hUipY=
=uAwO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/1224/
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/1224/
syQrn/dlzupW0OSco8FdKJpPzORTCKY8sIG
+HO90A7sgTcl/hoZ73o+bq7OGQ0OlF5StwoY/ESnn1t/Vf0vN98=
=7+zh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/789/
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/789/
Re: tho...@koch.ro 2018-08-12 <30489229.11585.1534073274...@office.mailbox.org>
> > Christoph Berg hat am 4. August 2018 um 08:52 geschrieben:
> >
> > After looking at Thomas Koch 's contributions and after
> > exchanging some emails to
> > get to
C5VYi
ttSxiF/nWirNyBG/jnIjEdV5CptobOBYmpxBIpOaN2Ht7NOhodHwftQDGvZcMWuM
43NY6QAaEgObC4y+eaAIk1FPyIKuZ5Yp5qtpu1TrlZDf5R0IILPY7R3/tZB+MWxS
LWT/fTji4axAXiuUd1UPzkTNLVCORqFORh6sle7Pgr+28YMgTps=
=mLCj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit
zq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/509
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/509
y8oOg
A3BeE6sQ27t1Zrlka2MxOJ+Os/7iMTcgCJBqcl/KZ4yW+HS779eeqvRoWaThAR9e
j/mafZqfZjsS4a0jFAt552aZj6SbH1Q3VOOsmAttazBAYxsUdAg=
=KyKE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/484
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/484
CXmXrwA+Le
ky6xVkV3dv6VbjDcB3nyJ40xtpujLMpv5njwariSjnfZCgUzc7kevN1hfCDUvzdh
c+hCug0nFRV9VzzlWmtXfEySZ9qYFNlcq9WNui+fvFqF84NTvZ0=
=MUFk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/147
tFuu+Kx3yu0/NVc5uY7sWEWxPQE8HLqAb5y2IdJ75CCZCuN2AfMikUiZSzhuu7V6
HRlKzz6N+b5sWcS+XTRq
=9PsT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/3
mxVri+1PROyiDrit0HmohyeVLLFTc9A7uicJtuQgUi2/qJu7f9spf+h2bSsD
fsTKz+xbdhRUhuBJQoCF
=5SMh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/44
[tl;dr: Richard is disappointed that I didn't advocate him for DM,
while I did advocate other team members shortly after.]
Hi Richard,
Re: Richard B Winters 2016-06-22
<204e2c0e01254a766699d615036d2...@mail.mmogp.com>
> During that time I worked with Christoph Berg, he advised no
Hi,
much of the content on https://www.debian.org/devel/join/ is horribly
outdated, especially the "New Members Corner". I'd think most of the
content there could/should actually be deleted because it would better
be hosted on wiki.debian.org.
Would anyone kindly volunteer to go through the pages
fOUT
=wyUh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/13
4 is signed by the Debian Developers
> Alexander Wirt, Evgeni Golov, Martin Zobel-Helas, Michael Banck,
> Christoph Berg and Noèl Köthe.
>
> I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer.
I wholeheartedly support Adrian's application.
I've been working on him on the Debian
Wirt, Evgeni Golov, Martin Zobel-Helas, Michael Banck,
> Christoph Berg and Noèl Köthe.
>
> I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer.
I wholeheartedly support Adrian's application.
I've been working on him on the Debian HA team, where he helped
salvaging several packages
to the project.
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
Re: Ferenc Wágner 2016-02-01 <87fuxcdudn@lant.ki.iif.hu>
> I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your attention.
I am working with Ferenc and others in the Debian HA team to get the
Pacemaker/Corosync stack back in shape, which is largely dysfunctional
in Jessie. The HA te
aging MariaDB myself. At the moment I maintain both the MariaDB and Galera
packages in Debian as a DM.
Regards,
Christoph Berg
discourages a lot of people.
I would also like to discover some other parts of Debian, like QA or
accessibility, but I am not yet sure as every area looks so interesting.
[1] : http://www.perrier.eu.org/debian/talks/foss-in-2007/contributing.pdf
Regards,
Christoph Berg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
better input method experience.
Regards,
Christoph Berg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150223215524.28464.37...@nono.debian.org
help make Debian
the great project it is.
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141014085823.2307.12...@nono.debian.org
>
> Currently, I maintain the packages pgloader, pgstaging and I co‐maintain
> the packages pgextwlist, prefix, pgfincore, prefix, preprepare and
> skytools3.
