On 7/9/19 12:05 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 8, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>> What I did so far:
>> debtree -R --rdeps-depth=100 python2.7 >py2.7.deps.dot
>> dot -Tsvg -o py2.7.deps.svg py2.7.deps.dot
>>
>> The result is here:
>> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.s
On Monday, July 8, 2019 5:45:17 PM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 7/8/19 6:28 PM, Stewart Ferguson wrote:
> > On 2019-07-08 00:13:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> On 7/7/19 5:31 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >>> you can start dropping it now, however please don't drop anything yet
> >>> with
> >>> reve
> On Jul 8, 2019, at 2:45 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> What I did so far:
> debtree -R --rdeps-depth=100 python2.7 >py2.7.deps.dot
> dot -Tsvg -o py2.7.deps.svg py2.7.deps.dot
>
> The result is here:
> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
Fascinating…
Can you give us some hints to i
On 7/8/19 6:28 PM, Stewart Ferguson wrote:
> On 2019-07-08 00:13:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 7/7/19 5:31 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> you can start dropping it now, however please don't drop anything yet with
>>> reverse dependencies. So leaf packages first.
>>
>> I'm sorry, but I think I nee
On 2019-07-08 00:13:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 7/7/19 5:31 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> you can start dropping it now, however please don't drop anything yet with
>> reverse dependencies. So leaf packages first.
>
> I'm sorry, but I think I need to contest this. Doing things in order,
> first
On 7/8/19 10:10 AM, Ansgar wrote:
> Thomas Goirand writes:
>> On 7/7/19 5:31 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> you can start dropping it now, however please don't drop anything yet with
>>> reverse dependencies. So leaf packages first.
>>
>> I'm sorry, but I think I need to contest this. Doing things
On 2019-07-08 at 07:16:01 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> it would be nice, if the python2 packages could be skipped in bulleye but not
> for backports in buster.
>
> Is it something which could be envision ?
I don't think it would be accepted by backports, since it goes against
the requ
Thomas Goirand writes:
> On 7/7/19 5:31 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> you can start dropping it now, however please don't drop anything yet with
>> reverse dependencies. So leaf packages first.
>
> I'm sorry, but I think I need to contest this. Doing things in order,
> first leaf, then go all the w
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:16:01AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> it would be nice, if the python2 packages could be skipped in bulleye but not
> for backports in buster.
>
> Is it something which could be envision ?
Not in the main backports, maybe in -sloppy. And it will be hard or
imp
it would be nice, if the python2 packages could be skipped in bulleye but not
for backports in buster.
Is it something which could be envision ?
Fred
On 7/8/19 12:27 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Are you 100% certain that there isn't some small subset of python2 packages
> we
> will end up needing for bullseye?
I'm 100% certain that we should as much as possible avoid this, indeed.
I'm also convinced we should do our best to speed-up the Pytho
11 matches
Mail list logo
