http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/01/msg00751.html
I'm attaching the Release file and the Release.gpg file for Emdebian
GNU/Linux Grip 1.0 (based on Debian 5.0 lenny).
$ gpg --verify Release.gpg Release
gpg: Signature made Sun 15 Feb 2009 00:17:23 GMT using DSA key ID 97BB3B58
gpg:
Hi,
as suggested in the release announcement, I’m preparing to upload pieces
of GNOME 2.24 to sid. Of course this has an impact on many packages.
There are shlibs bumps in most libraries, especially libpango1.0-0 and
libgtk2.0-0 (libglib2.0-0 has a symbols file). This also includes
synchronizing
* Rafael Laboissiere [Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:25:53 +0100]:
* Rafael Laboissiere raf...@debian.org [2009-01-07 13:45]:
[N.B.: This message is being sent to the maintainers of all packages that
currently depend on libsuitesparse-3.1.0.]
The new upstream package SuiteSparse version 3.2.0 is
Hi,
I'm planning on uploading libtool 2.2 to unstable soon. This includes
an soname bump for libltdl, which seems to have around 130 reverse
dependencies.
This might also result in some packages to FTBFS, or otherwise have
problems upgrading to 2.2 version.
Please let me know when the best
On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
If it's only a shlibs bump, and no package is *dropped* (only
additions), please go ahead, and thanks for contacting us.
Judging from what's currently in experimental, it's actually a SONAME
change, and the libsuitesparse-3.1.0 package
I hereby request the authorization to upload libmtp 0.3.6 to unstable.
Since version 0.3.0-1 of the package, uploaded to experimental on June 30,
2008, the SOVERSION was bumped to libmtp8. The current version in unstable
(0.2.6.1-3) has libmtp7.
I looked at the packages that build-depend on
* Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2009-02-15 14:09]:
On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
If it's only a shlibs bump, and no package is *dropped* (only
additions), please go ahead, and thanks for contacting us.
Judging from what's currently in experimental, it's
As you all know, lenny is released. It is time now to migrate lapack 3.2.0
to unstable. There was no shlib bump, so this migration should be safe,
UNLESS the library has changes in the API/ABI in spite of the SONAME not
changing. Does anyone know whether this is really the case? We should be
Luk Claes wrote:
http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates
My question was more: what's the way to have a package uploaded in pu.
Should I write in a particular list? This one maybe?
It's all mentioned on that page. If it's not clear, please tell me what
part so we can update it.
Hi,
first of all thanks a lot for getting the release out!
Can we add #511903 to the list of bugs targeted for 5.0.1? I'd be
willing to handle the details if the lvm maintainers are short on time.
Cheers,
-- Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Hi Release Team,
as per the recent announcement on d-d-a, I'd like to announce that we,
the pkg-multimedia team would like to update ffmpeg in squeeze at the
earliest convenience. libavcodec has seen an SONAME bump (51-52)
including some minor API changes.
I do expect some breakage in packages.
Hi,
we’ve been having a new version of GTK+ targeted to lenny ready for a
while, but refrained from uploading it because of the impact on the
installer.
Now that we have the hands more free, I’d like to propose GTK+ 2.12.12
for a lenny point release. We’ve received some requests to upgrade to
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 07:42:48PM -0200, Renato S. Yamane wrote:
Maybe we already in release time to Lenny, but check if is possible get
firestarter from SID, because this bug[1] do it unusable (it desapear
after sometime running).
[1]
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:08:57PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Last before I stop annoying you with this issue: can I add an entry
here, saying that yum shall be fixed?
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1
I'm curious why python-pyme is not sufficient. Anyway: there
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 04:06:26PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi,
first of all thanks a lot for getting the release out!
Can we add #511903 to the list of bugs targeted for 5.0.1? I'd be
willing to handle the details if the lvm maintainers are short on time.
Added.
Kind regards,
Philipp
On 02/13/2009 08:46 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
Yesterday several people started to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
...
* Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+
DirectFB patches
...
Is all of that OK with the release team?
- From d-i POV this is a serious issue since we will not allowed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
we’ve been having a new version of GTK+ targeted to lenny ready for a
while, but refrained from uploading it because of the impact on the
installer.
Without testing the binaries myself I think this
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Now that we have the hands more free, I’d like to propose GTK+ 2.12.12
for a lenny point release. We’ve received some requests to upgrade to
this bugfix-only release, fixing a number of issues that you’re likely
to hit with the
[ please keep the Cc to d-o-m, for the sake of other OCaml maintainers ]
Hi release-rs,
many thanks and congratulations for the Lenny release!
As a lot of teams I guess :), we---Debian OCaml Maintainers---are
eager to push our (r)evolutions to unstable, starting in the few
days. The first of
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:28:02PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Now that we have the hands more free, I’d like to propose GTK+ 2.12.12
for a lenny point release. We’ve received some requests to upgrade to
this bugfix-only release, fixing a number of
Philipp Kern wrote:
I'm curious why python-pyme is not sufficient.
It's simply a MISTAKE that has been done by the last maintainer of yum,
python-pyme is NOT the correct python package, python-gpgme is the right
one. python-pyme is fully in python, while python-gpgme is written in C.
