doesn't make sense, but the context talks about the Debian constitution
etc., so some relationship to big projects is implied.)
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED], 0681/9657944
http://rw4.cs.uni-sb.de/~cb/
Universität des Saarlandes, Compiler Design Lab
pgptn8o8irqvB.pgp
Description: PGP
Report for new developer applicant Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with Keyid 0x4E2ECA5A:
pub 1024D/4E2ECA5A 2004-09-08
Key fingerprint = CA4F D469 C047 165A 1A55 CCD7 5E6D EF1C 4E2E CA5A
uid
Report for new developer applicant Dominic Hargreaves [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with Keyid 0x5178E2A5:
ID Check passed, Key signed by 12 existing DDs:
pub 1024D/5178E2A5 1999-11-29
Key fingerprint = 1176 44DF C579 B6DD
Re: Dominik Margraf 2006-03-17 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I discovered a very good GPL 3D-CAD system called freecad
Wrong list, try debian-mentors.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2006-04-06 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have no AM experience yet, and would prefer some kind of ack that it's
worth trying it.
Working on the MIA stuff that uses exactly that system, I've found it
very natural to use and have even thought about using it for NM myself
a few days ago.
Re: Hubert Chan 2006-04-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe we need a debian-am-mentors system for AMs, like we have
debian-mentors for maintainers, for when AMs have questions about AM
tasks.
That's what [EMAIL PROTECTED] and #debian-newmaint (oftc) are meant
for.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Re: cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) 2006-05-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what's the rationale for needing a 2nd package?
e.g. I currently maintain 1 small simple sponsered package, I also have
contributed for several years as a translator.
If we're introducing a new stage with upload rights for
Re: Jeremiah Foster 2006-05-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Limiting voting rights seems a step in the wrong direction. Doesn't
debian want more enfranchisement rather that less?
We don't limit anything here, the prospective DMs can't vote in the
current system either. We can of course discuss on whether
Re: Hubert Chan 2006-05-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. can use his gpg key to upload this package [2]
- no account/@d.o address yet
- every upload which would go to NEW needs a sponsor [3,4]
I think it may be good to allow the sponsor to decide when the DM is
allowed to make uploads
Yesterday evening I sent out the text below to all applicants that
have had I look at before and found them to be active, plus all others
to the end of the queue that are yet unchecked (the majority).
The feedback has already started trickling in, and from what I've seen
so far, has mostly been
Re: To Debian New Maintainer List 2006-06-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yesterday evening I sent out the text below to all applicants that
have had I look at before and found them to be active, plus all others
to the end of the queue that are yet unchecked (the majority).
The feedback has already
Report for new developer applicant Romain Beauxis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with Keyid 0xde599800:
ID Check passed, Key signed by 1 existing DD (2 more signatures,
all separate paths to the strongly connected set):
Output
Hi,
due to events I don't know to the fullest extent, my primary mail
address's domain, df7cb.de went into the TRANSIT state in March. I
went to the web frontend the German NIC (Denic) told me, chose a new
provider, and thought everything was fine. Some time later, they sent
me a bill that said I
Hi,
originally I wanted to write up the notes I took during the 2
NM-related BoFs at Debconf, but it turns out they are too unsorted to
make sense with all the background I had in mind back then. Here's a
list of topics covered:
Reports: the point of the reports is to show that the applicants
Re: Lucas Nussbaum 2006-09-06 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to raise the issue of the ordering of applicants waiting for FD
or DAM approval. How does the FD/DAM select who is next for being
reviewed ? I suppose that it's done more or less in order (based on the
time the applicants are approved by
Re: Bart Martens 2006-09-13 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
citeDebian Account Manager and Front Desk Comments
no package; maintains buildd.net [Myon 2006-06-06]
waiting for DAM comment [Myon 2006-06-27]
/cite
My impression is that Front Desk has
- recorded that you contribute by maintaining
Re: Warren Turkal 2006-09-16 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A while back, my email address changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been actively using Debian and submitting bug
reports and attempting to help improve certain packages during this time.
