On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:06:43 +0200, Robert Wohlrab wrote:
So can somebody provide some examples for such a script in a
debian package or give me some informations what they should with what.
I had different ideas. For example to extract the provided tar.gz, remove the
non-dfsg dir and
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:01:30 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Should I rename the directory in the .orig.tar and make
tamper-checking more difficult, or not rename the directory in the
.orig.tar and make tamper-checking easier?
You should not, dpkg-source copes well enough.
True, on the other
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:58:36 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
You should not, dpkg-source copes well enough.
True, on the other hand the Developer's Reference suggests in
6.7.8.2:
4. should use packagename-upstream-version.orig as the name
of the top-level directory in its tarball.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 16:59:33 +0100, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package subnetcalc. subnetcalc is a
simple
IPv4 subnet address calculator. For given IP address and netmask, it
calculates network address, broadcast address, maximum number of hosts and
host
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:37:50 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
I'd
personally tend to say that, doing the above and assuming my
characterization is correct, it would be okay to put that in main.
Another precedent (and quite similar, since it's also an application
for a mobile phone, just symbian
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:30:35 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
AFAICS the source package contains the source for
gnapplet but it's not built but the pre-compiled .sis is installed
into /usr/share/doc/gammu/symbian/.
I see. And gammu is in main?
Yes, that's what `apt-cache policy gammu' tells
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:54:12 +, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
I suppose that's ok, but I'd check with the ftp-masters before
uploading.
Alright, who should I contact? ftpmas...@debian.org?
Yes, that's the official address according to
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization
Cheers,
gregor
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:45:39 +0200, Laurent Léonard wrote:
I'm searching for some standard templates for README.source about:
- DFSG changes
- Quilt usage (reference to /usr/share/doc/quilt/README.source ?)
- Other files removed from the original tarball for various reasons
For packages
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:07:42 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
[Any reason why this thread happens on both -devel and -mentors?]
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
It is never pointed out enough that the core packaging teams are
seriously understaffed. Please, before uploading your pet package
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:15:00 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
The interesting question is how to encourage people to join teams;
some thoughts from DebConf can be found here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/07/msg00083.html
(especially point 3)
One thought captured in those notes is to
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:27:05 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
Can you image to take a look at the Developers' Reference too? AFAIK
the only mentioning of teams there is in 5.12.
Yes, definitely.
[..]
I'm filing a bug against the developers-reference package for this
now.
Cool!
Thanks for
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:33:54 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
The reason why I posted to both is that I see a trend in -mentors that
many new contributors seem to create an artificial need as a reason to
get their contributions in the distribution and choose to package a new
program.
I agree with
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:06:48 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Description: an VTE based super lightweight terminal emulator
Shouldn't the field start with a VTE... instead?
Actually it should start without an article :)
Short descriptions are supposed to work as noun phrases or is a
phrase, i.e.
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:19:15 -0700, Don Raikes wrote:
This may seem like an odd question, but I am working on some debian
packages, and would like to put them onto a personal package
repository so that I can include them in a liveCD I maintain.
You can create your own repo with mini-dinstall
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:37:34 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
I don't know how to get it on planet.d.o,
http://wiki.debian.org/PlanetDebian
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x00F3CFE4, 0x8649AA06
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, developer -
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:13:48 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Tools like reportbug work out of the box on my machine; I suppose that
it is because they recognise the DEBEMAIL environment variable, in which
there is a routable email adress to use. Do you think that tagpending
could use it?
It
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 09:38:15 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
Meanwhile, could you explain the logic behind the version number 0.99-2+ds1.
(I suppose one could also look up policy on this but I'm being lazy!)
Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The +ds1 part means
that
it has
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:10:32 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
$ cp ggobi-2.1.7.tar.bz2 ggobi_2.1.7.orig.tar.bz2
Debian provides many facilities in the `devscripts' package. One of them
is the uscan/uupdate programs. They need a special file in the source
package, `debian/watch',
TTBOMK uupdate
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:49:26 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Maybe someone in the Pkg-Perl group has an interest in adopting this into
the group instead?
Sounds like a good idea.
I'll take a closer look at the package tomorrow.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:14:06 +0200, Fabio Balzano wrote:
I want to help Debian and
Great!
I need some advice where I can start, and where
I can find a contact to receive first job.
An easy way for contributing to Debian way is to join one of the
existing teams:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:55:44 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
pacpl - a multi-purpose audio converter/ripper/tagger script
Long Description:
Perl Audio Converter is a tool for converting multiple audio types from one
format to another using various external
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:49:37 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
[ I apologize for the private mail to Gregor, it was an error of mine. ]
[ No problem, actually I saw the one on -mentors before :) ]
I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me.
