On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 12:16 +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> On http://www.debian.org/ there is a link called "Help Debian", to
> http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ ("How You Can Help".
>
> Perhaps that page should incorporate your (very nice!) checklist.
> And/or maybe it should link to
> http://pe
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:23 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul Wise wrote:
> > * Delete all the Makefile.in, config.h.in during debian/rules
> > clean, or make otherwise make it so that they are not in the
> > diff.gz
> Why's th
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 12:08 +0800, Emfox Zhou wrote:
> in fact, the upstream has not officially released a tarball, i just
> used the CVS checkouted ones. you know, thing like Makefile.in
> couldn't be in CVS...
Ooops, I see.
> so, what should i do, is it ok to package the orig.tar.gz after
> ru
Hi all,
According to [0], the fonttools maintainer offers his packages for
adoption. I would like to adopt fonttools as I use it for when creating
fonts packages (2 so far). I have not received a reply to my wishlist
bug (#329171) requesting that the maintainer upload the new upstream
version that
Ooops, forgot this url:
http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=90
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 15:51 +0300, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote:
> > According to [0], the fonttools maintainer offers his packages for
> > adoption. I would like to adopt fonttools as I use it for when creating
> > fonts packages (2 so far). I have not received a reply to my wishlist
> > bug (#329
Cedric BRINER wrote:
> I'm working as a sysadmin at the Geneva Observatory and we do need
> some softwares which are not provided by the debian distribution. So I
> thought that it will be a good idea to do this job well once and to
> give this back to the debian community.
Really, you will need
Jean-Marc Ranger wrote:
> > There are no signs of an ITP ( Intented To Package )
> > Please file an "ITP bugreport"
>
> I thought it was optional.
Why would it be optional? Why would you want to prevent duplication of
effort and track your packaging progress?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 18:26 -0400, Jean-Marc Ranger wrote:
> You're well-placed to know since you're the credited author :) So
> agreed, my mistake.
Well, I just made a couple of minimal patches, Matthew Palmer is the
main author.
> Other comments ?
debian/changelog - add (Closes: #333237) - w
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 20:42 -0400, Jean-Marc Ranger wrote:
> I plan to keep a single changelog entry until package is "officially"
> issued. Is this ok ? As a side effect, using -v wouldn't be required.
This is ok, but, I don't think mentors.debian.net allows you to
re-upload the same version.
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 15:05 +0100, José Luis Tallón wrote:
> PLASE!!! Look for ITPs in WNPP before *duplicating and wasting* effort.
Indeed! That is what it is there for!
> The problem with KChmViewer is that it used a modified, statically
> linked version of chmlib... and that is not admiss
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:08 +0100, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > Since ming is not in Debian anymore,
>
> You're talking about libming, which is still supported in woody
> (oldstable). Do you know why it didn't make it to sarge? It might be
> possible to get it re-enter Debian. (Just saw upstream
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 11:26 +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/322208
>
> But this doesnt explain why it works with debsign entered as a command
> in the console. In this case, it uses the cached passphrase or ask for
> it if never used before.
As far as I can t
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 10:55 +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> I've seahorse-agent running in my gnome environnement .
Me too.
> While building a package, at the moement to sign it, I've the following
> messages:
> What Im missing?
You forgot to read the seahorse bug report (as I did :)
Hi all,
I need a sponsor for the following package, which is a build dependency
for another package I want to get in - synfig, a 2D vector animation
studio - http://synfig.com. I'll need a sponsor for that too, once it's
dependencies have gone through the C++ transition.
Package name: etl
Ver
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 01:07 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > complement and supplement the C++ STL.
> ^^ ^^
>
> What do they mean? I'm halfway serious .. I know in math class
> complement is 90deg and supplement is 180deg.
>
> Is there a nonmath interpretation to those word
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 10:54 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > In the case of ETL, the intent of 'supplement' is
> > simply 'adding new datatypes and functions'. The intent
> > of 'compliment' is 'which combine well with the existing
> > types and functions'.