>
> My GnuPG key 60B1CB4E is signed by the Debian Developers Stefano
> Zacchiroli, Julien Danjou and Cyril Bouthors, an
Hi Jari,
we are afraid to have to tell you that we currently agree with Raphael's
assessment here. Your contributions to Debian are widespread, but there seems
to be some attrition between them and the rest of the project.
We prefer not to accept your application for Debian Developer right now, b
Re: Iain Lane 2011-10-11 <20111011120007.GA31968@raleigh>
> Frankly, I don't think it'll be confusing at all. Both meanings will
> continue to live on for a while, and then if we consistently refer to
> New Member instead of New Maintainer, the old one will fade away.
>
> This is a good incrementa
Francisco,
my mutt says all your signatures so far in this thread are invalid.
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear Ozgur Karatas,
please stop trying to get random Debian developers to advocate you.
You tried this before in 2006 and got told to get lost. Please stop
wasting our time.
Best regards,
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1. Identification & Account Data
First name: Kåre
Middle name: Thor
Last name: Olsen
Key fingerprint: 5E5C4B0E1AFD7325CF66500F962680C5305A9418
Account: kaare
Forward email: ka...@nightcall.dk
ID check passed, key signed
Re: NM Front Desk 2010-11-29
> Database inconsistency errors
> -
> AM name is in brackets.
> AM confirm date occurs before AM assignment date
> m...@tls.msk.ru: 2010-04-01 occurs after 2009-12-09 (spectra)
> jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com: 2010-09-02 occurs after 200
Re: To Debian New Maintainer List 2010-10-02 <20101002210109.gg24...@df7cb.de>
> We are aware, that the automatic gpg verification of advocation
> messages is currently broken, this is being worked on.
This is fixed now. (If muting deprecation warnings from python
counts.)
Christoph
--
c...@df7c
Hi,
we have moved nm.debian.org to a new machine, nono.debian.org. Thanks
to weasel for the DSA side of this.
We are aware, that the automatic gpg verification of advocation
messages is currently broken, this is being worked on. Except from
that, the web interface should be operating normally. Pl
Package: nm.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Re: Steve Langasek 2010-08-09 <20100809014449.gb28...@dario.dodds.net>
> > Applicants with no advocate
> > ===
>
> > The following applicants will be deleted as they have been waiting in the
> > the queue for longer than 6 weeks wi
Hi,
I'm preaching to the choir here, but: if you are mailing with other
people, and especially with those from the NM front-desk who might
help you with getting through the NM process, it is neither helpful
nor acceptable to use sentences like "Don't be silly" as the opening
statement, being "a bi
1. Identification & Account Data
First name: Deepak
Last name: Tripathi
Key fingerprint: 4BEBFC6A62FC0CB40E10F2CEC4D1681A7F217B01
Account: deepak
Forward email: apenguinli...@gmail.com
ID check passed, key signed by one existi
Re: Raphael Geissert 2010-06-27 <4c26bb53.5770e70a.1d64.4...@mx.google.com>
> I wonder if there should be a list of packages with DMUA but no DM
> Uploader[s] or Maintainer.
You would have to filter out packges of people who were DM before they
became DD, or else the list would probably be contai
Re: tang ke 2010-06-24 <4c230b7c.7070...@lemote.com>
> I see the message from the
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2010/05/msg00134.html,but
> when I can't found my name at https://nm.debian.org/dm_list.html
> this page show the debian maintainers list or debian developer list?
Hi,
sorry
1. Identification & Account Data
First name: Thomas
Last name: Goirand
Key fingerprint: E4F0 EDDF 374F 2C50 D473 5EC0 9783 3DC9 98EF 9A49
Account: zigo
Forward email: tho...@goirand.fr
ID check passed, key signed by 1 existin
Re: Ralf Treinen 2010-01-05 <20100105082756.ga6...@free.fr>
> all the links associated to people and places are gone. Was that
> on purpose?
Not really, but I don't think they are really needed, having people's
email address should be enough.
> Also, please do not forget that someone should conti
I have moved the old php-driven gpg coordination pages to the Debian
wiki, where they are edited much more easily:
http://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning
http://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers
http://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Need
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
D
To start with making advocations public:
I know Axel since studying at the Saarland University. We were both
members of the student's council in the CS department. I think it was
him who teached me how to really configure fvwm.
He's been a close follower of the open source world in general and
De
Re: Hector Oron 2009-12-01 <4b14531a.8060...@gmail.com>
> In the process this key was revoked and no longer used. Now, I have a
> fat key[1]. Could you please use this newer key in the keyring before
> account creation?
