Quoting peter green (2020-02-27 22:54:19)
> > Relevant packages and bugs:
> > 943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> This bug is not marked as rc.
>
> Nevertheless I believe that this bug report is in-fact a false positive. From
> what I can tell git-buildpackage, even in
Relevant packages and bugs:
943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
This bug is not marked as rc.
Nevertheless I believe that this bug report is in-fact a false positive. From
what I can tell git-buildpackage, even in buster, does not (build-)depend on
python 2 or any
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:14:08PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I looked again and I was looking at an old version. Sorry for the
> noise. I still think we have problems with these
> 937132 nevow: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> 938622 tahoe-lafs: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> which I
Andrey Rahmatullin writes ("Re: git-buildpackage to be autoremoved due to
python2 transition"):
> Yes, and as far as I can see after pydoctor migrates the only problem with
> gbp will be python-rpm in debian/tests/control, which is probably
> unneeded.
Oh.
> > the py2
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:28:03AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> FYI. The widespread impact of this not so apparent because
> git-buildpackage is typically used ad-hoc by maintainers, rather than
> via (Build)-Depends.
>
> Relevant packages and bugs:
> 943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in
5 matches
Mail list logo