>
> I would suggest to use this phrase i
Claudio Moratti wrote:
> I'm working on a package that uses scons...
>
> everything goes fine but I find one problem: in order to clean the sources,
> debian/rules calls
> /usr/bin/scons -c
> but pbuilder don't try to install the Unmet build dependencies before the
> "clean"...
As other peopl
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 18:09 +0530, Prasad Kadambi wrote:
> I searched for the ITP in http://debian.org/devel/wnpp/ and could not
> find. Please help.
http://bugs.debian.org/wnpp doesn't show any indication either.
I did find this page via google: http://ice.jgaa.com/
The source package is a nati
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 18:11 +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for swftools, a collection of utilities for
> manipulating and creating SWF (Flash) files.
I'm not a DD, but I have some comments on the package and other things:
* The ITP needs to be retitled from an RFP, a
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 19:08 +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> The changes to the man pages came from accidentaly running lintian -I
> instead of lintian -i.
I use these lines in my ~/.devscripts so I always get the correct
lintian/linda stuff.
export DEBUILD_LINDA=yes
export DEBUILD_LINTIAN_OPTS=-i
ex
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 21:36 -0200, Jakson A. Aquino wrote:
> This package was discussed here before, but I didn't find a sponsor yet.
> Below, some information about it:
>
> Package: statist
The package looks good. I have a couple of comments:
* In the diff.gz, the changes to the .po file
Hi all,
Is anyone interested in sponsoring WWW::Topica now that the upstream
bugs are resolved? It is a perl script (and some modules) for converting
the list archives at lists.topica.com into mbox files. I also need
either a sponsor for the dependencies, or for the pkg-perl group to take
ownershi
Hi all,
I need a sponsor for xmms-midi, an xmms plugin for playing midi files.
Package name: xmms-midi
Version : 0.03-1
Original Author : Chris Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
License : GPL
Sponsor request : http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=182
Package : deb-src http
Hi all,
I've packaged synfig[1] (a 2D vector animation studio), and found a
sponsor for it. Since neither of us have much experience with shared
libraries, I would like some comments on the packaging, particularly if
the libraries are ok, the package split is ok and any problems you can
find. You
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 10:57 -0800, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for the GOPchop MPEG2 editor. I debianized
> and added man pages for it some time back, but never got the ball
> rolling for inclusion in the repository. Paul Wise recently took some
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 16:24 -0800, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> At present the packaging stuff is merged with the upstream source. Use
> the usual cvs commands to download the current code (I merged in the
> changes you contributed). Sample commands to download the code are at:
>
> http://sourcefor
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 18:02 -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I want to package mdf2iso and b5i2iso, two small utilities that convert
> proprietary programs' CD image formats into the normal ISO format that
> cdrecord and Linux's iso9660 filesystem accept. There are at least half a
> dozen such u
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 19:29 +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > Firstly, the changelog in indicates that the package is for the
> > development version of gopchop, however, you should only upload
> > stable releases to debian unstable (development/cvs/svn/etc releases
> > generally go to experimental),
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 00:43 -0800, Stan Vasilyev wrote:
> I'm the new maintainer for xdialog package. A user has submitted a new
> localization file ca.po via the BTS. I'm trying to include this file in the
> package.
Are you aware of the new upstream? http://thgodef.nerim.net/xdialog/
I was
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 22:57 -0800, Stan Vasilyev wrote:
> I merged your work with my changes and fixed almost all bugs in BTS.
