Returning to the original topic: I've now svn-injected python3-sympy [1],
and successfully built it in a PPA [2].
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-modules/packages/python3-sympy/
[2] https://launchpad.net/~takluyver/+archive/python3
Thanks,
Thomas
On 8 November 2012 13:32, Jakub Wilk
* Dmitry Shachnev , 2012-10-29, 14:47:
2. dh_sphinxdoc should handle URLs starting with a protocol name
correctly (so that it won't complain about
.../html/file:///usr/share/javascript/mathjax/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS_HTML-full
missing)
This is now fixed in svn.
3. It would be also good if
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Removing "file://" (and keeping only /absolute/path) should work as
> far as libjs-mathjax is installed on the server (and the permissions
> are set correctly). In this case, dh_sphinxdoc should handle absolute
> paths correctly. At least,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Yeah, that's a bug. You can work around it by passing "-Xfile:/" to
> dh_sphinxdoc.
>
> However, I wonder if this is a correct approach. If /usr/share/doc/ was
> served via an HTTP server, a web browser wouldn't load that file, would it?
Removi
* Dmitry Shachnev , 2012-10-29, 14:47:
2. dh_sphinxdoc should handle URLs starting with a protocol name
correctly (so that it won't complain about
.../html/file:///usr/share/javascript/mathjax/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS_HTML-full
missing)
Yeah, that's a bug. You can work around it by passing "
Yes, that should be a one-line change, but it requires dh_sphinxdoc's
side to be fixed first.
Please also note that Debian experimental has mathjax 2.0 (I'm
planning to upload 2.1 this week) while wheezy/sid has 1.1 which is
quite outdated.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Tho
Hmm, I see at least two issues there:
1. You should use the packaged version of libjs-mathjax (and add a
build-dependency on it);
2. dh_sphinxdoc should handle URLs starting with a protocol name
correctly (so that it won't complain about
.../html/file:///usr/share/javascript/mathjax/MathJax.js?con
On 29 October 2012 04:42, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> What was the MathJax complain about? I maybe can help you with that.
>
dh_sphinxdoc: debian/python-sympy/usr/share/doc/python-sympy/html/
https://c328740.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/mathjax/latest/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS_HTML-fullis
missing
Thanks,
T
What was the MathJax complain about? I maybe can help you with that.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
On 10/28/12, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
> On 28 October 2012 08:47, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
>> I assume that building the binary packages from a single source package
is preferred?
>>> sympy devs reckon w
ing for the Python 3 version. This now calls
the script isympy3. Is it OK to svn-inject this? And is python3-sympy the
right name to use for the SVN directory?
Thanks,
Thomas
sympy-0.7.2.patch
Description: Binary data
python3-sympy-debianpackaging.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
* Thomas Kluyver , 2012-10-28, 08:41:
I assume that building the binary packages from a single source
package is preferred?
sympy devs reckon we should use the separate release tarballs. Is that
acceptable for Debian?
Yes.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@list
On Oct 25, 2012 6:31 PM, "Thomas Kluyver" wrote:
> I assume that building the binary packages from a single source
> package is preferred?
sympy devs reckon we should use the separate release tarballs. Is that
acceptable for Debian?
Thomas
The attached patch is a first stab at packaging SymPy 0.7.2, which
supports Python 3. There's some polishing to be done, such as adding
an isympy3 script, but it at least builds.
I assume that building the binary packages from a single source
package is preferred? The upstream releases on G
13 matches
Mail list logo
