Le mer. 6 nov. 2019 à 23:49, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>
> On 06.11.19 22:04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > Brian May writes:
> >> Or maybe even expand as two bullet points:
> >>
> >> - Do not remove python-foo-doc.
> >> - Do not rename it to python3-foo-doc.
> >>
> >> I think this makes it very e
On 06.11.19 22:04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Brian May writes:
Stéphane Blondon writes:
Perhaps there is a doubt how to read it?
- do not (remove python-foo-doc or rename it to python3-foo-doc)
- (do not remove python-foo-doc) or (rename it to python3-foo-doc)
Would it be better if we remo
Brian May writes:
> Stéphane Blondon writes:
>
>> Perhaps there is a doubt how to read it?
>> - do not (remove python-foo-doc or rename it to python3-foo-doc)
>> - (do not remove python-foo-doc) or (rename it to python3-foo-doc)
>>
>> Would it be better if we remove the indentation and use this
Stéphane Blondon writes:
> Perhaps there is a doubt how to read it?
> - do not (remove python-foo-doc or rename it to python3-foo-doc)
> - (do not remove python-foo-doc) or (rename it to python3-foo-doc)
>
> Would it be better if we remove the indentation and use this sentence(?):
> if documentat
On 03/11/2019 15:16, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.11.19 15:09, Neil Williams wrote:
>> * do not remove python-foo-doc or rename it to python3-foo-doc
>
> yes, but this tells you not to rename it to python3-foo-doc.
Perhaps there is a doubt how to read it?
- do not (remove python-foo-doc or
On 03.11.19 15:09, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 15:00:17 +0100
Matthias Klose wrote:
[discussing this outside the bug report on the ML]
On 03.11.19 14:39, Neil Williams wrote:
Actually, that's a good catch. I was mixing up the defaults package
with the general advice on python3 mi
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 15:00:17 +0100
Matthias Klose wrote:
> [discussing this outside the bug report on the ML]
>
> On 03.11.19 14:39, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Actually, that's a good catch. I was mixing up the defaults package
> > with the general advice on python3 migration to not remove
> > pyth
[discussing this outside the bug report on the ML]
On 03.11.19 14:39, Neil Williams wrote:
Actually, that's a good catch. I was mixing up the defaults package
with the general advice on python3 migration to not remove
python-foo-doc just to rename it to python3-foo-doc.
where did you read that
Package: python3
Version: 3.7.5-1
Severity: normal
As discussed on IRC and alongside the post to debian-devel-announce, please
review and include this amendment to the Debian Python Policy to cover
the removal of the Python 2 stack as outlined at
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal
https://s
9 matches
Mail list logo