Just a few remarks:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:32:50 +0200, Cristian Greco wrote:
I found two last small issues:
Fixed!
Thanks, downloaded, checked and uploaded.
Feel free to contact me via private mail for new uploads of this
package.
PS: I think this package would be a good candidate for the
applications
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the three packages listed below;
my last sponsor is busy at the moment (thanks for your help until
now!) therefore I'm asking here. The packages are:
* fullquottel
fullquottel is in testing and unstable, the new version fixes a
wishlist bug (#356375), the only
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 03:16:50PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Normally I use wget --mirror --no-parent to get the source
files. So if you do your RFS, enable directory listing on
your server (or in package directory), post the exact link
of every file in the mail so we can mark them
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 12:30:10AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Oh one moment you are right. I havent yet tried dget but is
dget just generating the file names by itself and downloads
it?
No.
man dget:
... it fetches the given URL and recursively any files referenced,
if the URL points to a
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:08:38PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
One week later I would like to politely ask again for sponsors for
the following 3 packages:
* fullquottel
* mimetic
* mailtextbody
All packages can be downloaded from
http://www.toastfreeware.priv.at/debian/unstable
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 07:49:13PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
* fullquottel
fullquottel is in testing and unstable, the new version fixes a
wishlist bug (#356375), the only change in the package is the
description.
Uploaded.
Thanks a lot!
By coincidence Tony Mancill did an upload too,
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 01:27:10PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
I'd like to build my debian packages out of my repository, so I've added the
following in my debian/rules... Is there a better, standardized way to do
this? (I've already looked at cvs-buildpackage, but I want to move away from
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:58:29 +0200, Vedran Fura? wrote:
The upstream doesn't provide any version information so there shouldn't be
any problem if I fake new upstream releases: 1.0-1 - 1.1-1 - 1.2-1 .
Can't you use dates then? Like MMDD-a?
No problem, but one question, just to be
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:05:14PM +0530, Prasad Ramamurthy Kadambi wrote:
I'm ready with my package festival-te. How do I send it to alioth or any
other Debian server?
Alioth is for (often collaboratively maintained) projects, I guess
there's no registered festival-te project there. More
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:36:02 +0530, Prasad Ramamurthy Kadambi wrote:
How do I upload package for debian-in.alioth.debian.org ? I have an account.
It would be helpful if you can point out docs for svn-buildpackage.
Take a look at
file:///usr/share/doc/svn-buildpackage/HOWTO.html/index.html
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:45:42 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
I have one watch file with the following lines:
version=3
ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz
Doing an uscan --verbose, I get:
[..]
What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 02:18:02 +0100, Ian Beckwith wrote:
I'm (still) seeking a sponsor for libmp3-tag-perl (MP3::Tag, a perl
module for reading and writing ID3v1 and ID3v2 tags in mp3 files).
I'm not a DD, so I can't upload your package.
But maybe you'd like to join the Debian Perl Group and
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:19:09 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
I am working on a package which contains MSWord documents. I was wondering
the following questions:
1) How can I know if they are redistributable at all, for instance if
they contain non-free fonts?
TTBOMK MS Office files don't
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:01:27 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, thanks. But my tool dont need pipes and my pw.txt file looks like this:
password01
pass02
andmore
pwgen output file looks likes:
password pass02 andmore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ pwgen -1 10 10 pwd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat pwd
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 20:39:34 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
- convert doc-control to UTF-8 since it contains character (ö) which is not
present in iso-8859-1 if I'm not mistaken about the current encoding.
'ö' is longer in iso-8859-1 than utf-8 even exists ;-)
But I agree that the files in
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:19:31 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
indeed, I just noticed the following :
sorbet???~???$ apt-cache show latex2html
Filename: pool/non-free/l/latex2html/latex2html_2002-2-1-20050114-5_all.deb
^
Do you think that there are other converters around
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:07:48 +0100, Dario Minnucci wrote:
Does anybody knows where to find some guidelines to build a 'web application
package'?
http://webapps-common.alioth.debian.org/draft/html/
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
: :' : debian: the
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:31:28 +0200, Michel Barret wrote:
Bonjour Michel,
My name is Michel. I want help Debian and as I'm computer studen maybe can
developpe for Debian!
[..]
So can I help anybody? What can I make to Debian?
Thanks for your offer!
For getting ideas about how to get
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:43:51 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
I am looking for some tricks for generating patches for the debian source
packages.
