Dear Arnaud,
thanks a lot for agreeing, and all your work on mechanize!
All the best
Norbert
On Mon, 02 Sep 2019, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> As I have no plan to work on it, I think it is better if someone else
> maintains it, so please go ahead and thanks for taking over maintenance!
--
PREI
Hi,
> The current maintainers/uploaders are
> Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team
>
> Uploaders: Brian Sutherland ,
>Fabio Tranchitella ,
>Jérémy Bobbio ,
>Matthias Klose ,
>Arnaud Fontaine
> (In CC, but Brian removed, he already declared he does
On September 2, 2019 4:00:53 AM UTC, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> I would just stop building these. And if the reverse dependencies
>have a
>> py2removal bug itself, then comment in these issues that the
>> suggested/recommended package gets removed. If they don't have a
>py2removal
>> bug, please f
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:54 PM Drew Parsons wrote:
> Yes, your script counts the dependencies along one direction (rdeps),
> identifying which packages are ready to be de-python2-ised next.
>
> I'm talking about dependencies in the opposite direction, deps not
> rdeps. Upstream vs downstream.
>
>
> I would just stop building these. And if the reverse dependencies have a
> py2removal bug itself, then comment in these issues that the
> suggested/recommended package gets removed. If they don't have a py2removal
> bug, please file the bugs for these packages.
i dont believe this is a sensibl
On 2019-09-02, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On 2019-09-02 01:15, Drew Parsons wrote:
Sandro Tosi wrote:
i've prepared a small website,
http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html, to keep track of
the bugs user-tagged `py2removal`.
It could be useful to add another column counting the Dependenci
On 01.09.19 21:48, Martin Kelly wrote:
Hi,
I maintain python-gmpy and python-gmpy2, which need to transition to Python 3.
However, they have several packages that have Suggests or Recommends (not a hard
dependency) pointing to python-gmpy/python-gmpy2. These other packages appear to
be Python
Hi,
I maintain python-gmpy and python-gmpy2, which need to transition to
Python 3. However, they have several packages that have Suggests or
Recommends (not a hard dependency) pointing to python-gmpy/python-gmpy2.
These other packages appear to be Python 2 only.
Should I stop building the Py
Hello Sandro,
> I've just submitted
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/dh-python/merge_requests/9
> to address this; not sure how quickly it will get merged & released
thanks a lot, but what about backports. On backports we still need this mapping.
Cheers
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 9:21 AM PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am preparing the new spyder package.
> since the removal of pylint3 from the src:pylint.
>
> I need to remove the Build-Depends: pylint3.
>
> Now dh_python3 still produce a pylint3 dependency for the binary packages.
>
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 1:15 PM Drew Parsons wrote:
> It could be useful to add another column counting the Dependencies in
> the other direction.
>
> i.e. for all the leaf packages ready for processing, which one should be
> given priority? Which one has the most impact on Dependencies further
>
> I definitely think it will be helpful. Thanks for putting it together. It's
> the best thing I've seen yet for answering the question of what can we try to
> kill off now.
>
> Please keep it updated.
i set a cron every 2 hours (when the laptop is on)
also added a new column for the Maintainer
Sandro Tosi wrote:
i've prepared a small website,
http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html, to keep track of
the bugs user-tagged `py2removal`.
It could be useful to add another column counting the Dependencies in
the other direction.
i.e. for all the leaf packages ready for proces
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
* Package name: python-pypathlib
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Nico Schlömer
* URL : https://github.com/nschloe/pypathlib
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Polygon package fo
Hi all,
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Done that now, and removed the last lintian warning.
And now also
- fixed building in clean chroot (missing build deps for tests and run)
- install docs made via sphinx
- updated copyright file to match what is advertised in the package
Pack
Dear Raphael,
> Maybe you could have bumped debhelper to 12 and standards-version to 4.4.0
Done that now, and removed the last lintian warning.
Uploading later today.
All the best
Norbert
--
PREINING Norbert http://www.preining.info
Accelia Inc. + IFMGA ProGuide
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal
No upstream releases since 2010.
Popcon is 19.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-mocker
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019, Norbert Preining wrote:
> At all: anything you want to see before I upload the new version?
I checked the package quickly (without building it), it looks good.
Maybe you could have bumped debhelper to 12 and standards-version to 4.4.0
but that's a minor detail.
Thanks fo
18 matches
Mail list logo