Re: 2to3 adds '.' in front dir of "from dir import ..." statements (Was: [MoM] lefse migration to python 3])

2019-09-12 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi all, On 12.09.19 08:30, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I wont comment on the relative import ambiguity problem, as Ghislain > replied correctly. However, I do want to comment on 2to3. > > I generally recommend against using it, in the favor of other tools. ... > > The advantage is that you'll get a

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-12 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi, On 12.09.19 16:09, Andreas Tille wrote: > May be some final helping hint could be how to fix leaving the > program that leads to: > > > Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/cycle", line 83, > in OnCloseWindow Save_Cycle(cycle.name, cycle.passwd, cycle.file) > File "/usr/share/c

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-16 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi Andreas, On 16.09.19 11:38, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 02:47:50PM +0100, peter green wrote: tmp = rt.encrypt('Cycle{}'.format(pickle.dumps(objSave))) >>> >>> Thanks to this hint >> This hint was *wrong*, it will introduce garbage into the string and the

Re: dh-python does not stop if there is error during the byte-compiling

2019-10-07 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi Frederic, On 06.10.19 10:37, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, in one of my package (pymca), there is a syntax error like this. > > byte-compiling > /builds/science-team/pymca/debian/output/pymca-5.5.2+dfsg/debian/python-pymca5/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PyMca5/Object3D/Object3DPlu

Re: Help needed for issue in test suite for Python3 (Was: Bug#937698: python-dendropy: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2019-10-08 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi Andreas, On 08.10.19 09:28, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > I have prepared a fix for this package in Git[1]. Unfortunately I'm > stumbling upon a test suite error which was discussed with upstream > previously. It happens only for Python3 and was ignored before but

Re: python-urllib3 1.25.6 uploaded to experimental (closes CVE-2019-11236) but fails build tests

2019-10-29 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi all, On 27.10.19 17:27, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2019-10-27 23:13, Daniele Tricoli wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 10:31:31PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: >>> It conditionally works.  Using curl, I found that TLSv1_0 or TLSv1_1 will >>> support a successful connection, but only if the maximum S

Re: python-urllib3 1.25.6 uploaded to experimental (closes CVE-2019-11236) but fails build tests

2019-10-29 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi all, On 29.10.19 14:15, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2019-10-29 13:29:02 +0100 (+0100), Michael Kesper wrote: >> On 27.10.19 17:27, Drew Parsons wrote: >>> On 2019-10-27 23:13, Daniele Tricoli wrote: > [...] >>>> Not an expert here, but I think fallback is not d

Re: FYI: Python 3 migration of distributuion

2019-11-19 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi Osamu, On 19.11.19 14:43, Osamu Aoki wrote: > FYI: I found this repo > https://gitlab.com/dkg/getmail/commits/python3 > I think this is better work than my local work. I like he's done a commit for each step instead of one big "Turn into Python3" commit. Best Michael signature.asc Descrip

Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye

2021-02-12 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi all, Am 12.02.21 um 01:11 schrieb Thomas Goirand: > Hi Elana, > > Thanks for bringing this topic in the channel, and speaking with the > Python Steering Council, plus Mathias and Stefano. That's very much > appreciated. > > On 2/11/21 7:12 PM, Elana Hashman wrote: >> - When users install Pyth

Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye

2021-02-12 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi all, Am 12.02.21 um 20:52 schrieb Stefano Rivera: > This package is a dependency package, which depends on the full > standard library of Python for Python developers. Including modules > used only at build-time, such as venv and distutils, and modules with > complex dependencies, such as t

Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm

2023-02-05 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi Julian, Am 05.02.23 um 11:38 schrieb Julian Gilbey: Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in bookworm? Because it would amount to about double the work for all those involved. Besides, Python 3.11 has some points for it: - Real performance gains for real workloads

Re: Updating Flask to 3.x?

2023-12-18 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi Carsten, Am 17.12.23 um 10:06 schrieb Carsten Schoenert: Hi, the Flask team released Flask and the depending package Werkzeug 3.0.0 on 2023-09-30. Since Thomas Goirand did the last update of Flask to 2.2.x nearly one year ago in preparation for the Bookworm release I've talked with Thoma