On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 16:12 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Versioneer is meant to simplify version tracking for the developer;
> it supports a number of authoritative sources such as "git
> describe" to determine the current version number. There are two
> modes of operation:
>
> - in developer
Hello,
I've read more into versioneer, and it turns out with the way it works
you can't simply remove versioneer.py from the source, much less
_version.py. Therefore, I'm excluding _version.py in d/copyright, then
replacing it with the much smaller PyPI version in d/patches, and not
touching
> Sandro: you managed the numpy transition, it seems. What is involved
> in something like this? I would imagine something like:
>
> (1) Upload pytest 7.x to experimental
i took care of this just now, uploading pytest/7.1.2 to experimental
(and i've messed up the branches on salsa, so i've
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 03:59:22PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > As far as I understand it, this file is used by the author of the
> > > program, not end users. I don't understand it well, though, because I
> > > haven't put much time into researching what versioneer even does.
> > > If my
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:47:14AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> >>> _version.py is not a copy of versioneer, it's *generated* by versioneer.
> >>> However, there is versioneer.py in the root directory, which is. I'll
> >>> exclude that from the source and repack.
> >>
> >> hmm... how about
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yao Wei (魏銘廷)
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-fo...@lists.debian.org,
debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-openstep-plist
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : The FontTools Organization
* URL :
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 10:51:08AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> It seems to me that generated files shouldn't be shipped as part of the
> source we distributed to users. Those files should be (re)generated at
> build time.
Ah, I understand you better now. Debian is full of generated files
On 2022-06-07 15:44:28, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:47:33AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> On 2022-06-07 07:11:15, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > As far as I understand, versioneer (or the _version.py generated by
>> > it) uses a whole bunch of heuristics to determine
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:47:33AM -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2022-06-07 07:11:15, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > [...]
> > As far as I understand, versioneer (or the _version.py generated by
> > it) uses a whole bunch of heuristics to determine the version number
> > of the package, for example
Hi everyone,
* Ben Westover [2022-06-06 22:42]:
As far as I understand it, this file is used by the author of the
program, not end users. I don't understand it well, though, because I
haven't put much time into researching what versioneer even does.
Versioneer is meant to simplify version
On 2022-06-06 23:42:19, Ben Westover wrote:
> Here's another note:
>
> On 6/6/22 10:49 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
>> * i'm really not sure I like that C binary to fetch the keyboard
>>layout... surely there must be a more pythonic way of doing this? i
>>guess there's another layout-xkb
On 2022-06-07 07:11:15, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:42:53PM -0400, Ben Westover wrote:
>> > > _version.py is not a copy of versioneer, it's *generated* by versioneer.
>> > > However, there is versioneer.py in the root directory, which is. I'll
>> > > exclude that
On 2022-06-06 22:42:53, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello Antoine,
>
I am aware of this failure and have reported it upstream. For now, I'll
disable the offending test.
>>>
>>> After doing that, I discovered that almost all of the tests are faulty
>>> (at least on Python 3.10), so I've
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 08:27:38AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > Anyone willing to go for it?
> >
> > I thought you were volunteering for it? :) jokes aside, i think
> > preparing the new pytest upstream release for experimental may be the
> > "easiest" part of this ordeal.
>
> I guess it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ole Streicher
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-as...@lists.debian.org,
debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: specreduce
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Astropy Specreduce contributors
* URL :
On 2022-06-07 04:01, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I would consider pytest a "core" python package, and so a complete
> rdeps rebuild is appropriate
+1. That is what I meant by suggesting ratt-rebuilding all the rdeps.
Best,
Andrius
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 09:01:37PM -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > I think this page includes debci results for experimental:
> > >
> > > https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html
> > >
> > > It shows what would happen when migrating experimental to unstable.
> >
> > Oh
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:42:53PM -0400, Ben Westover wrote:
> > Does the package *work* at all in 3.10? We might not want to silence
> > real errors here...
>
> Upstream says 3.4-3.9 is supported, but I don't know if that's because 3.10
> doesn't work or because they haven't bothered to add it.
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:42:53PM -0400, Ben Westover wrote:
> > > _version.py is not a copy of versioneer, it's *generated* by versioneer.
> > > However, there is versioneer.py in the root directory, which is. I'll
> > > exclude that from the source and repack.
> >
> > hmm... how about
19 matches
Mail list logo
