Re: Hypothetical pkg-python alioth project (was:Re: .egg in Debian summary?)

2006-03-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 01:16 +0200, Carlos Galisteo wrote: IMHO that would be a great way to mantain python modules, and also a good place for more inexperienced people (like me) to be useful by doing delegated stuff and learning from the inside. Wait...It seems there already exists a

Re: RFS: python-urwid - Console UI Library for Python

2006-04-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 15:58 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: I have packaged versions for python2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, and I've made them available in an apt repository on excess.org. I think a better option would be to use python-support to make a single deb that supports all python

Re: RFS: python-urwid - Console UI Library for Python

2006-04-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 12:03 -0400, Ian Ward wrote: The tutorial.html file has been restored to urwid-0.9.3.tar.gz I know this might not be good form (I imagine I could have made a new release), but it was just a build problem that caused it to appear as a zero length file, and the file is

Re: RFS: python-urwid - Console UI Library for Python

2006-04-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 11:28 -0400, Ian Ward wrote: I've never tried using setup.py to generate documentation. Could you point me to an example of a module that does this? I don't really know enough about distutils or of any modules that do this. I think it would be fine to distribute both

Re: RFS: Templayer - HTML Templating Library for Python

2006-05-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 20:42 -0400, Ian Ward wrote: When Paul Wise was kind enough to repackage my Urwid libraries I learned that I was not creating packages the way I should be. They were mostly fine for the current python policy (although a bit overkill). I'm looking forward to a more sane

Re: python-central vs python-support

2006-06-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:31 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: no, not for packages with private extensions. Does this kind of package exist? (ie do you have an example?) fonttools does. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

RFS: urwid: python transition and new upstream

2006-06-15 Thread Paul Wise
) * Conflict/replace upstream packages * Bump Standards-Version (no changes) * Move debhelper and cdbs to Build-Depends (needed on clean) * Add executable bits to the .py files since they have shebangs * Add Ian Ward (upstream) to Uploaders, he will co-maintain it -- Paul Wise [EMAIL

Re: RFS: urwid: python transition and new upstream

2006-06-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 19:17 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Can someone upload the urwid package from the python-modules svn? Update: As requested in #debian-python, I've uploaded the dsc/diff. dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/urwid/urwid_0.9.4-1.dsc -- bye, pabs http

RFS: urwid: python transition fixes and new upstream

2006-07-16 Thread Paul Wise
and run the tests once * CDBS cleans *.pyc files, don't do that * Remove the whole build directory on clean * Place the Debian packaging in the public domain * Bump debhelper Build-Dep to 5.0.37.2 * Bump python-support Build-Dep to 0.3 * Add a debian/pycompat file -- Paul Wise [EMAIL

Re: joining the python modules packaging team

2007-04-05 Thread Paul Wise
On 4/5/07, Michel Casabona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to join the team to maintain the python-hachoir packages that I build, which will be soon uploaded to debian (thanks a lot to Piotr Ożarowski), and help maintaining other packages if possible. Thanks heaps for that, hachoir sounds

Re: Python related changes for unstable/squeeze

2009-02-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote: [Matthias Klose, 2009-02-16] Besides the normal pending update of the python version for the unstable distribution, there will be more changes around python packaging, including the introduction of python-3.x and

Re: Bzr lightweight checkout, bzr shallow branches, and git

2009-03-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: 3. Git == Git has shallow clones, created with the --depth option for git-clone. This cut-offs the history of the project past a certain point, but the result is lacking: mainly, you cannot push your changes back.

Re: Bzr lightweight checkout, bzr shallow branches, and git

2009-03-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote:  A shallow repository has a number of limitations (you cannot clone  or fetch from it, nor push from nor into it) [...]                    ^ Can you confirm whether my reading of the underlined part was

Re: License entry in egg info files

2009-10-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: I disagree. This issue in the ‘setup.py’ settings is upstream's responsibility. Lintian is best reserved for reporting problems that are the Debian package maintainer's responsibility. Do you object to

Re: License entry in egg info files

2009-10-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: Do you object to spelling-error-in-binary, duplicated-key-in-desktop-entry, embedded-zlib, duplicate-font-file or the other lintian tests that check upstream stuff? I think

Re: pymol vs numpy conflict

2009-11-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Jeremiah H. Savage jeremiahsav...@gmail.com wrote: However, a problem arises when I attempt to use pymol in the same program. First, to use the pymol api, I add the following to ~/.bashrc:    PYMOL_PATH=/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/pymol    export PYMOL_PATH

Re: Advice: how to effectively maintain pyparted in Debian?