Some comments/questions:
* Why did you remove the space in front of Homepage: in
debian/control I intentionally placed that there. Please read
the
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 13:15 -0800, Cameron Dale wrote:
> W: torrentflux: extra-license-file var/www/torrentflux/adodb/license.txt
Other people have pointed out the solution to this, however, it
indicates to me that torrentflux includes a copy of adodb. Please don't
install that copy, unless the t
Hi all,
I'm packaging a C++ app that has packages like this:
foo - binary using the library
libfoo0 - the library itself
libfoo0-dev - headers and so on
libfoo0-doc - docs for the library
I'd like to add a package for debug information, since the app crashes
occasionally. Should I ad
Hi all,
I'm trying to get synfig (http://www.synfig.com) into debian, and there
is one last issue before I start harassing my sponsors/co-maintainers to
upload it.
Lintian complains about shlib-with-non-pic-code on one of the plugins,
and the main lib. I think the problem with the plugin is that
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 07:33 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> HarvestMan is the only public-domain, multithreaded web-crawler
> program written in the Python language. HarvestMan is released under
> the GNU General Public License.
Public domain and the GPL are mutually exclusive. Please don't write
t
Hi all,
According to my reading of debian-policy 4.8 and 7.6, this should be
correct:
debian/rules:
build: build-indep build-arch
build-indep:
build arch-indep stuff (like docs)
build-arch: configure
build some binaries
However the autobuilders use debian/rules build instead of
Hi all,
I've packaged mtasc, a free compiler for creating SWF files from
ActionScript source code. This is part of a general effort to package
osflash stuff for Debian: http://osflash.org/debian_packaging
One issue with the packaging at the moment, is that I'm not sure where
to put the classpath
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 12:37 +0100, Volker Grabsch wrote:
> They saved a lot of work for me, so I decided to help to improve it.
> Since I'm relatively new to Debian packaging, I need some advice.
Have you asked the mingw32 maintainer about this? They are more likely
to be able to answer your ques
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:36 +0100, Volker Grabsch wrote:
> 1) The debian-devel list is too much traffic for me. Do I really
>have to advertise my plans there?
Not really, however it is courteous to do it, and there are archives. If
you don't like mhonarc archives, there are lurker ones availa
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 21:19 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Also you might want to get the Debian GNU/Win32 project restarted. Now
> that there is a free Win32 kernel/implementation (atheos - not sure how
> well it works), this might become more feasible/useful.
Correction: not ath
On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 11:40 +0200, Simo Kauppi wrote:
> I would like to get some comments for packaging the next upstream
> release of swftools.
* debian/watch: best remove the comments, and probably unsplit the
line.
* debian/changelog: might want to use NMU-style numbers un
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 07:09 +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
> > I am very interested in taking over fast-user-switch-applet package
> > (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=304763)
>
> I will be there in a few days with an RFS ;-)
IIRC, fusa is part of the upcoming GNOME 2.14, so the gn
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 00:35 +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for fast-user-switch-applet, an applet for
> the GNOME panel providing a menu to switch between users.
> This package is now part of GNOME 2.14, and should thus be sponsored by
> a member of the GNOME team.
Shou
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 10:10 +0100, Julien Valroff wrote:
> I contacted them before, and somebody told me I could keep my ITP and
> ask here for a sponsor, provided that I state clearly this is a GNOME
> package. I put them in copy just in case...
Ah cool. Will they put it in their SVN repo?
> >
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 16:57 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for this tiny screen cast utility named byzanz:
If you have no luck here, try the debian-gtk-gnome list.
> Package status:
> - lintian-clean, but linda gives a warning:
> W: byzanz; A binary links against a l
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 12:12 -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package 'tnef'.
Thanks for adopting this.
> Thank you in advance for reviewing this package
Some comments:
* debian/control: need an extra space before Homepage (see the
devref 6.2.4), may
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 21:55 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> I think gaupol is popular enough to be included in Debian.
Thanks for packaging this. BTW, once it is uploaded, check out the
popcon results for the package:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?popcon=gaupol
> I'm confused because I can
On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 10:53 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> I registered a weeks ago but... I didn't receive confirmation mail yet (sic!)
> I have even send a bug report to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no reply till today :(
Hopefully he will fix this soon.
