On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 03:36:25PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Sure: https://salsa.debian.org/jmtd/policy/merge_requests/1
>
> (MR #1? Wow)
You did the MR against your own fork instead of the original project ;)
(and the salsa project is not configured to accept MRs, so I suppose
Sean means
On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 03:53:43PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
On Mon 09 Jul 2018 at 03:16PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. I've run it, but I had to make a minor
adjustment because it was undercounting: the DEP-5 rules are such that
a a version suffix 4.0 and 4 are
On Mon, 09 Jul 2018 at 15:16:27 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> CC-BY-SA3.0 303
Note that some of those will be CC-BY-SA-3.0-US, some will be CC-BY-SA-3.0
Unported, and some might be a different (legally distinct) localization
(there are many).
Some uses of Creative Commons
Hello,
On Mon 09 Jul 2018 at 03:16PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. I've run it, but I had to make a minor
> adjustment because it was undercounting: the DEP-5 rules are such that
> a a version suffix 4.0 and 4 are equivalent. Adjusting the regexps
> (for CC 4.0 only.
On Thu, Jul 05, 2018 at 09:15:05PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
At least up until now, licenses haven't been added to the common
licenses list unless they are present in the archive a number of times
comparable to licenses that are already in common licenses.
There is a script in policy.git,
Hello Jonathan,
On Thu, Jul 05 2018, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Happy 3 years, bug!
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 06:44:36PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Thankfully, the 4.0 series of licenses only seem to have an
>> International version, although I don't know whether that will remain
>> true
Happy 3 years, bug!
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 06:44:36PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
Thankfully, the 4.0 series of licenses only seem to have an
International version, although I don't know whether that will remain
true forever.
Does anyone object to us proceeding for the 4.0 series of
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 at 18:41:08 +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
The Creative Commons licenses are quite popular for non-code files and
at least some of them are acknowledged to be DFSG-compatible since 3.0.
https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses only explicitly lists CC-BY-SA,
but I believe at least
8 matches
Mail list logo
