On Sunday, August 25, 2019 10:55:55 AM EDT Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 24.08.19 07:03, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 15, 2019 8:08:41 AM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> Hi there!
> >>
> >> According to the daily graph I built here:
> >> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
>
On 24.08.19 07:03, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, August 15, 2019 8:08:41 AM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> According to the daily graph I built here:
>> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
>>
>> we can work on Python 2 removal for the below packages. Note that I have
On 25.08.19 00:08, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 8/24/19 10:38 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
>> How is that graph turned into a list of packages? It's too large to
>> scan manually.
>
> Well, I did it manually... and this is only a short list, as a
> suggestion for a todo list, so nothing exhaustive... I
On 8/24/19 10:38 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
> How is that graph turned into a list of packages? It's too large to
> scan manually.
Well, I did it manually... and this is only a short list, as a
suggestion for a todo list, so nothing exhaustive... I very much would
welcome something automated.
BTW,
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:08:41 +0200
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> According to the daily graph I built here:
> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
>
> we can work on Python 2 removal for the below packages.
How is that graph turned into a list of packages? It's too large to
sc
On Thursday, August 15, 2019 8:08:41 AM EDT Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> According to the daily graph I built here:
> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
>
> we can work on Python 2 removal for the below packages. Note that I have
> *not* checked for reverse dependencies, please
I'll try to take care of the asciidoc* ones over the weekend even if
there's no official release of asciidoc with python3 support yet (and
upstream advises to use asciidoctor instead).
Joseph
On 2019/08/15 15:34, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Probably because it Depends: python?
Ah right, I was a bit too quick to jump on that mail (and yes it does
ship some python scripts I've forgotten about, should be trivial to
port, I'll get in touch with upstream).
-Jonathan
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Cart
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, Jonathan Carter wrote:
- btfs
That's weird, this program is written in C and contains no python
whatsoever. Any idea how it ended up on the list? Perhaps there are some
other false positives too?
Probably because it Depends: python?
Scott
On 2019/08/15 14:08, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> - btfs
That's weird, this program is written in C and contains no python
whatsoever. Any idea how it ended up on the list? Perhaps there are some
other false positives too?
-Jonathan
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Deve
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> According to the daily graph I built here:
> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
>
> we can work on Python 2 removal for the below packages. Note that I have
> *not* checked for reverse dependencies, please d
Hi there!
According to the daily graph I built here:
http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
we can work on Python 2 removal for the below packages. Note that I have
*not* checked for reverse dependencies, please do so before working on a
package. The list isn't exhaustive at all, and didn't
12 matches
Mail list logo