> Believe me, I was searching for it in repo
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 03:34 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> swfmill is an xml2swf and swf2xml processor with import functionalities
Some comments:
* debian/watch: only needs 2 lines - version and url. may want to
allow uscan to auto-run uupdate - add " debian uupdate" to the
en
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:19 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > W: libswfmill0: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libswfmillxslt0 libswft0
>
> What's the standard way of solving this?
It was suggested to me that the lintian warning should be overridden.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 23:43 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> * Package: rhinote
Some comments:
* debian/control: add a Homepage as per devref 6.2.4
* debian/copyright: misses the years in which the copyright
applies
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/0
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 13:02 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Gnash is not ready for uploading to SID yet, I'm considering putting
> it into experimental.
Please do! Thanks for taking on this package.
> The last packages I've made are available at
> http://baby.yi.org/packages/gnash/
Some comments:
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 02:31 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Some comments:
> * debian/copyright:
I forgot to point out this mail:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a dig
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 00:49 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > * debian/control: gnash is not binNMUable due to libgnash-dev
> > strictly depending on libgnash0 (= ${Source-Version}).
>
> What should I do in this case? just depend on libgnash0 without the version?
> wasn't they going to
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:59 -0400, Ian Ward wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the python-urwid debian packages I have
> created.
> WNPP submitted on November 30, 2005:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=341344
You will notice that I retitled that RFP bug to ITP. I've create
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:58 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > I have packaged versions for python2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, and I've
> > > made them available in an apt repository on excess.org.
> >
> > I think a better option would be to use python-support to make a single
> > deb that supports al
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 12:03 -0400, Ian Ward wrote:
> The tutorial.html file has been restored to urwid-0.9.3.tar.gz
>
> I know this might not be good form (I imagine I could have made a new
> release), but it was just a build problem that caused it to appear as a
> zero length file, and the fil
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 11:28 -0400, Ian Ward wrote:
> I've never tried using setup.py to generate documentation. Could you
> point me to an example of a module that does this?
I don't really know enough about distutils or of any modules that do
this. I think it would be fine to distribute both t
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:48 +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
> spcaview : package review needed
The convention is RFC: package -- package description
> http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-package/spcaview/spcaview_20051212-1.dsc
Best to just specify the dsc/diff so we can go dget -x for a
more thorough
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:14 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I'm using dpatch right now, pretty nice, thanks :-)
> FYI many people are now starting to use quilt.
For good reason, it rocks!
> > > * debian/watch: please add one (read uscan(1) for more info)
> >
> > Added. Looks great but is i
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 20:42 -0400, Ian Ward wrote:
> When Paul Wise was kind enough to repackage my Urwid libraries I learned
> that I was not creating packages the way I should be.
They were mostly fine for the current python policy (although a bit
overkill). I'm looking forward to
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 09:29 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Just use
> Depends: probcons (= ${Source-Version})
Please don't use Source-Version - from the dpkg-gencontrol manual:
"The source package version (from the changelog file). This variable is
now deprecated as its meaning is differe
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:27 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Thus proving that the real solution is to get rid of the Homepage bit
> completely and instead add a real field to dpkg, since people won't even
> agree on and follow the syntax for the hack of putting it in the long
> description so that pe
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 02:36 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> only linda is unhappy about non-free font in the upstream
> tarball
If linda is correct about there being a non-free font in the upstream
tarball, then you will need to repack the upstream tarball and document
that you have done so. S
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 13:31 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I kept the same version.
You should instead change the upstream version to 1.0.14.dfsg.1, the
other option is to rename the source package to pyepl-dfsg, but that is
generally not preferred, since renaming source packages can be annoy
Hi all,
Would anyone be able to sponsor templayer? It is a python module that I
need for urwid in order to be able to generate the tutorial. It uses
cdbs and python-support for building at the moment.
dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/templayer/templayer_1.2-2-1.dsc
http://mento
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 11:13 -0400, Kit Peters wrote:
> At my job, we would like to use apt to distribute certain packages,
> such as WWW applications written in PHP, to certain other of our
> machines.
