17 Dec 2023 at 18:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Is there
> > > any better way than editing debian/obitools.substvars in d/rules by
> > > adding some override_dh_gencontrol?
> >
> > Remove the line:
> >
> > Cython>=0.24
> >
> > fro
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:09:33AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 19:56 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > FTR, UbuntuStudio is an official Ubuntu flavor, not a derivative ;)
> Woops. Did that change at some point or did I mix them up with another
> distro or jus
FTR, UbuntuStudio is an official Ubuntu flavor, not a derivative ;)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/
sl
always symlinks to the real interpreter on Debian,
not wrapper scripts - other distributions have tried to do this as a wrapper
script and the result wasn't pretty.
Avoiding the performance hit would require that any changes to the banner
be made in the python source itself.
--
Steve Langasek
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:10:05PM -0400, ba...@debian.org wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2017, at 02:41, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> wrote:
> >> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide where it states:
> >>You'll want to have at least the f
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/html5-parser.git/commit/?id=4a8e02b20698e35e577482f96efdeb17826d797f
> which I reverted afterwards.
> Thanks a lot and all the best
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian D
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:23:06PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [1] pytables is a failure specific to Ubuntu armhf buildds which raise
> SIGBUS, this should not affect Debian. python-astropy rebuilds with no
> problem, but doesn't pick up python3.6 support.
To clarify: python-astro
symlinked on the filesystem to the
default version?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga
What is broken here? How can I find out?
I believe this is a regression in python3.5 3.5.1-15. Similar build
failures were seen with this version in Ubuntu.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, an
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:21:19AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes:
> > No. I first noticed this bug because the package failed to build in
> > Ubuntu[1], which uses sbuild, not pbuilder. I reproduced the failure in a
> > clean s
y makes sense.
No. I first noticed this bug because the package failed to build in
Ubuntu[1], which uses sbuild, not pbuilder. I reproduced the failure in a
clean sid schroot. I think either your sbuild environment is not clean, or
it is not up-to-date.
--
Steve Langasek Giv
's not my place to judge whether this was a correct disciplinary action
for the DPMT, of which I am not a member; but for the record, this does not
in any way prevent Thomas from continuing to maintain *his* packages. The
DPMT doesn't block a maintainer from moving their packages out of the DPMT
reposi
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 11:10:26AM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Aug 15, 2015, at 08:24 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
So, what's the situation? Should we do something during this Debconf?
JFDI. :)
Yes, let's!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
at this point, but there is a session here at DebConf14 this
evening that will be streamed and might be worth following:
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf14/meeting/75/dgit-treat-the-archive-as-a-git-remote/
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:43:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 23:01, schrieb Steve Langasek:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:15:37PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 07.05.2014 17:27, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
+penumlist + item + p +
Applications
. Why would you expect cross-installing
anything as part of an upgrade?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org
user (or the package maintainer) should
not have to configure :)
But I don't think the DPMT should wait for these buglets to be fixed in
git-buildpackage before switching to git. (Not that my opinion matters
anyway. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
.
I would like us to be able to drop python2 from Priority: standard in jessie
in favor of python3, so that users can reasonably have systems with only
python3 installed. Would you accept patches to reportbug and
apt-listchanges to move them to python3?
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
remember offhand what the others
were.
In short, I see no reason why Debian would want to stick with python2 by
default in Jessie. The barrier is much lower than in Ubuntu, because Debian
makes much less use of python in the default install.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
or should not be used. Why can pybuild not autodetect?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org
they must be downloaded from the
mirror.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
anything. Add an option (say, --multiarch-me-harder),
so that maintainers can opt-in for :any dependencies.
That doesn't sound to me like it's optimizing for the common case.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
-install
on top of the wheezy python, which is a negligible use case.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org
. Promoting
its use, or making /usr/bin/python incompatible with the many existing
scripts running on older Debian releases, does not.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu
. Just
because Arch screwed up doesn't mean we should propagate the ambiguity.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp
package break during upgrades because it tries to call
python and fails looks like a pretty serious bug to me. I'm not sure about
what the right way to *fix* it is, but we definitely don't want users'
upgrades to blow up...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
scripts.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor
at the beginning of the release cycle - I would suggest
moving on to more constructive topics.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
; and as Dmitrijs
mentions, being able to cross-build packages that use python too.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp
effort on
this problem unless and until we see a pattern of such abuse (where a
pattern is N1)?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:10:00PM +0400, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
This can be caused by extra space in your override_dh_auto_install
line: it should be dh_auto_install --prefix=/usr without space after
--.
