Re: Old World Mac mounting troubles

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:41:22PM -0700, Brian wrote: > If you have a old style plain hfs partition around that is good > because without hfs plus utils package may not be able to write > to hfs plus The hfsplus driver in a modern kernel can write to an HFS+ file system as long as it isn't journ

Re: Old World Mac mounting troubles

I recall dealing successfully with this issue. I think you had to go into the partitioning stage where it creates device nodes and then cancel the partitioning. But I also had a rescue cd which was Gentoo installer a live console. But recently a rescue option has been added to the Debian insta

Old World Mac mounting troubles

Hi all thanks for looking. I've installed Wheezy on a 9600 PPC (oldworld) using bootx and the network install cd, and I read while searching the list that I have to copy the kernel and init from the install to my hfs partition containing bootx in order to boot the system. What I've also read and t

Re: Problem seeing/mounting external firewire hard drives

using firewire for fancy stuff (video tapedeck device control) not just regular old FW HD mounting… Thanks again for any advice, - canton > Hi there, > First of all THANK YOU to everyone who is maintaining debian PowerPC. > I'm so happy to have my trusty old laptop back in use

Re: Problem seeing/mounting external firewire hard drives

nning 2.6.32-5-powerpc just great... except for mounting > firewire drives. Anyone here who can help? > > When I plug in an external firewire drive, I see the following > messages: > > Jun 26 21:49:14 debian kernel: [20282.231276] firewire_core: giving up > on confi

Problem seeing/mounting external firewire hard drives

Hi there, First of all THANK YOU to everyone who is maintaining debian PowerPC. I'm so happy to have my trusty old laptop back in use again. I've ressurected my Powerbook G3 pismo (actually a G4/500 upgrade) and it's running 2.6.32-5-powerpc just great... except for mounting

Re: mounting

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 17:40 -0500, caleb storms wrote: > first i'm sorry if this has been asked but i just joined the list. > > I'm running the latest stable build of debian on a ppc G4 and am unable > to write to any hfs+ drives. Altough I was able to and then it just > stopped although mtab tel

mounting

first i'm sorry if this has been asked but i just joined the list. I'm running the latest stable build of debian on a ppc G4 and am unable to write to any hfs+ drives. Altough I was able to and then it just stopped although mtab tells me it is mounted for rw i get the message that the drive is mo

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

> http://dev.gentoo.org/~josejx/diskdev_cmds-332.11.patch.bz2 which > applies to the latest version of the Apple source found here: > http://darwinsource.opendarwin.org/tarballs/apsl/diskdev_cmds-332.11.tar.gz > > It's still not 100% complete yet, checking if the partition is mounted > isn't do

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

David Moreno Garza wrote: On 16:03 Wed 04 Jan 2006, Florian E wrote: Jose Jezak already did. on bugs.gentoo.org is a ebuild, not included in gentoo's portage tree yet, but it works fine on my iBook G4 (unstable ppc-gentoo aka ~ppc). Where exactly? http://dev.gentoo.org/~josejx/diskdev_cm

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

> unable to mount it under Linux to perform the needed operations. It complains: > > HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only. Just to get a simpler map over here: You were mounting rw the iPod and then unplugged it without unmounting and then you could mount it but witho

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

On 16:03 Wed 04 Jan 2006, Florian E wrote: > Jose Jezak already did. on bugs.gentoo.org is a ebuild, not included in > gentoo's portage tree yet, but it works fine on my iBook G4 (unstable > ppc-gentoo aka ~ppc). Where exactly? -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.ne

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

I might be on the wrong track, but is journalling disabled? Because it should be. Just had a similar problem with a OSX hfsplus hard disk under linux... Kasper

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: If you are willing to disable the code that forces the read-only mount at linux kernel, I can send you a patch. The proper "fix" is for somebody to port to linux the hfsplus fsck program in darwin ... The licence is good enough for inclusion in linux distros. Ben

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

Jesus Climent wrote: > Otherwise, I am now using MacOSX to transfer things to my iPod. ¡Hola! I don't know if it possible (I've no iPod) but have you tryed to check and repair various times the iPod disk with the MacOS X disk utility? Yannick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

> If you are willing to disable the code that forces the read-only mount > at linux kernel, I can send you a patch. The proper "fix" is for somebody to port to linux the hfsplus fsck program in darwin ... The licence is good enough for inclusion in linux distros. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 11:45:36PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:40:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Greetings, Mr. Data! > > > > At this document, > > > > http://www.e-vse.com/csi/doc/hfs/Release%201.0A/HFS%20Provisional.pdf > > > > look for the WAKEUP command

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

I converted my HFS-formatted iPod to VFAT as soon as I got it, and it's worked reliably with Linux ever since. I don't use it with OSX regularly, but I just checked and iTunes at least sees its contents just fine. -- Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 07:40:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings, Mr. Data! > > At this document, > > http://www.e-vse.com/csi/doc/hfs/Release%201.0A/HFS%20Provisional.pdf > > look for the WAKEUP command. It says (quote): > > 'Certain parts of the HFS are necessarily single-thread

Re: HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

ins: > > HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only. > > I have tried to erase the whole thing by dd'ing /dev/zero to the device and > restoring the whole thing under Mac OS X, which has no troubles accessing and > modifying the filesystem, but which has no

HFS/HFS+ mounting problems: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only.

. It complains: HFS-fs: Filesystem is marked locked, mounting read-only. I have tried to erase the whole thing by dd'ing /dev/zero to the device and restoring the whole thing under Mac OS X, which has no troubles accessing and modifying the filesystem, but which has no references to the lock

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:52:56PM -0700, Kim Cascone wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2005, at 1:37 PM, Brad Boyer wrote: > > >The partition map doesn't have separate types for HFS and HFS+. > but what is odd is that gparted (gnome partition editor) *does* seem to > make a distinction between HFS and HFS+

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:55:20PM -0700, Kim Cascone wrote: > something interesting to note: > == > - gparted (gnome partition editor) describes my 9G OS X partition as > HFS+ > - fdisk describes the same part as a HFS Don't use fdisk, parted (and its derivative) is the way to go

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:52:56PM -0700, Kim Cascone wrote: > but what is odd is that gparted (gnome partition editor) *does* seem to > make a distinction between HFS and HFS+ -- so I assume it's looking at > the volume header? If it's accurate, it would have to do that. > how does one look at

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

On Sep 26, 2005, at 1:37 PM, Brad Boyer wrote: The partition map doesn't have separate types for HFS and HFS+. but what is odd is that gparted (gnome partition editor) *does* seem to make a distinction between HFS and HFS+ -- so I assume it's looking at the volume header? To tell the diff

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

On Sep 26, 2005, at 1:37 PM, Brad Boyer wrote: The partition map doesn't have separate types for HFS and HFS+. but what is odd is that gparted (gnome partition editor) *does* seem to make a distinction between HFS and HFS+ -- so I assume it's looking at the volume header? To tell the diff

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:55:20PM -0700, Kim Cascone wrote: > something interesting to note: > == > - gparted (gnome partition editor) describes my 9G OS X partition as > HFS+ > - fdisk describes the same part as a HFS > > also: > - fdisk describes my NewWorld boot part as 'NewWo

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

something interesting to note: == - gparted (gnome partition editor) describes my 9G OS X partition as HFS+ - fdisk describes the same part as a HFS also: - fdisk describes my NewWorld boot part as 'NewWorld bootblock' - gparted describes the same NewWorld bootblock part as a HF

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

Linux and OS X) make of it? I'm sorry, you are correct: the 300G is indeed an HFS+ drive formatted from a OS X machine... How did you partition and format the drive initially? using Disk Utils in OS X so again, why would mounting a HFS+ drive on a ext3 machine (Ubuntu PPC 5.04) make

Re: mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:13:06AM -0700, Kim Cascone wrote: > no one seemed to have an answer for this one so I am posting it again: > When I booted into Linux with my 300G HFS+ formatted backup drive > hanging off the iMac the drive came up and I could see all the .dmg > backups on it... > but

mounting a HFS drive on a Linux machine clobbers it?

no one seemed to have an answer for this one so I am posting it again: When I booted into Linux with my 300G HFS+ formatted backup drive hanging off the iMac the drive came up and I could see all the .dmg backups on it... but when I rebooted into OS X the HFS drive came up as unrecognized...WTF

Re: mounting mac partitions in linux

thanks jason kahn just install the hfs tools and then mount them Dean jason kahn wrote: hello i wanted to have my mac partitions appear on the desktop when i am in debian. how can this be done? thanks. best regards jason kahn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Re: mounting mac partitions in linux

just install the hfs tools and then mount them Dean jason kahn wrote: hello i wanted to have my mac partitions appear on the desktop when i am in debian. how can this be done? thanks. best regards jason kahn -- WWW: http://dean.bong.com.au LAN: http://www.bong.com.au EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTEC

mounting mac partitions in linux

hello i wanted to have my mac partitions appear on the desktop when i am in debian. how can this be done? thanks. best regards jason kahn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mounting CF card

> I just bought the new Canon Digital Rebel XT 350D, and I want to know how I > can mount a CompactFlash card (Lexar 1GB 80x). I need help mounting the CF > card, and also want to know if there are any reliable apps for converting You want to mount the card while it's inside the ca

Re: Mounting CF card

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 05:30:59AM -0400, Nathan Thrower wrote: > I read the man for mount, and even specifying a mount point yielded the same > results. I should have mentioned that in my email. > > Digicam fails to autodetect my camera, and even specifying its location on > the USB port fails

Re: Mounting CF card

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think (but I'm not sure at all...) that it should be treated like an usb-pen device, i.e. you have to mount it as your first scsi disk available (if you don't have any scsi disk it will become sda (sda1 for first partition if you have previously form

Mounting CF card

I just bought the new Canon Digital Rebel XT 350D, and I want to know how I can mount a CompactFlash card (Lexar 1GB 80x). I need help mounting the CF card, and also want to know if there are any reliable apps for converting RAW image files. I'm running Debian Sarge on an Apple PowerBook G

Re: mounting...

: But now: After doing a mount -t hfsplus /dev/sda10/hfs or mount -o rw -t hfsplus /dev/sda10/hfs I get: HFS+-fs-warning: Filesystem was not cleanly unmounted, running fsck.hfsplus is recommended. mounting read-only I can read from this disk - but not write. How can I obtain fsck.hfsplus

mounting...

unmounted, running fsck.hfsplus is recommended. mounting read-only I can read from this disk - but not write. How can I obtain fsck.hfsplus for a i386 debian (kernel 2.4.27) ? - It's not on my machine. Or is there another way of resolving this - mount -o rw,remount /dev/sda14 leave

Re: Problems mounting HFS+ partitions for writing

On 08 Feb 2005 at 21h02, Till Schmalmack wrote: Hi, > Does this still hold true? I checked the changelog of the latest > hfsplus > version plus_1.0.4-7/changelog>, but could not find any direct hints according > to this issue in the

Re: Problems mounting HFS+ partitions for writing

Hi, On 26-Jan-2004 Jens Schmalzing wrote <http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2004/01/msg00988.html>: More importantly, the HFS+ driver itself still likes to eat file systems from time to time. Mounting HFS+ partitions read-only seems like a prudent thing to do in any case. Does this

Re: mounting msdos flash cards

On 19/01/2005 at 13:48 -0800, Adam Done wrote: > That worked perfectly. Now I noticed that depending on what is pluged > in first and or at start up such as a firewire drive or the compact > flash card, the first one probed gets sda. So in my fstab file I set > things for sda or sde which is lis

Re: mounting msdos flash cards

On 19/01/2005 at 13:48 -0800, Adam Done wrote: > That worked perfectly. Now I noticed that depending on what is pluged > in first and or at start up such as a firewire drive or the compact > flash card, the first one probed gets sda. So in my fstab file I set > things for sda or sde which is lis

Re: mounting msdos flash cards

On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 23:10 +0200, Juha-Matti Tapio wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:08:04PM -0800, Adam Done wrote: > > # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x > > > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda, > >missing codepage or other error > >In some cases use

Re: mounting msdos flash cards

Le Mercredi, 19 Janvier 2005 22.08, Adam Done a écrit : > I have been trying to mount flash cards and found out they are msdos > formated. But when I mount > > # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x > Try with /dev/sda1 or /dev/sda2 ... Good luck > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /de

[Fwd: Re: mounting msdos flash cards]

Adam Done wrote: I have been trying to mount flash cards and found out they are msdos formated. But when I mount # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in s

Re: mounting msdos flash cards

On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:08:04PM -0800, Adam Done wrote: > # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda, >missing codepage or other error >In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >dmesg | tail or so How abo

mounting msdos flash cards

I have been trying to mount flash cards and found out they are msdos formated. But when I mount # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try d

Re: mounting msdos flash cards

On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 23:10 +0200, Juha-Matti Tapio wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:08:04PM -0800, Adam Done wrote: > > # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x > > > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda, > >missing codepage or other error > >In some cases use

Re: mounting msdos flash cards

Le Mercredi, 19 Janvier 2005 22.08, Adam Done a écrit : > I have been trying to mount flash cards and found out they are msdos > formated. But when I mount > > # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x > Try with /dev/sda1 or /dev/sda2 ... Good luck > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /de

[Fwd: Re: mounting msdos flash cards]

Adam Done wrote: I have been trying to mount flash cards and found out they are msdos formated. But when I mount # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog

Re: mounting msdos flash cards

On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:08:04PM -0800, Adam Done wrote: > # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda, >missing codepage or other error >In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >dmesg | tail or so How abo

mounting msdos flash cards

I have been trying to mount flash cards and found out they are msdos formated. But when I mount # mount -t msdos /dev/sda /mnt/x mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda, missing codepage or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try d

Re: Problems mounting HFS+ partitions for writing

On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 16:01, Sebastian Henschel wrote: > hello rick... > > * Rick Buitenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-26 15:54 +0100]: > > Several Gentoo ppc users (including myself) are reporting the problem of > > suddenly only being able to mount their hfs+ partitions read-only. [...] > we

Re: Problems mounting HFS+ partitions for writing

and their experimental Linux and FreeBSD ports. > Remounting only seems to work in some cases. > Fixing the partition from OSX doesn't solve the problem. > The partition remains writable under OSX directly and via MOL. More importantly, the HFS+ driver itself still likes to eat file

Re: Problems mounting HFS+ partitions for writing

hello rick... * Rick Buitenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-26 15:54 +0100]: > Several Gentoo ppc users (including myself) are reporting the problem of > suddenly only being able to mount their hfs+ partitions read-only. > > dmesg says: > HFS+-fs warning: Filesystem was not cleanly unmounted, run

Problems mounting HFS+ partitions for writing

Several Gentoo ppc users (including myself) are reporting the problem of suddenly only being able to mount their hfs+ partitions read-only. dmesg says: HFS+-fs warning: Filesystem was not cleanly unmounted, running fsck.hfsplus is recommended. leaving read-only A little googling tells me this pro

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 09:21:32PM +0100, Sebastian D.B. Krause wrote: > Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe MOL is compiled without Large File Support? Can anybody confirm > > this? If so, this could be why you are getting the errors. > > Well, the question is: How can I compile MO

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 02:00:51PM +0100, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote: >> How can I find which value is too large and what the maximum value is? > > Maybe MOL is compiled without Large File Support? Can anybody confirm > this? If so, this could be why you ar

Solved: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

Selon Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wednesday 24 Dec 2003 4:58 pm, Graham Wilson wrote: > > Maybe MOL is compiled without Large File Support? Can anybody > > confirm this? If so, this could be why you are getting the errors. > > Yes, I recall that, now that you mention it. I have made a

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

On Wednesday 24 Dec 2003 4:58 pm, Graham Wilson wrote: > Maybe MOL is compiled without Large File Support? Can anybody confirm > this? If so, this could be why you are getting the errors. Yes, I recall that, now that you mention it. -- Lee.

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 02:00:51PM +0100, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote: > I've got the following error on the console when MOL mounts the disks: > - MOL console > > > CD /dev/cdrom CDROM -- BOOT1 > fstat: Value too large for defined data type > fstat: Value too la

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

On Wednesday 24 Dec 2003 2:58 pm, Josh Lauricha wrote: > I am just now starting to play with linux on powerpc's, so I've never > setup MOL. But my expectation is you need to make a loopback device for > MOL to use. Its been a while sence I've done that but its something > like: No, MOL understands

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

On Wed 12/24/03 15:39, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote: > # hformat /home/mol/macosx > hformat: /home/mol/macosx: error opening medium (File too large) > > 3GB is too much for ext3? I am just now starting to play with linux on powerpc's, so I've never setup MOL. But my expectation is you need to make a

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

On Wednesday 24 Dec 2003 2:39 pm, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote: > # hformat /home/mol/macosx > hformat: /home/mol/macosx: error opening medium (File too large) > > 3GB is too much for ext3? You're formatting a file as an HFS filesystem. I think the limit is 2Gig (but I gather there's no real reason

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

Selon Joe Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 02:00:51PM +0100, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote: > > So I have created a 3GB file with (home/ has an ext3 filesystem): > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/mol/macosx bs=3k count=1M > > This file is not mounted when I try to start MOL. > >

Re: error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 02:00:51PM +0100, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to install MOL with Mac OS X on my Titanium G4, the reason is > my employer gave me a Palm Tungsten T3 but it's too new so I cannot > synchronise it and I need Mac OS... > > I have no free partition to creat

error mounting empty file as disk with MOL

Hi, I'm trying to install MOL with Mac OS X on my Titanium G4, the reason is my employer gave me a Palm Tungsten T3 but it's too new so I cannot synchronise it and I need Mac OS... I have no free partition to create a HFS+ volume, I removed all that was related to Mac OS when I got the PowerBook.

Re: Mounting CDROM

On Tuesday 25 November 2003 07:31, Harvey Ussery wrote: > In /etc/fstab the line for /cdrom is: > /dev/cdrom/cdromiso9960ro,user,noauto00 > im newbie also, it worked for me changing /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdc then i had to trahs the old cd-rom icon from the KDE destop and creat

Mounting CD-ROM: Thanks!

Thanks to John, Ricky, and others for their insights & suggestions about getting my CD-ROM drive to mount. As usual, it wasn't any one thing that was the magic bullet, but all together--plus of course much thrashing about thru the documentation--that finally put together a correct config. It's

Re: [shenlug] Mounting CDROM

Does the /cdrom directory exist? Try the following and see what you get: mount /dev/cdrom /cdrom -Ricky On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Harvey Ussery wrote: > I've just installed DebianPPC3.0(Woody) on an 833Mhz iMac 17"LCD. I > cannot mount cdrom drive. > > In /dev/cdrom the link to cdrom shows as: >

Re: [shenlug] Mounting CDROM

Hey Harvey, Try this from a console : dmesg | grep hd This will search the boot up messages for anything with an hd and display it. This should help you with troubleshooting the problem. I attached a copy of my machines output for reference. JP Harvey Ussery wrote: I've just installed Debia

Re: Mounting CDROM

On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 07:31:09AM -0500, Harvey Ussery wrote: > I've just installed DebianPPC3.0(Woody) on an 833Mhz iMac 17"LCD. I > cannot mount cdrom drive. > > In /dev/cdrom the link to cdrom shows as: > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root3 Nov 21 11:50 cdrom -> hdb > and hdb shows as: > br

Mounting CDROM

I've just installed DebianPPC3.0(Woody) on an 833Mhz iMac 17"LCD. I cannot mount cdrom drive. In /dev/cdrom the link to cdrom shows as: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root3 Nov 21 11:50 cdrom -> hdb and hdb shows as: brw-rw 1 root disk 3, 64 Mar 14 2002 hdb In /etc/fstab the lin

Re: mounting old ext2 - "does not exist"

> > How can I get the debian system to recognize an SuSE ppc ext2 partition? > > Adding a line to /etc/fstab doesn't seem to work: > > /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse ext2 defaults > > I assume that changing the partition-type erases the data associated > with it. If done using mac-fdisk it doesn't. Just chang

Re: mounting old ext2 - "does not exist"

This is pretty confusing; can you post the results of mac-fdisk -l and mount /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse ? sure... (sorry for the confusion) debian2:~# mount /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse mount: mount point /oldsuse does not exist As Rogerio says, mkdir /oldsuse So, just possibly, you can use

Re: mounting old ext2 - "does not exist"

On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 02:50:04AM -0700, Torben Brosten wrote: > Chris Tillman wrote: > > >This is pretty confusing; can you post the results of > > > >mac-fdisk -l > >and > >mount /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse > >? > > > sure... (sorry for the confusion) > > debian2:~# mount /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse > mount: mo

Re: mounting old ext2 - "does not exist"

On Jun 08 2003, Torben Brosten wrote: > debian2:~# mount /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse > mount: mount point /oldsuse does not exist So, first you'll have to create the mount point (mkdir /blah). Then, use something like: mount -t ext2 /dev/correct_partition /blah > debian2:~# mac-fdi

Re: mounting old ext2 - "does not exist"

Chris Tillman wrote: This is pretty confusing; can you post the results of mac-fdisk -l and mount /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse ? sure... (sorry for the confusion) debian2:~# mount /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse mount: mount point /oldsuse does not exist debian2:~# mac-fdisk -l /dev/hda #

Re: mounting old ext2 - "does not exist"

On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 08:11:31PM -0700, Torben Brosten wrote: > Hi, > > How can I get the debian system to recognize an SuSE ppc ext2 partition? > Adding a line to /etc/fstab doesn't seem to work: > /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse ext2 defaults > > On a BWG3, have a partition table that looks like (ref,

Re: mounting old ext2 - "does not exist"

How can I get the debian system to recognize an SuSE ppc ext2 partition? Adding a line to /etc/fstab doesn't seem to work: /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse ext2 defaults I assume that changing the partition-type erases the data associated with it. Since the complete SuSE is still installed on hdb, I'm g

mounting old ext2 - "does not exist"

Hi, How can I get the debian system to recognize an SuSE ppc ext2 partition? Adding a line to /etc/fstab doesn't seem to work: /dev/hdb8 /oldsuse ext2 defaults On a BWG3, have a partition table that looks like (ref, type): (misc apple partitions omitted) # hda has debian and macos installed

Re: kernel bug while mounting hfs cdrom

On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 12:54:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have got a CD lying around that is reportedly burned for > MAC; so I tried to mount it as follows: > > the bug seems to occur in fs/buffer.c, after the > assertion: > /* Size must be multiple of hard sectorsize */ >

kernel bug while mounting hfs cdrom

hej, I have got a CD lying around that is reportedly burned for MAC; so I tried to mount it as follows: mount -t hfs /dev/cdrom /mnt/ I then got a fancy kernel error message: kernel BUG at buffer.c:2501! vector: 0 at pc = c0042984, lr = c0042984 msr = 9032, sp = c4833d10 [c4833c58] current = c4

Re: Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro

Wow, that was easy thank you for your help. :) - Original Message - From: "Jan Govaere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Kevin Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "debian-ppc" Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:24 AM Subject: Re: Mounting Debian Partition

