix dhcpcd doesn't configure

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

Hi Sérgio, did you get accepted in the pkg-games team? I can't see you https://alioth.debian.org/project/memberlist.php?group_id=30862 this seems to be the last showstopper for me to upload, the package looks good. cheers, G.

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Built, I tested and the package was looking good. Thanks for your contribution to Debian, I hope you will (as you said on irc) consider contributing more in this nice package! cheers, G.

Bug#798655: RFS: node-text-encoding/0.5.3-1 [ITP] -- Polyfill for the Encoding Living Standard's API

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Julien some issues: 1) copyright: please mention the apache documentation without the link (e.g. hedgewars/copyright package has a 14 lines version) 2) examples.html examples-no-indexes.html what about installing them? 3) bower.json what does this file do?

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Hi Azat, >dkms is good idea, thanks! (I was skeptic about linux-headers at the >very beginning). >Converted and uploaded to mentors. for sure the package is good now, there is still however a problem http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/ktap/0.4-1/buildlog it fails to

Re: RFS: ranger/1.7.1-1 (new upstream release)

Hi, Built, the package is in a really good shape :) Just a nitpick, you might want to mention copyright changes in the changelog (this wasn't a showstopper since the license didn't change, the changes were minimal) keep up the good work! cheers, G.

Bug#787148: gambatte review

Hi Sérgio, >> what about maintaining it under Debian Games Team? > >What should I do? Send a message to the mailing list? With all my packages? just join the Games Team, set it as uploader or maintainer and live happy. I guess all the packages that are games should live under that pkg-games

Bug#798507: RFS: node-wrench -- Recursive filesystem (and other) operations for Node.js

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, the packaging looks good, just set the priority to optional in the control file and we should be good. cheers, G.

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Hi, you can just dput again, it will override the previous upload! cheers G. -- Il ven 11 set 2015 01:05 CEST, Fabiano Antunes ha scritto: >Hi Gianfranco, >> Somehow, dch --qa automatically pushes the minor version up. I have >> realized it just now, >> >> I

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Another issue you should address: I duplicate-long-description libcunit1-dev libcunit1 libcunit1-ncurses-dev libcunit1-ncurses libcunit1-doc (you might append something like "this is the development package" "this is the common documentation" or so) feel free to steal from python-pyqtgraph or

Bug#796030: tablesnap

Hi Jeremy, did you have time to look at my last review? let me know if you need help cheers, G.

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Hi, >You are correct, I've put debian/ktap.manpages statically. wonderful >s/dh_installmanpages/dh_installman/ yes, sure maybe something like override_dh_installman: help2man --no-discard-stderr -h-h --version-string $(VERSION) -n "$(DESCRIPTION)" ./ktap > debian/ktap.1

Bug#797766: pac is not really ready yet

Control: noowner -1 Since for now pac has an autogenerated Debian directory I guess it isn't ready for inclusion. Feel free to ping me as soon as you have a debian packaging, and I'll reassing myself back to this task. cheers, G.

Bug#787396: mupen64plus-qt ping

Hi Sergio, did you have time to look to my package review? cheers, G.

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

(please also address issues from other emails) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cunit/cunit_2.1-3-dfsg1.dsc quoting changelog: + * Bump to 2.1-3 + * Fix versions I see two patches dropped and the watch file updated (diff between this version and your previous one, not complete

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, I'm referring to: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792144#54 and (sorry for that I forgot to send the mail) to the need to mark the package as multiarch where needed https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation also, please rebase the changelog into one entry. (I

Bug#788418: nfft

Hi Ghislain, with the gcc-5 transition almost done, how do you feel about looking at the nfft review? cheers, G.

Bug#787148: gambatte ping

Hi Sergio, did you had time to look at the gambatte review? cheers, G.

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

>Hm, there is linux-headers package, why build bot can't install it? >vms? don't know, it doesn't install in a clean sid environment. maybe you want to deal with the module with some runtime build, like it is done with virtualbox-dkms package otherwise you need to force the module rebuild

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Fabiano, +++ alien-8.95/alien.spec 2015-09-09 02:28:26.0 +0200 @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ Summary: Install Debian, Slackware, and Stampede packages with rpm. Name: alien Packager: Joey Hess -Version: 8.93 +Version: 8.95

Bug#789699: ping :)

yntax is it normal? cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 9 Settembre 2015 10:44, Daniel Stender <deb...@danielstender.com> ha scritto: On 09.09.2015 08:55, Daniel Stender wrote: > On 09.09.2015 08:50, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> Hi, Ping about 789699 (vulture) >> >> :

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

>You are correct, there is no need in "linux-headers-amd64", however there >is second option just "linux-headers", and I don't understand why it >doesn't work for you. it does work for *me*, it doesn't for buildd system. IIRC they are configured to pick only the first version... >Anyway I

Bug#786795: dhcp-probe review

Hi Laurent, I'm pinging you because I think you missed my review on #786795 Let me know if you intend to address the issue I raised here :) cheers, G.

