On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 18:26:43 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Judging from this, we need at least
unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2
unblock haskell-yesod-auth/1.0.2.1-2
(these only change the Build-Depends field in debian/control)
grep-excuses haskell-yesod-auth looks rather
On 22 March 2013 22:17, Nicolas Boulenguez nico...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:50:07PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
e2fsprogs (1.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
This shouldn't have been uploaded to unstable without first getting
permission from
Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2013 11:23:10 +
with message-id 1364037790.24071.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#703731: unblock: keepassx/0.4.3+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #703731,
regarding unblock: keepassx/0.4.3+dfsg-0.1
to be marked as done.
On 22 March 2013 23:26, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:09:44AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
I was about to file unblock request and ping the installer team coordinators.
Sorry, if this is the wrong way around with respect to an upload to unstable.
Well,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:35:41 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:51:30PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:25:51PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
The upstream diffs are quite large:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:26:30PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:50:51AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Roger Leigh wrote:
Alexander, is this approach OK with you? If you're happy with
what this is doing, can this go into wheezy?
its basically
Ok, I can see how it can be confusing. who-uploads does show that it
was my gpg signature on the upload. It's just this way I sponsor any
other uploads were the code/changes I am not the author of.
IMO there is a big difference between asking someone to sponsor and
posting a patch to the BTS.
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:26:30PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:50:51AM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Roger Leigh wrote:
Alexander, is this approach OK with you? If you're happy with
what this is
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 11:53 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 18:26:43 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Judging from this, we need at least
unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2
unblock haskell-yesod-auth/1.0.2.1-2
(these only change the Build-Depends field
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freebsd-utils
rpc.lockd from freebsd-nfs-common/testing has a bug (#664812)
preventing it from starting. Steven found the root cause for this a
few days ago
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:59:36PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:35:41 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:51:30PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:25:51PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
The upstream diffs
Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:51:04 +
with message-id 20130323165104.gc4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#702523: Bug#702486: libnet-twitter-perl: version 4.x
required for new Twitter API
has caused the Debian Bug report #703257,
regarding RM:
Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:51:04 +
with message-id 20130323165104.gc4...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#702523: Bug#702486: libnet-twitter-perl: version 4.x
required for new Twitter API
has caused the Debian Bug report #703258,
regarding RM:
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #703781 [release.debian.org] unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-10
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
703781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 17:05 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Please unblock package freebsd-utils
rpc.lockd from freebsd-nfs-common/testing has a bug (#664812)
preventing it from starting. Steven found the root cause for this a
few days ago and provided a
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (23/03/2013):
Looks good to me, but needs an ack for the udeb.
an ack for the udeb.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:14:15 +
with message-id 1364062455.24071.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#703781: unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #703781,
regarding unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-10
to be marked as done.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package scratch
Closes: #703141
unblock scratch/1.4.0.6~dfsg1-4
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:47:10 +
with message-id 1364064430.24071.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#703788: unblock: scratch/1.4.0.6~dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #703788,
regarding unblock: scratch/1.4.0.6~dfsg1-4
to be marked as done.
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 21:23 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
You need to mail the submitter if you expect replies / information from
them.
this could either be fixed with a Breaks against older mplayer versions,
but I recognize this is not preferred if the bug only affects incomplete
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
As discussed with Adam, please approve the attached tpu diff for gunicorn.
The primary fix is the updated patch for dropping guids; however, it also
includes an important fix for switching to
Hi,
so i upgraded mplayer rebuild agains new libogg and goes bad.. then i
upgrade mplayer sources and rebuild agains libogg (and several others new)
and work fine
I am not sure what you mean. Does this report affect mplayer and libogg
*both* installed from the Debian repository or does it
i'll explain..
the kernel are bad.. my kernel are x86 only 3.2.0 from wheeze
so i upgraded mplayer rebuild agains new libogg and goes bad.. then i
upgrade mplayer sources and rebuild agains libogg (and several others new)
and work fine
i send the report with and old due i very busy and the
Your message dated Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:07:22 +0100
with message-id 514e198a.4000...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#702394: unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #702394,
regarding unblock: ttf-cjk-compact/1.20
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package griffith
I fixed it looong time ago in the trunk. Restoring database from a
backup is something I want to work in Debian stable.
diff -Nru
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-03-23 at 14:31 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:06:24 +0100
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Where is this undone? What happens if you call build twice? If the
package isn't already using a patch system, then apply the
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #703482 [release.debian.org] pu: package smarty/2.6.26-1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
703482: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703482
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:34:31AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
I'm not sure if the installer team would want to reroll the images or
not, since there is no code changes to the udebs.
But the fix will benefit to be present in the CD's pool to anyone who
upgrades from CDs without internet
Processing changes file: smarty_2.6.26-0.2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ujwyr-0002mh...@franck.debian.org
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 16:49 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 11:53 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 18:26:43 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Judging from this, we need at least
unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2
Hi Release Managers,
cpufreqd is in a relatively bad shape, unfortunately I haven't been able
take care of it as I should have in quite some time.
One bug seems particularly bad (severity is important at the moment):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619913
The patch is simple, the
Mattia Dongili malat...@linux.it writes:
On running lintian against the package though there one particular error
that I'm wondering if I should fix:
E: cpufreqd: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file
usr/lib/cpufreqd/cpufreqd_acpi.la
E: cpufreqd: non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
Hi,
Please approve fonts-vlgothic-20120629-2 upload to testing-proposed-updates.
Its fix is tiny as below, and same fix for fonts-ipafont/ipaexfont which is
permitted to introduce wheezy
33 matches
Mail list logo