We need you to re-sign the following:
Do you agree to uphold the Social Contr
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2009-09-20 <20090920104125.ga25...@rivendell>
> As a package maintainer, I will do my best to help the Debian project
> release a stable version of our operating system. In particular, I will
[...]
> I am aware of the limits of my skills and my available time and I will
> avoid
Hi Adrian,
Re: Adrian Perez 2009-08-21 <1250878361.12633.57.ca...@desktop>
> As you may already know by now, I have just met Maykel, he's an awesome
> guy! BTW Thank you for pointing me to him. We have cross-signed keys and
> talked a little while.
Maykel's key is very well connected, that's a g
1. Identification & Account Data
First name: Oliver
Last name: Korff
Key fingerprint: E6BB7EF8CC4D7FF79D570EAA6042B0B5D3F974DF
Account: okoli
Forward email: o...@xynyx.de
ID check passed, key signed by several existing develop
> Auth-Key: nmauth3d694935653a0bb0f09415f21c283a0a
> Applicant: Antonio Radici
Re: Antonio Radici 2009-06-06 <4a2a7e09.6020...@dyne.org>
> Hi all,
> I would like to become a debian maintainer and this is my declaration of
> intent.
Antonio is doing a great job in maintaining mutt. He has forwar
Re: Raphael Geissert 2009-05-12
> I though there was no clear concensus on using +nmuX on non-native packages,
> do you have any pointer?
+nmuX on non-native packages is ugly.
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
key signed by a dozen existing developers:
sig! DED45912 2006-08-26 Paul Martin
sig! 12066207 2006-09-01 Ben Hutchings
sig! F2CF01A8 2007-06-19 Bdale Garbee
sig! DD9B9910 2007-06-20 Philip Hands
sig! 58510B5A 2007-06-22 Christoph
Re: Julien Valroff 2009-02-16 <1234801355.16100.6.ca...@athyr.kirya.net>
> I have seen on the Debian Wiki that an annual ping is required from DM,
> in order to confirm their interest.
>
> This ping should be a signed bug report against the debian-maintainers
> package.
Uhm, I guess you are the f
1. Identification & Account Data
First name: Alexander
Middle name: GQ
Last name: Gerasiov
Key fingerprint: 0628 ACC7 291A D4AA 6D7D 79B8 0641 D82A E3E3 CE1D
Account: gq
Forward email: g...@cs.msu.su
ID check passed, k
Re: Martin-Éric Racine 2009-01-03
<11fae7c70901030327q5e96d543te6aa4c0592039...@mail.gmail.com>
> I have been maintaining Debian packages since 2003, where I have often
> been praised for the high quality of my packaging (especially for the
> clean repackaging of packages I have adopted) and for m
Behan is a returning emeritus DD.
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 6DE006ED5430A503940ED685BAC78EE5DBA50595:
ID check passed, key signed by Tim Riker.
2. Account Data
---
Account: behanw
3. Philosophy and Procedures
-
Hi,
the New-Maintainer Front-Desk is proud to announce the addition of two
new members to its ranks. Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> have accepted the invitation to join
the team.
Welcome on board!
Christoph,
on behalf of the current FD members
--
[EMAIL
Re: Vincent Bernat 2008-05-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Oh, it does not work with dash as sh. ;-)
That's why it says #!/bin/bash :)
> Here is a simple patch:
Applied, thanks.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Report for new developer applicant Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid FA26E2EE:
ID check passed, key signed by 3 existing developers:
pub 1024D/FA26E2EE 1999-07-01
Key fingerprint = 1CB2 93
Hi all,
a few days back, Martin has expressed his wish to resign as
application manager.
During his time as AM, he has managed a whopping 120 new maintainer
applicants [*], all of which are Debian Developers now. I'm not going
to count the number of NMs he has processed as front-desk member -
tha
Hi,
as using CVS started causing severe pain for me a few years ago, I've
converted and imported the nm-template repository into the nm
repository. Unfortunately that means that the repository UUID changed,
so you have to recreate your nm (and gpg-coord) checkouts.
For the nm-templates users, the
Re: Paul Wise 2008-04-01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I didn't mail any of the NMs/AMs in the situation where the NM is on
> hold and has an inactive AM. Should I do so now? There were four or
> five names in that situation IIRC.
Yeah, at least Tatsuki Sugiura looks actually quite active, it's worth
a tr
Re: Paul Wise 2008-03-31 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I note that several NMs are both on hold and have an inactive NM. I
> think the NM report should differentiate such NMs from those that are
> just on hold or just have an inactive NM. Not sure what the
> appropriate action is for those who are both on
Re: Paul Wise 2008-03-24 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The following applicants are not AM approved but have an inactive AM:
>
> Would anyone object to me manually mailing these NMs prompting them to
> contact FD to ask for a new AM? I think that I should also CC the AMs
> and FD on that mail.
