Hi,
policy (12.3) says, that putting the contents of package-doc
into /usr/share/doc/package/ (main package) is preferred over
/usr/share/doc/package-doc/. debhelper detects the Python 2
package as main package. One can override this to the path for
the Python 3 package, but both feels wrong to me
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 at 11:16:16 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> policy (12.3) says, that putting the contents of package-doc
> into /usr/share/doc/package/ (main package) is preferred over
> /usr/share/doc/package-doc/. debhelper detects the Python 2
> package as main package. One can override th
Quoting Simon McVittie :
In python-mpd-doc and python-dbus-doc, I installed the real documentation
files in /u/s/d/python-*-doc, but placed symlinks to them in both
/u/s/d/python-* and /u/s/d/python3-*. Perhaps that's a reasonable way
to achieve the spirit of the Policy ยง12.3 recommendation while
On 03/12/2018 11:16 AM, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> policy (12.3) says, that putting the contents of package-doc
> into /usr/share/doc/package/ (main package) is preferred over
> /usr/share/doc/package-doc/. debhelper detects the Python 2
> package as main package. One can override this to
On 2018-03-12 23:15, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> But what now that python-foo is gone? Should I rename the doc package?
No, but that's just my gut feeling.
2018-03-12 22:30 GMT+00:00 W. Martin Borgert :
> On 2018-03-12 23:15, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> But what now that python-foo is gone? Should I rename the doc package?
>
> No, but that's just my gut feeling.
Definitely not, indeed. The python- prefixes in python-foo and
python-foo-doc are not exactl
6 matches
Mail list logo