Take a look at interdiff and/or debdiff (in package devscripts).
http://women.debian.org/wiki/English/AdvancedBuildingTips has some
hints, too.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:59 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
I adopted a web application package that used to set a symlink under
/var/www: /var/www/phpmyadmin - /usr/share/phpmyadmin. This was not good:
we shouldn't touch /var/www and not enable phpmyadmin without asking.
Why? What is so bad
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:23:27 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
CEGUI::Exception: DynamicModule::DynamicModule - Failed to load module
'libCEGUIDevILImageCodec.so': libCEGUIDevILImageCodec.so: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
CEGUI Exception occurred :
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:00:40 +0200, Giorgio Pioda wrote:
Download: http://web.ticino.com/gfwp/debian/qgfe-1.0/
I'm not a DD, but here go some short remarks on your package:
* debian/README.Debian is an empty template and can possibly be
removed.
* All the debian/foo.ex files seem to be
On Mon, 07 May 2007 17:12:33 +0200, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. wrote:
I really enjoyed svn-buildpackage. Is there a similar system for hg /
Mercurial?
$ apt-cache search --names-only \-buildpackage
[..]
hg-buildpackage - Suite to help with Debian packages in Mercurial archives
(Never used it.)
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:17:06 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
If the source package contains debian/bin/harvestman then debian/install
can contain this line: debian/bin/harvestman usr/bin/
Unfortunately, the source package does not contain such a file.
Bart was talking about the _Debian_
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:25:53 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
I'm trying to make a package that depends on xmame that is in non-free,
the program under GPL and so I think it can uploaded to main,
If it depends on a package in non-free your package has to go to
contrib.
Cf. Debian Policy 2.2
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 11:19:27 +0100, Jiří Janoušek wrote:
The package fails to build when built twice in a row,
man/nuvolaplayer.1 needs to be removed on debian/rules clean (just add
a debian/clean file).
Fixed. Can be twice in a row building tested with pbuilder?
man pbuilder mentions a
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:13:44 -0500, Emilien Klein wrote:
- The current version number is 0.0.32 beta (including space) as
written on the web page and in the source code, and 0.0.32beta in
the zipfile. As the version number in Debian can't contain spaces,
would you use 0.0.32beta, or even just
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:41:43 -0500, Emilien Klein wrote:
I'd go with 0.0.32~beta or similar (assuming that there will be a
0.0.32 release later) since ~ sorts before everything else.
The upstream author justifies the addition of beta to mean be
aware, no guarantees, this could break. Until
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:12:41 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
I was told that the VCS cotnrol fields are not meant for upstream but
only to point to servers on the debian infrasturcture to contain the
packaging stuff.
s/on the debian infrasturcture//
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:12:37 +0100, Olе Streicher wrote:
uscan debug: [...]
-- Found the following matching hrefs:
[...]
http://foo.bar.edu/foo/foo-1.2.3.tar.gz
Newest version on remote site is 1.2.3, local version is 1.2.3+dfsg
= remote site does not even have current version
--
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:24:27 +0100, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
On 24.01.2012 02:55, Michael Gilbert wrote:
As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
support for this into reportbug:
[..]
How would I tag a sponsorship request of an ITA-Package? It matches neither
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:28:49 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
I'm working on to prepare QA upload for surf which is orphaned by its
previous maintainer. There is a FTBFS bug reported against this
package [1]. But I'm not able to reproduce this bug. Package builds
fine on the pbuilder clean
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:51:47 -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
In practice, how does a request for sponsorship appear at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;dist=unstable
?
I'm CC'ing the list again, because I think this is worthwhile to
everyone (and to the
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:35:53 +0100, Savvas Radevic wrote:
1. If I have an already open bug in wnpp, do I close it or merge it with
the one in s-r (=sponsorship-requests)?
No, they are independent. The WNPP bug is about the package itself,
and the SR bug is about sponsoring.
2. If I have a
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:02 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
We could ask listmasters to filter out BTS bot messages. Now, there
are certainly people (e.g. me) who do want to see control messages.
But they could always subscribe to sponsorship-requests via PTS.
What do others think?
I'm happ to see
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:55 -0600, Paul Elliott wrote:
The untimate source of my project is a windows programer who GPLed. He
thought
it would be a good idea to write the documentation in windows word .doc file!
Bad move.
The only free program that I can find to convert this document
tag 659854 + confirmed
owner 659854 !
thanks
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:08:00 +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package vpnc:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vpnc/vpnc_0.5.3r512-1.dsc
http://mentors.debian.net/package/vpnc
This looks very
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:45:33 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
In case someone is tempted to try Build-Depends like check | dpkg,
it doesn't work at all in pbuilder which is smart enough to notice that dpkg
is already installed so it never pulls 'check'.