Done.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL
Report for new developer applicant maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 0x9B441EA8:
ID check passed, key signed by 4 existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh 0x9B441EA8:
pub 1024D/9B441EA8 2005-09-05
! 8BB527AF 2006-05-31 Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! DD9B9910 2006-06-01 Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! 58510B5A 2006-06-01 Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! 72D03CB1 2006-06-03 Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! 1880283C 2006-06
Report for new developer applicant Thomas Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 0x38E68E0E:
ID check passed, key signed by several existing developers:
pub 1024D/38E68E0E 2005-11-08 [expires: 2009-11-07]
Key
Report for new developer applicant Jérémy Bobbio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid D7D0EF65:
ID check passed, key signed by 6 existing developers:
pub 1024D/D7D0EF65 2004-09-23 [expires: 2007-09-25]
Key
! 58510B5A 2005-07-02 Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! A244C858 2005-07-20 Torsten Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! 607559E6 2005-08-07 Benjamin Hill (Mako) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! 16BD77C6 2006-09-24 Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig!25706A4B4
Re: Vincent Fourmond 2006-12-20 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is mode = median = 180, average = 172 and max = 177. It strikes me
as funny that some statistics on a variable could be bigger than its
maximum. Where is the mistake coming from ?
If you like to find out, the code is there:
Report for new developer applicant Sergei Golovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 6A461052:
ID check passed, key signed by one existing developer:
pub 1024D/6A461052 2001-09-24
Key fingerprint = 2CA2 0F84 8E5C
Report for new developer applicant Jan Lübbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid D8480F2E:
ID check passed, key signed by several existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/D8480F2E 2002-03-20
Key
Report for new developer applicant Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid C3DC59FA:
ID check passed, key signed by two existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/C3DC59FA 2003-11-11
Key
Hi,
AMs might be interested in the following update to the NM website:
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 21:41:29 +0100
From: Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AM login patch
I have written a patch for the website of nm.debian.org to allow AMs to
login when directly surfing to
Re: Charles Plessy 2007-05-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think that I lost email contact with my application manager, Christoph
Berg. I am sort of slow in my ansers so if Christoph is temporarly busy,
I can wait, there is no problem. Otherwise, Maybe the best would be to
change ?
Hi,
I've recently
Re: To debian-private 2007-04-12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be moving over the next weeks and will start a new job at the
beginning of May (more details on that later), so I'll probably be
less visible/available than usual. If there's anything urgent, try
mailing my @debian.org address or catch me
Hi,
thanks to the ftp-masters (aj I think) there is now a nm.debian.org
pseudo package in the BTS:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=nm.debian.org
Please note that it should *NOT* be used for reporting problems with
individual persons (I want a new AM), please mail
[EMAIL
Report for new developer applicant Amos Waterland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 0x0485EFCD:
ID check passed, key signed by 1 existing developer:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/0485EFCD 2007-01-18
Key
Hi,
I'll be on holidays this and next week, and will be on a business trip
the week after that, so I don't expect to be able to do much
Debian-wise during that time.
Christoph
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! 808D0FD0 2006-05-29 Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! 8BB527AF 2006-05-31 Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! DD9B9910 2006-06-01 Philip Hands [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig! 58510B5A 2006-06-01 Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sig
Report for new developer applicant Arnaud Fontaine [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 0x5E3619D3:
ID check passed, key signed by several developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/5E3619D3 2003-05-31
Key
Report for new developer applicant Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 7FED549B:
ID check passed, key signed by 1 existing developer:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 1024D/7FED549B 2002-10-06
Key
Report for new developer applicant George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 0x0E4BD0AB:
ID check passed, key signed by several existing developers:
Output from keycheck.sh:
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
Debian New Maintainer Front-Desk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://nm.debian.org/Christoph Berg
November 25, 2007 http://www.debian.org/devel/join
FYI:
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:59:13 +0100
Source: debian-maintainers
Binary: debian-maintainers
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Maintainer Keyring Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: Debian Installer 2008-01-27 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changes: debian-maintainers (1.17) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Added Debian maintainer Adam D. Barratt. Closes: #462747
| SL 1,1K Jan 26 22:25 Adam D. Barratt newmaint DM Application
| N 0,8K Jan 27 12:32 Debian Installe d-m-team
Re: Joerg Jaspert 2008-01-29 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Waiting a week may seem long, but actually isn't. But if you really dont
want a week - make it 3 or 4 days. It doesn't hurt the future DM to wait
the *few* days more *and* leaves other DDs the option to raise concerns.