Maybe it
Looks like a mistake in RELEASE NOTES, since there is
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=apache
O.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Petr Baláš p...@balas.cz wrote:
I's problem at this moment - special apache module not ported to apache2.
BTW - from release notes:
4.10. Deprecated
Hello,
First of all, I would like to congratulate for all the work you did.
Thank you for releasing Lenny and for making it possible.
While updating the DebianLenny wiki page, I noticed that there was no
public announcement for Upcoming Release of Debian GNU/Linux 5.0,
like:
The reverse dep, jack-audio-connection-kit, dropped .la files and arts .la
files
references them. Please binNMU arts on all archs.
Version is 1.5.9-2
--
I cannot insert in a RO head of the URL from AutoCAD, how does it work?
The point is that you can't cancel a prompt in order to reset the
reopen 486888
reassign 486888 release-notes
retitle 486888 Section 4.10 (Deprecated packages) talks about packages
deprecated in Etch and disappeared in Lenny
thanks
Hello,
It seems section 4.10 is wrongly stating that these packages will be
dropped from Squeeze, when the truth is that they are
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
* Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+
DirectFB patches
...
Is all of that OK with the release team?
- From d-i POV this is a serious issue since we will not allowed to test
the
(please keep pkg-kde-talk in cc, but no need to keep me)
Hi release team!
We are as good as ready to push a new and better KDE into unstable at your
command.
You basically have two choices. Brief and rough or less pain over a longer
period of time.
The total breakages/pain is expected to be
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:35:20AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote:
I'm curious why python-pyme is not sufficient.
It's simply a MISTAKE that has been done by the last maintainer of yum,
python-pyme is NOT the correct python package, python-gpgme is the right
one. python-pyme
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:36 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
Ok, please go ahead. Thanks for contacting us that early so that it
spends plenty of time in proposed-updates. We will see what d-i
testing with the new binaries will bring us.
In
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 19:51 +0100, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
The reverse dep, jack-audio-connection-kit, dropped .la files and arts .la
files
references them. Please binNMU arts on all archs.
For the record, cleaning up .la with
sed -i /dependency_libs/ s/'.*'/''/
is less prone
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 07:50:29PM +0100, Sune Vuorela wrote:
We are as good as ready to push a new and better KDE into unstable at your
command.
You basically have two choices. Brief and rough or less pain over a longer
period of time.
The details about this at:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
* Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+
DirectFB patches
...
Is all of that OK with the release team?
- From d-i POV this is a serious issue
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:36 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
Ok, please go ahead. Thanks for contacting us that early so that it
spends plenty of time in proposed-updates. We will see what d-i
testing
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
Your comment fears me even more since it does look that we can end up
without directfb support for long time... I think you agree with me that
Graphical Installer can't be droped from Debian without a lot of people
being
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
Your comment fears me even more since it does look that we can end up
without directfb support for long time... I think you agree with me that
Graphical Installer can't be droped from
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:05:35PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
* Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+
DirectFB patches
...
Is all of
Hi Release Team!
Unfortunately a bug which breaks pyusb on 64bit arches and Python 2.5 only, was
not noticed until now. So I'd like to upload a patched version to
stable-proposed-updates. Hope that's ok :)
I've attached a debdiff between -4 and -5 (which was uploaded to unstable right
now),
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
using X11 instead.
Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
- the X
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
- the X server,
- evdev input module and
- a framebuffer video module.
Anything else?
HAL and DBus to go with input-evdev, I guess?
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux
Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
using X11 instead.
Can you
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Are there any concrete proposals for how to deal with this
systematically within debian without leaving GnuTLS users in lenny
perpetually gullible to MD5-based forgeries, or improperly-trusted V1
certificates?
Unless you want to fix openssl, Firefox, etc, Lenny
Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
using X11 instead.
Can you do a size estimate
Luis Matos g...@otiliamatos.ath.cx writes:
Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:04:10PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
using X11 instead.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:36:11AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:54:02AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Simon Horman wrote:
I would like to upload a(nother) fresh version of heartbeat to fix
a fairly severe bug. The fix has been in unstable since 2.1.3-7 and
was
Hi all,
Lenny is now out, so I think it is time to decide how to proceed with what
was discussed during DC8. Is the release team still ok with the idea of
keeping orphaned packages out of testing? how should it be done? via
severity: serious bugs and, possibly automated, auto removal hints? some
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 02:46:17PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
GnuTLS stopped accepting MD5 as a proper signature type for certificates
just two weeks before the release. While I don't question the decision
themself, MD5 is broken since 4 years, I question the timing.
Yesterday several
Hi people,
I am the de-factor maintainer of evolution (since nobody else seems to
be present for that) and thus would like to upload a new evolution in
Unstable. It's not really part of the GNOME 2.24 transition but I guess
it'll have some interdependencies.
Evo means evolution,
On 15/02/09 at 22:23 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hi all,
Lenny is now out, so I think it is time to decide how to proceed with what
was discussed during DC8. Is the release team still ok with the idea of
keeping orphaned packages out of testing? how should it be done? via
severity:
50 matches
Mail list logo