Bug#798423: RFS: alien/8.95 [QA] -- convert and install rpm and other packages

>Somehow, dch --qa automatically pushes the minor version up. I have >realized it just now, >by testing is again in a new directory. Is there a way I could do the >QA work without changing >the tarball version? I guess this is because the package is native >Having two separate patches

Bug#788653: RFS: ktap/0.4-1 [ITP] -- lightweight script-based dynamic tracing tool for Linux

Control: owner -1 ! Hi, quick review: 1) watch file does not work, please use something like this url https://github.com/ktap/ktap/releases 2) control: linux-headers-amd64 | linux-headers, why? e.g. on i386 The following packages have unmet dependencies: sbuild-build-depends-ktap-dummy

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, >Yes, you are right, dh-autoreconf is enough. so please drop the other one :) >Hm, according to lintian(1): > "For binary packages, Lintian looks for overrides in a file named > usr/share/lintian/overrides/ inside the binary package, where > is the name of the binary package."

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi again, >Hm, so if I will replace all targets with dh_*_auto, and will add >override_* for them when required, this will not work for rules.d since >it will call the same again and again, no? Or do you suggesting get rid >off that rules.d stuff? yes, or merge them in the main rules file :)

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, well something has been buried by my MUA. There is a new upstream release, can you please update it? BTW there is a problem in versioning: -2.dfsg is bad, because it seems only Debian revision, while -2 is upstream and dfsg is Debian. please use two "-" but I'm not sure if it works or

Bug#797888: RFS: panda3d/1.9.0-1

Hi, >2) Tried to set myself as owner, but I'm unsure if that was correct - I >guess not. bugs.debian.org is a bit tricky imho. (it should be fixed now, right?) >5) I did apply for membership something like a week ago, but nothing >hapenned yet. But I really think working together with the

Bug#792144: RFS: cunit/2.1-2.dfsg-3 -- Unit Testing Library for C [ITA]

Hi, quick review: 1) lintian is complaining about no compat level set. I don't see any problem in the compat level set, not sure if a bug in lintian or something else... 2) d/rules: please use the new dh format, it should be trivial to convert. 3) d/control: do you really need autoconf as b-d?

Bug#798215: RFS: node-typedarray/0.0.6-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Ross, 1) control: "priority: extra" as said before on debian-mentors the priority should be optional, unless you have good reason to have extra https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities 2) "In order to run the tests

Bug#798186: RFS: node-punycode/1.3.2+git702cc2da-1 ITP

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Bastien review: 1) "As an extra tip, don't use 'extra' as 'priority' (d/control) if your package doesn't conflict with other[1]. I suggest 'optional'. [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-priorities; this still

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi Lumin, >I will keep those custom target in the bottom of d/rules. >Yes, all of custom-target-related lines had been already >clustered at the bottom of d/rules, and I have drew a big >split line at the beginning of them, in the updated version. wonderful! > >The custom stuff is

Bug#798044: RFS: php-mf2/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- Microformats2 is the simplest way to markup structured information in HTML.

Hi Bhuvan the packaging looks good to me, however I have some issues that you might want to address: 1) override_dh_install: dh_install well, this is funny and useless :) 2) no watch file is usually bad... please add one if possible 3) DH_VERBOSE in the rules file might be disabled, not an

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi again, The package doesn't build in a clean environment. http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/caffe/0.~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1/buildlog cheers, G.

Re: help

Hi, /usr/bin/ld: src/Daemon/usbguard_daemon-Daemon.o: undefined reference to symbol 'qb_ipcs_create' //usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libqb.so.0: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line I think you need to add the library providing that symbol. Accoding to codesearch.debian.net

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi Lumin >Reduced one. wonderful >Stripped all Multi-Arch: no in d/control. wonderful > >Then, how about splitting those custom target into another file? > >e.g. debian/custom >$ debian/custom cpu >$ debian/custom cuda if they aren't called by standard dh calls it is fine to keep them

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi Lumin, Can you please start by fixing the lintian warnings on mentors page? thanks :) G.

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

Hi, control: libboost-all-dev (>= 1.55) | libboost1.55-all-dev (>= 1.55), what is the rationale for that? I guess libboost-all-dev is already enough... Multi-Arch: no isn't that the default? "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}" this should be useless rules: --builddirectory= can be

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

Hi Henrique, Do you think we should rename it? I can upload a new version on ftpmaster with changelog and control renamed. the python package has the correct name, and the source name is the pypi one... cheers, G. Il Giovedì 3 Settembre 2015 20:12, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Bug#797636: RFS: variety/0.5.4-1 [ITP]

Hi James, >Uhhh, I don't see it either. Upstream uses distutils, and I've never >changed the setup.py myself when I packaged it. you might want to ask them to change :) >Noted. uscan is called with a bunch of arguments in get-orig-source to >comply with policy, so I assume they do something

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

21:51, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <h...@debian.org> ha scritto: On Thu, 03 Sep 2015, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Henrique, > > Do you think we should rename it? Yes, otherwise I would not have suggested it :-) -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find the

Bug#797771: RFS: [ITP] tzlocal/1.2-1

Hi, the reject has been performed, I'll reupload as soon as I get a confirmation email. thanks for the feedback! cheers, G.

Bug#797864: RFS: eclipse-titan/5.3-1 [ITP]

Hi, I don't think I'll sponsor this package, if you really care you might want to get in touch with the pkg-java-maintainers list, and get help there. https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Anyway, something you need to fix: 1) open an itp bug

Bug#797885:

Control: owner -1 ! Hi Bastien I don't think using a fakeupstream in watch file is useful, can you please try to use github instead? the rest looks good. (maybe you want to remove lines in the rules file, but not a problem) cheers, G.

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >