On 06/08/2011 04:05 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 18:16 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
- pandoc out-of-date on several architectures. It seems that it
needs highlighting-kate to build which is missing there. fwiw,
gitit needs pandoc.
should be fixed now (by removing
On 06/09/2011 10:58 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
So, I did a new run with an updated set of hints (attached) and the result
is the following:
endloop: 85+0: i-1:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-42:k-42:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
now: 114+0: i-30:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-42:k-42:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
* i386: configfile-doc,
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 10:58 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
So, I did a new run with an updated set of hints (attached) and the result
is the following:
endloop: 85+0: i-1:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-42:k-42:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
now: 114+0: i-30:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-42:k-42:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0
On 11/06/08 20:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt said ...
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 19:13 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:12:21 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Dear Release Team. dput in squeeze still has the old upload data for
backports in it from its unofficial time. Given
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
telepathy-gabble 0.13.0-1/amd64 was built against an experimental libgnutls26
(#629879). Please schedule:
nmu telepathy-gabble_0.13.0-1 . amd64 . -m rebuild to drop dependency from
Hi!
Am 09.06.2011 00:09, schrieb Philipp Kern:
the second Squeeze point release (6.0.2) is now scheduled for
Saturday, June 25th.
Bad timing; Meike and I will not be available on that weekend.
Joey, are you available?
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:02:13 +0200
with message-id 4df0a835.60...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#629895: nmu: telepathy-gabble_0.13.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #629895,
regarding nmu: telepathy-gabble_0.13.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
severity 608582 serious
thanks
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 08:50:54PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Package: libruby1.8
Version: 1.8.7.302-2
Severity: important
File /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/irb/completion.rb was previously in irb1.8, and now
is in libruby1.8. Because of that, lenny - squeeze
On 09/06/2011 11:07, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Could you force-hint haskell-dummy? As long as haskell-hsql-mysql has
not migrated to testing, there is no upgrade path for the old
libghc6-hsql-mysql-dev anyways, so it should not be worse for the
users to have an uninstallable upgrade path?
On 09/06/2011 13:37, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/06/2011 11:07, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Could you force-hint haskell-dummy? As long as haskell-hsql-mysql has
not migrated to testing, there is no upgrade path for the old
libghc6-hsql-mysql-dev anyways, so it should not be worse for the
users
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:58:02 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
On 11/06/08 20:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt said ...
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 19:13 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 07:12:21 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Dear Release Team. dput in squeeze still has the old
Hi Mehdi,
thanks a lot!
Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:37 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
So, if you are happy breaking some arch:all packages from haskell-dummy,
we will do so.
Yes. I actually think that an uninstallable dummy package (indicating
the user: There is an upgrade path, it just
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze.
I'd tend to allow it if you show me a successful piuparts run in stable with
the new version (or if I get around to do the same thing). And, more
importantly, this needs to be
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:07:02AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le Wed, 25 May 2011 15:08:39 +0200,
Mehdi Dogguy me...@debian.org a écrit :
@Laurent: Do you know already which packages will need a sourceful
upload? Reporting bugs against those and user-tagging the reports
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 622279 with 606382
Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (switching
default: 2.6 - 2.7)
Was blocked by: 628860 629085 621829 628243 625676 623587 622966 623578 629087
625171 606363 622912 625153 624917 625040 624940
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 15:56 -0400, micah anderson wrote:
Back in March, before the previous stable point release update, I had
written to debian-release about an annoying issue that came up with the
puppet
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:14 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
I would like to get win32-loader 0.7.0 migrated to testing.
Unblocked, as discussed on IRC.
By the way, note that the migration has to be coordinated with FTP-Masters
for the standalone flavours that are mirrored to
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 13:15 -0400, micah anderson wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 20:29:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 15:56 -0400, micah anderson wrote:
Back in March, before the previous stable point release update, I had
written to
, I propose to upload the
following update. It changes nothing on the package itself, just the mentioned
updated packages.
ia32-libs (20110609) stable; urgency=low
* Packages updated
[ libxml2 (2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze1) stable-security; urgency=low ]
* xpath.c: Fix some potential problems
Hi Bill,
sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 16:29:17 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
One issue with this transition is that a number of packages still depends on
libjpeg62-dev instead of libjpeg-dev. This might cause packages to have
uninstallable
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 14:43:48 +0100, Rik Theys wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
A few things:
- the fix should probably get a bit more exposure in unstable before we
accept it in stable
- changing the source package format in a stable update is a no-no
The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
Oracle has updated the security baseline to 6.26 and that means we should update
the package in stable and oldstable. They plan to do such updates every 3 or 4
months from now on. I've
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:06:03PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
Let me know whether I can proceed.
Yeah. I cannot guarantee that we don't accept something new afterwards but
I'll check it once it hits p-u.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:38:37PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi Bill,
sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 16:29:17 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
One issue with this transition is that a number of packages still depends
on
libjpeg62-dev instead of
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it.
Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be
confusing. I will report bug to packages that Depends on libjpeg62-dev
as a first step.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:43:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 23:13:03 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Given the large legacy of libjpeg62, it is probably safer to keep it.
Also having libjpeg62-dev an alias for libjpeg8-dev is going to be
confusing. I will report
Processing changes file: cyrus-imapd-2.2_2.2.13-19+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cyrus-imapd-2.2_2.2.13-19+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cyrus-imapd-2.2_2.2.13-19+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
Hi,
Oracle has updated the security baseline to 6.26 and that means we should update
the package in stable and oldstable. They plan to do such updates every 3 or 4
months from now on. I've
28 matches
Mail list logo
