Uploading attached to DELAYED/2
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 20:59, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>
> Hi Pino
>
> On 2020-06-08 14:47:13 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > Also, boost transitions works slightly different than other library
> > transitions: the old and the new libraries are provided by
Hi Pino
On 2020-06-08 14:47:13 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Also, boost transitions works slightly different than other library
> transitions: the old and the new libraries are provided by different
> sources and they are co-installable (not their -dev, though).
> It's enough that the new boost
In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 14:19:39 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> You are not being reasonable either.
I am being reasonable as your unreasonable attitude.
> Boost1.71 transition was prepared since February.
>
> kig, like majority of packages, succeeded to build in all test rebuilds
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020, 12:14 Pino Toscano, wrote:
> In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 12:49:19 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> > On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 08:38:44 +0200 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > > In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 08:06:42 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha
> scritto:
> > > > > I'm pretty sure
In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 12:49:19 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 08:38:44 +0200 Pino Toscano wrote:
> > In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 08:06:42 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> > > > I'm pretty sure boost 1.67.0 can stay 3 months more around, especially
> > >
I have doublechecked that all other packages that still depend on
boost1.67 are all marked RC-buggy and pending autoremovals with
various dates.
kig is not an exception, and is treated the same way as all other
packages still using boost1.67.
since kig rebuilds against boost1.71 were successful
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 08:38:44 +0200 Pino Toscano wrote:
> In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 08:06:42 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> > > I'm pretty sure boost 1.67.0 can stay 3 months more around, especially
> > > since I see it is still not the only package using the old boost.
> > >
> >
> >
In data lunedì 8 giugno 2020 08:06:42 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> > I'm pretty sure boost 1.67.0 can stay 3 months more around, especially
> > since I see it is still not the only package using the old boost.
> >
>
> No, it cannot as it entangles too many other transitions.
Which
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020, 19:28 Pino Toscano, wrote:
> severity 962348 important
> thanks
>
> In data sabato 6 giugno 2020 16:26:34 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> > Package: kig
> > Version: 4:20.04.1-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > boost1.67 is being removed from testing and is
severity 962348 important
thanks
In data sabato 6 giugno 2020 16:26:34 CEST, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto:
> Package: kig
> Version: 4:20.04.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> boost1.67 is being removed from testing and is transitioning to boost1.71.
Yes, I know about the boost transition
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 962348 important
Bug #962348 [kig] kig: boost1.67 is being removed from testing
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
962348: https://bugs.debi
Package: kig
Version: 4:20.04.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
boost1.67 is being removed from testing and is transitioning to boost1.71.
kig has just now switched from boost1.71 to boost1.67.
boost1.67 must not be shipped in testing.
Thus I am opening this bug report to prevent kig from migrating.
12 matches
Mail list logo