Re: Request to join PAPT

2019-09-12 Thread Christopher Hoskin
Hello, Is someone able to make me a member of PAPT on Salsa, please? Thanks. Christopher On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 20:51, Christopher Hoskin wrote: > > Hello, > > Please could I join PAPT in order to maintain a pympress package [1]. > I am a Debian Developer and already a member of DPMT. I have

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andrey, On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 07:32:33PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > $ cycle > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/usr/bin/cycle", line 12, in > > from dialogs import * > > File "/usr/share/cycle/dialogs.py", line 8, in > > from cal_year import cycle, Val >

Re: 2to3 adds '.' in front dir of "from dir import ..." statements (Was: [MoM] lefse migration to python 3])

2019-09-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 9/10/19 7:50 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > in the process of the Python3 migration the package lefse was converted > using 2to3. Hi Andreas, I wont comment on the relative import ambiguity problem, as Ghislain replied correctly. However, I do want to comment on 2to3. I generally

Re: 2to3 adds '.' in front dir of "from dir import ..." statements (Was: [MoM] lefse migration to python 3])

2019-09-12 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 9/10/19 7:50 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > in the process of the Python3 migration the package lefse was converted > using 2to3. Hi Andreas, I wont comment on the relative import ambiguity problem, as Ghislain replied correctly. However, I do want to comment on 2to3. I generally

Re: 2to3 adds '.' in front dir of "from dir import ..." statements (Was: [MoM] lefse migration to python 3])

2019-09-12 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi all, On 12.09.19 08:30, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I wont comment on the relative import ambiguity problem, as Ghislain > replied correctly. However, I do want to comment on 2to3. > > I generally recommend against using it, in the favor of other tools. ... > > The advantage is that you'll get

Re: 2to3 adds '.' in front dir of "from dir import ..." statements (Was: [MoM] lefse migration to python 3])

2019-09-12 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Michael, On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:22:06AM +0200, Michael Kesper wrote: > On 12.09.19 08:30, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > I wont comment on the relative import ambiguity problem, as Ghislain > > replied correctly. However, I do want to comment on 2to3. > > > > I generally recommend against

Re: pybuild mysteriously does not copy all testfiles

2019-09-12 Thread Debian/GNU
On 10.09.19 16:14, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi IOhannes, > > I have basically the same problem, funnily with almost the same subject: which was entirely intentional :-) i decided to start a new thread because i'm not sure whether the problem is really the same. but i guess, i'll just file a bug

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:17:08AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > $ cycle > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > > File "/usr/bin/cycle", line 12, in > > > from dialogs import * > > > File "/usr/share/cycle/dialogs.py", line 8, in > > > from cal_year import cycle, Val > > >

Re: 2to3 adds '.' in front dir of "from dir import ..." statements (Was: [MoM] lefse migration to python 3])

2019-09-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 08:30:20AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I wont comment on the relative import ambiguity problem, as Ghislain > replied correctly. However, I do want to comment on 2to3. > > I generally recommend against using it, in the favor of other tools. For > example, you can use

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 01:57:32PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > > There are circular imports in the code so you most likely broke that by > > > reordering imports in various files. > > > > s/you most likely broke/2to3 most likely broke/ > 2to3 doesn't do that. You mentioned autopep8, it

Getting rid of debian-python.readthedocs.io ?

2019-09-12 Thread Louis-Philippe VĂ©ronneau
Hi! Often I stumble on this readthedocs.io [1] website and it's badly outdated. Since we already have the Debian Wiki, I'm not sure it's worth keeping up to date, or at least no one has cared to do so in the last 4 years. If we really want a sphinx website, we should just build one on Salsa [2].

should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Drew Parsons
https://python3statement.org/ is a site documenting the projects which are supporting the policy of dropping Python2 to keep Python3 only. The site is designed for python packages specifically, to have only Python3 supported by end of 2020. But it seems to me it would be in the spirit of the

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Drew Parsons writes ("should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?"): > https://python3statement.org/ is a site documenting the projects which > are supporting the policy of dropping Python2 to keep Python3 only. That statement is a *pledge* to drop support for python2 by the end

Bug#940102: RFS: flask-jwt-simple/0.0.3-1 [ITP] -- Protecting flask endpoints with JSON Web Tokens (Python 3)

2019-09-12 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Owner: Emmanuel Arias X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-jwt-simple" * Package name: flask-jwt-simple Version : 0.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Landon

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 12-09-2019 17:01, Ian Jackson wrote: > But we need to be clear what's going on and communicate early. Yes, not on the front page, but there is (first bullet): https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#deprecated-components Paul signature.asc

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi Drew, https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python2-rm.html Given the current progress it looks not easy to make a promise. If some upstream happen to lag behind the schedule of python3 migration, we'll just stuck there for a while. On 2019-09-12 14:46, Drew Parsons wrote: >

Re: should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?

2019-09-12 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12.09.19 17:01, Ian Jackson wrote: Drew Parsons writes ("should Debian add itself to https://python3statement.org ?"): https://python3statement.org/ is a site documenting the projects which are supporting the policy of dropping Python2 to keep Python3 only. That statement is a *pledge*

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-12 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi, On 12.09.19 16:09, Andreas Tille wrote: > May be some final helping hint could be how to fix leaving the > program that leads to: > > > Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/cycle", line 83, > in OnCloseWindow Save_Cycle(cycle.name, cycle.passwd, cycle.file) > File

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-12 Thread peter green
but this leads later to Traceback (most recent call last): File "cycle.py", line 83, in OnCloseWindow Save_Cycle(cycle.name, cycle.passwd, cycle.file) File "/home/andreas/debian-maintain/salsa/med-team/cycle/save_load.py", line 46, in Save_Cycle tmp=rt.encrypt(