And it also doesn't work -- the other way
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:48:18 +0100, Dennis van Dok wrote:
Now I can think of several ways to fix this:
- use something other than dinstall
- change the .changes file before using dput (breaks signing)
- use --debbuildopts=--changes-option=-Ddistribution=squeeze
- change the distribution in
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:29:48 +0100, Dennis van Dok wrote:
- change the distribution in debian/changelog before building:
debchange -D $dist maybe other options
Thanks, but this complicates my procedures. After calling debchange
I'm left with a modified tree and svn-buildpackage will
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:14:28 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
dget uses dscverify to check the signature. dscverify only uses the
debian-keyring.gpg and debian-maintainers.gpg keyrings located in
/usr/share/keyrings by default, so it will not see any keys you imported
unless you tell it to use
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:47:44 -0400, Bilal Akhtar wrote:
liboauth (0.9.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (Closes: #650138)
I can't confirm this.
Both the bti in unstable and a bti rebuilt against 0.9.6-1 fail with
liboauth0 0.9.6-1 installed with the same error as before:
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:15:04 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
similarly to the plink case I can not found an easy solution for this
problem.
alphabet.h:48:3: error: 'reverseInPlace' was not declared in this scope, and
no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of
On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:22:46 +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
8-
override_dh_autoreconf:
sed s/libast/libstarlink_ast/g -i Makefile.am
AUTOMAKE=automake --foreign dh_autoreconf
override_dh_clean:
sed
On Thu, 10 May 2012 13:18:42 +0200, Olе Streicher wrote:
I have the same problem in another package: here, an executable is going
to be renamed, and therefore also the manpage. Additionally, the manpage
needs a patch. Since the manpage is renamed, unpatching it after build
fails.
Not sure
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:27:58 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:58 AM, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote:
I want to adopt this package because I'm planning to ITP
the package (rt-extension-calendar) which depends on this
library.
On Sat, 26 May 2012 13:48:21 -0400, Robert James Clay wrote:
Then you can do also (from cdbs package):
/usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5
I don't use cdbs myself, so that's something I'm not familiar with.
(Nor can I find how it's actually used, as there is no man page that I
can
On Sun, 06 May 2012 23:26:43 +, Frédéric Brière wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2012 20:01:27 +0200, Alexander Toresson wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.5-1 of the package
fceu.
What a coincidence, I was just about to send you an email with various
comments on your
On Thu, 24 May 2012 14:39:33 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
What about creating a list as owner of the pseudo-package dedicated to
BTS traffic (including control messages) named
sponsorship-requests@l.d.o. Furthermore, the mentors list should still
get bug traffic (only). Therefore we would
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:37:45 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
[java] No protocol specified
[java] Exception in thread main java.lang.InternalError: Can't
connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY
variable.
I had similar problems that I solved using
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:28:39 +0200, Alexander Toresson wrote:
- The changelog doesn't mention if this is a hostile takeover, a
friendly salvage or whatever of the package.
I want this to be as friendly as possible, but so far Joe hasn't been
very responsive at all. In fact, even this RFS
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:04:13 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package coinor-ipopt. It contains
a fix for #662236 which caused its removal from testing.
I looked at the package now, and there's one that doesn't make me
happy:
The old packages has:
Depends:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:58:45 +0200, Julian Wollrath wrote:
since I offered Patrick Winnertz, the maintainer, to co-maintain about two
weeks ago and he was also CC'ed in parts of this thread but got no response
from him, I am hoping someone could sponsor my updates to the powertop
package,
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:29:09 +0200, Julian Wollrath wrote:
thank you for your comments. I uploaded a new version of my packaging to
http://rbw.goe.net/jw/ which addresses all of your comments.
Thanks!
- some other changes in d/control are also not mentioned
If you mean the dependency
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:32:35 +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org [120625 22:19]:
The old packages has:
Depends: libmumps-4.9.2 (= 4.9.2) | libmumps-seq-4.9.2 (= 4.9.2), ...
After the changes the dependency is:
Depends: ..., libmumps-4.10.0,
Thanks
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:42:19 +, Bart Martens wrote:
I'm personally not a fan of DEP5, because I have not yet seen any benefits,
only more work for the packager, and less readable for humans than plain text.
Side remark: I personally find a structured Copyright-Format 1.0 file
much easier
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:05:02 +0100, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
I need a sponsor in order to upload an updated package which resolves an RC
bug.
I'm quite surprised nobody has stepped in before.
Bug number is #681654.
Why are you surprised?
