bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello, work on nm.debian.org has continued, bringing a few interesting changes that need an announcement. * New simplified advocacy procedure In order to advocate people who are DMs or have a guest account in Debian machines (who therefore already have a page on nm.debian.org), any DD can look

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Enrico Zini dixit: [1] https://nm.debian.org/public/findperson/ No, the form is missing the submit button, this doesn’t work. [2] The DD needs to have their webpassword set, which every DD can do at https://db.debian.org/login.html This doesn’t work either, I can log into db.d.o but not

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/05/12 14:21, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Enrico Zini dixit: [1] https://nm.debian.org/public/findperson/ No, the form is missing the submit button, this doesn’t work. Did you enable JavaScript ? Did you try to hit enter? [2] The DD needs to have their webpassword set, which every DD

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org, 2012-05-29, 16:57: Why does it need JavaScript? Because searching for people for whom you are unsure of the spelling of the name works much better when you get results as you type. The form is also designed to be used by Front Desk to enter new people

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Enrico Zini
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:10:11PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: It's infinitely less efficient for people who are not okay with running untrusted, often non-free (or even undistributable) code on their machines. Fantastic. Then you can follow the all people link on the same page. Or, even

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/05/12 17:10, Jakub Wilk wrote: It's infinitely less efficient for people who are not okay with running untrusted, often non-free (or even undistributable) code on their machines. I'm sorry but where do you see non-free code? AFAICS, it is using jQuery and jQuery TableSorter, which are

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Enrico Zini
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:34:35PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: software. Admittedly, it is using a minified version of the libraries but I still would not qualify that by non-free. The rest of the JS Good point about the minified JS. I'm using the minified versions that are shipped with JQuery

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 29/05/12 17:45, Enrico Zini wrote: I wouldn't object to having only the original javascript library sources in nm.d.o's git and then building the minified versions at deploy time with tools available in Debian, if someone could show me what tools are available that work and do an acceptable

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Mehdi Dogguy dixit: On 29/05/12 14:21, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Enrico Zini dixit: [1] https://nm.debian.org/public/findperson/ No, the form is missing the submit button, this doesn’t work. Did you enable JavaScript ? Did you try to hit enter? I tried to hit Enter, yes. I must *strongly*

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 04:08:28PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: I must *strongly* protest the creation of new webpages that are not accessible, and requiring ECMAscript is preventing all Lynx users from accessing it. Actually, no, I think you must not, or at the very least not *strongly*.

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Dienstag, 29. Mai 2012, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Actually, no, I think you must not, or at the very least not *strongly*. Simply because you're not doing the work yourself. I think you should rather first of all say thanks for the work done. And then report a bug against nm.debian.org

Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed

2012-05-29 Thread Jose Luis Rivas
On 05/29/2012 11:15 AM, Enrico Zini wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:34:35PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: software. Admittedly, it is using a minified version of the libraries but I still would not qualify that by non-free. The rest of the JS Good point about the minified JS. I'm using the

AM report for Stuart Prescott

2012-05-29 Thread Chris Taylor
I recommend to accept Stuart Prescott as a Debian Developer. 1. Identification Account Data First name: Stuart Middle name: - Last name: Prescott Key fingerprint: BE65 FD1E F4EA 08F3 23D4 3C6D 9FE8 B8CD 71C5 D1A8 Account: