Diederik de Haas: Advocate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 This message is to state my support for Diederik de Haas' request to become a Debian Developer, uploading. It will probably look like very much like Diederik's other advocacy, from Cyril Brulebois, as we have worked together in the same team. Diederik has been part of the Raspberry Pi team at least since late 2019 (according to my IRC logs). Several of our interactions, at least since 2021, have been signed with the OpenPGP key F5B143C162CC869A2E2EB32FD76E5BCE787EDB6E. I have also been repeatedly surprised to find out he is not yet an uploading DD, as he has long had everything needed to be one. He has participated in correctly and sensibly in several issues regarding the Raspberry Pi images -- from helping clean the build infrastructure to pin-pointing kernel oddities. I will be very happy to welcome Diederik as an uploading Debian Developer soon! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iHUEARYIAB0WIQRNFAUGU6QC1zaHBJ0kBMlUbhRTYAUCZiktswAKCRAkBMlUbhRT YAupAP4jeJFg13+yPuEB2qxrTcOQImVkie5g005+rvhqRSHzLQD/Y5Ky4qi8Qaj2 IbSGv6rrC5+3wi12FqUe9nxzp1/j6g0= =olH1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/1281/ -- https://nm.debian.org/process/1281/
Filip Strömbäck: Advocate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I first came across Filip Strömbäck's (fi...@fprg.se) work two years ago, at the online version of the SIGCSE (Computer Science Education Special Interest Group) Posters session. He was showing a tool he wrote and released as free software I found immensely useful for my teaching, progvis. I later understod this was just an examplke program of a much larger, much more ambitious project called Storm Language. I encouraged Filip to help me package this tool for Debian. Not only he did this, but he took the lead! He did most of the packaging with very little hand-holding from me, sensibly split a complex project into several binary packages with clearly defined roles and responsabilities, took care of weird licensing interactions (including creating an upstream branch where progvis is conditionally built without support for given graphics primitives as "skia" is not available in Debian)... He even ported the x86_64 assembly part of the Storm compiler to also support ARM64 at my request! I know Filip will be a great Debian Maintainer, and I can only hope that in some time he proceeds to be also interested in becoming a full DD. Please, grant him upload right for his own packages, right now! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iHUEARYIAB0WIQRNFAUGU6QC1zaHBJ0kBMlUbhRTYAUCZScGfQAKCRAkBMlUbhRT YJa+AP0fWkIh1GWnnEUqGMtZA8q2unMUdGjHv/H+xPsojousoAD/YeRqwbc0R9tq u7zDuqZthaD+l3j6RfFaekguSsnhPwg= =cZzc -END PGP SIGNATURE----- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/1221/ -- https://nm.debian.org/process/1221/
Re: Christopher Obbard: Declaration of intent to become a DD, upl.
Christopher Obbard (via nm.debian.org) dijo [Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:09:20PM -]: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian > Developer, uploading. > > I have worked on maintaining some packges for the past six months > and I would like to be able to upload packages to the NEW queue > without a sponsor. Hello Christopher, It is customary to give more information -- which kind of packages are you interested in? Which teams or people have you most interacted with? If directly uploading to NEW is an issue (I understand you are already a DM), do you plan to introduce many new packages? What are their unifying factors / why are you interested in them? Greetings,
Re: Bernelle Verster: Declaration of intent to become a DD, non-upl.
Bernelle Verster (via nm.debian.org) dijo [Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 04:20:16PM -]: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian > Developer, non-uploading. > I have been asked and accepted to stay on the DebConf Committee, and > thus will need to change from emeritus to active status. FWIW, I know and have worked with Bernelle since 2016, when she was part of the local organization team in Cape Town, South Africa. She is a very enthusiastic member of DebConf, and has contributed a lot to the DebConf Committee, with perspectives often different from the other, more "traditional" Debian members that conform the Committee. I am very happy to continue having her on debconf-ctte, and am more than happy to welcome her again formally back in the project. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Endorsing Robin Jarry's key DC0718E322E2C7605EBDC83146957EC08FD0FE90
Nilesh Patra dijo [Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:08:09PM +0530]: > > Please be a bit more specific. How many months is "past several > > months"? > > Since November last year (as I wrote in my advocacy too) so that > would be around 8-9 months. OK, thanks! > > What does "a few mails" mean? > > Their mails on mailing lists aren't signed unfortunately, but I check the > signatures in > personal correspondence hence the phrase. Thanks again! > > What is a "long-term interaction"? > > I suppose you/newmaint should answer this -- I did not type the last part, > it is directly picked up from the nm template that I get when I click on > "Endorse" > (As per my understanding, I took $long-term as the number of months that I > have worked with him) > > Do you want me to re-declare an endorsement? (I mean, I could but it doesn't > add up much here) I think the endorsement, together with your response, would still work, but if you don't feel too much of a hassle to amend the text you sent to NM with the precise details, I think it'd be better. Maybe we should be clearer in the instructions. At least, I feel much better when processing an endorsement if it has more precise information; I feel 8-9 months to be enough; as for the personal correspondence, maybe if you said "four personal mails sent over a three month period", it would be better. Yes, we have no clear guidelines. I'm just applyig what I feel to be right (but then again, I am one of the people that has to act upon endorsements ;-) ) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Endorsing Robin Jarry's key DC0718E322E2C7605EBDC83146957EC08FD0FE90
Hello Nilesh, Nilesh Patra (via nm.debian.org) dijo [Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 01:31:35PM -]: > For the past several months, I have worked with Robin Jarry on buildbot and > aerc. > (...) > For this past work, Robin Jarry sent mails using the email address > ro...@jarry.cc > which is the one they're using on nm.debian.org. > > I have made the following checks for their keys: > > 1. Checked a few mails for signatures in a lot of private correspondence we > have had > > 2. Checked their signed commits to the repositories. I checked several of his > upstream project >repositories releases (aerc,dlrepo,sysrepo-python etc.), which are all > signed with his gpg key. > > 3. Made sure that they are able to decrypt the messages sent to them with > their GPG key > > I've made sure that they are able to decrypt encrypted messages sent to this > key > and that they're able to sign messages with the same key. > > Due to the long-term interactions we had, I'm convinced that Robin Jarry as > they > present themselves on nm.debian.org is the rightful owner of both email > ro...@jarry.cc and GPG key DC07 18E3 22E2 C760 5EBD C831 4695 7EC0 8FD0 FE90. Please be a bit more specific. How many months is "past several months"? What does "a few mails" mean? What is a "long-term interaction"? Thank you very much, signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Endorsing xiao sheng wen's key 740D7FE2AB3143E86C8FD12300186602339240CB
*shuffles around the desk looking for his keyring-maint hat* *finds the hat and puts it on his head* Ehem... Sam Hartman dijo [Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 11:00:30AM -0600]: > It's very much about identity, but normally it's about identity in the > sense of "I interacted with this person using this key for six months." > > I guess there's nothing wrong with an endorsement for a single > interaction, but my understanding is that in deciding to approve key > consistency checks, front desk is looking for a long history with a key, > so a one-time endorsement is unlikely to hold much value on our side. I completely agree with Sam here. We can easily check whether a given upload was signed by a given key. However, as you know, the main way to assert your identity towards Debian for a long-term commitment is... your GPG key. Key endorsements were invented because of the difficulty to many of getting real-life interactions with other developers, specially since the COVID-19 outbreak (but also due to living in a developer-space geographic region). We want endorsements to reflect you have had a real, meaningful interaction WRT Debian with a {person,key} pair, helping assert that said pair has held for a long enough time for Debian to grant privileges to said person. So... I would not be comfortable in accepting an identity assertion based on a just-one-off endorsement.
Diederik de Haas: Advocate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I support Diederik de Haas 's request to become a Debian Developer, non-uploading. I have worked with Diederik de Haas as part of the Raspberry Pi Debian support team for about two years, and I consider them as having more than sufficient technical competence (quite more than myself FWIW). Diederik has provided several patches for fixing various issues both in the raspi-firmware¹ and the scripts for creating the Raspberry Pi images we distribute in raspi.debian.net², as well as in the project web page itself³ — You can look for his work in the commit logs, but also in the issues on the projects; his input has always been insightful and kind. ¹ https://salsa.debian.org/debian/raspi-firmware/ ² https://salsa.debian.org/raspi-team/image-specs/ ³ https://salsa.debian.org/raspi-team/web-raspi-img/ I am very happy Diederik de Haas stepped forward and submitted his NM application. I know he can be trusted to be a full member of Debian, right now. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iHQEARYIAB0WIQRgswk9lhCOXLlxQu/i9jtDU/RZiQUCYTtoLQAKCRDi9jtDU/RZ ieezAQDI0ywJzxeiC9/DDIFDUTCYc0etMu93j0bwtT7h35ftcAD4+2pi+8Lh/sNE XKzrZNXjfT7qYYNnhVlh69sXP/rJCw== =NB7X -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/928/ -- https://nm.debian.org/process/928/
Re: Phil Morrell: Declaration of intent to become a DD, non-upl.
Hello Phil, > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Developer, > non-uploading. > > I have been maintaining two contrib packages in the Games Team, and now taken > on one main and 3 official backports. Debian has been my personal philosophy > for about a decade, I am not going anywhere, though my actions do wax and > wane. > I want to be a part of deciding Debian's future through DPL elections and GRs. After reading the two mails that support so far your request, it grabs my attention that both Norbert and Markus mention working with you on activities that imply uploading -- "taking over the orphaned qalculate packages", "packaging contributions for games", "technical work accurate and correct"... My question is, why not applying for uploading DD? It would seem to be more consistent with your Debian involvement history! Greetings, signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Endorsing Gunnar Hjalmarsson's key F235A25E8A2A9718D7D8BDA36C79687A51F6608C
Pierre-Elliott Bécue dijo [Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 01:40:00PM +0100]: > I'm afraid Gunnar didn't take the habit of signing his mail and side > work, only his uploads of packages on Ubuntu repos. We'll have to see if > Keyring Maintainers would be okay with you endorsing his new key relying > on signed work he did in unbutu with his older one. > > Not sure of their answer. FWIW, in my opinion, key endorsements need to come from DDs, but don't necessarily have to cover Debian work -- "I have played CryptoChess with Suchand Such on a weekly basis for twelve years, and for three years already, he has always used 0xDEAD00BEEF00" would be valid -- it would be equivalent to what we get from a GPG certification. I would be more happy if the endorsement process mentioned publicly-accessible artifacts... But I understand it is not a requisite. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Endorsing Gunnar Hjalmarsson's key F235A25E8A2A9718D7D8BDA36C79687A51F6608C
Hello all, I am sorry I got late to the "party" with this discussion. Just a recommendation on form - As I said, key endorsements are very new, and we have a long way to follow to get them wrinkle-free. > I've worked with Gunnar for 10 years now, mostly in Ubuntu but also in Debian > sponsoring ibus uploads for him. > In that time he has interacted with me using key > F235A25E8A2A9718D7D8BDA36C79687A51F6608C. > Gunnar wishes now to apply to be a DD, and for that he needs an updaded 4096R > key. > Travel is difficult currently, so after talking in private we decided to go > down the endorsement (rather than signing) route. > > Gunnar has published a transition statement on: > > https://people.ubuntu.com/~gunnarhj/gpg-transition-statement.txt.asc > > this is signed with both the new key and the old one which I am satisfied is > controlled by Gunnar. > > Gunnar has also updated his Launchpad account to reference this key. I believe > the Launchpad account is controlled only by Gunnar - and it also is the > container for his upload rights to the Ubuntu archive. > > https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj > > and the latest upload was signed using this key too > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/hirsute-changes/2020-December/006933.html I noticed this due to me growing up with a name that does not match my culture: I know for a fact that whoever calls a Gunnar is calling me. So, having skipped the subject (I was just glancing through my pending mails), I felt this meant me... Who do I know for ten years? Who says I have worked in Ubuntu... What is that key?! Yes, it took me two seconds to go to the subject line and recognize that... I am not the only Gunnar in town. And also, there are links with Gunnar Hjalmarsson's webpage. So, no, mails similar to this one would not confuse people for long enough to be important. But I would prefer if endorsement mails carried the full name of the endorsee _within the GPG-signed portion_. Greetings, - That_other_Gunnar. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Endorsing Gunnar Hjalmarsson's key F235A25E8A2A9718D7D8BDA36C79687A51F6608C
Gunnar Hjalmarsson dijo [Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 01:10:34AM +0100]: > > > > I have known Gunnar for years under the key > > > > > > > > 0CFE 997B 7245 80A7 FA72 F8CF F0B1 10E7 5A69 2F32 > > > > > > I'm afraid Gunnar didn't take the habit of signing his mail and side > > > work, only his uploads of packages on Ubuntu repos. We'll have to > > > see if Keyring Maintainers would be okay with you endorsing his new > > > key relying on signed work he did in unbutu with his older one. > > > > > > Not sure of their answer. > > > > In general I'm not a fan of key changes as part of AM processes; it is > > much better to continue with an established key if there is no pressing > > reason to change. A well known 2048R key trumps a new 4096R with no > > cross signatures. > > Thanks for that clarification, Jonathan! I created the new key solely > because I thought it would strengthen my case with respect to endorsing. And > now you say that the opposite is true. > > Needless to say I can switch back to my old key and attach that one to my > application instead. If that's what you recommend, can you please confirm > and I'll accomplish the switch. Yes, I also suggest you go back and complete the process with your present key. Parallelly, build trust on your 4096R key (or a EC one, or whatnot). And when your new key has been around and carrries enough recognition, request the update, we (keyring-maint) will be happy to do it. Please understand key endoresements are a very new and not fully proven and understood method to cope with a series of changes both in the technical and the social infrastructure we live with. We have yet to learn how to properly juggle with them. > @Pierre-Elliott: That sounds as a 'door opener' to me and it would eliminate > at least one of the reasons for your doubts, wouldn't it? I certainly hope so! signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Octavio Alvarez: Declaration of intent to become a DM
Octavio Alvarez dijo [Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:29:42PM -]: > Hi! I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Maintainer. > > I have worked on packages superkb and ipv6toolkit for a while. I am more > comfortable with the Debian packaging process and tools. I know the package > source for both well enough to be able to contribute upstream as well. My > intention is to keep these packages in good shape by my own, this is, without > having to take time away from a sponsor. This would also allow me to continue > contributing to Debian more easily. Finally! I cannot advocate you, as I have never seen your technical work... But I am very happy to see you request DM after long years of contributing to Debian!
Re: Bernelle Verster: Declaration of intent
Bernelle Verster dijo [Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:03:43PM -]: > For nm.debian.org, at 2019-12-16: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Developer, > non-uploading. > I have worked on DebConf organisation since 2016 and I would like to > be able to contribute officially as a member of the DebConf > Committee, which I have been elected for, and for which I need to be > a DD. I surely endorse Bernelle's request. We worked together for DC16, she showed amazing energy and strength, and managed to endure our community and our work pace. I was most happy this year to see her again, and to see she was interested in getting more involved in Debian. Am more than thrilled in her being part of the DebConf Committee. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Clément Hermann: Application Manager report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 This might be unorthodox, so I'm spelling it out here: I was a "non-advocate" for Clément¹ (this is, I said I would have advocated him if I had done technical work in Debian with him). FrontDesk assigned him to me during DebConf, so that the process would be expedited, and suggested us to talk face-to-face regarding Clément's technical work, and keep a mail registry only about the P parts, which we did. ¹ https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20190721125049.gb15...@mosca.iiec.unam.mx I completely stand by what I said. Clément is an active member of the Go and Perl teams. He has also been part of the Tails distribution, a privacy-oriented Debian derivative, for a long time. He described to me the work he has been doing to get important server/VM orchestration technologies (we prominently talked about lxd) properly in Debian. He mentioned several "interesting" issues when doing so. I spent some time going through the bugs he has interacted with. He very often provides either a full answer, or good technical insight in them. So, without further ado, I completely agree and subscribe that Clément Hermann can and should indeed be a Debian Developer, uploading, right now. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEfHleU5lojd9m99YgSd0qTkl5YZwFAl1JzMAACgkQSd0qTkl5 YZw3/g//aNjb4pE8hBOjY83+FGNhFlPsg8YA4MAeqk1Qmz0LtSDqrCi9Qc1C/rAk AmpjURGe5ScWXEKT5DtYuKvM4n6/e5XLk2unqJfMW9WO6kud7n9aI8/K/V7Ec+Lx ssO2BhQ+KvH6A8+wGf81c0lOE2Xb3XMw1A+e+aSg5TzqY2fNH3ThKo1LKOyYK4Us CJaFVwKP8d7uTcZUFYTMjA1/1K6Ry+lZQz4a0UmF5owjZRdXyWVRvgc+tx7w6CsD ae8DWjU0ps5fqytjhYyubn8dEh2JoyiZJYM3BRhn22+FnsDBoHnPbQU88OA1Zf0F ugJBIpN+360E53zsYdUwkDvCyFC3wz0UFs5IJF8mxz2Te3G8fOj3ulXcP5TipoqK gyWzNOSE645svgwIAM5o57n2rOrBKiK0wQwFnF6GQk045Vg/Jzv+WsQ8FCgyFmBH bxxHw/xcoNSKzxH4/DuSkaB4mz6ORJf6rTvYYqMU6Rqs1nyuXNy/x/66I8Fb7W/A 4AT5hv02FkHWDXh7l3oVe4FOu/0rFYXz1BObrIZb5vzcmx70gEhosXtc+rqbTiDn BZMz5h6/jS4hBKp2nhMrDNFpIxYyzHx8Va9D9yDBU4tcB3YTaEDs9tvGa1rFg9SA /uv6TKxsylj3whL1I/al1s7q1AfK3/dZqDhGQz4gieC+CuXV0Ro= =7grz -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/627 -- https://nm.debian.org/process/627
Re: Jonathan Bustillos: Declaration of intent
Jonathan Bustillos dijo [Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:08:09PM -]: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Developer, > non-uploading. I am using Debian since 2008 and I have helped in some > teams like the Spanish Localization Team doing po.debconf templates > translations since 2011. At the DebConfs I have attended since 2012 > (...) FWIW, I pushed Jonathan to take this step and ask for an official status recognition in Debian. Jonathan is a very motivated person, and can present things in a very motivating fashion. I have attended several activities where he has been among the organizers or instigators, and he is always warm, welcoming and enthusiast. He has contributed several debconf templates translations to Spanish. Although I have witnessed he is technically knowledgeable, he is not yet requesting to become an uploading DD - I know this will come in due time... He has been shy to step forward and get more directly involved in teams, but I trust he will do so; he has participated in several aspects of DebConf organization and running (mostly in the video team, but also on the catering team at DC17), and is a keen volunteer. I am sure Jonathan will increase his involvement in Debian, and knowing him, I am also sure this will enable him to further inspire other people to join the project. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Clément Hermann: Declaration of intent
Clément Hermann dijo [Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 09:52:05PM -]: > For nm.debian.org, at 2019-07-20: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Developer, > uploading. About time! > I also participated in the Alioth replacement Sprint [3], where it > became clear to me that I needed to actually step up and start the > NM process, since not being a DD actually made me less helpful. Yes. NM is not about status. It's about being able to contribute more and better. > (Also, Holger has been bugging me about requesting this status > change all night and wouldn't leave me alone until I did :P) Do not yield to blind pressure. You could say, Holger bullied you into NM. But, I'm quite happy he did. I am *not* officially advocating you, as we have not worked together. But, for the record, Clément has been a great, supporting guy. He helped me out of a misery hole last year at DC17 when my servers back home were undergoing hardware failure (and I was sad and worried for two days). He has an excellent technical grasp and the ability to diagnose problems, plus, he is a most compassionate member of the community who goes out of his way for others to be able to enjoy DebConf. Please, somebody else, do advocate him!
Alban Vidal: Application Manager report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Six months ago, I was assigned to be Alban's AM. If the process took this long, it's because I have been too busy and often took up to a month in answering to his mails. Alban's work as part of the Web team (French L10N( is good and recognized by other members. And although Alban is a technical person and manages way more complex installs than I do, he is choosing to be a non-uploading DD because his area of action does not need greater privileges — Understanding and agreeing to the "Principle of Least Authority" is great! Throughout our interview process, while Alban's answers were not always perfect at the first try, he clearly understood all of the needed points. Alban displays a clear understanding of the Debian philosophy, and can interact with all of the important bits of the project we mentioned. I agree with the advocates, Alban Vidal can and should be a Debian Developer (non-uploading, per his request) right now. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEfHleU5lojd9m99YgSd0qTkl5YZwFAl0LxZIACgkQSd0qTkl5 YZwukQ//TClYWroBb6WFmnnjLOz45HnwAafXZZwBoBl5M94b/qSvRSIlQFR++n3X p/n5zHvAcQ3G/UCwURd2+20ZYw+RDlEOzWxndPihvFz0YO1LOT+UeQ6dp4JLNFKi 5g0Fy9iErRkHmg869ZFXQRcBa/ovnwqfw0vvc/4Ttq3H0L+6MccNVJ9uvJAQdbT6 SMt6OZ3Qc2pXEAu4Zys1wBfOT6DKLk15o8jTkHvfAl/rPgLg0EOMyMfEcSBOf85v qIp1Gju0KfUod+JKk1jKuPJseR1CkUGupZV2sdF0SBKfxfxt4LJysS9sM/vcvzKZ dqOpdf0p1NQUkSEn0nUc/yC6f7816pH86kdd3Si/a9H9Abkce1dOVwPnvXX6qUdv cUrFlNb51jMNyLrNOtYima/6Y1PRfIuPQ1xLeWbHC6SzNhQrJbuenqsMHEhStjea RtVDN1Wbwjap/UBLa/NhkMavOwoqOSDrQu/wg2mTJpn/2n7Jl6OElwNOIWfqt5hJ w0QuV8GB/yz0jyMJkSmuuCYLRRpxnTHvSDjkQS4EgOtY01bAtbduQyjkSy+Li2xM LoIpwxuBs8yfhCDXldEMMxgBxfkQaN7kOhU+7ZGYd/aocbrg4Of3tlj7j26qYLFz 00VX6nRgyQ4V1zsJr+fR5M8/6OeMEkOVdFk8FIHH6Lh4U63t7ss= =p+Mf -END PGP SIGNATURE----- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/564 -- https://nm.debian.org/process/564
Romain Perier: Advocate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I have worked with Romain Perier for some months (at least since October 2018), debugging issues related to the (non-free) raspi3-firmware package, where he kindly helped me put my head out of a thick layer of sand. He has helped me with several issues regarding the (unofficial) Debian preview image. While there is clearly a lot of ground Romain has still to cover to learn the nooks and crannies of Debian development, I see him as an engaged person, and I am happy to state he would make a great Debian Maintainer. [ according to the recommendations in nm.debian.org, I will state: I am sending this message to advocate Romain Perier for DM process #585. Today is 2019-01-28. ] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEfHleU5lojd9m99YgSd0qTkl5YZwFAlxPipsACgkQSd0qTkl5 YZwmEg/9Hz1EOfqEh4THj047CFj99+KSOAPWPnLZqh7webGk5wyeFyOceaoE8CaE rYpCiB5TlQaq2mXINeBIqLC8ve7IJFC3rNWKi72AAqxQKEyJkibu+X6K+UweAAtV U6GAyogLsaapBP76lEnTUIQi9ur+pbRx0VtX5GrNSGQ0T35IaESyGZWiVvVQfw7U p1sYm0BZeDiq9l92hz2f0OTlZ/OIivSR0iK/fBn1wZSvrpfA1Uy2MKOwoSF/rFOU GscpkKiJJE93GLTdKhmkk1M+LJOeDIdr7naB3oZaC0X2iDKKF+4Kdfa0UH+xTxZ/ hccDGZGx6AzEz44AfpUcSfcwybZDMQ3CF4kO0CtXXrXd29dSnVnSqT2Uwy4yAq+f CDHxvnRjf7lzFpv/t4uupJuzCS+Ade5ALhfycnQO2i4rK7xyR9qao98sItL2Fy5f 7pdo0e4AFPR08gBd9nRs/dC9OAM6xyvYvAJancDAtZ8/UORxyruVtwTpHpZsvEBI PZZhLf0VIhHoOYSg7v/WbV5dQz/moPbEWzwK4f5XAhNNwG8A5kEoOuSZyy4t/nDL JPPbHen24hoRRvw043A1xIJdC8Xif+ZTz2qpaUIgv0vd1zQd1Ja2l9jnK9jrGWlN C5VFNWX1hHutZIn/kAFLe+1IS5jzz4jSiYL0vFXARzib/8Msi7M= =QxKq -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/585 -- https://nm.debian.org/process/585
Daniel Echeverry: Application Manager report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I have interacted with Daniel Echeverry for the last few months (why months? Mainly because I have been too busy to give his application the attention it required), and can now be fully confident in recommending him to be a DD. So, please: Daniel Echeverry should be a Debian Developer, uploading, right now. Thanks! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE+kI6oG2P6e1dbF5CpfZP3rmBzYwFAlupgUcACgkQpfZP3rmB zYxB0xAArXlkc9LFqQGHAupvynLRHqBSudx3paTIyRM9hEfQxhRninpXQRFb1WmK zjVXaRmOScHuN11svhiPcHnBiQ89a/xC4Xr5RS/u8C8feoxNCwWlLGTGO54qENki 8NuQzuTtcaKfVeopzqKgjyHNHPto25OIZ0z4g3lcBqvNq+bfh7O3hrUEnCdxCVDr RFUrCKi65XBTj9CgAdAmsCWAympcOJRVrcaMuyVrDwJ8RTeUEBwLWM5b6scC+Teg SyHacBINxsZF29ymRpaz5XOwXy0C4J2/T89S7XR6tKn42ud72p74R9uP3Fdsh/xB f57nPXOQEnJjMIyGxIzBetphDyPW4S4/PSR0cMisBq2oPJzEN4Nda8ttga3LEZQr 4MR383v+mrSXRbSM0qhMmlVf+L6SO5Nf1PeuCig64UIufzjl3l93wkMm2TAadQa5 /x2rGq47pI0+VCKAw/Ko0tKBmfBrvyfkiOP4Dfbn727Zih6bmR+ElLnyVD34XpjV iV/kFUbza+38AwNZUeO4HzVFlm10x3MD5fZUIIbV5rhS1ReS9H5WOxwjlJi9sDo5 jKTbAPNRSDMCzLqs/EJaSIqUQiXozKWEmWklnPDKi3bM3h2s5hONrfKzKV8itmzv lnDYusWnYFeDmj0Lx9yxqNKTBzwIlmONvqd9UTrbHnGjQfdIte8= =svyn -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/456 -- https://nm.debian.org/process/456
Nicolas Braud-Santoni: Advocate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I have worked with Nicolas mainly for DebConf organization for a couple of years. He has proven to be knowledgeable, cool-tempered and very valuable for DebConf orga work. Besides DebConf organization, I share with her an interest on the applications of cryptography on the society at large, and we have exchanged many viewpoints. I take her as a very knowledgeable person with clear, sane policies, interesting in pursuing a stronger crypto culture for Debian and elsewhere. While I have not uploaded nor reviewed nicoo's packages, I have been asked by her for several issues - And I can assert that, at least, her practices go way over my own. So, I clearly support Nicolas Braud-Santoni's request for becoming a DD, uploading. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEq0HBxor9ZoygRev4ZzoD5MHbkh8FAltkdZoACgkQZzoD5MHb kh8FjRAAu/LK326Dy5Re5tcSK1EXEpFEt9J+A+6LwkdI2MpnxI/KoHI2KY2FqLuJ mfE1T2yHcE/93IdMAzlW5xgeztpK3S5oGWMEV7bmLgGUP2bP+360YLByRPdXz7dB VwGuHaS9cKr3mkyfs5lBbPNRXqbvSaW8wIsc2yWarCT4qBXClv4vaLqWYzg4Ynk3 Ielwgk9Ax8YX93XuqoOPJix9W2Js+MRjgETN0VBPjXAPboACYudlMWuIfhgHhTPT bIeCK8xFnWDhVX7xnYFkPE+NGHyW2ShVPg3jlH83ss33ISe6HNp74FvZQKUjWR+y 5BYXhcWsxFEHIdPDHMtvLj8KsE+GOlteIKk0VCWWawQK+MoqvXLXof+U7Ne49Yyd emcJybRiYrsIjalkMWl8JTKTZnYwam53KUeiSjdnWk0sqn1UKmdEf/JiDk9P5j6Y /Db47xMvBWFku/LjazO9J51Uc+QLXy8xF7E0bAyJzjiHTw38jFu53YyAZVu/oza/ GEY0S+MRIlBwvFNFaI7gZ1KbBQciE4/Bm/PiEImkYxNh3mye9z/DPaFe/Lh1/Xw0 b5e/Ogd0gYzznkeLHDnbgJgBP5QWHmkVzu6GVaBiAyxYtxMtZ3kraCEEmuVajyz7 7cfYgLCwzWzCan2Ao3My3t8vr7wquCqvDDQX2wY6Yn/utUvYjCM= =x3pS -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/525 -- https://nm.debian.org/process/525
Re: Iñaki Martin Malerba: Declaration of intent
Inaki Malerba dijo [Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 06:52:13PM -0300]: > Hi Gunnar, > > Thanks for your reply ! > After sending the _DD, uploading_ apply I realized the best way to start > would be via DM first, so I applied there too. Should I cancel this form > or just leave it there? Yes, there were two very similar messages - And _both_ said DD uploading! :-] Anyway, a FrontDesk member can answer to this better. Can the application be changed from DD to DM? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Iñaki Martin Malerba: Declaration of intent
Iñaki Martin Malerba dijo [Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:13:16PM -]: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Developer, > uploading. > I have worked on doit (salsa.debian.org/debian/doit) for a while and I would > like to collaborate in a more formal way. > If this happens, I'd like to mantain docker.io package which has not been > updated for almost a year. Hello, FWIW, I see your contributions to this project are basically over the past five weeks. https://salsa.debian.org/ina-guest It also springs to my attention that you want to maintain Docker.io; I agree the package looks like it could use some love, but it somehow feels you haven't yet got the grip of how current-day Debian collaboration works - There is a Docker packaging team you could join. Docker.io was last updated on on October (so, half a year ago). Have you considered joining the Docker-maint team? Note that I *completely* agree with your assessment that it needs love - But your statement suggests a "hostile takeover". Please start by getting in touch with the maintainer / uploaders, mentioned in the package's tracker: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/docker.io Docker-maint has a mailing list, which until now had half-decent movement: https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/docker-maint/ But sadly, as it was hosted in Alioth, the last announcement (sent today) is basically closing it down: https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/docker-maint/Week-of-Mon-20180402/000832.html So, a good way for you to build more Debian skills is to join forces with the team and find Docker.io some new loving in Salsa, fixing some of its most salient bugs (it has 5 RCs), and... That would be great to show on your DD application! ;-) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Göran Weinholt: Application Manager report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Göran was a DD a long time ago, and retired originally because of lack of time - he had to pay more attention to his university studies. This was many years ago, and he is now returning motivated to work on Chez Scheme, amateur (HAM) radio packaes, and... In his words, "it was fun back then and it will be fun to get back". We held an exchange of mails and, while he is no expect in every field of Debian packaging (who is? I am not, for sure!) he is quite proficient and motivated. I am happy to recommend him to be admitted as a full DD with upload rights. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEq0HBxor9ZoygRev4ZzoD5MHbkh8FAlq5Zq4ACgkQZzoD5MHb kh/r+w//STIUTQwbU89pwO7bH8Dm3uI4OPs7DyYAMvQeMKS8vN09vNJ9y+nT8n4C zt78IQWLXlk8KqCAH4t8+OC7PBy8rvsnwS2fYsqc/50ui8x6QSYsq27wydKLxBMS WVV+0pUCFgXmVVvF7auJdLu0PZ6Qmog/wPgC1EPNwf7fJOFptPQWQSqyCLwc0luL aRH+OnVLvVlHzu3rpGwSSiBdK5m61MUFC1QIE5CzQBJLG2xPUmo4bWdR694Dx2mW iOlspvXZs+RtvhAsAb9l2jWRDkoiQSIBzCUaT9ge8Pka/2SE7SDwtbtyaHsOiX08 q3he9VcY7RkbfbUT2vnfRuhpEdDk0hhrw41wuG2NAtzOd7nylYI2CMQXaI9GwUfJ jVzq6kRBjRf5/P+OBj3CoGL0H0VzkhTQWKvH480wgm1z9MCK1Y6CXQOAXX/8LVme Idrhvtfvi/t5ZP+uytgGuGHDadAfBOtWDsHi6pC4jVtUpCOTEBQMsFxQ8HGiabC7 1E0cgS+Fkdhn4upxFY3n+jAwhP9bMmA51L0/5ISqrOzUbA/65svJjJYUFowBMyR+ ZtYp5mKvqeiDdWFkgQ7jOu+iNYg2N5+EeUVDhkL4M07PpRLJ1epm44RUu1q0hEze oZyzKgQriws0hiCzABAagzXkJVFK2Ew2S7Z+seX3fwCCYiooBsA= =551L -END PGP SIGNATURE----- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/427 -- https://nm.debian.org/process/427
Re: Andrea Bolognani: Declaration of intent
> My sponsor's argument for going for DM at first rather than straight > for DD was that, though I have been contributing to Debian for a long > time, most of my work has been done in isolation and doesn't reach > outside the comfort zone of the few packages I've been maintaining > over the years. > > In particular, I would probably not be able to line up more than one > Advocate since I've been working with Niels exclusively for the past > several years, and asking someone who's sponsored a few uploads 6+ > years ago for advocacy would be reaching quite a bit. > > So the plan is to get DM now, then come back for DD after my > involvement in Debian has broadened further. (phone kbds all suck, sorry) IMO that's orthpgpnal. DMs are somewhat forced into staying in their comfort zone. Only DDs roam at will. But anyway, welcome to the journey finally!
Re: Dd application: issues with my GPG key
> I just checked msameer's entry in the LDAP database, and it lists the A3FD0DF7 > key as his active key. > Why then does the key checks say that my key is unsigned by a DD ? Right: $ git log */*A3FD0DF7 commit 7ce054f088ce5e687eca0b8fae6b86643c7f348d Author: Jonathan McDowellDate: Thu May 4 09:56:20 2017 +0100 Remove removed-keys.gpg and removed-1024.gpg keyrings With the keyrings stored in git there is no reason to keep keys we do not trust and do not intend to ever use again around. They can be retrieved from the commit history if necessary. Remove all infrastructure around maintaining these removed keyrings, and the keys themselves. Note that the key was already in a "meaningless" keyring since 01.01.2015 (commit 281f30c8). signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Jerome Charaoui: Declaration of intent
Sean Whitton dijo [Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:08:37PM -0700]: > Packaging mistakes can be rectified, but rectifying them sucks volunteer > time. The reason why we expect highly trusted contributors to have a > longer track record of packaging updates is to reduce the chance they'll > make mistakes which cause work for other people. > > Becoming someone who doesn't make common packaging mistakes just takes > time and lots of uploads. Not having that ability doesn't reflect on > someone's general technical ability. Umh... /methinks that this volunteer time sucking will happen regardless of whether the person in question is a DM or a DD. The number of botched uploads a DD can make is _usually_ n+1 the botched uploads the same person would do being a DM (that is, a package gets reviewed and access is granted to do unsupervised uploads). Of course, a DD will be able to NMU. However, how often will a newbie DD NMU something they are not familiar with? Or, uploading to NEW... NEW gets reviewed no-matter-what, so that's not _so_ different. People tend to get confident over time. I guess that's one of the reasons I have made some of my mistakes: Because of not triple-checking some stuff I would be checking otherwise. Say, I have uploaded to backports something that was lacking quite a bit of dependencies. Silly me. Or, as keyring-maint, I have often made formatting errors in the git log (which we consume for some automated tasks) requiring me to rewrite history. Both are things that Should Not Happen™, but happen nevertheless. I guess that if I were a new DD, I would be more careful. I understand your point and won't argue more about it — But what I am stating is... There is no clear point as to where a person has "done enough" to be trusted to be careful not to botch too much. I can assert the level of care I have observed in this person's interactions is high enough that I trust he won't be a serial upload botcher ;-) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Allison Randal: Application Manager report
ChangZhuo Chen dijo [Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:41:59PM -]: > For nm.debian.org, at 2017-08-10: > After looking at Allison Randal's contributions and > after exchanging some emails to > get to know them a bit better, I agree with the advocate(s) that Allison > Randal can > and should indeed be a Debian Developer, uploading right now. After being Allison one of the people I strongly looked up to in the Perl community, many many years ago, I am more than happy to have her fully join our most select club :-]
Re: Jerome Charaoui: Declaration of intent
Sorry for taking so long to reply to this mail. I hope my input is still useful now. Mattia Rizzolo dijo [Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 02:40:18PM +0200]: > (...) > Whilst I can see how contributing in the DebConf orga is a huge > contribution to our community, I question your technical abilities. Of > the two advocacies, one said nothing about technical aspects, and the > other is a generic "he is a DM => he has the needed background"; > besides, neither of them sponsored his uploads. > > Having upload rights to the Debian archives means you will then be able > to upload everything, and whilst I don't expect everybody to be able to > understand everything, I do expect all DDs to have enough knowledge and > abilities to be able to "find their way" in most packages, ability that > I do not believe you have publicly proved. > > I'm more than happy to be proved wrong. Being one of the people you mention, I'll quote myself: I have to say that I have *not* done any technical, packaging-oriented work with Jerome, but the fact that he is committed enough to the project and that I'm recommending him to be a DD for his non-technical contributions, together with the awareness that he is a Debian Maintainer already, makes me be sure and recommend him to become a full DD *with* upload rights. With this, I do mean I trust him to have full upload rights, and I stand by it. Jerome has proven he knows what Debian is about, and he believes in it. He has also proven to be a man of criteria. A problem solver. A guy who can defuse an escalating fight. Our work together organizing DebConf more than supports that. I have not seen a line of code written by him... But let me put this appreciation in a different light than yours: I know Jerome has been trusted to have limited upload rights, and he has modest experience in doing so. Most probably, were it not because he was running a complex conference, he would have got more time to do technical work. By taking the decisions he took (and standing by them) during the DebConf organization, I can assure you he will not be irresponsible with whatever powers we grant him. I could happily and at ease leave a printout or a digital copy of my private key material at his home, and I'm sure that –other than his kids becoming rogue about it– I'd have nothing to fear. I am sure that, when granted full DD rights, Jerome will not go berserk and upload a trojaned Linux kernel. Will he make minor packaging errors? I'm sure he would. I'm sure I have done them. Then, when I noticed, I fixed them promptly; I am sure Jerome will unscrew whatever he wrongly screws up. So, I stand by what I said: If that's what he is aiming for, I trust Jerome to be a full DD *with* upload rights. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Jerome Charaoui: Advocate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I have worked with Jerome towards the organization for DebConf17; our collaboration began well before DC16, and he has proven to be an accessible, responsible, mature and devoted Debian enthusiast. His work has been instrumental to hosting DebConf in Montreal, particularly at his workplace. That, by itself, makes me recommend him for becoming a full member of the Debian project. I have to say that I have *not* done any technical, packaging-oriented work with Jerome, but the fact that he is committed enough to the project and that I'm recommending him to be a DD for his non-technical contributions, together with the awareness that he is a Debian Maintainer already, makes me be sure and recommend him to become a full DD *with* upload rights. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZiogjAAoJEGc6A+TB25Ifv34P+wc59pIZcrUYq+7fD7evVks+ SYMSDGenuEAp6km8pyFvLhJzMuoB4jcbs0m5WBIpgSMyXq5MlKOGorSjD0ReSz1q JMvce8OcYXuoIIiRf6iqcTFi809k5WVZ4d0MH/+nZVdrWz1NR0ikvk88LWtvWIGw vA8y/e6a+kEJ+AUw8Xr8KHPLg0GeV85wlXYpCCwv0KgOigOxTkc6uXh6fckgPBbB jFb8FBvAbi/bNn0Yd4NwW0t0hbYK79n6YG35BdpkPPFmeyZx4qxY1C+qkNqBF4zG KhhdKeha5zNEGeepCw0l8YDPSlA7xkYymEz/aLIDOedjb5zXh1iyDIDamRmc9MUP zEzX7WZqUzAnwn7i2BcSXSotMvIQ5eugsXzCTJq49D8+vGwC7AXIJ7MohSgQWKBj zdOv8ZSq+MqgzoOkB9HnnY5JITtEtGtyNk6gWgretgNBj48GA2KXjIn74IuvnC8J gqeLp7g0j9V15YWFJd+CVwUVqhKDlb+qUxvGF+y1QzOOz2WIk0ZmVlxkF72+9BmX 73ldjX0/5+UkH8bu3DVEAfo8Kq1bO1TwPGdiEr1rhFZ33/LKsDe0PU2kAD1I3jef +hkBOhuRl72a6+hWXcqO9shONPNMBdgawqFEboxMOZ1AhdP5y2FZgLFMww68batL vz5oDG5CGCjWSe/Z2ISr =5ABx -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) -- https://nm.debian.org/process/276
Jeremy Bicha: Application Manager report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I have reviewed Jeremy Bicha's answers for the NM process, and am more than satisfied by them. I have also been approached in DebConf by his team mates, who very strongly recommended him as a DD. I am of the opinion the project will win quite a bit having him as a full DD with unimpended upload rights. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEq0HBxor9ZoygRev4ZzoD5MHbkh8FAlmKKH0ACgkQZzoD5MHb kh+7DBAArzGVhizSWy7z9BlzqOjWvRXfGfmxMkCMaomlkdNz3FoFGqZbRaJTkI1U lX3WfwDWhXJ3nUIi140Rz6dwOOcbTt1qdXdoZHgM+hZ3/GYuUb5V3P5gWG1LmokO svs+Q8LyCi5DIuKjGBlFDvAM62qH4DM3h54hfG3mtlsF3RaQgduFKJYZFoH/BTsa GXfn+snVtt5L1CUDVcOWsUpt+L7VJiq5CAhodhuL8XWXdKQraAfqJSQi7DyFDcnk 9J1UYihLDJn8jcDdrWHhVv8FZElnUzUk78RhST+mb3r0wqmhjCz87CSJXHa2QXt3 loMe7uoWjwQ8pNKlOz8GhmpvUptoAV1AYRNF0HmQtmEPD2312QYEpx9etQNeKxN3 HtfDC0zonz8uniHypf5TRz6nu3c+2HEK6vyKpkGd0NuXVixQLxJmFcwgYVoPT+W4 O8AKOlEyzjsJhi3KAkLUKImHe5+lJ3iVAjcukpfCzYnK8yEjM0ZgV6VbQCMQJboK +f17C5XXCZpISFdHF+ve6l/tcwZ9O9RsLuSkDredGz74EIr6nqgC7lpPdlcXEPVq hZjZ/xmk9MnrMWRchFB5aTVl8U0y5FGQho4xQEuG4bEH6BtTHcJcpNamIWl5LPRW MP531NK6PCIwWNhohd5yLE12vqrRiI5tkQzay2xCdHHLiyUjrtQ= =MPa5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) -- https://nm.debian.org/process/184
Re: Adrian Alves: Declaration of intent
> For nm.debian.org, at 2017-01-08: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Maintainer. > I have worked on python stopit for a while and I would like to be able to > continue working with other python team packages But then again, > For nm.debian.org, at 2017-01-08: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Developer, > uploading. > I have worked on grokmirror medusa python-cluster for a while and I would > like to be able to main taince those as dd Adrián, which one should be considered? FWIW, I met Adrian some weeks ago in Argentina. I cannot advocate him, as I have not talked in any technical level yet with him, but I can clearly state he is an enthusiast Debian contributor, and I believe it is worth considering him for this change of status so he can directly contribute. We only need to know whether Adrián is currently wanting to become a DM or a DD. When we talked, he told me he wanted to become a DM for later applying to be a DD — But given he told me he has been contributing for a long time, I told him being a DM for some time is *not* a necessary step. But, of course, Adrián — Your decision. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Raoul Snyman: Declaration of intent
Raoul Snyman dijo [Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:57:42PM -]: > For nm.debian.org, at 2016-12-15: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Maintainer. > I have worked on the openlp package for a few years, and Stefano Rivera > suggested I apply for DM status in order to upload the package myself. I also > wish to package one or two more Python modules. (Not signing, as this is not a technical endorsement; I have never worked technically with Raoul) Raoul has shown enough interest and committment to Debian to be a very active member of the DebConf16 local team. Whoever agrees to put up with *that* should be granted upload rights, no questions asked :-] Cheers and hope to have you on board soon!
Sean Whitton: Application Manager report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Sean is clearly more than ready to become a Debian Developer, uploading. His skillset and professionalism are quite impressive, and he deals with many different areas of Debian. He has triaged bugs, written documentation, packaged simple and quite complicated software, helps mentoring, etc. In our short (in our number of exchanges, not so much in time chiefly because of my own time constraints) interview, he surprised me with his attention to detail and knowledge about Debian processes; after a long hiatus as an AM, it would be more than fair to say I learnt more about Debian's practices than he did. I completely endorse him and expect to see him become a full DD very soon. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYVK+EAAoJEGc6A+TB25If6zsP/iNZmzO3x3eDQ/MP9V4CEqu6 1JUSSUPhBGR8Xx6D4aGHbZRVDdNP4nCCuk5p4VCWfWq+L1uLhDLnNMOagOHW8yA8 FMu1SStOFBCMx4qjmnd4HnvDqkL6nFS/jWbJ7YcXkNKwaor/tXpEeHLAN1J5I2BN 8gIrgUWZOzW2RfFaRr97nC84Z0NclyyG/QFF3Wkjfw/Hz37fd49yzXHwtEntrkLa NQ7aQB6sP02cZPDx+19LmZ7XmBcu6YRkk9tHzk4f8+jYC0Ga46c5UsjnKi212dYW J+nJFITdiZhW6jJKGPr/EXdeRloE9tsYIr8DLjXIABX+M0dvqJOUUPPGF2oTaO50 zDEVke1VROzVpgUno/RlHRZ9qhp/dyVVGRspPY0DGzk0UEnVvFdH1MejpNoieHw5 AufubwymFIOON6U7XCpYZLwnx6mJqZEpQHr+TyorYVq8ON5xb1gTKXvzLehFw7j8 17BvNIPmfqGF+xd6yDe5HMXIKS/nUsHhz+8yE3WvUhHYF2xxW2j6vqmBSuLJy8yr sYoFpOZg9zHxYmaVeTjLo9btMzxOJmak6O6LJZi8MDi2p51XJc0PAoFWgPONPEai bVkLqspvXZW+H/0hZQsTMRR9sPBY1jpnKOXiz2f6uLvihSS2YrGbkxcSe2m+QZhp xJViZx9KlGEywxPmA7Tr =anoH -END PGP SIGNATURE- Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) -- https://nm.debian.org/process/89
Re: Michael Shuler: Declaration of intent
Michael Shuler dijo [Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:07:39AM -]: > I would like to apply to change my status in Debian to Debian Developer, > uploading. > > I have been a contributor to Debian for quite a few years and this is long > overdue :) I want to comment the same as Holger — I took for granted you were a DD already. Great thing you are taking this step, I trust the process will be quick and easy for you! I'm only replying to this message because you sent *two* different request (I'm including both in my reply), one to become a DM and one to become a DD-Uploading. Which one are you applying to? And, as Holger commented, I'm not formally endorsing your application, as I haven't directly worked with you... But from you being so long close to the project, and with the packages you maintain... I guess you should be aiming to DD. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Unit 193: Declaration of intent
Holger Levsen dijo [Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 01:58:49AM +]: > > But, again, find two DDs with active keys in the keyring with personal > > policies different than mine, and I will accept it. Hell, I won't even > > be able to know about it :) > > while I appreciate that you accept keys signed with other policies than > yours, I don't think keyring maintainers should be willing to accept > *all* signatures done by DDs. > > (And I do see the problem that you cannot know everything…) Ack > But still, if you *hear* some signatures have been done under fishy > circumstances, I *do* think you should object. > > Else I^wsomeones may be tempted to try to game the system… > > IOW: please don't state you'd be willing to accept *any* signatures done > by two DDs… maybe just adding a single word and saying "you'd *almost* be > willing…" is enough to make the difference I think is important here. > > I fully understand your POV but if I were to take a similar stance, > namely "I will sign any key presented under any ID to me, because I have > no means whatsoever to properly verify IDs anyway" and if there then > were several DDs with that policy… I dont think that would be good. And > it would be worse if our keyring maintainers were to accept those IDs > into Debian. Just for the record: I agree with Holger here. We expect every Debian Project Member to be a responsible user of their key, and that includes not blindly signing anybody's key. We do not currently have a policy on what to do in the event somebody is known to misuse the trust model we work with, but I think that a key used improperly could very well be treated as if it had been compromised, and removed from the keyring (as happened many years ago, when many people were storing their .gnupg/secring.gpg in project machines). In short: The system can be gamed. We assume good will and best intentions from Debian people. Bad intentions will be punished. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Unit 193: Declaration of intent
Christian Kastner dijo [Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 07:45:36PM +0200]: > On 2016-07-13 10:16, Filippo Rusconi wrote: > > To the community : Should we accept pure pseudo "identifications" in > > Debian ? > > Personally, I wouldn't care about the pseudonym, but I would very much > care about an in-person meeting. > > There was a longer thread about this on -project last year: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/02/msg00017.html Absolutely. But signing somebody's ID is done out of personal policy. I always make clear to people how my personal signing policy differs from some other people's (and why I am sometimes flexible upon what I say, if the reality pushes that way). Signing an identity must mean that you verified the identity in a nontrivial way. Signing somebody you have not directly interacted with at all is wrong in my eyes. But, again, find two DDs with active keys in the keyring with personal policies different than mine, and I will accept it. Hell, I won't even be able to know about it :) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Report for 'Debian Developer, uploading' applicant Josué Ortega
Santiago Ruano Rinc\xf3n via nm dijo [Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 03:02:35PM -]: > Hello, > > I recommend to accept Josué Ortega as a new Debian Developer, uploading. > The account name is josue. I am very happy to have Josué on board finally now! I have not done any technical work with him (hence no prior endorsement from me), but know him personally, and know of his links to the Central American communities. It is great to have him as a full DD!
Re: LDAP accounts for DMs
Ian Jackson dijo [Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:19:19PM +]: (...) As I understand it the correct way to implement this would be for DMs to have accounts in LDAP. (Presumably flagged in some appropriate way so that they don't get more permissions than necessary.) Is this something that DSA and DM-keyring are happy with ? If so, how can we make it happen ? The workflow for keyring would be quite similar to what we currently have, and maybe it would even simplify some details such as retaining permissions after a key migration. So I would not object to it. But then again, AFAICT implementing this is completely outside of our hands (we would only need minor adjustements to our scripts). signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Advocacy for Tássia Camões Araújo
Hello, I advocate Tássia Camões Araújo to become Debian Developer, non-uploading. Advocacy text: I met Tássia nine years ago, and have worked year after year with her for DebConf organization. She is a really centered, dilligent person, always willing to work, trustworthy and intelligent. As part of the responsability she is now starting to exercise as a (not yet official as she is not a DD) DebConf chair, she is really showing skills in preventing conflicts and analyzing our problematic workflows. I strongly advocate Tássia to be a non-uploading DD. The only thing that bothers me about her request is that we didn#39;t receive it several years ago. Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140830204633.16754.42...@nono.debian.org
Re: AM report for Jacob Appelbaum
Moritz Muehlenhoff dijo [Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:42:10PM +0200]: Jacob Appelbaum is a a perfect match for Debian both in terms of technical skills and in terms of compatibility with ours spirit and free software values. I thus recommend Jacob as a Debian Developer. 1. Identification Account Data First name: Jacob Middle name: - Last name: Appelbaum Account: ioerror 2. Background - (...) I am very glad Jacob is finally joining the Debian ranks. Yes, I know the time for advocating his request is long over, but I have been waiting for his request to be approved for quite a bit. Having met Jacob back in 2008 in DebConf 8 was a great experience, and although I have not followed him much, it often struck me that he was not yet in here. So, welcome, and let me preemptively thank you for all the great work you will do in Debian :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130617214644.gj54...@gwolf.org
Re: Advocacy for Jari Aalto
Jakub Wilk dijo [Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:12:20AM +0200]: * Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr, 2013-05-21, 21:52: I think Jari would be a very valuable asset in Debian, and that he should be made DD. I very much disagree. Please, if you disagree with an advocacy, do so with more arguments than this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130522022740.ga6...@gwolf.org
Re: Advocacy for Patty Langasek
Clint Adams via nm dijo [Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:29:25PM -]: Hello, I advocate Patty Langasek to become non-uploading DD. Advocacy text: (...) Wow, this is very good news! Two people I have worked with and consider very much worth advocating in the same day! Patty has been a repeating DebConf volunteer, each time taking more formal steps to become part of the formally organizer team. She is also part of the DebConf14 Portland team. She is often a voice of reason, something sorely needed during the DebConf organization cycle. We were talking some two weeks ago, and I strongly encouraged her to become a non-uploading-DD. I am very glad she did, and I am sure she will be a very important DebConf organizing team member - And fellow DD. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
AM report for James Downing Page
I recommend to accept James Downing Page as a Debian Developer. 1. Identification Account Data First name: James Middle name: Downing Last name: Page Key fingerprint: AB23E9A98422889E08C3838CBFECAECBA0E7D8C3 Account: jamespage 2. Background - James is an active Debian Maintainer, and he has been for almost a year and a half. All of the work I saw from him shows solid, good understanding of Debian, both philosophically and technically. I would venture to say James is not so personally outgoing as others, as he limited his answers to technical matters ;-) So instead of the personal history, he jumps right into the technical details of his work. He writes: I maintain 57 packages as part of the Debian Java team; these support three key applications - Jenkins, Lucene/Solr 3 and Zookeeper. I packaged Jenkins (and its numerous new dependencies) from scratch in 2011/2012 (it landed in Ubuntu first); I picked up zookeeper when it was orphaned by its previous maintainer in July 2011; I pickup bugs from both Debian and Ubuntu for both of these packages (+ deps). (...) Yes; the work I did on the Ubuntu Java 6-7 transition still has quite a few outstanding (as Debian has not undertaken this for wheezy): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=openjdk-7-transition;users=ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com (...) I'm a member of the Debian Java team; I've worked with Neils Thykier, Tony Mancill and Damien Raude-Morvan as part of my involvement in that team. Not done a DebConf yet - hope to get to the next one; Occasional participation in ML's (debian-java) and on irc in #debian-java as well. I have some upstream involvement in python-jenkins; I'm active in both Openstack and Ceph communities through my work in Ubuntu. I was very happy with James' answers throughout the AM interview, and I'm somewhat ashamed I did not devote more time to handling the request faster. Anyway, here it goes — I clearly recommend to accept James Downing Page as a Debian Developer. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: DM application of Tom Marble
Tom Marble dijo [Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:26:06AM -0600]: All: This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer [0]. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. I have collaborated with the Java Packaging Team for years and, finally, am working on updating the versions of JRuby and OpenRocket (and their dependencies). My GnuPG 0x40BFEE868B055D9A is signed by many Debian Developers. In fact I think it's possible that I may have the DM application with lowest MSD (1.717 as of DebConf12 [0]). I am thrilled to become a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your attention. I'll also join to Holger's answer: I cannot speak for Tom technically, but I do know he is long-term interested and committed to Debian, have seen him several times at DebConf. I know he has mentored Debian projects for the GSoC, given some interesting Java-related talks (and having something interesting and Java-related at the same time is almost a NOOP for me!) So, Tom, I'm not signing this mail (as it should not be seen as a formal endorsement, as I don't know your job technically). But I hope your passage as a DM is short, and you soon become a DD :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130304230652.ga60...@gwolf.org
AM report for Anton Gladky
I recommend to accept Anton Gladky as a Debian Developer. 1. Identification Account Data First name: Anton Middle name: - Last name: Gladky Key fingerprint: BBBD 45EA 818A B86F F67E 7285 D3E1 7383 CFA7 FF06 Account: gladk 2. Background - Anton writes as his introduction: I started to use GNU/Linux in 2007, installing Ubuntu on my laptop. Since then I was trying to replace my favorite applications, which I used under another operation system, by free analogues. Right now I am doing a research work at the University and all of my main specific software (mostly for discrete element method simulations) are working only under GNU/Linux. I use Debian and derivatives because they have all necessary packages for installing my DEM-software. I maintain packages, which directly or indirectly connected to my work. Some of them are: gnuplot, freecad, paraview, gmsh, yade etc. I am trying to keep them in a good shape. I plan to continue my activity for Debian especially under Debian Science Team, bringing new and orphaning an existing packages. From our interaction, I found Anton as a very worthy prospective DD. Most of his work is done with the Debian-Science team, and many of his packages are adopted from previous maintainers; even though some do have several open bugs and issues, he answered to my complete satisfaction as to why this status holds - It is more due to being a responsible maintainer and trying not to break software with lots of users being close to or already under a freeze. Anton has work in Experimental fixing several of the mentioned problems. I fully recommend Anton to be accepted as a DD. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Advocacy for Leandro Gómez
Daniel Kahn Gillmor via nm dijo [Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:26:05AM -]: Hello, I advocate Leandro Gómez to become non-uploading DD. Advocacy text: (...) There are many, many reasons to advocate Leandro to become part of Debian. I also subscribe Daniel's. Having worked with him for different community-building projects (mainly ECSL 2009, one of the most amazing Free Software encounters I have ever seen, and of course DebConf12), I wholeheartedly advocate him as well, and expect him to become a DD soon. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Advocacy for Cédric Boutillier
Hello, I advocate Cédric Boutillier to become uploading DD. Advocacy text: I'll join David in adding my extraoficial advocacy here. I have been working with Cédric as part of the pkg-ruby-extras team. He is a very active, technically competent team member, often pushing us to upload packages faster than we can react. A nice guy to work with, and surely a welcome addition to the project! Hope to see him soon as a DD. [via Enrico adding 20120604170308.gf6...@gwolf.org to the nm.d.o site] Gunnar Wolf (via nm.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120713223857.27032.27...@nono.debian.org
Re: Advocacy for Cédric Boutillier
Antonio Terceiro via nm dijo [Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 09:09:36PM -]: Hello, I advocate Cédric Boutillier to become uploading DD. Advocacy text: (…) I'll join David in adding my extraoficial advocacy here. I have been working with Cédric as part of the pkg-ruby-extras team. He is a very active, technically competent team member, often pushing us to upload packages faster than we can react. A nice guy to work with, and surely a welcome addition to the project! Hope to see him soon as a DD. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: AM report for Mònica Ramírez Arceda
Luke Faraone dijo [Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:53:06PM -0500]: 1. Identification Account Data First name: Mònica Middle name: Ramírez Last name: Arceda Key fingerprint: 403A CC08 5210 5B23 34EF 153E 1EFE B180 1A49 C0D2 Account: monica Forward email: mon...@probeta.net (…) 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Mònica as a Debian Developer. I have not technically worked with Mònica. I just met her at DebConf11 where we had some nice chats. Still, even if our interaction has been 100% at the social level I'm very happy she is joining us! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120302170629.ga29...@gwolf.org
Re: Question about gpg key.
Boris Pek dijo [Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:02:28AM +0200]: I have read all related documentation before send the message. Procedure [4] affects only DD. But I am not even DM now. And it seems like the key of a sponsored maintainer does not matter and it can be changed in any moment. Because only one important thing in upload to the main repo is the sign of sponsor (DD) which is checked by bot. Correct me if I am wrong. That's why I asked the question. In other words. Should I sign my new key by old one or make any other action? Or can I just use new key as it is? keyring-maint hat on Sorry for the delay, as I should have answered to your question earlier on. Yes, if you want to get closer to Debian (that is, be able to do any uploads by yourself), you _do_ need to move to a 4096R key. But, as to this specific question: If you are not interested in becoming DM or DD, nobody will object - If I were to be your sponsor, I could do everything without you even having a GPG key. A sponsor must not blindly build and upload, but check everything as if it were his own package. (Of course, once you have a working relation with a DD/DM that sponsors you, _and_ you use a GPG key regardless of its strength, said DD/DM will start trusting your work) But anyway - Create a new key. Try to get it signed. Even if the old one has many signatures, start getting people (specially those better connected) to sign the new one. *Do* sign the new key with the old one, to ensure people who already know you it is still you doing this. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: AM report for Tanguy Ortolo
Ana Guerrero dijo [Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:20:29AM +0100]: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:37:14AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote: I didn't explicitly ask Tanguy for his formation and personal history, as I didn't really feel it as something needed — and asking him who are you after the AM process is basically done does not seem that would add much to it. But as to who he is, I asked some Internet oracles, and found a person clearly committed to Free Software and to Debian in particular. Thats a shame, without this section I feel that AM reports become almost content-free and not worth reading. Agreed. Oh - Well, I won't skip it in the future. Thanks, Tanguy, for providing it! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
AM report for Tanguy Ortolo
1. Identification Account Data First name: Tanguy Last name: Ortolo Key fingerprint: 240B BA15 B694 DD00 E380 30D8 D6EF A6AC 4B10 D847 Account: tanguy Forward email: tan...@ortolo.eu ID check passed, key signed by many existing developers: Output from keycheck.sh: pub 4096R/4B10D847 2010-04-14 Key fingerprint = 240B BA15 B694 DD00 E380 30D8 D6EF A6AC 4B10 D847 uid Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) sig! 797EBFAB 2010-11-02 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org sig!307F89BB8 2010-11-01 Ludovico Gardenghi gar...@acheronte.it sig! 58A23DE9 2010-11-02 Vincent Legout vinc...@legout.info sig! 464B8DE3 2010-11-04 Xavier Oswald xosw...@debian.org sig! 6D866396 2010-11-01 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@upsilon.cc sig! 33E749FC 2010-11-01 Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@drazzib.com sig! 929D42C3 2010-11-01 Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@openics.org sig!34B10D847 2010-09-28 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) sig!34B10D847 2010-09-28 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) sig!34B10D847 2010-11-01 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) uid Tanguy Ortolo tan...@ortolo.eu sig! 797EBFAB 2010-11-02 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org sig!307F89BB8 2010-11-01 Ludovico Gardenghi gar...@acheronte.it sig!311691130 2010-11-01 Georges Khaznadar (Organisation for Free Software in Education and Teaching) georg...@ofset.org sig! 58A23DE9 2010-11-02 Vincent Legout vinc...@legout.info sig! 464B8DE3 2010-11-04 Xavier Oswald xosw...@debian.org sig! 7C5BB6A5 2011-05-12 Olivier Berger ober...@ouvaton.org sig! 6D866396 2010-11-01 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@upsilon.cc sig! 33E749FC 2010-11-01 Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@drazzib.com sig! F2AC729A 2010-11-01 Raphaël Hertzog raph...@ouaza.com sig! 49881AD3 2010-05-31 Stéphane Glondu st...@glondu.net sig! 929D42C3 2010-11-01 Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@openics.org sig!20ED6122A 2010-11-21 Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org sig!34B10D847 2010-04-14 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) sig!34B10D847 2010-11-01 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) sig!34B10D847 2010-09-28 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) sig!34B10D847 2010-04-14 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) uid Tanguy Ortolo (Debian) tanguy+deb...@ortolo.eu sig! 797EBFAB 2010-11-02 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org sig!307F89BB8 2010-11-01 Ludovico Gardenghi gar...@acheronte.it sig!311691130 2010-11-01 Georges Khaznadar (Organisation for Free Software in Education and Teaching) georg...@ofset.org sig! 58A23DE9 2010-11-02 Vincent Legout vinc...@legout.info sig! 464B8DE3 2010-11-04 Xavier Oswald xosw...@debian.org sig! 7C5BB6A5 2011-05-12 Olivier Berger ober...@ouvaton.org sig! 6D866396 2010-11-01 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@upsilon.cc sig! 33E749FC 2010-11-01 Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@drazzib.com sig! F2AC729A 2010-11-01 Raphaël Hertzog raph...@ouaza.com sig! 49881AD3 2010-05-31 Stéphane Glondu st...@glondu.net sig! 929D42C3 2010-11-01 Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@openics.org sig!20ED6122A 2010-11-21 Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org sig!34B10D847 2010-04-14 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) sig!34B10D847 2010-11-01 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e, France) uid Tanguy Ortolo (Ubuntu) tanguy+ubu...@ortolo.eu sig! 797EBFAB 2010-11-02 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org sig!307F89BB8 2010-11-01 Ludovico Gardenghi gar...@acheronte.it sig!311691130 2010-11-01 Georges Khaznadar (Organisation for Free Software in Education and Teaching) georg...@ofset.org sig! 58A23DE9 2010-11-02 Vincent Legout vinc...@legout.info sig! 464B8DE3 2010-11-04 Xavier Oswald xosw...@debian.org sig! 6D866396 2010-11-01 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@upsilon.cc sig! 33E749FC 2010-11-01 Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@drazzib.com sig! F2AC729A 2010-11-01 Raphaël Hertzog raph...@ouaza.com sig! 49881AD3 2010-05-31 Stéphane Glondu st...@glondu.net sig! 929D42C3 2010-11-01 Emmanuel Bouthenot kol...@openics.org sig!20ED6122A 2010-11-21 Serafeim Zanikolas s...@debian.org sig!34B10D847 2010-04-14 Tanguy Pierre Charles Philippe Ortolo (DOB: 1985-10-02, POB: Paris 14e,
Re: DM application of Cédric Boutillier
Cédric Boutillier dijo [Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:27:13PM +0200]: This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer URL:http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. I subscribed to debian-devel-announce and debian-devel mailing lists. (...) I support and advocate Cédric's application to become a DM. I have worked with him on the pkg-ruby-extras team - In fact, he is making a better job at maintaining some packages that badly needed love and I have left aside for a generic later (repackaging/updating libprawn-ruby and its newer dependencies), so he is outperforming me in my duties ;-) I have reviewed (few, but some of) his packages, and they are well made, with good quality. He will be a good addition to Debian. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: on the M of NM
Thomas Goirand dijo [Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:21:06PM +0800]: Because NM is what people are already used to, it's part of the Debian culture about joining. Overloading that, preexisting, acronym is sort of the maximum change we can do preserving backward compatibility, but still bringing existing processes closer to the correct (according to Constitution and GR) terminology. I'm not saying we should only do backward compatible changes, a more general reform of terminology might be good. But I AOL the many comments that perfect should not be the enemy of the good: let's do this one and improve over the status quo. (I.e.: your brainstorm is welcome, but let's avoid that it gets in the way of smaller, less invasive, improvements.) Cheers. In this case, I'll have to voice my concern again that I really fear that it's going to be even more confusing if we change the words behind the abbreviation only (nobody will know about this change if we don't advertize it enough). Also, I don't get why you are writing that changing names for DD/DM will deserve a GR and constitution review, when changing from NM to NM wouldn't. Is it because NM isn't written into the stones of the constitution? I am here with Thomas. Yes, the NM process is known, both by initials and by full name. I think just doing a s/Maintainer/Member/ would be similar to adding an epoch version to it. People would be as confused by following NM 0:* than by following NM 1:*. If we want to make things clear, rather than sticking to old and confusing name schemes (that reflected reality back where you were either a Developer/Member/Maintainer or nothing at all), is to abandon old namings and come up with new ones. And if it needs a constitutional amendment, well, so be it. If we come up with clear reasoning and naming, I don't expect it to fail. Yes, it's more bureaucratic, but there's a reason for the process to exist. Precisely, to make us all DDs 1) think it over until it's a good enough proposal and 2) participate even if we don't follow the relevant mailing list. Having your proposal go through a GR will get the input of more DDs, give everybody the opportunity to comment on it, and inform all of them on the outcome. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: on the M of NM
Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:45:26PM +0200]: Also, I don't get why you are writing that changing names for DD/DM will deserve a GR and constitution review, when changing from NM to I didn't write that. [ and this is likely my last post in this sub-thread, unless new evidence/arguments appear ] (umh... If you didn't, please disregard my last mail - I've half-followed the thread, and answered somewhat impulsively. Or better yet, regard it only where it makes sense and discard the gibberish ;-) ) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111005145248.gb8...@gwolf.org
Re: AM report for Antonio Terceiro
Jan Hauke Rahm dijo [Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 02:15:32PM +0200]: 1. Identification Account Data First name: Antonio Last name: Terceiro Key fingerprint: B2DE E660 36C4 0829 FCD0 F10C FC0D B1BB CD46 0BDE Account: terceiro Forward email: terce...@softwarelivre.org 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Antonio as a Debian Developer. YES. Yes, yes, yes. Thanks, Hauke, for going through Terceiro's long due application. He will be a very worthy DD. He is now more active than many of us :) Greetings, signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: When to update public key?
Thomas Goirand dijo [Sat, May 07, 2011 at 04:49:52PM +0800]: On 05/07/2011 10:42 AM, Andres Mejia wrote: Thank you. I did have some concern that my NM application would be rejected because of my old key. It is a 1024 bit key and it's only signed by a single person. I saw that someone else had his application rejected for what looks to be a reason which is similar to my situation. See [1]. My new key however is 4096 bits and signed by several people to include one DD. I had trouble convincing these same people to sign my old key. I don't see why the NM would stop for such a reason, as you are identified already, however, you might run into trouble to have your 1024 bits key uploaded to the keyring. I would suggest you to get your new 4096 bits key signed by more DD if possible, so when you finish the NM process, you at least have a solution. FWIW, as keyring-maint, I agree with Thomas here. If you already started your NM process and your key was accepted for identification, when you finish NM, DAM will request us to add your key to the keyring. We might not love adding a new 1024D key, but we will do it (as we trust the process started before the deadline we set). You can otherwise also ask your AM to re-do the identification part with your new key - The process will be up to him. In any case, if he accepted your 1024D key, you can present a mail signed with your OLD key, stating the full fingerprint for both keys and the reasons for the change. Do this when the new key has already been signed by a DD. Please note that, although your key can be accepted as new with only one signature, in order to replace your key we require two (to protect your identity to be stolen by a single evil-minded DDs. Yes, we do have evil-minded DDs!) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [NM-AM] NM process for Aron Xu
1. Identification Account Data First name: Aron Last name: Xu Key fingerprint: 3A9E 7D14 9697 510A 3E37 CD95 C38E 8160 A178 41FE Account: aron Forward email: happyaron...@gmail.com ID check passed, key signed by one existing developer. Aron is aware he should get more signatures, but due to his geographical location (Jilin province, China, 2000Km away from the nearest DD) has so far been unable to do so. Output from keycheck.sh: $ ./keycheck.sh 3A9E7D149697510A3E37CD95C38E8160A17841FE gpg: requesting key A17841FE from hkp server keys.gnupg.net pub 4096R/A17841FE 2010-10-04 Key fingerprint = 3A9E 7D14 9697 510A 3E37 CD95 C38E 8160 A178 41FE uid Aron Xu (happyaron) happyaron...@gmail.com sig! 6D67F790 2010-11-25 Anthony Fok f...@debian.org sig!3A17841FE 2010-10-04 Aron Xu (happyaron) happyaron...@gmail.com uid Aron Xu (GNOME) aro...@gnome.org sig! 6D67F790 2010-11-25 Anthony Fok f...@debian.org sig!3A17841FE 2010-10-04 Aron Xu (happyaron) happyaron...@gmail.com uid Aron Xu (Ubuntu) happya...@ubuntu.com sig! 6D67F790 2010-11-25 Anthony Fok f...@debian.org sig!3A17841FE 2010-10-04 Aron Xu (happyaron) happyaron...@gmail.com uid Aron Xu (Fedora) a...@fedoraproject.org sig! 6D67F790 2010-11-25 Anthony Fok f...@debian.org sig!3A17841FE 2010-10-04 Aron Xu (happyaron) happyaron...@gmail.com sub 2048R/AB62B0B8 2010-10-04 [expires: 2011-10-04] sig! A17841FE 2010-10-04 Aron Xu (happyaron) happyaron...@gmail.com sub 2048R/9BDF4C7E 2010-10-04 [expires: 2011-10-04] sig! A17841FE 2010-10-04 Aron Xu (happyaron) happyaron...@gmail.com sub 4096R/BA99A4BE 2010-10-04 sig! A17841FE 2010-10-04 Aron Xu (happyaron) happyaron...@gmail.com 8 signatures not checked due to missing keys Key is OpenPGP version 4 or greater. Key has 4096 bits. Valid e flag, no expiration. Valid s flag, no expiration. 2. Background - Aron has been a DM since December 2010 - A short time indeed, but he has been maintaining packages for quite some time before that - The reason he didn't apply before is because he had not got the opportunity to get his key signed before. An important part of his work consists on maintaining input methods for X (for inputting Chinese characters). He is part of the IME Packaging Team (pkg-ime), so many of his packages are group-maintained, although he explained to me that he is often the only responsible human for them. Many of the bugs where he has been active are related to I18N/CJK support and documentation translation. Aron also works in some upstream groups - He is both a GNOME and KDE committer and GNOME foundation member, following the same lines. He is also leading the Ubuntu Simplified Chinese Translators. 3. Philosophy and Procedures - He proficiently replied at all of my PP-related questions, we had a nice little debate regarding some of the pointy questions. He definitively knows where Debian stands in the Free Software world, properly understands what do the SC, DFSG, DMUP mean, and agrees to abide by them in his Debian work. He even managed to reply and make sense out of some extra/trick questions I expected him to skip! 4. Tasks and Skills --- Aron pointed me at several examples of bugs he has fixed, and to some well managed and well understood corner cases of upstream interaction. Even though he (as we all) needs to sharpen his skills on some areas (explicitly, better/cleaner shell scripting - A very important skill of a package maintainer!), even his mistakes show he understands the processes, and are more about form than about function. I am confident he will become a valuable DD. 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Aron as a Debian Developer. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Advocating William Vera - Again
I sent this message two days ago to nm-committee, but in any case, I think it should be re-sent to a public list. Front-desk, please comment on it (whether you approve it or not). Hi, I'd like to resubmit my advocacy for William Vera to start his NM process. I have long known William, although he used to live in a very distant part of the country and we had met only briefly. I sent an advocacy message on May 2010, but it was not accepted as I had explicitly stated I had not yet worked technically with him. He has now relocated to Mexico City, and has been staying at myy house for the past two weeks. We have talked extensively about his work as a maintainer since 2005, his work in the forensics and testing-security teams, and his role in building local Debian communities. I want to submit again my advocacy for him to start his NM work. I am confident he has enough experience to start the process, and I am sure he will be a good gain for our project. Thanks, signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Advocating Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:16:25AM +0100]: On 22/02/11 at 06:35 +, NM Front Desk wrote: Auth-Key: nmauth45ce94b15a8386d4f7c5b216a8e98913 Applicant: Antonio Terceiro terce...@softwarelivre.org Why do you advocate this person? (please provide a 5-10 line summary). Even if one advocate is enough, I want to join in. I am glad Terceiro finally is applying as a NM. I met him IIRC in DebConf 4, in Brazil, 2004, and remember fondly the interaction with him. I am also working with him in the pkg-ruby-extras group, where he has shown to be a dilligent and knowledgeable person. He will undoubtely pass the NM process, and will be an important asset to Debian. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
AM report for Kamal Mostafa
1. Identification Account Data First name: Kamal Last name: Mostafa Key fingerprint: 73EE 9226 58C2 E073 40EA 9613 E7F7 1055 5409 E422 Account: kamal Forward email: ka...@whence.com ID check passed, key signed by 5 existing developers. Output from keycheck.sh: $ ./keycheck.sh 73EE922658C2E07340EA9613E7F710555409E422 gpg: requesting key 5409E422 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net pub 4096R/5409E422 2010-03-28 Key fingerprint = 73EE 9226 58C2 E073 40EA 9613 E7F7 1055 5409 E422 uid Kamal Mostafa ka...@whence.com sig! F2C423BC 2010-05-19 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@upsilon.cc sig! 01AA4A64 2010-10-28 Steve Langasek steve.langa...@canonical.com sig! C095D941 2010-09-22 Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com sig!23EFB79EF 2010-04-03 Andrew Pollock m...@andrew.net.au sig!326B47B9F 2010-11-02 Martin Pitt mar...@piware.de sig!35409E422 2010-03-28 Kamal Mostafa ka...@whence.com uid Kamal Mostafa ka...@canonical.com sig! F2C423BC 2010-05-19 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@upsilon.cc sig! 01AA4A64 2010-10-28 Steve Langasek steve.langa...@canonical.com sig! C095D941 2010-09-22 Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com sig!23EFB79EF 2010-04-03 Andrew Pollock m...@andrew.net.au sig!326B47B9F 2010-11-02 Martin Pitt mar...@piware.de sig!35409E422 2010-03-28 Kamal Mostafa ka...@whence.com uid Kamal Mostafa kamal.most...@canonical.com sig! F2C423BC 2010-05-19 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@upsilon.cc sig! 01AA4A64 2010-10-28 Steve Langasek steve.langa...@canonical.com sig! C095D941 2010-09-22 Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com sig!23EFB79EF 2010-04-03 Andrew Pollock m...@andrew.net.au sig!326B47B9F 2010-11-02 Martin Pitt mar...@piware.de sig!35409E422 2010-03-28 Kamal Mostafa ka...@whence.com uid [jpeg image of size 4526] sig! F2C423BC 2010-05-19 Stefano Zacchiroli z...@upsilon.cc sig! 01AA4A64 2010-10-28 Steve Langasek steve.langa...@canonical.com sig! 26B47B9F 2010-11-02 Martin Pitt mar...@piware.de sig! C095D941 2010-09-22 Bdale Garbee bd...@gag.com sig!35409E422 2010-03-28 Kamal Mostafa ka...@whence.com sub 4096R/9807A936 2010-03-28 sig! 5409E422 2010-03-28 Kamal Mostafa ka...@whence.com 100 signatures not checked due to missing keys Key is OpenPGP version 4 or greater. Key has 4096 bits. Valid e flag, no expiration. Valid s flag, no expiration. 2. Background - Applicant writes: (paragraphs copied from our conversation; full log will be available to FrontDesk) I first became motivated to get involved with Debian in 2009, through my involvement with Ubuntu (I have since become employed by Canonical). Part of the process of fixing bugs in Ubuntu is to report the bug and send the patch upstream -- usually up to Debian and/or beyond -- so I quickly learned that fixing Debian bugs directly was the fast track to fixing Ubuntu bugs. When I then discovered that some of my own favorite ham radio packages were in need of maintenance at Debian, I was eager to get more involved and help out. Since then though, I've come to appreciate Debian not just as a path to helping Ubuntu, but for its own sake. Debian provides an incredibly valuable resource to the world, and I will be proud to be included in the ranks of its developers. (...) My efforts at Debian are indeed focused on the two ham radio packages that I've adopted. I am considering adopting more of the ham packages that were orphaned when Joop Stakenborg retired last year. Ham radio is my hobby and I have become quite involved with the Debian and Ubuntu ham radio groups. (...) I am employed by Canonical as a Hardware Enablement Engineer on the Ubuntu kernel team. I focus on machine-specific quirks like dysfunctional volume or brightness keys on particular laptop models, graphics issues for certain models, suspend/resume hangs and other BIOS-related problems. I investigate and resolve such issues for Ubuntu community users and Canonical customers, and contribute patches upstream to various Linux maintainers. Google says: I have to admit that, due to Kamal having many pseudonyms, I have mainly restricted my report either to sources he controls (such as his personal homepage) or that he already mentioned (such as Canonical's Launchpad - His real job is at Canonical). Kamal's curriculum shows a very long history of professional involvement in Unix development, dating back to the 1989 SCO: http://www.whence.com/kamal/Kamal-Mostafa-resume.html Given his real job is at Canonical, it is natural -but still impressive- to have this very active Launchpad page: https://launchpad.net/~kamalmostafa I have to note that, as I specifically asked Kamal whether he planned to get involved with the kernel development/hardware support
Re: DM application of Luis Uribe
Luis Uribe dijo [Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:05:42AM -0500]: Hi all, This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. As it has happened before: I have met Luis, and am very happy he is taking the step of actively and officially starting to work on Debian as a DM. This mail, however, is _not_ signed and should _not_ be seen as advocating him: I remember meeting him in Bogotá and talking with him, and I welcome him among our ranks. However, I have never worked technically with him, so my support can only stay as anecdotic :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010101143.gf14...@gwolf.org
Re: Advocating Jonathan Yu jaw...@cpan.org
Xavier Oswald dijo [Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 05:51:48PM +0200]: Im doing this advocation with my DD hat but you can see it more or less as the whole perl team behind this advocation. Still, you didn't do it with your key - Please do it again ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100920194310.gb4...@gwolf.org
Re: DM application of Jonathan Yu
Jonathan Yu dijo [Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 05:08:35PM -0400]: This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer URL:http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. Currently, I am developing libdebctrl (a Debian project, which began in the 2009 Google Summer of Code). I co-maintain several [1] packages with the Debian Perl Group, but have reduced my group involvement as of late to focus on libdebctrl. Although I am currently not active in the Debian Perl Group, I have worked with Jonathan, seen his technical work, opinions and suggestions, and sponsored some of his packages. I would have supported his DM application one or two years ago, and I can only assume he has become even better at it. So, I fully recommend him to be accepted as DM. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Accepting new applicant's keys: Stronger requirements
Hi, Just re-stating yesterday's mail to d-d-a¹ for the relevant people, I'll quote here the last paragraph: But then again, we are not allowing any new 1024D keys anymore. Anybody who is currently a DD or DM, or that has started his application towards becoming one, will be allowed with whatever key they currently have - But effective October 1st, no applications for DM or DD should be processed with anything less than a 2048R SHA2-capable key. So, please don't forget to request this from your applicants. This is valid both for NMs and for DM applications. Oh, one more thing: I will update keyring.d.o's Web pages with this information - Please update DM and NM pages reflecting the change as well, to avoid upsetting applicants! Thanks, ¹ http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/09/msg3.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: AM report for Deepak Tripathi
Christoph Berg dijo [Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 04:34:47PM +0200]: 3. Philosophy and Procedures - Deepak has a good understanding of Debian's philosophy and procedures and answered all questions about the social contract, DFSG, BTS, etc. in a good way. Deepak committed to uphold the SC and DFSG in his Debian work and accepts the DMUP. 4. Tasks and Skills --- Deepak has a good understanding of the technical side of Debian. Deepak is maintainer of more than 40 packages, mostly ruby and perl modules. All packages are in good shape. Deepak also answered other questions regarding TS without problems and provided patches for RC bugs. 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Deepak as a Debian Developer. I have been working lately with Deepak, as he maintains many Ruby-related modules in the pkg-ruby-extras group. After failing to be accepted as a DD in the past, he has really put effort into understanding the shortcomings he had. I completely agree that now he is qualified to become a DD, and welcome him on board! -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100701150155.ga23...@gwolf.org
AM report for Felipe Sateler
1. Identification Account Data First name: Felipe Middle name: Last name: Sateler Key fingerprint: 218E E036 2033 C87B 6C13 5FA4 A3BA BAE2 408D D6CF Account: fsateler Forward email: fsate...@gmail.com ID check passed; Felipe's key is signed by Robert Collins only. I have requested Felipe to work on getting additional signatures; he lives in Chile, where there is one DD (Bruno Barrera), but is somewhere between inactivity and MIA :-( Output from keycheck.sh: $ ./keycheck.sh 408DD6CF Syncing Debian Keyrings with rsync from keyring.debian.org Receiving and checking key gpg: requesting key 408DD6CF from hkp server keys.gnupg.net pub 4096R/408DD6CF 2009-05-08 Key fingerprint = 218E E036 2033 C87B 6C13 5FA4 A3BA BAE2 408D D6CF uid Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com sig!3FBD3EB8E 2009-06-10 Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net sig!3408DD6CF 2009-05-08 Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com uid Felipe Sateler fsate...@uc.cl sig!3FBD3EB8E 2009-06-10 Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net sig!3408DD6CF 2009-05-08 Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com uid Felipe Sateler fel...@sateler.com sig!3408DD6CF 2009-05-08 Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com sub 4096R/D70D5F18 2009-05-09 sig! 408DD6CF 2009-05-09 Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com 3 signatures not checked due to missing keys Let's test if its a version 4 or greater key Key is OpenPGP version 4 or greater. Good! Check for key expire stuff Valid e flag on key 0xA3BABAE2408DD6CF, no expiration Valid s flag on key 0xA3BABAE2408DD6CF, no expiration 2. Background - Felipe has been active for several years already in Debian, first being sponsored, and since December 2009 as a DM. To be honest, although we work in very different areas, I was surprised when he was assigned to me for NM processing (after he worked on NM in September/October with mk...@d.o), as I expected him to be already a DD. Felipe had even NMU'd one of my own packages ;-) Applicant writes: My first attempt at trying linux was back in 99 I think, with WinLinux. I didn't get very far, though. The first real attempt was with Red Hat 8, in 2002-2003. I used it for a while, but got really annoyed with the package manager, so in 2004 I switched to Debian (when sarge was testing), after a quick stage on Linux From Scratch. All this time I was also using several free applications for Windows (I remember Gnutella was the reason I started looking into free software as such, until then linux was just an alternative OS for me). I decided to start volunteering time because I had some free time, but nowadays I do it because what I want to do with my computer, Debian right now can't offer. I started packaging for debian with checkinstall in 2005-2006. I stayed at that for a while, but adopted csound when I started using it but the current debian package was lagging behind upstream. Since then, I have been getting more involved in the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team (formerly Debian Multimedia and Debian Multimedia Packages teams), hoping to make Debian a good digital audio workstation. I have now 5 source packages in debian, with one in the adoption stage (ladspa-sdk). My plans for the future are trying to make Debian a top-notch audio processing distribution, on where it currently lacks. In particular, the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team is understaffed not only with contributors in general, but specifically DDs that can sponsor uploads. This makes it hard to maintain packages within the team without being a DD, which is why some of my packages are not maintained within the team's umbrella, even though I'd like that. Google says: Actually, Google replied precisely as I expected: Felipe has long been active in Debian; there are many instances where he gives good support leads in other Free Software related forums. 3. Philosophy and Procedures - Felipe has a good understanding of Debian's philosophy and procedures and answered all my questions about the social contract, DFSG, BTS, etc. in a good way. Felipe committed to uphold the SC and DFSG in his Debian work and accepts the DMUP. 4. Tasks and Skills --- Felipe has a good understanding of the technical side of Debian. Felipe is maintainer of several multimedia-related packages (csound, qutecsound, cmt, csound-manual and liblo), as well as of checkinstall. He has worked on such packages for several years already, and they are kept in good state - Although there are some open bug reports, they are not at all neglected. His packaging is quite good; Felipe works together with the CDBS maintainer, who is most pleased with his work. 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Felipe as a Debian Developer. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw
Re: Advocating William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx
Enrico Zini dijo [Sun, May 09, 2010 at 04:22:13PM +0100]: I have not directly worked Debian-wise with William, but know him from the Free Software activities in my country - and have talked with him several times. I have reviewed his currently sponsored work in Debian, and is very well kept, which speaks well about his personal abilities Just one clarification: you say I have not directly worked Debian-wise with William, and that phrase raises a FD alarm bell about this size: http://www.1-800-4clocks.com/images/Big-Ben-Clock-Bell-London.jpg However you say that you have reviewed his sponsored work in Debian. The two statements are, as I see it, contradictory, unless it was just a quick review. (...) Hi Enrico, I added William as a recipient - Billy, I told you so! ;-) I told you I would not be a good advocate for you, as we have stone-cold and iron-cast people sitting at the frontdesk. Not only that, they masquerade for a nice, warm, lovable Italian guy... Nobody is safe now! Enrico, on a more serious note: I agree with you. I know (and stand by what I wrote) William will make a good addition to Debian, and I would have liked him to take this step several years ago already. However, I also agree I cannot judge his technical work - I did a bit more than just looking at the pages, but of course, that's not as much as saying I have worked closely with him. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100512024822.gb12...@gwolf.org
Re: Advocating William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx
NM Front Desk dijo [Wed, May 05, 2010 at 03:33:53AM +]: Auth-Key: nmauth8516eb5ede9276908126ac8529c71ef8 Applicant: William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx Why do you advocate this person? (please provide a 5-10 line summary). You are encouraged to take questions such as the following into account but you're not limited to answering these: - How have they contributed to Debian already? - What do they intend to do for Debian in the future? - How do they interact with others, such as users and other developers? I have known William for many years already - probably at least since 2005, and he was already interested in getting more into Debian. I have not directly worked Debian-wise with William, but know him from the Free Software activities in my country - and have talked with him several times. I have reviewed his currently sponsored work in Debian, and is very well kept, which speaks well about his personal abilities and motivation. Besides general GNU/Linux promotion as the LUG leader in Mérida, Yucatán, William currently maintains 12 packages in Debian¹, all of them with perfect QA as of right now. He was explaining to me his strategy towards choosing which packages to take over: By using wnpp-alert, he learns about packages he uses and which are orphaned. William tells me he is trying to fix the situation where many people have found it cool and trendy to upload a package to Debian, only to later abandon it. He is currently working in the security/forensic areas, and those are the areas he shows most interest in colaborating with in Debian. In short, I expect him to be a valuable addition to Debian. ¹ http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=bi...@billy.com.mx -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian Maintainer application
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Deepak Tripathi dijo [Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:02:30AM +]: This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer URL:http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. Currently, I maintain the packages pyodbc, libi18n-ruby, djang-apps-plugin, libxml-simple-ruby and many more (around ~25) under debian-perl, debian-ruby and debian-python groups. My GnuPG key B9B0C9F2 is signed by the Debian Developers Erik Schanze, Christian Perrier, Sam Hocevar, Kartik Mistry, Sean Finney, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag and John Leuner. I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your attention. I have sponsored several of his Perl and Ruby packages. You can see¹ they are kept in very good shape. Deepak is a very enthusiastic, long-time Free Software enthusiast, long motivated to work in Debian, committed to his local Free Software groups. I will clearly welcome Deepak as a Debian Maintainer, and of course, I advocate his request. ¹ http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=apenguinli...@gmail.comcomaint=yes - -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLznooAAoJEGc6A+TB25IfnPgP/A2iwi6dIc0U7bp8H7Y43raW 2UK1Oz/3Jl5DNnwfrH6TrgLquAud5RpR6oolA9veaoNemNM65hu2BHhYQwCmD3vv lg9mdsWzb1salkSaSBe1fHL4Bx2Pl6IVO3wjRiyFa3GaOImYsG6yM1BOeFfJmC+D +unegF9RgbWAOMIWLjGDk5rnJCg4iq9nJ8Hq4cMvEOyLK+yO0R+XKNDnPtSPM8Wy W7FDy/QcTcyQaXfn/wjLZdOsjVuQ0QnF/kbWCZQQFKHAdgdwLmXbzlD+jlT25X5O UtOPFuycq7SXVwoq3Oh0caWAvc2CoRQkypA+mToj3J7sw6kj5UFoYrm3wpWSJA0O +RDUZ/dCWmN4aDI1D1l+DAYlFa9lvVCPcFgGodeudAQK+kM4nsBJ5YBYLQ8Xk4AH EXoZkPRwH5c0bIgd90gn9zWe6MxonB0nKyI41eOGC/XGNMMhqUGy4zXGAzDIQnT7 PztjPlKESevsP98XScz1iDsVeDYZyWqTVeNsvU9TQruYEPT9xEhPFkytk0qHfiHq AzMSGRVcj8yYTV+HOqw5A2F4q4BQab/U12oKKjQoFyLKJiEwOBP7N+4zUmilSwJ1 7u9RuphaF6dPtAM5Pw1eddFZmnNcKGHz+tgnT2E5po0jTae/NBMOt0k3VQIFY8/Z 8zgTgD1T4uqD/lFZxOom =NEZB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100421040959.ga9...@gwolf.org
Re: Debian Maintainer application
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:34:31AM -0500]: Your name (from the 'From:' header) was UTF-mangled, at least both for my mutt client and in the mail archives¹. Could you please either fix your client or state your name as part of the body (or both, of course)? FWIW, the four identities in Stefan's GPG key are: pub 1024D/868EFA66 2001-08-04 uid b...@bc-bd.org b...@bc-bd.org uid Stefan Voelkel ste...@bc-bd.org uid Stefan Völkel ste...@bc-bd.org uid Stefan Völkel ste...@bc-bd.org sub 2048g/8E493D7C 2001-08-04 So from here we can get his name. And his frustration with different encoding systems ;-) -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100417155117.ga30...@gwolf.org
Re: AM report for Obey Arthur Liu
Stefano Zacchiroli dijo [Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:49:34PM +0200]: (...) 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Arthur as a Debian Developer. It will be a honor to Obey Arthur as a DD. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
AM report for Tommi Vainikainen
1. Identification Account Data First name: Tommi Middle name: Last name: Vainikainen Key fingerprint: 1228EB75 Account: tvainika Forward email: t...@iki.fi ID check passed, key signed by lots of existing developers (Tommi was present at the Helsinki keysigning party) Output from keycheck.sh: $ ./keycheck.sh 1228EB75 Syncing Debian Keyrings with rsync from keyring.debian.org Receiving and checking key gpg: requesting key 1228EB75 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net pub 1024D/1228EB75 2001-06-07 [expires: 2010-12-10] Key fingerprint = 10CA 47C6 A071 7261 20E2 2E0B 5470 3CDE 1228 EB75 uid Tommi Vainikainen t...@iki.fi (…) sub 2048g/4D7C1E4C 2001-06-07 [expires: 2010-12-10] sig! 1228EB75 2003-12-12 Tommi Vainikainen t...@iki.fi 43 signatures not checked due to missing keys Let's test if its a version 4 or greater key Key is OpenPGP version 4 or greater. Good! Check for key expire stuff Valid e flag on key 0x54703CDE1228EB75, expires Fri 10 Dec 2010 14:54:19 CST, OK! Valid s flag on key 0x54703CDE1228EB75, expires Fri 10 Dec 2010 14:54:19 CST, OK! 2. Background - Tommi has long been approaching Debian — His first first advocation mail dates back to 2004 (!), and he attended DebConf5 in Finland. His advocate states he is familiar with Tommi mainly due to his Finnish translation efforts in GNOME. Looking through minechangelogs' output confirms this, as many DDs hace credited him in their changelogs, both for translation and for bugfixes. Applicant writes: Let me introduce myself shortly: I'm 28 year old, I'm married, and we have 7 months old boy with my wife. I've MSc. Tech (CS) from Helsinki University of Technology (graduated 2005), and I'm working as Senior Software Developer in small startup called Conformiq working on a proprietary software product for model-based testing (automated test generation from models) using Debian. At work I also sysadmin our Debian servers, and help others to install Ubuntu. Sometimes I also have to work with the operating system From the dark side, but I get paid to do that. :) (…) My interest in being part of Debian is mostly philosophical: I think that free software benefits the society more than proprietary software, especially on core software such as operating systems. I think that Debian project is very unique free software project with Debian's massive developer base and democratic decision making. Of course Debian distribution is technically very advanced too, both in historic perspective with Apt, but still that everything works so smoothly with new releases. Software is well tested and stable when released. Google says: Consistent with what he and his advocate wrote, Google says he is an active translator for Finnish in Launchpad, and he can be easily linked to his workplace, Conformiq. There is a high proportion of pages listing Tommi in Finnish, of course, and I dare not wander in there unaccompanied ;-) This page has a good listing of the activities I have found him related to - Of course, I assume the musician is a homonym, or just an area of his person he didn't feel with a strong relation to Debian: http://pipl.com/directory/name/Vainikainen/Tommi You can also see his activity in Debian L10N: http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po/fi 3. Philosophy and Procedures - Tommi has a good understanding of Debian's philosophy and procedures and answered all my questions about the social contract, DFSG, BTS, etc. in a good way. Tommi committed to uphold the SC and DFSG in his Debian work and accepts the DMUP. 4. Tasks and Skills --- Tommi has a good understanding of the technical side of Debian. Tommi is maintainer of gnus and xqilla, both of which I have sponsored. All packages are in good shape - Gnus has a high bug count, but he has done some progress in comparison to when he adopted it. Tommi also answered my other questions regarding TS without problems and provided patches for RC bugs. 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Tommi as a Debian Developer. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian Maintainer application for Ansgar Burchardt
Ansgar Burchardt dijo [Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:26:35PM +0900]: Hi, this is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer[1]. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. Currently, I (co-)maintain too many packages to list them all here[2]. All packages except `at' are team-maintained in either the Debian Games Team or the Debian Perl Group. Still, it would be convenient to be able to upload some packages myself, especially taking into consideration that Cyril Brulebois asked to step down as a co-maintainer for `at'. My PGP key 0x595FAD19 is signed by the Debian Developer Frank Lichtenheld fr...@lichtenheld.de. I also applied to become a Debian Developer[3]. I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Regards, Ansgar [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Maintainers [2] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ansgar%4043-1.orgcomaint=yes [3] https://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=ansgar%4043-1.org Although I have not been directly engaged much with Angsar's work, he is quite active and enthusiastic in the pkg-perl group, and he is one of the people I clearly recognize as doing the very hard work of keeping such a beast moving and up to date. I support him becoming a Debian Maintainer, and expect to see him as a full DD soon! -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Cuban prospective DD can't acomplish NM identification
Raphael Hertzog dijo [Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:09:04AM +0200]: Was it not so that the DAM phone contact which is (nearly?) always set to not required in NM reports was about that, i.e. if the applicant cannot get near a DD, then the DAM talks to him on the phone, checking he is a real live individual, maybe reading his key fingerprint over the phone, and put the key in the keyring based on that? I hope not, having a chat over the phone is no id check. Yet that's the only id check that happened to me... (except the numerous signatures that I got after becoming DD.) Well, the times they are a' changin'. At some point in history it was determined that was not enough of an ID check. Possibly, we should make some analysis on the current keyrings to find if there are DDs (possibly among the old-timers) who do not have any cross-signatures — I am adding Jonathan (keyring-maint) on Cc: to this mail (in case he is not following this list) to check if he is aware of any such check. Of course, in any case, this would not be throwing DDs out, but should bring to their attention they should actively seek somebody to sign/verify. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Cuban prospective DD can't acomplish NM identification
Adrian Perez dijo [Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:48:53AM -0400]: Hello list. My name is Adrian Perez, and since months ago, I've managed to get the time to contribute to debian as a maintainer. The first issue I found it's that my country wasn't listed on the gpg-coord page, thanks to the contact with Ralf Treinen that got fixed; but as you may see I was able to submit my request long time after my intentions were to. (…) When I first entered NM, I was also alone in Mexico. Of course, I recognize your and my countries stand on a very different position, but still, this is worth giving a shot. Some ideas: • Maykel Moya, who AFAICT lives in La Habana, was in DebConf7. You might ask him to sign your key. (adding him Cc: — Greetings, Maykel!). His key (A99479EF) is signed by several DDs. • Whoever signs your key would most preferably be a DD, but it can be a different person, whose identity can be traced and connected to the Debian keyring or to other Free Software strong keyrings. I know there are several Cuban Free Software communities — Are you in touch with any of them? Do any of the members belong to any FS development or advocacy groups? • Several Debian people have travelled to Cuba over the last years. Sadly, when I travelled (back in 2000) and met quite a bit of (then) Free Software-related people, I was still not acquinted with establishing webs of trust (and a 10 year old signature starts smelling stale ;-) ). Still, I'm Cc:ing David Moreno (Damog), who travelled not so long ago to Cuba. Of course, not so long ago might mean four years or so — David is now living on the USA, so I know it was not _so_ recent! • Which city do you live in? Even if the keys are not signed, David or me (or somebody else who has travelled to Cuba in this fashion) can phone somebody we trust (and identify) in your area. If we can establish this person is clearly the person we trust (i.e. by recognizing the voice _and_ adding some questions regarding what did we do together), and this person asserts having checked your identity, it might be enough. I hope the following is enough to get you started! -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 pgpmwIAq98FM1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Cuban prospective DD can't acomplish NM identification
Adrian Perez dijo [Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:40:38PM -0400]: • Maykel Moya, who AFAICT lives in La Habana, was in DebConf7. You might ask him to sign your key. (adding him Cc: — Greetings, Maykel!). His key (A99479EF) is signed by several DDs. I've contacted him, although you CC'ed him, and DebianCuba seems to offline. [Update]: Maykel has replied, and is in contact with Adrián. Of course, given the Cuban situation, having Maykel's signature _should_ be more than enough as an ID check. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: http://wiki.debian.org/FrontDesk/Tips
Enrico Zini dijo [Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:58:22PM +0100]: The first bit that I wanted to add to it was Things to do before asking questions from the templates, where I'd like to condensate some of the things discussed during Debconf. Ah. Are there records of those discussions? Was DAM involved? It seems to involve trying to reduce the templated questions asked so I was wondering how as an AM you know if you've asked enough to satisfy FD and DAM. The notes have been posted here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2009/07/msg00034.html I think that the main thing that can be extracted from the notes to answer your question is this one: - common sense is more effective that you'd imagine I'm neither part of FD nor DAM, but that was IIRC the consensus during the BOF. A couple of weeks before this discussion, I was talking about this same topic with Mako, who stopped by for some days in Mexico (and who I am adding as a Cc: in case he does not follow -newmaint). He strongly stressed that he never follows the template questions, and I found his position quite sound. Although more time-consuming and engaging for the AM (and possibly for FD+DAM at the review, as they would not be familiar at all with the topics discussed), engaging in a true conversation leading to find the weakest -or most interesting- spots in an applicant's PP and TS. Mako told me he used to push people to stay away from templates, but is less pushy nowadays as he is less active/visible here. He told me he would publish (at least in an AM-visible way) a couple of his mail interchanges — I believe we can learn a bit from that approach. So, this mail is basically to push him to do so :) -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 pgpo5bUxLfu08.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Proposed patches for NM templates
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz dijo [Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:07:21PM -0300]: Why? I happily researched all the questions during the NM process before writing my responses, even for the questions i felt that i already had answers to. It was an opportunity to conduct a deliberate exploration of useful details, led by a helpful guide. I just bad expressed myself here. I meant questions I would *only* be able to say something about if I did a research. In other words, I think it's important to give the AM my previous/current experiences, even if it's next to zero. Imagine I've written in my first NM email I want to become a DD because I want to package libraries. Then I answer in a good way all the questions regarding libraries - by doing some research, because I've never did it before. So, don't you think is missing something here? For someone who wants to become a DD mainly to work in i18n infrastrucure, it would be ok just knowing the nice steps for packaging libraries. For prospective library packagers, it's not enough IMO. However, the questions by themselves don't make any difference between the one who knows and the one who really knows by previous experiences a given subject. Ummm... Well, you are supposed to get to the questions _after_ verifying the applicant is already contributing in a meaningful way to Debian. So far, part of what I do prior to getting to PP is to check their current activity and to talk with at least one person they have interacted with to see how their technical work is. -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: New Debian Developers
Bernd Zeimetz dijo [Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 12:21:39AM +0200]: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm happy to announce that the following applicants have recently completed the New Maintainer process and are now Debian Developers: Yay! Special congratulations from my part to Francisco García Claramonte (francisco), as he is the first person to go through my (possibly lacking) actuation as an AM, and to Raphael Geissert (geissert), an admirable and bright connational, the fourth Mexican DD (and the second that currently lives in the country). And, of course, congratulations to the rest of you! Welcome on board! -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: AM report for Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com
Enrico Zini dijo [Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 01:03:50PM +0200]: Hello, 1. Identification Account Data First name: Ryan Last name: Niebur (...) 3. Philosophy and Procedures - Ryan has a good understanding of Debian's philosophy and procedures and answered all my questions about the social contract, DFSG, BTS, etc. in a good way. Ryan committed to uphold the SC and DFSG in his Debian work and accepts the DMUP. 4. Tasks and Skills --- Ryan has a good understanding of the technical side of Debian. Ryan is an active member of the Debian Perl group. Ryan is maintainer of a staggering amount of packages (sponsored by all sorts of people). I'll avoid copying and pasting here his large DDPO page: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ryanryan52%40gmail.comcomaint=yes I have checked ack-grep, apt-listbugs, crip, inosync, libbackgroundrb-ruby, mergelog, storebackup and xli and they are all in good shape. Ryan also answered my other questions regarding TS without problems. I did not bother asking him to create patches for RC bugs because I judged that he has fixed more than enough already in the past and I did not want to make him waste unnecessary time. 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Ryan as a Debian Developer. I completely second this recommendation and hope Ryan's account is promptly created. He is a very active and communicative member of the Perl and Ruby teams, and will become an important asset to Debian1 -- Gunnar Wolf • gw...@gwolf.org • (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 pgp0XQfJsIVxc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Intent to become a Debian Maintainer
Ryan Niebur dijo [Fri, May 15, 2009 at 08:32:17AM -0700]: This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer URL:http://wiki.debian.org/Maintainers. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. My GnuPG key F69C6AC5 is signed by the Debian Developer Lantz Moore. I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your attention. I fully support Ryan being admitted as a DM. He is very active in the pkg-perl and pkg-ruby-extras group, and I'm sure he will be a good gain for Debian. -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgpOQnkP7LhXA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Debian maintainer application for Angel Abad
Angel Abad (Ikusnet SLL) dijo [Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:41:11PM +0200]: Hello, This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer URL:http://wiki.debian.org/Maintainers. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. Currently, I maintain the packages almanah and I co‐maintain the packages libautodie-perl, libconfig-scoped-perl, libdata-report-perl, libjson-perl, libjson-xs-perl, libsvn-hooks-perl and libsvn-look-perl. My GnuPG key EE3BC279 is signed by the Debian Developer Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org. I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your attention. Thanks! Hi, I have been in communication with Ángel. He has not been involved in the community side of Debian (I have invited him to become more active in the lists/channels), but is a dilligent maintainer. He has applied for the NM process, and was almost-advocated by Amaya¹. He approached me for this same purpose, and I requested him to get more involved in Debian first, both by becoming more active in the pkg-perl group and by acting as a DM first. So, I fully support Ángel's request to become a DM. ¹ Who could not perform this task due to technical factors not relevant to this discussion -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgpigijLbMpQF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Why 0 new developer? (Re: NM Report for Week Ending 15 Mar 2009)
Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:36:14PM +0100]: Why any people cannot become a new Debian Developer in these days? What is the bottleneck for that, or there is any reason? We needs more and more developers, I think. # but I don't want to blame someone. Just want to know why and how to solve it. Check https://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php: 39 applicants are currently waiting for an application manager. To help those, new AMs need to be recruited amongst the DDs, or existing AMs need to take more applications. Just as a side note here... I recently gave my NM to FrontDesk for evaluation, so I am free to take one more NM. I am basically waiting for the powers that be to assign one to me - but I understand the system running it all might prefer to wait until FD says my AM process was fine. I know I won't respond in due time if I increase my number of applicants. So, FD humans: Send another victim my way. Or tell me to increase my threshold and later decrease it :) -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Why 0 new developer? (Re: NM Report for Week Ending 15 Mar 2009)
Ďoďo dijo [Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:31:58PM +0100]: Another question Patrick, Real example: More then year ago I applied to become Debian developer. After some time I got answer that rule has change and I need to maintain at least to packages and I should wait for 1 year. My question is: Why should I come after 1 year again? I continue to maintain my 2 packages, I do not try any more to become debian developer and I want to become maintainer just not to ask always someone else to upload packages for me. I do not have too much time, and since process takes long time, I will may be decide to rather disturb always someone else to upload the latest version of my packages rather then to answer another question I got during my application processing. It is not optimal, but I do not like processes :) And that's great! Do not see it as a rejection: Yes, you were not deemed ready to become part of Debian back then. Maybe you would now - But being part of Debian is not just uploading packages... A couple of years ago we didn't have DM (which, although is often criticized, _does_ solve problems such as this one). Being a DD requires more involvement and idetification with the project than wanting to directly upload software. So, nothing bad in being happy with being just a DM. It is a great contribution! (And yes, I do think we should try and get more profiles besides DM and DD, for different sets of tasks) Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Why 0 new developer? (Re: NM Report for Week Ending 15 Mar 2009)
Hideki Yamane dijo [Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:22:12PM +0900]: Weekly Summary Statistics = 2 more people applied to become a new maintainer 0 applicants became maintainers. Why any people cannot become a new Debian Developer in these days? What is the bottleneck for that, or there is any reason? We needs more and more developers, I think. Well... Time to put on my old person hat :) When I joined the project (2003 - I did NM for slightly over a year, starting at the end of 2001), there was a perception of a big waiting period after the checks were in place. This feeling (I think :) ) grew over the following year or two. And yes, ~2005 we saw many important changes in how the accounts were created, the people and steps involved in the process. NM is far from perfect, as it has already been said, but it is what we have. And FWIW, we have improved it quite a bit. As for we needs more and more developers... I tend to disagree. We need developers to be better. We need motivated people to join, and demotivated people to leave. It is not about being more - it is about being better. -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
AM report for Francisco Garcí a Claramonte
Name: francisco Email Address:franciscomanuel.gar...@hispalinux.es 3. Philosophy and Procedures - Francisco has a good understanding of our philosophy and procedures, and answered to the questions in a satisfactory way. He agrees to uphold the SC and DFSG, as well as the DMUP. We exchanged several rounds of mail on this subject, and I can completely state that he knows our documents and our philosophy well enough to play as part of the team. I tried some tricky ellaborations, and he answered them correctly. 4. Tasks and Skills --- Francisco is no newbie in Debian packaging, as he has maintained several packages (via sponsorship) for quite some time. He currently maintains five packages [1] (and has one, drgeo, pending for adoption, with the previous maintainer's blessing, having performed two NMUs on it), in very good shape. Going over his TS replies has been an interesting process. Although, as expected, there were some precisions to be made - But I can clearly state he has performed very well in this area. 5. Recommendation - I fully recommend Francisco to be accepted as a Debian Developer. [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=franciscomanuel.garcia%40hispalinux.es -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@iiec.unam.mx - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF - End forwarded message - -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgp1T21wMf2R3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: AM report for Xavier Oswald
Kari Pahula dijo [Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 03:14:24AM +0200]: Report for new developer applicant Xavier Oswald x.osw...@free.fr: (...) 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Xavier Oswald as a Debian Developer. Me too. He has been a pkg-perl team member for quite a bit, and I fully recommend him to be acceepted as well. -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgp6QXkYsV33r.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: AM report for Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org
Steffen Joeris dijo [Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:23:54PM +0100]: Report for new developer applicant Asheesh Laroia ashe...@asheesh.org 5. Recommendation - I recommend to accept Asheesh as a Debian Developer. I have not worked with Asheesh in Debian, but met him at DebConf9, and -at least from the PP, Debian-ideological side- I am happy to see him also on this boat. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgpd01UlVgt01.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: DM application for Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz dijo [Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:35:56AM -0300]: Hi, This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer. I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them. (...) My GnuPG key is signed by many DDs since I've joined some key sigining parties in past Debconfs. Otavio Salvador (otavio) has been sponsoring my packages for more than 2 years, so he can write about my technical skills on packaging. I've worked with Daniel Baumann (daniel) on live helper, who is also my advocate in NM process. Maybe he can express a bit about me for DM process. They are both receiving a CC of this email. Like Holger, I will leave aside the technical recommendations for Otavio and Daniel - But I also wish to support Tiago's (IMHO long due!) application. He has been active in Debian for many years already, active and involved in various of DebConf's organization activities, and clearly identifies himself with the project. Reading he is finally stepping ahead to become officially part of Debian, although only as a DM for now, is great news. -- Gunnar Wolf - gw...@gwolf.org - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgpgwDNTKHCqU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: former DD
Nathan Hawkins dijo [Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 04:30:32PM -0400]: Ok. Can someone tell me why exactly I'm in removed-keys instead of emeritus? I suspect that it's because I retired from Debian before the emeritus status existed. Nathan If I understand correctly, it might be because you didn't properly retire from Debian (i.e. you didn't inform the project with a signed mail), but was found as inactive and missing. If you _did_ announce your retirement, do you remember when was this? Even better, do you have the message ID, so we can find it quickly in the archives? Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: former DD
Nathan Hawkins dijo [Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:15:46PM -0400]: I did announce it, but I believe I did that on -private. I suppose it should have been debian-devel, and it should have been signed. :-( There is a copy that I had forwarded to debian-bsd here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2004/08/msg7.html As for being missing, I'm not aware of any attempts to contact me, and my email address has not changed since the mid-90's. It's OK if it's sent to -private, that's the usual way. It should have been signed. But, well, having this mail... Is as far as I can get. Anyway, it's refered on the thread (: -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DM application for Xavier Oswald
Hi, As Xavier said, I recommend him as a DM (and invite him to push harder, as I'd like to see him become a DD later on, of course). Xavier is an active member of the pkg-perl group (I'm Cc:ing this message to our list, in case somebody wants to add or correct something I say). He has prepared several packages, mostly regarding authentication schemes in Perl (not all of them are listed in his QA page [1] due to an internal reorganization decision [2] that we ended up reverting in the pkg-perl group - Sorry, Xavier!). Basically, all of the Authen::Simple modules are his. His packages are well maintained - I recognize parted might be a hard package. Looking a bit into his activities, he has been active in Debian for at least two years - He was involved into an alternate partitioning tool for d-i [3], although the project is mostly stalled (he was working on this with svenl). Still, I see he is co-maintaining parted, so there is indication of continuing interest. He is one of the founders of the Debian France non-profit [4]. So, once again, I fully recommend him. Greetings, [1] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]comaint=yes [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2008/01/msg00156.html [3] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/GUI and http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/06/msg01358.html [4] http://blog.technologeek.org/2006/07/07/28 -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgpuIGMJz9KJW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: DM applicant Filipe Lautert
Filipe dijo [Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:47:44AM -0200]: after talking with one of my packages sponsor, and knowing that they are very busy at the moment and that if I could upload packages it would relief them of some work, I´m applying to DM. I´m also in the NM process and this is a shortcut to some rights that I want to have as a DD. So, I acknowledge and agree to the Debian Social Contract, the Debian Free Software guidelines, and the Debian Machine Usage Policies. I'll wait for a recommendation of one of my sponsors to fill a bug against debian-maintainers. I have worked with Filipe as part of the pkg-ruby-extras team. He is very enthusiastic, and technically very good. Of course, as he is still a relative newcomer to Debian, every now and then his packaging do need a minor tuning - but I'm sure Debian will be better off having him as a maintainer than having him act through sponsors. For the record, since we started working together, Filipe became upstream of one of the most important and popular packages he maintains in the group (Mongrel, a Ruby-based HTTP application server). Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF pgpphzPPL3KX4.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: AM Report for Gunnar Wolf
Hi Report for new developer applicant Gunnar Wolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: (...) Great! :-D -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-1118 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF