On Mon, September 23, 2013 14:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Did you tag them 'gift'?
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/GiftTag
This may just be me, as it's very personal, and no offense intended at
you, but I really detest the name 'gift' of that tag and that prevents me
from using it.
Tagging
On Sep 24, 2013 2:37 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, September 23, 2013 14:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Did you tag them 'gift'?
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/GiftTag
This may just be me, as it's very personal, and no offense intended at
you, but I really detest
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Its not just you - while I appreciate using a word other than bitesized or
low-hanging-fruit, I tend to get the same slightly off putting feeling
about gift
Not to bikeshead.
So, folks, what do you propose instead? :)
If the
On 24/09/13 at 08:37 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, September 23, 2013 14:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Did you tag them 'gift'?
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/GiftTag
This may just be me, as it's very personal, and no offense intended at
you, but I really detest the name 'gift'
On Sep 24, 2013 8:03 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Its not just you - while I appreciate using a word other than bitesized
or
low-hanging-fruit, I tend to get the same slightly off putting feeling
about gift
debian-love? :P
On 24/09/13 14:02, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Its not just you - while I appreciate using a word other than bitesized or
low-hanging-fruit, I tend to get the same slightly off putting feeling
about gift
Not to
On 24/09/13 14:09, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Sep 24, 2013 8:03 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org
mailto:z...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Its not just you - while I appreciate using a word other than
bitesized or
Hi,
We will have a DPL helpers meeting on wednesday:
2013-09-25 17:00 UTC (date -d @1380128400) on #debian-dpl
Titanpad with agenda: http://titanpad.com/debiandpl-20130925 (Please
update the status of your action items before the meeting if possible)
Lucas
-- copy of the agenda
Btw, i didnt exaclty came up with debian-love myself
https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeLove
On 24/09/13 14:05, Alberto Fuentes wrote:
debian-love? :P
On 24/09/13 14:02, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Its not just you - while I
On 24/09/13 at 14:46 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 24/09/13 14:09, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Sep 24, 2013 8:03 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org
mailto:z...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Its not just you - while I
On 24/09/13 16:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/09/13 at 14:46 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 24/09/13 14:09, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Sep 24, 2013 8:03 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org
mailto:z...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On 09/24/2013 05:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/09/13 at 14:46 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 24/09/13 14:09, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Sep 24, 2013 8:03 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org
mailto:z...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:51:53AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:41:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/09/13 at 14:46 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Can we use a word that is neutral and obvious?
Maybe trivial-to-fix or something like that?
Wouldn't new contributors feel bad if they can't fix a trivial-to-fix
bug?
We
I think the original intent of gift was that fixing the bug would be a
welcome and happy gift to the maintainer, rather than that the bug was a
gift to the person fixing it from the maintainer. But I agree that
doesn't come across all that clearly.
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
14 matches
Mail list logo