4 days is fine with me.
[This should have gone out last week, my apologies for delaying the
debian-newmaint copy]
Report for new developer applicant Filipe Lautert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 0xA6BA423E:
ID check passed, key signed by 1 existing
Re: Dmitry E. Oboukhov 2008-02-02 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just received the status 'not approved' via FD-check.
The reason is 'AM report mail broken [Myon 2008-02-02]'.
Could you explain whose mail is broken?
I've asked Steffen to resend the report, it was badly formatted.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL
Re: Thijs Kinkhorst 2008-01-14 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database inconsistency errors
-
AM name is in brackets.
AM confirm date occurs before AM assignment date
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007-11-06 occurs after 2006-09-16 (thijs)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007-11-11 occurs
Re: Paul Wise 2008-03-24 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following applicants are not AM approved but have an inactive AM:
Would anyone object to me manually mailing these NMs prompting them to
contact FD to ask for a new AM? I think that I should also CC the AMs
and FD on that mail.
Please do,
Re: Paul Wise 2008-03-31 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I note that several NMs are both on hold and have an inactive NM. I
think the NM report should differentiate such NMs from those that are
just on hold or just have an inactive NM. Not sure what the
appropriate action is for those who are both on hold
Re: Paul Wise 2008-04-01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't mail any of the NMs/AMs in the situation where the NM is on
hold and has an inactive AM. Should I do so now? There were four or
five names in that situation IIRC.
Yeah, at least Tatsuki Sugiura looks actually quite active, it's worth
a try.
Hi all,
a few days back, Martin has expressed his wish to resign as
application manager.
During his time as AM, he has managed a whopping 120 new maintainer
applicants [*], all of which are Debian Developers now. I'm not going
to count the number of NMs he has processed as front-desk member -
Report for new developer applicant Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid FA26E2EE:
ID check passed, key signed by 3 existing developers:
pub 1024D/FA26E2EE 1999-07-01
Key fingerprint = 1CB2 93CA
Re: Vincent Bernat 2008-05-17 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, it does not work with dash as sh. ;-)
That's why it says #!/bin/bash :)
Here is a simple patch:
Applied, thanks.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
the New-Maintainer Front-Desk is proud to announce the addition of two
new members to its ranks. Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
Michael Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] have accepted the invitation to join
the team.
Welcome on board!
Christoph,
on behalf of the current FD members
--
[EMAIL
Behan is a returning emeritus DD.
1. Identification Background
--
Check with keyid 6DE006ED5430A503940ED685BAC78EE5DBA50595:
ID check passed, key signed by Tim Riker.
2. Account Data
---
Account: behanw
3. Philosophy and Procedures
1. Identification Account Data
First name: Alexander
Middle name: GQ
Last name: Gerasiov
Key fingerprint: 0628 ACC7 291A D4AA 6D7D 79B8 0641 D82A E3E3 CE1D
Account: gq
Forward email: g...@cs.msu.su
ID check passed,
Re: Julien Valroff 2009-02-16 1234801355.16100.6.ca...@athyr.kirya.net
I have seen on the Debian Wiki that an annual ping is required from DM,
in order to confirm their interest.
This ping should be a signed bug report against the debian-maintainers
package.
Uhm, I guess you are the first
Re: Raphael Geissert 2009-05-12 guci6v$n3...@ger.gmane.org
I though there was no clear concensus on using +nmuX on non-native packages,
do you have any pointer?
+nmuX on non-native packages is ugly.
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
1. Identification Account Data
First name: Oliver
Last name: Korff
Key fingerprint: E6BB7EF8CC4D7FF79D570EAA6042B0B5D3F974DF
Account: okoli
Forward email: o...@xynyx.de
ID check passed, key signed by several existing
Hi Adrian,
Re: Adrian Perez 2009-08-21 1250878361.12633.57.ca...@desktop
As you may already know by now, I have just met Maykel, he's an awesome
guy! BTW Thank you for pointing me to him. We have cross-signed keys and
talked a little while.
Maykel's key is very well connected, that's a great
Re: Raphael Hertzog 2009-09-20 20090920104125.ga25...@rivendell
As a package maintainer, I will do my best to help the Debian project
release a stable version of our operating system. In particular, I will
[...]
I am aware of the limits of my skills and my available time and I will
avoid
Re: Hector Oron 2009-12-01 4b14531a.8060...@gmail.com
In the process this key was revoked and no longer used. Now, I have a
fat key[1]. Could you please use this newer key in the keyring before
account creation?
We need you to re-sign the following:
Do you agree to uphold the Social Contract
To start with making advocations public:
I know Axel since studying at the Saarland University. We were both
members of the student's council in the CS department. I think it was
him who teached me how to really configure fvwm.
He's been a close follower of the open source world in general and
Re: Ralf Treinen 2010-01-05 20100105082756.ga6...@free.fr
all the links associated to people and places are gone. Was that
on purpose?
Not really, but I don't think they are really needed, having people's
email address should be enough.
Also, please do not forget that someone should continue
1. Identification Account Data
First name: Thomas
Last name: Goirand
Key fingerprint: E4F0 EDDF 374F 2C50 D473 5EC0 9783 3DC9 98EF 9A49
Account: zigo
Forward email: tho...@goirand.fr
ID check passed, key signed by 1
Re: tang ke 2010-06-24 4c230b7c.7070...@lemote.com
I see the message from the
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2010/05/msg00134.html,but
when I can't found my name at https://nm.debian.org/dm_list.html
this page show the debian maintainers list or debian developer list?
Hi,
sorry for
Re: Raphael Geissert 2010-06-27 4c26bb53.5770e70a.1d64.4...@mx.google.com
I wonder if there should be a list of packages with DMUA but no DM
Uploader[s] or Maintainer.
You would have to filter out packges of people who were DM before they
became DD, or else the list would probably be contain
1. Identification Account Data
First name: Deepak
Last name: Tripathi
Key fingerprint: 4BEBFC6A62FC0CB40E10F2CEC4D1681A7F217B01
Account: deepak
Forward email: apenguinli...@gmail.com
ID check passed, key signed by one
Hi,
I'm preaching to the choir here, but: if you are mailing with other
people, and especially with those from the NM front-desk who might
help you with getting through the NM process, it is neither helpful
nor acceptable to use sentences like Don't be silly as the opening
statement, being a bit
Package: nm.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Re: Steve Langasek 2010-08-09 20100809014449.gb28...@dario.dodds.net
Applicants with no advocate
===
The following applicants will be deleted as they have been waiting in the
the queue for longer than 6 weeks with no
Re: NM Front Desk 2010-11-29 e1pmr6a-0007vb...@nono.debian.org
Database inconsistency errors
-
AM name is in brackets.
AM confirm date occurs before AM assignment date
m...@tls.msk.ru: 2010-04-01 occurs after 2009-12-09 (spectra)
jeffrey.ratcli...@gmail.com:
Dear Ozgur Karatas,
please stop trying to get random Debian developers to advocate you.
You tried this before in 2006 and got told to get lost. Please stop
wasting our time.
Best regards,
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Francisco,
my mutt says all your signatures so far in this thread are invalid.
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Iain Lane 2011-10-11 20111011120007.GA31968@raleigh
Frankly, I don't think it'll be confusing at all. Both meanings will
continue to live on for a while, and then if we consistently refer to
New Member instead of New Maintainer, the old one will fade away.