Please
Re: Thijs Kinkhorst 2008-01-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Database inconsistency errors
> > -
> > AM name is in brackets.
> > AM confirm date occurs before AM assignment date
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007-11-06 occurs after 2006-09-16 (thijs)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007
Re: Dmitry E. Oboukhov 2008-02-02 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've just received the status 'not approved' via FD-check.
> The reason is 'AM report mail broken [Myon 2008-02-02]'.
> Could you explain whose mail is broken?
I've asked Steffen to resend the report, it was badly formatted.
Christoph
--
[E
[This should have gone out last week, my apologies for delaying the
debian-newmaint copy]
Report for new developer applicant Filipe Lautert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0xA6BA423E:
ID check passed, key signed by 1 existin
Re: Joerg Jaspert 2008-01-29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Waiting a week may seem long, but actually isn't. But if you really dont
> want a week - make it 3 or 4 days. It doesn't hurt the future DM to wait
> the *few* days more *and* leaves other DDs the option to raise concerns.
4 days is fine with me.
Re: Debian Installer 2008-01-27 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Changes: debian-maintainers (1.17) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Added Debian maintainer Adam D. Barratt. Closes: #462747
| SL 1,1K Jan 26 22:25 Adam D. Barratt newmaint DM Application
| N 0,8K Jan 27 12:32 Debian Installe d-m-team [D
Re: Joerg Dorchain 2007-12-20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> this is the second try this time to get a response. I checked my
> spamfolder but did not see a response message. Sorry if I missed one.
>
> Basically I am waiting for about 12 month for a comment from my AM
> (Rene), and I'd be please to hear an
FYI:
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:59:13 +0100
Source: debian-maintainers
Binary: debian-maintainers
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Maintainer Keyring Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL
Debian New Maintainer Front-Desk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://nm.debian.org/Christoph Berg
November 25, 2007 http://www.debian.org/devel/join
Report for new developer applicant Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0x36EE0861:
ID check passed, key signed by several existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/36EE0861 2004-12-25
Key
Report for new developer applicant Cameron Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
ID check passed, key signed by 3 existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/0D2036AD 2006-01-10
Key fingerprint = FF07 84FE E439 DA85
- Forwarded message from Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:52:34 +0100
From: Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AM report for Cyril Brulebois
1. Identification & Background
--
sh ke
Re: Bas Wijnen 2007-11-11 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Personal notifications sound good to me, but automatic actions don't.
Agreed.
The checks do indeed need a sync with reality though, e.g. 'everything
done but not approved' could easily be a false positive, I like to
check that box when T&S 1 and 2 a
Report for new developer applicant George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0x0E4BD0AB:
ID check passed, key signed by several existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
Report for new developer applicant Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0x416CF2DC:
ID check passed, key signed by one existing developers:
pub 1024D/416CF2DC 2003-03-31
Key fingerprint = 748F 769E 7
Report for new developer applicant Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0xBAFEC7F2:
ID check passed, key signed by 3 existing developers:
pub 1024D/BAFEC7F2 2006-03-04
Key fingerprint = FECC 64F8 4F8
Report for new developer applicant Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 7FED549B:
ID check passed, key signed by 1 existing developer:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/7FED549B 2002-10-06
Key fing
Report for new developer applicant Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0x5E3619D3:
ID check passed, key signed by several developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/5E3619D3 2003-05-31
Key fing
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! DD9B9910 2006-06-01 Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! 58510B5A 2006-06-01 Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! 1880283C 2006-06-10 Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig!
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2007-08-03 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's more complicated to implement and it's a bit heavy but we don't
> copy-paste emails from public archives that often so that it's a major
> nuisance for us.
I do that all the time on the nm.debian.org web pages.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
I'll be on holidays this and next week, and will be on a business trip
the week after that, so I don't expect to be able to do much
Debian-wise during that time.