No, it shouldn't. --prefix is not an argument to dh_auto_install.
--
Steve Langasek
/PyCentral2DhPython2
http://wiki.debian.org/Python/PythonSupportToDHPython2
Any objections if I do that?
I think the current pages strike the right balance between maintainability
and having an easy, linear document that maintainers can follow. IMHO it
would be nice to keep them as-is.
--
Steve Langasek
to dh_python2+cdbs, I would love
to see it.
I don't have an example, because my test case also got converted from cdbs
to dh(1) in the middle of the night ;-)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:27:00PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Jun 10, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
Did you try with:
DEB_PYTHON2_MODULE_PACKAGES = ubuntu-system-service
Bingo!
This is a list of Debian package names, not python package names. If cdbs
isn't explicitly
* weren't already
passing --install-layout=deb.
However, AIUI the main concern here is about getting dh to compile the
extension twice, once for each python version. I don't think
--install-layout=deb helps at all for that.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
. Maybe a name like
Python/PythonSupportToDHPython2 would be better (with a
backwards-compatible redirect added)? I think that would help make this a
little easier to find... and certainly make it easier for me to figure out
what I'm going to find at that url.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
layout so that git-buildpackage *does* work out of the box, and
please *do* use the pristine-tar options.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
in bzr,
frankly. Perhaps you're comparing bzr merging with the seemingly common git
practice of discarding revision history as a substitute for doing an actual
DVCS merge? Having done merges in both systems, I don't see any major
differences.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
(preferably with patches) for these issues. (Ideally, cc:ing
debian-python on the bug reports, so that we don't accidentally wind up with
lintian checks that don't match the consensus understanding of how python
packages are supposed to work.)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor
be exempted
from the MBF.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
for the good of Debian.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Pietro Battiston wrote:
Il giorno mar, 12/01/2010 alle 00.06 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:39, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
I have no idea what
TC member,
I would disagree.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
to the
+ current filepythonvarX/var.varY/var/file executable.
The packagepython/package package must also depend on the
appropriate packagepythonvarX/var.varY/var/package to
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
in adding
pedantic tags to lintian. :)
The rest seem ok to me.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org
.
There is no bug filed against python-central for this. An NMU would be out
of order.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
it instead
If there is really a consensus about that, it would not be too hard to
implement
it in dh directly.
Architecturally, it looks more appropriate for pyversions to examine the
build-depends, not debhelper.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
tool.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor
documentation that you're wrong. Stop wasting my time.
plonk
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga
an implementation detail for python-central.
They were part of the design that came out of the python packaging BoF in
DebConf 6 that you then proceeded to ignore entirely.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
feature.
:-)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 05:30:57PM -0500, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org wrote:
My rebuttal is that if git is technical superior to bazaar because bazaar
has a mechanism to create repositories with only partial history, then
bazaar
without instead making
python-based programs excessively brittle during upgrades?
There are tradeoffs here.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
with the conclusion to
avoid an upload to unstable for now.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
is the
steep learning curve and the non-intuitive UI, therefore I do prefer
bzr over hg over svn over others.
In my opinion git is much more intuitive than any other tool - but you have to
climb a bit on the learning curve before you realize it.
... That's not what the word intuitive means.
--
Steve
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:04:26PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:17:24PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Decorate only the shared library names with the python versions, and retain
the current names for the .a files and .so symlinks - with two separate -dev
that has
already been made uninstallable?
Any ideas how to fix b), so that python-numpy can go to testing?
By dealing with python-scipy.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu
a build-dependency or a
build-conflict (or is buggy in some other way).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp
itself.
python2.4-dev was such a false positive. If a bug was ever opened for it,
it's been closed and archived long ago.
You should proceed with the ldbl transition for your own package.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
because a mailing list can never do an upload and therefore
it misses the /point/ of the Uploaders field.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
python 2.4 or better, then the package's
current dependencies are wrong...
python2.4 is default now so there's no need to add extra dependencies
Um, no. Your package is supposed to have a versioned dependency on python
(= 2.4), and it doesn't.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
needs python 2.4 or better, then the package's
current dependencies are wrong...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
that current, = 2.X be used to
*successfully* build packages when 2.X is greater than the currently
available python-dev.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-module
dependencies, as discussed at Debconf;
Do the helpers implement this, or is this going to be a policy that packages
can't actually comply with?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:03:37PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 à 14:51 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:47:37PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
If this is a public extension, this goes completely against the spirit
of the policy
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:59:40PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Steve Langasek, 21.03.2007]
So with current deprecated, what is the solution for a package which wants
to build a single binary extension for the current python version in a
package named python-foo, with no support for other
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:16:14PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:44:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:22:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I think it's time to update the python policy with the progress that has
been made in how we
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:05:30AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:51:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:16:14PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
If we don't, I don't see the purpose of the policy alltogether.
Allowing transitions between
to the supported list. The binNMU is not *required*, true, but doing such
binNMUS may be a factor in how smooth the upgrade path is between stable
releases.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
extensions (needed for question (2));
* only build things for the default python version (opposed to those
who build for as many as possible), knowing that I'm only speaking
of packages with public binary modules here.
(needed for 2, and for 3)
Looks right to me.
--
Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 06:17:35PM -0800, Suhas kurse wrote:
I am new to Python programming.
I want to set the PYTHONPATH in Windows XP. How should I go about it
Appreciate your reply
1) Install Debian
2) ask an on-topic question about Python on Debian
HTH,
--
Steve Langasek
package from the etch
perspective.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
of the package that's no longer in the archive? If so, there's nothing RC
about this because mercurial wasn't included in sarge.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the mistake to define
policies in a meeting.
I think the only lesson is to not invite you to such meetings, because
you'll piss on any attempt at building consensus anyway.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:41:55AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 11:38:19PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
Suggested packages:
python-doc python-profiler
The following NEW packages will be installed:
python-minimal
(= 2.3.5-6)...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
And if I just ${python:Depends} I receive msg that I need to put
python as Dependence.
Out of interest (I know someone has already offered you a patch), could you
post your package somewhere so that we can understand what went wrong?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:18:15AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 25 août 2006 à 17:09 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
As long as these fields don't even have clear semantics, implementing
them is, at best, useless.
So, why has there been no discussion about the problems
and deprecate the XS-Python-Version without offering any alternative
suitable for mass-detection of binNMU candidates.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:26:54PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 25 août 2006 à 13:09 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
I object to basing future work exclusively on dh_pysupport as long as it
implements your unilateral decision to abandon the XB-Python-Version field
for all packages that have
XB-Python-Version and XS-Python-Version values, since that's sort of why
they're there...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
only declare Provides when something exists in
the archive which actually *needs* them, I think the uploads between 1) and
4b) would nearly cancel out, making it a win to avoid the need for post hoc
Conflicts.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
would only need to be done
on demand for modules that are actually used from scripts invoking a
non-default python interpreter.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:32:27AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:01:37 -0700, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:10:07PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
3.1.3. Provides
Packages with public modules and extensions should be named
obsolete versions of dependencies off the system when
they're functionally compatible.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
) (for pyversions script)
Are packages expected to call pyversions directly, or is this something that
should be a versioned dep from one of the other build-dependencies?
Hmm, I guess it's called by dh_python, and debhelper doesn't depend on
python at all.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
builds (if required).
- binNMUing such a package becomes possible to change either $minver or
$maxver as needed without any requirement of source edits.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
dependency nightmares.
Unfortunately, I don't know that anyone was taking notes at the python BoF,
we were a bit busy running around and discussing; I was hoping that the
videos would be on-line sooner than they apparently will be.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
dh_python / python-central
solution in unstable, and we do need to get the python2.4 transition started
with or without this aid.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
in the BoF whether it was appropriate to allow building binary modules only
for the current version of python, and the agreement was that yes, this was
appropriate and support will be implemented.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
, python-ctypes will not be installable (and will need
to be updated).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 10:40:50PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
On Sat April 29 2006 16:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 06:28:32PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
Also, to make python-gtk2 support more than one version, we could
only achieve that by providing
-build cycle; but that could only happen
with non-free packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
that
infrastructure in place.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
?
If you mean, not provide automation for such packages, that seems like a
reasonable approach until someone demands support for it and/or provides a
patch. :)
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
earlier, and no one answered. Are there .config
scripts being written in python today in Ubuntu? (Hmm, where are the python
bindings for debconf, and what ensures that they're installed?)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:52:09AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:40:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
I asked this question earlier, and no one answered. Are there .config
scripts being written in python today in Ubuntu? (Hmm, where are the python
bindings
that Joss's
description of python-support provided for symlinking of other data files
that may be included in module directories, other than .py files...)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
)?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