Re: Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro

Kevin Smith wrote: Can someone tell me if it is possible to mount a filesystem from Debian 3.0r1 (powerpc) into Windows 2000 Pro? Windows 2000 Pro on powerpc? What's that? Do you mean something like Samba share? Regards -- Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "\"Programmer\""

Re: Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro

On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:51:21AM -, Kevin Smith wrote: > Hi All, Yes, this is crosspost. > > Can someone tell me if it is possible to mount a filesystem from Debian > 3.0r1 (powerpc) into Windows 2000 Pro? > > If so, can you give me step-by-step instructions, > or point me in the right di

Re: Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro

It is not specific ti debian-ppc but I answer. You got to install samba on your debian. Change your /etc/samba/smb.conf (lot of examples on the web) After that you can connect to your debian with //IP/Name_of_shared_dir That's all. Hey guy ! You have to read the man pages ! :-) ; /etc/samba/sm

Re: Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro

On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 09:51, Kevin Smith wrote: > Hi All, > > Can someone tell me if it is possible to mount a filesystem from Debian > 3.0r1 (powerpc) into Windows 2000 Pro? > > If so, can you give me step-by-step instructions, or point me in the right > direction, on how to do this? Do

Mounting Debian Partition in Windows 2000 Pro

Hi All, Can someone tell me if it is possible to mount a filesystem from Debian 3.0r1 (powerpc) into Windows 2000 Pro? If so, can you give me step-by-step instructions, or point me in the right direction, on how to do this? Thanks, Kevin

Re: mounting hfs+

On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:21:08 +0200 (CEST) Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I use an hfs partition to exchange. There is no code which safely > > > handles hfs+. > > > > > Note that the hfs support is quite unstable, mainly in writing. > > I already got several kernel errors :-( > >

Re: mounting hfs+

> > I use an hfs partition to exchange. There is no code which safely > > handles hfs+. > > > Note that the hfs support is quite unstable, mainly in writing. > I already got several kernel errors :-( So use hfsutils. For that matter, use hfsplusutils. Works like mtools (volume not mounted system-w

Re: mounting hfs+

On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 08:07:16 -0700 "Chris Tillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use an hfs partition to exchange. There is no code which safely > handles hfs+. > Note that the hfs support is quite unstable, mainly in writing. I already got several kernel errors :-( Pierre

Re: mounting hfs+

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 03:08:06PM +0200, Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to mount two partitions; first one is hfs, without system, > and mount -t hfs /dev/hda12 /mac -r > works. > Same thing on hda13 leads to a /mac containing only some files, > and no directory... Is it becau

Re: mounting hfs+

On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: > I tried to mount two partitions; first one is hfs, without system, > and mount -t hfs /dev/hda12 /mac -r > works. > Same thing on hda13 leads to a /mac containing only some files, > and no directory... Is it because it holds a System dir ? > or i

mounting hfs+

Hello, I tried to mount two partitions; first one is hfs, without system, and mount -t hfs /dev/hda12 /mac -r works. Same thing on hda13 leads to a /mac containing only some files, and no directory... Is it because it holds a System dir ? or is it a hfs+ volume ? How do you proceed to exchange d

Re: Problems mounting cdrom

On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 03:59:27PM -0700, Greg Howland wrote: > I'm trying to mount the cdrom on a PowerBook G3 Lombard, > running Testing. When I enter the command 'mount /dev/cdrom' > I get the error 'mount: special device /dev/cdrom does not exist'. > I have an entry for it in /etc/fstab. What e

Problems mounting cdrom

I'm trying to mount the cdrom on a PowerBook G3 Lombard, running Testing. When I enter the command 'mount /dev/cdrom' I get the error 'mount: special device /dev/cdrom does not exist'. I have an entry for it in /etc/fstab. What else needs to be done? -- Greg _

Re: Mounting ext3 in Darwin

On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:04:10PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Gday again, > > I am in some desperate need of help. I've been looking on the net for a > solution, but to no avail. If anyone can point me in the direction of a link, > it'd be much appreciated. > > Basically, I have somehow

  1   2   >