Christoph
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Report for new developer applicant Amos Waterland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0x0485EFCD:
ID check passed, key signed by 1 existing developer:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/0485EFCD 2007-01-18
Key fin
Hi,
thanks to the ftp-masters (aj I think) there is now a nm.debian.org
pseudo package in the BTS:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=nm.debian.org
Please note that it should *NOT* be used for reporting problems with
individual persons ("I want a new AM"), please mail
[EMAIL PROTEC
Re: To debian-private 2007-04-12 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'll be moving over the next weeks and will start a new job at the
> beginning of May (more details on that later), so I'll probably be
> less visible/available than usual. If there's anything urgent, try
> mailing my @debian.org address or cat
Re: Charles Plessy 2007-05-12 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think that I lost email contact with my application manager, Christoph
> Berg. I am sort of slow in my ansers so if Christoph is temporarly busy,
> I can wait, there is no problem. Otherwise, Maybe the best would be to
> c
Re: Santiago Vila 2007-03-29 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm trying to advocate my friend Antonio Ullán:
>
> https://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=aullan%40unex.es
>
> but I do not receive any email to gpg-sign, as stated by the web page.
> Am I doing anything wrong on my side, or is there a bug som
Hi,
AMs might be interested in the following update to the NM website:
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:41:29 +0100
From: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AM login patch
I have written a patch for the website of nm.debian.org to allow AMs to
login when directly surfing to
Report for new developer applicant Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid C3DC59FA:
ID check passed, key signed by two existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/C3DC59FA 2003-11-11
Key f
Report for new developer applicant Jan Lübbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid D8480F2E:
ID check passed, key signed by several existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20
Key fin
Report for new developer applicant Sergei Golovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 6A461052:
ID check passed, key signed by one existing developer:
pub 1024D/6A461052 2001-09-24
Key fingerprint = 2CA2 0F84 8E5C
Re: Vincent Fourmond 2006-12-20 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That is mode = median = 180, average = 172 and max = 177. It strikes me
> as funny that some statistics on a variable could be bigger than its
> maximum. Where is the mistake coming from ?
If you like to find out, the code is there:
http://svn.
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! BD8B050D 2005-07-01 Roland Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! 58510B5A 2005-07-02 Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! A244C858 2005-07-20 Torsten Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! 607559E6 2005-08-07 Benjam
Report for new developer applicant Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid D7D0EF65:
ID check passed, key signed by 6 existing developers:
pub 1024D/D7D0EF65 2004-09-23 [expires: 2007-09-25]
Key fingerpr
Report for new developer applicant Eike Sauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 6A8333C6:
ID check passed, key signed by 1 existing developer:
pub 1024D/6A8333C6 2003-12-28
Key fingerprint = 7536 36FE 6276 8F94 785
Re: Thomas Hood 2006-09-27 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The first part of the answer is that I am not complaining about my AM
> taking so much time to process my application. If I only had to wait
> half a year it would have been acceptable. But that was half a year
> of waiting just to get into the pha
Report for new developer applicant Thomas Girard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0x38E68E0E:
ID check passed, key signed by several existing developers:
pub 1024D/38E68E0E 2005-11-08 [expires: 2009-11-07]
Key fin
-05-25 Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! 16D970C6 2006-05-28 Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! 808D0FD0 2006-05-29 Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! 8BB527AF 2006-05-31 Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sig! DD9B9910
Report for new developer applicant maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with keyid 0x9B441EA8:
ID check passed, key signed by 4 existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh 0x9B441EA8:
pub 1024D/9B441EA8 2005-09-0
Re: Warren Turkal 2006-09-16 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A while back, my email address changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been actively using Debian and submitting bug
> reports and attempting to help improve certain packages during this time.
Done.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PR
Re: Bart Martens 2006-09-13 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Debian Account Manager and Front Desk Comments
> > no package; maintains buildd.net [Myon 2006-06-06]
> > waiting for DAM comment [Myon 2006-06-27]
> >
> My impression is that Front Desk has
> - recorded that you contribute by maintaining buildd
Re: Lucas Nussbaum 2006-09-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'd like to raise the issue of the ordering of applicants waiting for FD
> or DAM approval. How does the FD/DAM select who is next for being
> reviewed ? I suppose that it's done more or less in order (based on the
> time the applicants are approv
Report for new developer applicant Robert Edmonds:
1. Identification & Background
--
Check with Keyid 0x73014091:
ID Check passed, Key signed by Stevie Strickland.
pub 1024D/73014091 2004-03-21
Key fingerprint = 73FE 5760 EBEA 331F C39F 83E7 769F BF4
Hi,
originally I wanted to write up the notes I took during the 2
NM-related BoFs at Debconf, but it turns out they are too unsorted to
make sense with all the background I had in mind back then. Here's a
list of topics covered:
Reports: the point of the reports is to show that the applicants ar
Hi,
due to events I don't know to the fullest extent, my primary mail
address's domain, df7cb.de went into the TRANSIT state in March. I
went to the web frontend the German NIC (Denic) told me, chose a new
provider, and thought everything was fine. Some time later, they sent
me a bill that said I
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
