Re: Backport of python-lockfile and suggested team maintenance

2017-03-06 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ben, On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:50:59PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Fortunately, Git is a distributed VCS; we can share changes between > repositories with all information preserved. > > If you also publish your repository, you can ‘git request-pull’ to the > package maintainer address and

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Brian May's message of 2017-03-06 12:30:56 +1100: > The concept to convert from git-dpm to gbp pq is very very easy: > > 1. Delete debian/.git-dpm > 2. Unapply all patches. > 3. Commit and push. > > (repeat for all branches on all repositories) > > Step 2 is easier said then

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, March 06, 2017 07:04:41 AM Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Brian May's message of 2017-03-06 12:30:56 +1100: > > The concept to convert from git-dpm to gbp pq is very very easy: > > > > 1. Delete debian/.git-dpm > > 2. Unapply all patches. > > 3. Commit and push. > > > > (repeat

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 at 10:32:17 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think it's reasonable to try this out on a branch Here's a maybe-stupid idea: use http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14/ branch naming (debian/master, debian/experimental) for that branch, and switch to it as the default branch (edit

Transition away from git-dpm was: Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Updated the subject, since we've drifted... On Monday, March 06, 2017 04:47:39 PM Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 at 10:32:17 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I think it's reasonable to try this out on a branch > > Here's a maybe-stupid idea: use http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14/

Re: Transition away from git-dpm was: Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Brian May
Scott Kitterman writes: > Personally, I don't know enough to have an opinion. I'm interested in the > views of DPMT members with gbp pq experience. What's the consensus about > branch naming (all I know is for git-dpm, it was pretty hard wired)? I tend to think that

Re: Transition away from git-dpm was: Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 03/06/2017 09:25 PM, Brian May wrote: > Scott Kitterman writes: > >> Personally, I don't know enough to have an opinion. I'm interested in the >> views of DPMT members with gbp pq experience. What's the consensus about >> branch naming (all I know is for git-dpm, it

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Mar 06, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >I think it's reasonable to try this out on a branch for some number of >packages and write documentation (the documentation for using git with >git-dpm in DPMT is excellent and I don't think we should regress in that >area). Once that's done,

Re: Adopting OpenStack packages

2017-03-06 Thread Brian May
Vincent Bernat writes: > I think you mean git-dpm. Whoops. Yes, of course. -- Brian May