* Matthias Klose (d...@debian.org) [100915 01:53]:
> In experimental you'll find a set of packages for Python3
>
> python3.1 3.1.2+20100909-1
> python3.2 3.2~a2-4
> python3-defaults 3.1.2-10
> python-defaults 2.6.6-2
> distribute 0.6.14-3
For reference, since I was asked on IRC: As nobod
* Jonathan Wiltshire (deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk) [100228 17:19]:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 04:46:09PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le dimanche 28 février 2010 à 15:29 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> > > It would be far easier to let Python 2.6 be the default, then file (or
> > > upgrade)
* Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org) [100228 16:50]:
> Le dimanche 28 février 2010 à 15:29 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
> > It would be far easier to let Python 2.6 be the default, then file (or
> > upgrade) serious bugs and solve them in a week or two.
>
> Yeah sure, let’s knowingly break
* Floris Bruynooghe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060828 12:02]:
> Secondly it should be noted that communication didn't go too good
> either since people in favour of the P-V fields didn't realise not
> everyone was happy with it and thought it was fine to go ahead with
> introducing it to unstable.
Well
* Alexandre Fayolle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060801 17:06]:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:54:27PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le mar 1 août 2006 16:41, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm looking for some "wiki-like"-language which
Hi,
I'm looking for some "wiki-like"-language which can be parsed in python
sufficiently fast. I was hinted to pytextile, but it looks dead upstream
and isn't really fast (to say it nice :). So, any other hints for me?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
ng transitions of new such packages.
If you think that one of the packages above should be removed, please
increase the severity to serious, and ping -release.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
e standards-version is IMHO still a good idea, but nothing I'm
going to fight for (especially as the use case is not as large, but it's
more like "cool idea, btw").
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
* Joe Wreschnig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060620 07:14]:
> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 06:49 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060620 01:35]:
> > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > > - uses "XS-Python-Standards-
at (at least, if you want to do it
efficient).
> Several people have concerns with this Python-Standards-Version field
> because it may have implications further than dh_python. This
> debian/pycompat would solve that.
These people should bring up their concerns here.
Cheers,
Andi
--
nted out) but it relies on dpkg-query -L
> instead.
Which *is* an official interface. And, I don't see anything wrong to read
internal files in a very early development face. So, nothing bad about
pycentral.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060620 01:02]:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > I only know two reasons for those headers:
> > > - python-central use them for its internal work
> > > - it may help track a transition and discover which packa
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 21:08]:
> On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > We shouldn't have two vastly different ways to do it.
>
> Life would be best if we had already taken a decision... we know this but it
> is
> not going to happen unt
the "Upgrade Procedure" checklist careful
> thought before you decide to take this on.
I decided to adopt this document. I'll hope to give it a living on the
usual policy place soon enough - until that, it lives at
http://people.debian.org/~aba/python-policy/
Cheers,
Andi
--
http
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 13:49]:
> Le lundi 19 juin 2006 à 13:28 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > Calling /bin/false doesn't entirely break the system.
> >
> > It seems that you are unaware with the way dpkg works. If a package's
> &g
really should discuss
them here, and speak about the reasons we had in Mexico to accept them.
And, I don't think that "they're no more required" right now - just
dh_python could live without them. And I really want further discussions
before jumping to conclusions.
Cheers,
Hi,
* Marc Dequènes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 13:17]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Don't you think it might be a good idea to explain the policy better if
> > it is not understood correctly? (And you might remember that I did such
> >
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 13:12]:
> Le lundi 19 juin 2006 à 12:15 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > Don't you think it might be a good idea to explain the policy better if
> > it is not understood correctly?
>
> If high-grade developers need expl
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060619 13:03]:
> Le lundi 19 juin 2006 à 12:09 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > Eh, I'm sure you can explain where somebody messed up with dpkg's
> > database? What you can see is "only" that some programs postinst fail
cial weight yet, we can only
> > go forward with a broad consensus)
>
> I think you are exaggerating the importance of the policy. A policy in
> Debian becomes effective when most packages use it. This is even true
> for the Policy with a big P.
A policy becomes also effective
t.
> [0] http://blog.technologeek.org/2006/06/17/27
Please stop throwing shit on Matthias. Uploads of a package with a
really silly mistake happen. Nobody wants them, nobody enjoys them, but
they still happen. And Matthias really puts lots of efforts into
Debian's python packages, and, I can s
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ython version and less NEW processing when
>adding new pythonX.Y-foo packages.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060611 10:13]:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060611 10:00]:
> > What is slowing our progress is the refusal to let the time decide between
> > python-central and/or python-support. There's no consensus here and if you
> > n
> committee to make a choice. And the technical committee needs time as
> well.
Especially as I don't see the good reason why we cannot have two
competing implementations.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
* John Goerzen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050620 05:47]:
> Not everyone can be in an IRC discussion. There are pesky things like
> sleep, work, and Real Life that mean that it's not possible for
> everyone to participate in a real-time discussion.
I think IRC meetings are fine for teams like the rele
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050619 22:17]:
> Le dimanche 19 juin 2005 à 21:45 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > There is a simple reason for discussing that topic in the release team
> > meeting: Our current RC policy makes any violation against the current
> > py
Hi,
please keep the heat level low. You summarrized the result quite
nicely with:
> There's a need for change, this is for sure.
and
> I agree on waiting for the C++ ABI change
> completion before starting to move python stuff.
Nothing else has yet been discussed, except that I will speak with
Ma
lve these problems.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
29 matches
Mail list logo