There's a dicsussion in the bug log that show
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:24:14 +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote:
* why libcurl4-gnutls-dev | libcurl4-nss-dev | libcurl4-openssl-dev ?
shouldn't that be something simplier like libcurl4-dev ? libcurl-dev ?
libcurl-ssl-dev ?
If I use libcurl4-dev, libcurl-dev or libcurl-ssl-dev, I
obtain the
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:30:22 +0200, Jose G. López wrote:
I had a look at libcdk5 at mentors uploaded there on 2012-10-08 19:09. The
file debian/copyright is not yet complete, see for example include/button.h
with Copyright 1999, Grant Edwards. The name Grant Edwards is also
mentioned
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 23:40:30 +0100, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
I am working on the devilspie package - which has a release mentioned
and linked in the last entry on Ross Burton's blog -
http://www.burtonini.com/
I do however have problems getting a watch-file reading the folder
where the
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+doc-linux-fr (2005.08-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+
+ [ Ivo De Decker ]
+ * Remove build-depends on mirror. Closes: 691570
+
+ [ gregor herrmann ]
+ * Set Maintainer to Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org (cf. #637643).
+
+ -- Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:32:46 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Please fix #677786 using the patch to the bug log in message #12. I
suggest delayed/7 to give the maintainer some more time to react. That
bug blocks RC bug #677762.
Uploaded to DELAYED/7.
Please close this
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It
might be a problem is some script, because mentors has 2 versions of lftp: a
version for sid, and a version for testing-proposed-updates.
However, are you sure
tag 656301 + patch
tag 692261 + patch
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:34:59 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de wrote:
thanks for your interest in xarchiver. I haven't found a sponsor yet, so
please go ahead!
Uploaded! Thanks for your work!
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:09:41 +0530, Kartik Mistry wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de wrote:
I think fixing the two minor bugs is covered by point 4 of the freeze
policy. It's a win-win situation and it comes without altering one
single line of code.
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:51:51 +, Paul McEnery wrote:
W: slimrat: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man8/slimrat-gui.8.gz
W: slimrat: manpage-has-bad-whatis-entry usr/share/man/man8/slimrat.8.gz
I'll search the web, but I'm not sure how to resolve this. Hopefully
someone on
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:45:03 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
The upstream author is silent since June, 2004, and a test build
using 'webfs.links' produced the silence from Lintian I was aspiring
for at the moment, so I will try that in the new packaging. Thanks!
`dh_installchangelogs -k
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:56:35 +0100, Michael Schutte wrote:
I’m looking for comments on (and an upload of :-)) my parti package.
dget http://alioth.debian.org/~michi-guest/packages/parti_0.0.6-1.dsc
Sounds funny :)
I've no experience with python package, so just a few nit-picking
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:07:14 +0100, Michael Schutte wrote:
- d/control: Standards-Version - 3.8.4 (and update your version of
lintian :))
Well, crap. That’s what I get for running testing/unstable.
:)
- You might want to fix the following lintian info with a patch:
I: xpra:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:10:59 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote:
To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to v4l-utils.
But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
v4l-utils in the archive?
http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
Cheers,
gregor
--
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:57:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to
v4l-utils.
But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
v4l-utils in the archive?
http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
I don't think
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:52:47 +0100, Johann Felix Soden wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for a small NMU
of the package svn-workbench to version 1.6.2-1.1
Uploaded to DELAYED/2, thanks for your work!
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x8649AA06,
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why
don't you use dh7 style debian/rules? I mean, you don't have to, but you
can avoid the whole DEB_*_GNU_TYPE stuff and shorten your rules file to
a few lines.
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:05:09 +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
autotools-dev has debhelper helpers/addons since 20100122.1, so
dh --with autotools_dev $@ (and an appropriate versioned build dep)
should be enough.
Wow, never saw that. Thanks for mentioning!
It's rather new, and I saw it in
On Tue, 11 May 2010 01:58:33 +0430, Sameer Rahmani wrote:
i want to join the debian community . i read some article in website
about it but i wonder how can i join to a debian team ?
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams has a list of teams in Debian, and they
also list what they are doing and how to
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:40:12 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
$ dget -u http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf/xpdf_3.02-3.dsc
$ cd xpdf-3.02
$ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc
[..]
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
$ apt-cache policy
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:20 +0200, Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package swftools.
* Package name: swftools
Version : 0.9.1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
*
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:42:09 +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote:
Is there any preference/reasoning for using any particular symbol that
joins dfsg bit with the package name? I can see that different
packages use a different format, here are some quick stats from packages
in unstable (with the counts):
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