2009-12-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote: Recently, upstream declared that pyparted is bound to Fedora libparted, and not with upstream [3], so I'm not sure future versions will be ever supported by our libparted. Is the issue just that upstream has not yet

Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be 1.3

2009-12-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 7:06 AM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: Trac 0.11 ships with jQuery 1.2.6 However, Debian patches remove this file in favor of libjs-jquery package which contains version 1.3.x This breaks plugins for Trac 0.11 that rely on 1.2.x jQuery features removed

Re: jQuery dependency for Trac 0.11 should be 1.3

2009-12-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 7:23 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote: Upstream Trac is shipped with jQuery it needs while leaving Genshi and other libraries as dependencies. Debian specific patch removes jQuery from Trac distribution even though it contributes only 2% to package size.

Re: RFS: openshot

2010-01-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Thomas jonathan.oo...@gmail.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package openshot. I reviewed this package recently and concluded that it needs work: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/01/msg00254.html -- bye, pabs

Re: Would like a sponsor to upload the new version of python-foolscap

2010-01-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote: I would think a separate task tracker would be more appropriate; the channel topic should remain primarily descriptive of the topic of the channel, after all. I'd strongly suggest the use of PET (package entropy

Re: python2.6 vs python-json

2010-02-13 Thread Paul Wise
So basically, Python upstream hijacked a part of the import namespace. Unless they can be convinced to undo that, python-json is clearly at a disadvantage and future JSON consuming Python code will likely use the Python json module since it comes with Python. Therefore python-json needs to be

Re: RFS: pyrit

2010-05-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at wrote: Pyrit is an excellent example of a GPGPU-driven application. It consists of a main program and optional extensions for various GPGPU technologies, such as NVIDIA CUDA and OpenCL. Do we have OpenCL support in Debian main?

Re: RFS: pyrit

2010-05-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at wrote: On 05/20/2010 03:58 PM, Paul Wise wrote: Do we have OpenCL support in Debian main? Not yet, but it's being worked on. I've been in contact with the NVIDIA Team, they expect the NVIDIA toolkit (with CUDA and OpenCL

Re: Policy for Specifying Supported Versions for Python3

2010-06-21 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: If we maintain a standard that if in Python you import foo, then the Python package name is python-foo and the Python3 package is names python3-foo, I would think this is manageable.  I think that adding this

Re: Policy for Specifying Supported Versions for Python3

2010-06-22 Thread Paul Wise
I don't agree with your analysis. I was hoping someone else would speak up before your proposal got implemented, but I can see that doesn't look like it will happen. I would like you to consult with a wider audience, at least -devel and -release, before Debian changes the python policy yet again.

Re: Proposed Email to the release team about XS/B-P-V

2010-06-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: In Debian Python we are currently discussing how best to specify version information for Python 3.  There is a strong (but not unanimous) view among the participants in debian-pyt...@l.d.o and #debian-python that

Re: Proposed Email to the release team about XS/B-P-V

2010-06-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: The email is meant to go to the release team to address what I understand to be release team specific requirement.  I think that the broader question needs to be discussed in a broader audience. I think it is

Re: python 2.6 deb for lenny ?

2010-06-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Toni Mueller t...@debian.org wrote: FWIW, I've just updated to 2.6.5. See http://people.debian.org/~toni/python2.6/. The only thing I had to change was to set the libdb-dev dependency from 4.8 to 4.7, but then, I only compiled on my workstation, which might

Re: karaage

2010-07-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Brian May br...@microcomaustralia.com.au wrote: On issue that has been nagging us - what is the best way to handle python based config files? e.g. the settings.py file that is standard for Django applications? This sounds like more of a question for the

Re: Packages whith “except” overwriting builtins

2010-08-03 Thread Paul Wise
2010/8/3 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org: You might be easily mislead into thinking that this code ... will catch both IOError and OSError exceptions. In fact, it will not, as it is more or less equivalent to: ... There are about 50 packages in the archive whose developers make this kind of

Re: Packages whith “except” overwriting builtins

2010-08-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Tristan Seligmann mithra...@mithrandi.net wrote: How would you implement the warning? There's no way to easily tell whether a given name is an existing class name or not. Using whatever method Jakub used to create his list, if it is implementable in perl that

Re: Packages whith “except” overwriting builtins

2010-08-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:43 AM, W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org wrote: There are pychecker, pyflakes, and pylint in Debian. This specific case raises a warning in pylint, if I'm not mistaken. Thanks for the info, I've added these package names to the DebianMentorsNet wiki page listing

Re: Packages whith “except” overwriting builtins

2010-08-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: I checked only for built-in exception names, which should cover most cases. A simple regex like: Thanks. Also, feel free to file a bug against lintian. :) Done (#592379). This will probably end up as a wishlist against

common issue: setlocale handling?

2010-08-22 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, I recently got a bug filed on iotop about its setlocale handling (#593846). With a quick grep of my system I can see code in the following packages that looks like they would probably have the same issue: python-xdg virt-manager virtinst iotop mercurial-common python-hachoir-metadata

Re: common issue: setlocale handling?

2010-08-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: I don't think this is a bug at all. I'd rather say it's an user error. I disagree, stuff written in C or Perl doesn't crash when the locale is not set properly and neither should stuff written in Python. -- bye, pabs

Re: Skip Python 2.6 and use 2.7 as default in Squeeze?

2010-08-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Marian Sigler mariansig...@gmail.com wrote: Given how much work is required to change the default Python, does it make sense to just skip Python 2.6 and use 2.7 as the default Python version in Squeeze? What has emerged here? I see that it won't be the default,

Python 2.6 release candidate in squeeze?

2010-09-10 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, Looks like python2.6 2.6.6-3 was intended for sqeeze, is that the case Matthias? A summary of the changes: Two new upstreams (rc2 and final 2.6.6) One RC bug (#590138) One CVE (CVE-2010-1634) Two regressions (upstream #8688, LP #615240) Disabling some tests

Re: common issue: setlocale handling?

2010-09-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote: My guess is that you'd get a lot of push back from folks in python-dev.  Won't a change like this have the potential to produce confusing, wrong, or hard to track down bugs?  This kind of implicit behavior change seems to

Re: Untrusted search path vulnerabilities

2010-11-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 22:58, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: A number of packages in the archive sets the PYTHONPATH environment variable in an insecure way. They do something like:      PYTHONPATH=/spam/eggs:$PYTHONPATH This is wrong, because if PYTHONPATH were originally unset or

Re: Packaging Django applications and projects

2011-03-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Zygmunt Krynickiu zkryni...@ubuntu.com wrote: I'd like to define and document the recommended best practice of packaging Django 1.0+ (and especially 1.3) web applications and projects for Debian. I started this on the Debian wiki at

Bug#622239: RFP: python-iview -- alternative frontend to ABC iView

2011-04-11 Thread Paul Wise
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-iview Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Jeremy Visser jer...@visser.name * URL : http://jeremy.visser.name/2009/08/30/python-iview/ *

Re: list of package for python_support - dh_python2 ?

2011-06-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: What is the process for deprecating python-support?  Who makes that decision? Add a lintian warning saying that it is deprecated. Wait. File bugs on all packages using it. Remove it and anything still depending on it. The maintainer is

restarting processes when python libraries are upgraded?

2011-06-19 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, Since python doesn't keep .py files open its hard to use things like checkrestart to find out which servers to restart when upgrading a python library for security updates. I wonder if a dpkg triggers based mechanism could perform this function. Any thoughts? -- bye, pabs

Re: python2.7 as default: where are we? (Was: Bug#641207: ITP: ordereddict)

2011-09-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: Would it be possible to draw a map of things still to finish before attempting to switch default to 2.7? There are a couple of resources already ([0] and [1]), are there other useful bits around? The same as the release.d.o bug, but:

Re: may be a logo?

2011-09-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: Do we have a logo for our Python-In-Debian effort(s) (was needing one for a recent talk but failed to deliver in time)?  What about having one?  I am not a designer and possibly lacking any taste, so please do not judge wildly.  What

Re: Request for packaging - Nuitka the Python Compiler

2011-10-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Kay Hayen wrote: Currently I am just trying to be a good upstream. On that topic, we have a bunch of good links and some Debian-specific information about how to be a good upstream here: http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide I would personally add don't use

Re: Alternate way to contact Python-modules-team mailing list?

2011-10-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Paul Elliott wrote: returned was: 550 550-Blacklisted URL in message. (blackpatchpanel.com) in [black]. See 550 http://lookup.uribl.com. (state 18). If you read the error message you would have noticed that your blackpatchpanel.com domain has been blocked by

Re: Python 3 packaging

2011-10-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: I've been having a go at repackaging some Python modules where I know the same codebase can be compiled for Python 3. Any chance someone could update numpy for Python 3 (#601593)? I need it for testing a Python 3 patch for fonttools

Re: How do I add support for python3 to my package?