Your question has been answered by others, but I would like to suggest
that you join the debian
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 22:57 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> An URL to *.dsc file will suffice and is actually more suitable to grab (i.e.
> dget) debian source packages from sites, then dpkg-source -x .dsc.
Agreed. Extra tip for dget users:
dget -x http://foo.bar.com/foo_1.0-1.dsc
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:27 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
> - dget
>
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/queuegraph/queuegraph_1.1.0-1.dsc
There is a strange error in your diff.gz:
$ dget -x
http://mentors
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 04:57 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> I am searching for a sponsor for OptiPNG.
Hmm, I thought you would have a permanent sponsor by now.
> It's an updated package (new upstream release).
> Linda and lintian clean and builds OK on pbuilder.
> http://mentors.debian.net
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 13:49 -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.05b3-7 of my
> package "bottlerocket". It was recently orphaned and since I use
> the package in my home to control lights, I filed an ITA in order to
> keep it in Debian.
Excellent, always
No need to CC me, I'm subscribed. You should assume that people don't
want a CC unless they indicate that they do in some way.
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 22:00 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
> > dpkg-source: failure: patch gave error exit status 1
>
> Hmmm, I'm not sure how to investigate this. All I d
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 02:58 +0100, Conall O'Brien wrote:
> > I've rebuild my package now (and it seems to be 3.7.2 complient). I've
> > uploaded it to mentors.debian.net again. Hopefully the updated packages
> > will be moved from incoming/ to the pool soon.
>
> I tried to do your dget -x test an
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 14:08 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Curently I have over 480 packages to custom applications to maintain...
If any of them are free software, please consider uploading them to
Debian or filing bugs in the BTS for customised versions of existing
packages. Not sure if you h
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 22:33 +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
>
> Major part of the orignal binary is compiled from OCAML sources so maybe
> there is some specific error behavior of dh_strip related to these kind
> of binaries.
>
Read the ocaml policy, but you are correct, dh_strip needs -X
so it doesn
On 5/3/07, Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
php4-ffmpeg - ffmpeg support for php4
php4 will be removed from sid soon, please remove this package:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/04/msg00816.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On 5/18/07, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am looking for somebody willing to have a look for problems in a
new version of my biggest package that I split up recently.
Please post a URL to your split package.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On 5/26/07, John Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All problems solved, except the following when running lintian:
E: lbadmin: package-contains-xvpics-dir var/www/lbadmin-1.0/images/.xvpics/
Get upstream to make sure it won't be put into future tarballs they
release and change debian/rules to re
On 5/29/07, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately, packaging it for Debian looks like a momentuous task.
SAGE, as it stands right now, distributes its own versions of a number
of other free software packages that are already in Debian
I'd suggest finding out what tho
On 6/13/07, Philipp Benner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: prolog-el
http://www-lehre.inf.uos.de/~pbenner/debian/prolog-el_1.14-1.dsc
Some comments:
* You might want consider configuring your server (if you are the
sysadmin) to allow people to view the diff.gz in their browser (or
switch
On 6/13/07, Francesco Cecconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Package name : kopete-otr
Some comments:
- yr upstream probably shouldn't be including a debian/ dir, if only
for the reason that it results in incomplete reviews by drive-by
reviewers such as myself.
- why is the library installe
On 6/13/07, Jeremiah Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
xnee - an X evironment emulator and recorder
Some comments:
- xnee is already in Debian and has a maintainer. There are no RFA or
O bugs either.
- you didn't preserve the debian/changelog history from the existing
xnee package
- deb
On 6/11/07, Michael Mende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wackamole - Daemon to make a cluster highly available
Some comments:
- Why do you need to add /usr/lib and /usr/include to the configure
arguments? Those are standard dirs.
