On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:21:55AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
On 04.04.2012 01:19, Adam Borowski wrote:
Lintian now complains: W: tcng source: changelog-should-mention-qa
but this seems wrong -- it's this very upload that is orphaning the
package; lintian has no real way to know that, though.
Le 04/04/2012 06:38, Adam Borowski a écrit :
Should I be rather Lintian correct, or what-seems-to-be-right correct?
Reading the long description usually helps:
$ lintian-info --tags changelog-should-mention-qa
W: changelog-should-mention-qa
N:
N: If this upload is to orphan this package,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:55:32PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:
Le 04/04/2012 06:38, Adam Borowski a écrit :
Should I be rather Lintian correct, or what-seems-to-be-right correct?
Reading the long description usually helps:
$ lintian-info --tags changelog-should-mention-qa
W:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
On 04.04.2012 00:50, Adam Borowski wrote:
* Orphan the package.
if your intention is to orphan the package you should set the
maintainer to Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org, too.
I didn't look any further but this was drawing my
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:04:28AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
On 04.04.2012 00:50, Adam Borowski wrote:
* Orphan the package.
if your intention is to orphan the package you should set the
maintainer to Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org, too.
I didn't look any further but this was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
On 04.04.2012 01:19, Adam Borowski wrote:
Lintian now complains: W: tcng source: changelog-should-mention-qa
but this seems wrong -- it's this very upload that is orphaning the
package; lintian has no real way to know that, though.
Just
6 matches
Mail list logo