2011-11-17 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Stefano Rivera wrote: Hi Paul (2011.11.17_12:05:46_+0200) I created a package with py2dsc. After some tweeks, it works correctly. The upstream says package also works with python 3. How do I alter my source package to also produce a python 3 version? That's

Re: search.html doesn't look like a Sphinx search page

2012-02-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: Also, please remove Google Analytics code, and references to other JavaScript code and CSS hosted on external websites. I don't want to be tracked when viewing local documentation. : That sounds like an RC bug; things in main depending on

Re: search.html doesn't look like a Sphinx search page

2012-02-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Pietro Battiston wrote: If there is consensus (and I guess it would be good to find it), I wasn't able to detect it... http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/05/msg00194.html Notice I _did_ provide locally some javascript libraries which (the upstream

Re: warning: symbol PyLong_FromUnsignedLong...

2012-04-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:  I am trying to remove the remaining warnings from the gdcm/python package. They can be seen here: That is pretty normal for plugins on Linux; the symbols are provided by the program that loads the plugins and the plugins do not

Re: warning: symbol PyLong_FromUnsignedLong...

2012-04-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: I am trying to remove the annoying 'todo' section of the gdcm package page: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html If this was a lintian false positive, one would use *.lintian-overrides file. However in this case I did not know

Re: how to take a public package private?

2012-04-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Paul Elliott wrote: I mean move it from the standard place, to a package specific place. I mean move it to a package specific directory. Michelle seems to be confused. Michelle was talking about the location of the binary and source packages, rather than your

Re: Porting UberWriter to Debian

2012-09-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Hadret had...@gmail.com wrote: I'm working on packing UberWriter (http://lauchpad.net/uberwriter) software. Basically everything is working flawlessly, except one file: locales.db. I'm using plain dh_python2 to build the package and this is the only file,

Re: PyCon 2013 -- tentative title/abstract/outline -- feedback plz

2012-09-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: ^^ this is a great idea. It'd be nice if we could prototype a flake8 / pyflakes run against the archive, and filter for serious errors We did do that at one point with pyflakes: http://qa.debian.org/daca/pyflakes/sid/ Unfortunately

Re: Solving the multiarch triplet once and for all

2012-12-18 Thread Paul Wise
Seems like a lot of effort when there is no /usr/bin/triplet/python so there can be only one arch of python installed anyway. What are the use-cases for python multiarch? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: How does team maintenace of python module works?

2013-02-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: That's the sort of thing that convinces me it's too hard. The fact that I have to manually make the association between individual local and remove branches is just insane. This has changed with git from experimental, it sets up the

Bug#701222: RFP: dnsgraph -- trace and graph all resolution paths for DNS names

2013-02-22 Thread Paul Wise
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: dnsgraph Upstream Author : Dennis Kaarsemaker * URL : https://github.com/seveas/dnsgraph * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : trace and graph all

Bug#705339: RFP: python-pyephem -- scientific-grade astronomical computations for Python

2013-04-13 Thread Paul Wise
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-pyephem Upstream Author : Brandon Craig Rhodes * URL : http://rhodesmill.org/pyephem/ * License : GPL/LGPL Programming Lang: C, Python

Re: how could I help?

2013-06-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: Do you think I could help? If yes, how? A number of parts of Debian infrastructure are written in python, if you wanted to help out our core teams by writing python that would be great. There are dak (ftp team), ud (sysadmin team),

Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules

2013-07-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Oh, I need this pyX package... Let's download it. I assume here you mean I need whatever package provides 'import pyX' for python? If so this is solvable using something like DEP-11 that maps package names to things that they provide

Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules

2013-07-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: I've seen both cases in the archive! DEP-11 FTW. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: PEP 453 affects Debian packaging of Python packages

2013-09-18 Thread Paul Wise
We don't do private copies or bundled copies in Debian, so I guess the right way to go for Debian is to have python depend on python-pip and python3 depend on python3-pip? http://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: about python-oauth2: CVE-2013-4347

2013-10-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Philippe Makowski wrote: do you think that for fixing that, using return ''.join(random.choice('abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz123456789') for i in xrange(length)) ... would be an acceptable fix ? No, from the announcement of this issue on oss-sec: ... the Python

Re: Using ‘export http_proxy = http://127.0.9.1:9/’ to fail noisily on dependency problems

2013-10-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: I've read multiple times that they do. Could you show a build log where something is downloaded? At around 24:30 in the DebConf13 cross-compiler BoF a discussion about -source packages, build-depends on foo:src/foo:build-deps and apt-get

Re: Packaging AngularJS application as part of the python twisted application

2013-10-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Ben Finney wrote: I think we're going to have to (as the Debian Python community? as the broader Debian maintainer community?) come up with a unified approach to dealing with the rapidly increasing tendency for upstream releases bundling doing this. Upstream

Re: uninstalling issue of a local Debian package

2013-10-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Florian Rothmaier wrote: I'm an astro-physicist working for the Virtual Observatory project at the University of Heidelberg. Awesome! What is the reason behind this issue? It sounds like your prerm is missing the code needed to delete the .pyc files. For

Re: Best practice: exclude generated ‘foo.egg-info’ files from source and VCS

2013-11-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Ben Finney wrote: Since Distutils is the officially supported standard for Python It is probably about time it were demoted from that. Not supporting dependency information in a useful way is not really acceptable today. -- bye, pabs

Re: Recommending get-orig-source for packages ?

2013-12-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Olivier Berger wrote: I haven't spotted anything recommending a get-orig-source target in debian/rules in the team's docs. Policy recommends it, that should be enough? http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules -- bye, pabs

Re: Recommending get-orig-source for packages ?

2013-12-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Stuart Prescott wrote: tl;dr: is get-orig-source supposed to be a duplicate of uscan (d/watch) or apt-get source? Neither. As policy attempts to explain, get-orig-source is for the cases where the Debian orig tarball is not bit-for-bit identical to the upstream

Re: Recommending get-orig-source for packages ?

2013-12-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: That's in devscripts git and will be included in the next devscripts version. (see [1]) Awesome, thanks for your work on that. That said, the choice of debian/copyright as the location for files to be excluded seems awkward/weird. I would

Re: QA Developer overview, compared with PET

2014-01-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Ben Finney wrote: Thanks for bringing PET to my attention. But I wonder whether it's unused for good reason? The only reason it is unused is people don't know about it or forget it exists. What does PET do which the Packages Overview tool does not? It looks

Re: Future of django-pagination in Debian

2014-02-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: Any one have any opinions? How does the upstream Django community recommend to do pagination? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: RFS: Pyspread 0.2.6-1

2014-02-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Andreas Noteng wrote: Pyspread works just fine without ttf-mscorefonts-installer, so I guess suggests would be a better choice anyway. The tests will fail without the package though. Is it OK to include ttf-mscorefonts-installer as a test dependency in

Re: Python 3.4 and ensurepip (rehashed, long)

2014-03-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: I: Should we follow Fedora? Fedora is discussing some of these issues too[6]. Looks like one of their devs created an rpm-wheel conversion script so that if you pip install a package from the archive, it'll get the rpm, convert it to a

Re: favouring Python3 in the Debian policy

2014-05-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: Attached is a proposed change to the Debian Python policy to focus on Python3 within the distribution. The intent is to document and start a large journey towards one Python stack in Debian. This is unlikely to happen for jessie+1, but

restarting services after security upgrades in pure-Python modules?

2014-05-16 Thread Paul Wise
Hi all, Anyone know if it is possible to detect processes that are using old versions of pure-Python modules after security upgrades to them? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Embedded six.py in many packages: can someone add a lintian check?

2014-05-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: One of the things I want to add to my mythical PEP are at least declarations of vendored packages. What tool do people use to do vendorising? Maybe that could be patched to include a file containing info about which projects were

Re: Embedded six.py in many packages: can someone add a lintian check?

2014-05-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: On May 29, 2014, at 10:58 PM, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: One of the things I want to add to my mythical PEP are at least declarations of vendored packages. What tool do people use to do

Re: RFS: python-rarfile/2.6-1 [ITP] -- RAR archive reader module for Python

2014-06-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote: It builds the python-rarfile package, which provides an RAR archive reader module for Python. More informations can be obtained from the following URLs: I don't intend to sponsor this but here are some comments: It looks like upstream is

Re: Passing arguments to nosetests in debian/rules:override_dh_auto_test

2014-07-06 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Josue Ortega wrote: How can I pass them? and which is the right way to do it? According to the nosetests manual page the right way to do it is for upstream to delete the options from the Makefile and from travis.yaml and put them in a [nosetests] section in the

Re: apache2.2 / apache2.4 config

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Brian May wrote: Anyone got any better ideas? Something like this for the configuration: /etc/apache2/conf-available/someconf-2.x.conf: # All the common config options here /etc/apache2/conf-available/someconf-2.2.conf: Allow from all Include

Re: Help with old mathplotlib API (nxutils) needed

2014-09-10 Thread Paul Wise
The mathplotlib API changes document recommends switching from matplotlib.nxutils to matplotlib.path.Path.contains_point and friends. http://matplotlib.org/api/api_changes.html#id1 Also I used codesearch.d.n and found some code which supports both versions of the mathplotlib API:

Re: Speech Input

2015-01-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:19 PM, chaitanya sai alaparthi wrote: ... takes the help of google speech recogniton api ... This means that the software relies on proprietary software and transmits user data over the Internet to Google. If you put this in Debian it will have to go to contrib and it

Re: Python 2 d-d-a proposal

2015-04-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: You might also ask Debian teams using Python in the Debian infrastructure to review their packaged dependencies and identify any that aren't available for Python3. We'll need to know that soon so we can work on porting

Python and Debian infrastructure

2015-04-16 Thread Paul Wise
In addition to the Python 3 related work: Port service dependencies to Python 3. Port service code-bases to Python 3. We also need to: Port Django based services to Django 1.7 Port services based on Pylons (deprecated) to something else like Django: snapshot.debian.org debexpo

Re: Python and Debian infrastructure

2015-04-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Jan Dittberner wrote: Pyramid is a bit more lightweight Flask might be another option for lightweight framework needs. Paul already suggested to merge debianmemberportfolio with db.debian.org but I did not have time to evaluate that option yet. That is

Re: Offer to help with Python 2 porting

2015-04-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Bryan Shook wrote: I saw Paul Tagliamonte's post to the debian-devel-announce list. I'd be interested in assisting with this project. I wrote some ctypes Python code that interacted with a Windows DLL. I ran into a lot of String encoding situations with

Re: Sphinx 1.3 in Debian experimental

2015-06-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: Maybe upstream would accept a patch similar to what I've done before. It could map |today| to the value of an environment variable, if it's set. E.g. something like SPHINX_TODAY. Then pybuild, dh_python{2,3}, or some other infrastructure

Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules

2015-09-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 19:25 -0400, Donald Stufft wrote: > Because the way Python packaging currently is and historically has > been, binary packages are not something that is widely available or > viable. Hmm, I thought eggs have been around for ages (seems about 8 years)? -- bye, pabs

Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules

2015-09-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Donald Stufft wrote stuff Thanks for the summary, it sounds like the Python community is slowly moving towards a setup that is more closely aligned with Debian's values and setup. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Dealing with flit -- a simplified packaging of python modules

2015-09-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Thomas Kluyver wrote: > That's my point ;-). From our upstream point of view, it's not a bug > that the distributions we put on PyPI contain generated/bundled files - > we do it that way deliberately, so that end users can install without > needing Javascript

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

2015-11-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > That's one of the multiple breakage that the NEW queue brings. There's > unfortunately no way to fix that for this kind of complex uploads with > inter-dependencies and updates of existing packages. The only way, > unfortunately, is to have

Re: help2man usage with pybuild / debhelper packaging workflow

2016-06-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > I like this approach. Any example you may have in mind? Apparently onionbalance uses sphinxcontrib-autoprogram. I plan to figure out python3-sphinx-argparse at some point for check-all-the-things. Another really useful thing to have is

Re: Python Policy: Things to consider for Stretch

2016-02-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I don't remember exactly why we called it 'site-packages' ... Thanks for the history :) I always thought it strange to put site- in /usr/local since /usr/local already implies site/system-wide packages. Same for dist- since /usr already

Re: Packaging dependencies for mailman3-hyperkitty

2016-03-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > Packaging dependencies for mailman3-hyperkitty Does HyperKitty depend on mailman3 or just enhance it by providing an archive web interface? If the latter, I would suggest calling it hyperkitty instead of mailman3-hyperkitty. >

Re: Packaging dependencies for mailman3-hyperkitty

2016-03-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 19:35 +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > That's in progress, the only goal of this detection is to deactivate > javascript dynamic load of threads. We're thinking about alternative > solutions. I don't understand why you would deactivate JavaScript dynamic load for bots?

Re: nose2 reverse dependancies

2016-03-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Brian May wrote: > Paul Wise writes: > Are these available in Debian/testing? If so, what packages? According to packages.debian.org and apt metadata: botch is only in unstable dose-ceve is in dose-extra, which is in all suites. -- bye, pabs

  1   2   >