- May want to use debhelper compat level 5
- May want to contribut
On 6/14/07, Jeremiah Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been requested to maintain this package by the developer - the
DD he was working with has stopped all work on the package and is not
answering emails. Furthermore the version in debian is 1.8x and the
new version is 2.06 with lots of
On 6/14/07, Richard A Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kicad - Electronic schematic and PCB design software
A drive-by diff review:
Perhaps add descriptions and your name to the dpatches.
Have you sent the patches and the .desktop file upstream?
is 02_debpaths.dpatch really needed?
Migh
On 6/15/07, Richard A Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As of last week I now have write access to the kicad dev svn
repository (in fact it's only as of about 2 weeks ago that there was
an upstream dev repo at all). So patches have gone upstream, except
the debpatchs one (see below).
Excellent
On 6/15/07, Richard Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No problem, thanks for your time. If you know anyone that would be
able to help please point them in my direction.
There are some tips for this sort of thing in the mentors FAQ. Perhaps
someone on debian-science might be interested.
--
bye
On 6/28/07, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using a datestamp because that seems to be the best way to handle
the 'version' of the icons pack.
To prevent the need for an epoch if upstream decides to use versions,
you might want to go with something like 0.0.20070625-1 or
0.0.20
On 7/3/07, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, I'll use the latter (uploading to mentors right now).
By the way, are you interested in sponsoring the package? =)
I'm not a KDE user and I don't have time for sponsoring, sorry.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
On 7/1/07, Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ampache- A web based audio file management system written in PHP
I attended the debian-security talk at debconf. Lets just say that PHP
isn't popular with them :) Have you audited the code so that the
security team don't have to do it when you
On 7/7/07, Nicholas Jefferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/inferno/inferno_0.0.20070510-2.diff.gz
No time to sponsor, but some comments:
* consider putting the patches into quilt (or maybe dpatch)
* that is a lot of patches to the font stuff, what ar
On 7/6/07, LIU Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unalz/unalz_0.61-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
Send manpages, patches upstream if you haven't already.
Might want to convert the patches to quilt (or dpatch/cdbs-simple-patchsys)
In
On 7/7/07, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/thwab-lib/thwab-lib_1.1.2-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
New upstream release for a package not yet in debian?
Please file an ITP and close it in the changelog
What happens
On 7/5/07, William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/ninja/ninja_0.1.2-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
I see the security issues mentioned in the ITP have been fixed, am I correct?
debian/rules contains unused configure target, comm
On 7/4/07, Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.5.2-1.diff.gz
No time for sponsoring, some comments:
Why the changes from /bin/sh to /usr/bin/wish? The wish manpage says
using what upstream has is better.
Might want to s
On 7/8/07, Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason for using debhelper 4 instead of 5?
I used dpkg-buildpackage to build package secpanel 0.5.2-1
Should I avoid dpkg-xxx and prefer debhelper tools ?
By debhelper 5, I mean debian/compat 5 and debian/control
Build-Depends: debhe
On 7/10/07, Bruno Costacurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a newbie as maintainer : I suppose I can close this bug #305135 once this
package is uploaded to Debian repos by a mentor ?
Usually one would put something like this in the changelog:
* New upstream release (Closes: #305135)
If it
On 7/18/07, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I made a package for creating and checking HFS(+) filesystems. The basic
information about this package is here
What is the relationship between hfsprogs and the existing hfsplus and
hfsutils packages? Perhaps all three could be consolidated
On 7/20/07, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is quite nice that you have shown some interest in hfsprogs. I will
explain what you have asked.
I don't really have any interest in them (don't interact with Macs at
the moment), my motivation for the question was to perhaps get those
th
On 7/25/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor
>
> Content seems to be missing?
? I see alot of content.
In galeon I am unable to scroll down and see the sponsoring
guidelines, which are clearly there when looking at the source code.
Probably
301 - 400 of 2570 matches
Mail list logo
