Re: fluidsynth 2.0

2018-12-07 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi Felipe, Felipe Sateler wrote: > I think the first step would be to prepare a package targeting > experimental, see how much stuff fails to build and how hard it is to fix. thanks for the heads-up! As the one who uploaded the last two 1.x packages, I agree this is the right way to go.

Re: fluidsynth 2.0

2018-12-06 Thread Bodo Meißner
Hello Felipe, thanks for the explanation. Currently I'm a bit too busy to take care about this. Version 2.0 introduced a seek function (among other changes). This seek function was originally implemented by Willem Vree and is available on his website in the form of modified files for an

Re: fluidsynth 2.0

2018-12-06 Thread Felipe Sateler
(Sorry, this seems to have gotten stuck in the drafts folder) On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:05 AM Bodo Meißner wrote: > Hello Felipe, > > thanks for the hint. > > Zitat von Felipe Sateler : > > > I think the more relevant question is whether version 2.0.0 introduced > any > > backwards-incompatible

Re: fluidsynth 2.0

2018-10-26 Thread Bodo Meißner
Hello Felipe, thanks for the hint. Zitat von Felipe Sateler : I think the more relevant question is whether version 2.0.0 introduced any backwards-incompatible change. According to the documentation, version 2.0.0 introduced incompatible API changes, not only adding new functions. If

Re: fluidsynth 2.0

2018-10-25 Thread Felipe Sateler
Hi On Thu, Oct 25, 2018, 07:21 Bodo Meißner wrote: > Hello Multimedia team, > > is there a plan to add packages for fluidsynth version 2.0.x? (current > version is 2.0.1) > > In version 2.0.0 the API function fluid_player_seek() and related > functions were added to libfluidsynth. This function