Hi Ben,
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:50:59PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> Fortunately, Git is a distributed VCS; we can share changes between
> repositories with all information preserved.
>
> If you also publish your repository, you can ‘git request-pull’ to the
> package maintainer address and
Excerpts from Brian May's message of 2017-03-06 12:30:56 +1100:
> The concept to convert from git-dpm to gbp pq is very very easy:
>
> 1. Delete debian/.git-dpm
> 2. Unapply all patches.
> 3. Commit and push.
>
> (repeat for all branches on all repositories)
>
> Step 2 is easier said then
On Monday, March 06, 2017 07:04:41 AM Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Brian May's message of 2017-03-06 12:30:56 +1100:
> > The concept to convert from git-dpm to gbp pq is very very easy:
> >
> > 1. Delete debian/.git-dpm
> > 2. Unapply all patches.
> > 3. Commit and push.
> >
> > (repeat
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 at 10:32:17 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think it's reasonable to try this out on a branch
Here's a maybe-stupid idea: use http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14/ branch
naming (debian/master, debian/experimental) for that branch, and switch to
it as the default branch (edit
Updated the subject, since we've drifted...
On Monday, March 06, 2017 04:47:39 PM Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Mar 2017 at 10:32:17 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I think it's reasonable to try this out on a branch
>
> Here's a maybe-stupid idea: use http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14/
Scott Kitterman writes:
> Personally, I don't know enough to have an opinion. I'm interested in the
> views of DPMT members with gbp pq experience. What's the consensus about
> branch naming (all I know is for git-dpm, it was pretty hard wired)?
I tend to think that
On 03/06/2017 09:25 PM, Brian May wrote:
> Scott Kitterman writes:
>
>> Personally, I don't know enough to have an opinion. I'm interested in the
>> views of DPMT members with gbp pq experience. What's the consensus about
>> branch naming (all I know is for git-dpm, it
On Mar 06, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>I think it's reasonable to try this out on a branch for some number of
>packages and write documentation (the documentation for using git with
>git-dpm in DPMT is excellent and I don't think we should regress in that
>area). Once that's done,
Vincent Bernat writes:
> I think you mean git-dpm.
Whoops. Yes, of course.
--
Brian May
9 matches
Mail list logo