This is a good incremental
Hi Jari,
we are afraid to have to tell you that we currently agree with Raphael's
assessment here. Your contributions to Debian are widespread, but there seems
to be some attrition between them and the rest of the project.
We prefer not to accept your application for Debian Developer right now,
by
Christoph Berg.
I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your attention.
Hi,
I have worked with Dimitri on several PostgreSQL packages and would
welcome if he could also upload them.
Thanks Dimitri for applying! :)
Christoph
--
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de
5DB84E0B04 is signed by the Debian Developers
> Alexander Wirt, Evgeni Golov, Martin Zobel-Helas, Michael Banck,
> Christoph Berg and Noèl Köthe.
>
> I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer.
I wholeheartedly support Adrian's application.
I've been working on him on the D
Re: Ferenc Wágner 2016-02-01 <87fuxcdudn@lant.ki.iif.hu>
> I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your attention.
I am working with Ferenc and others in the Debian HA team to get the
Pacemaker/Corosync stack back in shape, which is largely dysfunctional
in Jessie. The HA
tFuu+Kx3yu0/NVc5uY7sWEWxPQE8HLqAb5y2IdJ75CCZCuN2AfMikUiZSzhuu7V6
HRlKzz6N+b5sWcS+XTRq
=9PsT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/3
ky6xVkV3dv6VbjDcB3nyJ40xtpujLMpv5njwariSjnfZCgUzc7kevN1hfCDUvzdh
c+hCug0nFRV9VzzlWmtXfEySZ9qYFNlcq9WNui+fvFqF84NTvZ0=
=MUFk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/147
Le
nvL/ghDHQGrqKR0RrdVajsgLJFthwfWWT1poztAwVKT7BJKestMHWULHsxVy8oOg
A3BeE6sQ27t1Zrlka2MxOJ+Os/7iMTcgCJBqcl/KZ4yW+HS779eeqvRoWaThAR9e
j/mafZqfZjsS4a0jFAt552aZj6SbH1Q3VOOsmAttazBAYxsUdAg=
=KyKE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/484
--
SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/509
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/509
ttSxiF/nWirNyBG/jnIjEdV5CptobOBYmpxBIpOaN2Ht7NOhodHwftQDGvZcMWuM
43NY6QAaEgObC4y+eaAIk1FPyIKuZ5Yp5qtpu1TrlZDf5R0IILPY7R3/tZB+MWxS
LWT/fTji4axAXiuUd1UPzkTNLVCORqFORh6sle7Pgr+28YMgTps=
=mLCj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https
Re: tho...@koch.ro 2018-08-12 <30489229.11585.1534073274...@office.mailbox.org>
> > Christoph Berg hat am 4. August 2018 um 08:52 geschrieben:
> >
> > After looking at Thomas Koch 's contributions and after
> > exchanging some emails to
> > ge
/dlzupW0OSco8FdKJpPzORTCKY8sIG
+HO90A7sgTcl/hoZ73o+bq7OGQ0OlF5StwoY/ESnn1t/Vf0vN98=
=7+zh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/789/
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/789/
Debian
the great project it is.
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141014085823.2307.12...@nono.debian.org
better input method experience.
Regards,
Christoph Berg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150223215524.28464.37...@nono.debian.org
and discourages a lot of people.
I would also like to discover some other parts of Debian, like QA or
accessibility, but I am not yet sure as every area looks so interesting.
[1] : http://www.perrier.eu.org/debian/talks/foss-in-2007/contributing.pdf
Regards,
Christoph Berg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
MariaDB myself. At the moment I maintain both the MariaDB and Galera
packages in Debian as a DM.
Regards,
Christoph Berg
ence-agents and libqb.
>
> My GnuPG key 0x61F7985DB84E0B04 is signed by the Debian Developers
> Alexander Wirt, Evgeni Golov, Martin Zobel-Helas, Michael Banck,
> Christoph Berg and Noèl Köthe.
>
> I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer.
I wholeheartedly support Adrian's app
.
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
=
=uAwO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Christoph Berg (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/1224/
--
https://nm.debian.org/process/1224/
88 matches
Mail list logo
