Hi,
I somewhat forgot about #671450, the situation is that
/etc/cron.daily/amavisd-new was replaced by /etc/cron.d/amavisd-new and I
failed to take care about the old cronjob. Now a broken cronjob is lying
around. Would it be acceptable for r0 or r1 if I upload a modified package
that uses
Hi,
I prepared ipvsadm 1:1.26-2 - which is a translation only update - for
wheezy, but the announcement that translation updates are not accepted
anymore was faster. This translation updates also fixes some annyoing warning
about broken templates, therefore i want to see this in update in the
Hi,
Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de (09/05/2013):
I somewhat forgot about #671450, the situation is that
/etc/cron.daily/amavisd-new was replaced by /etc/cron.d/amavisd-new
and I failed to take care about the old cronjob. Now a broken
cronjob is lying around.
a wishlist bug report
On Thu, 09 May 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de (09/05/2013):
I somewhat forgot about #671450, the situation is that
/etc/cron.daily/amavisd-new was replaced by /etc/cron.d/amavisd-new
and I failed to take care about the old cronjob. Now a broken
Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de (09/05/2013):
I prepared ipvsadm 1:1.26-2 - which is a translation only update -
for wheezy, but the announcement that translation updates are not
accepted anymore was faster. This translation updates also fixes
some annyoing warning about broken templates
On Thu, 09 May 2013, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Alexander Wirt formo...@formorer.de (09/05/2013):
I prepared ipvsadm 1:1.26-2 - which is a translation only update -
for wheezy, but the announcement that translation updates are not
accepted anymore was faster. This translation updates also
Am 09.05.2013 05:39, schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
On May 8, 2013 12:05:39 PM Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 23:08:15 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
I would like to change Debian's default boost version from 1.49 to
1.53 or later -- likely to the most current Boost at the time the
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #702278 {Done: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk}
[release.debian.org] pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #702278 to the same values
previously set
--
702278:
Control: reopen -1
05.05.2013 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
Hmm. I didn't notice the bug has been closed...
Reopening it (now re-titled as a pu), instead of
submiting a new report, so that all the information
is in one place.
Thanks, and sorry for
Hi,
I'm unlikely to be able to do much archive rebuild work in the coming year, so
I would welcome help on that front.
Here is the job description:
- maintain scripts to organize archive rebuilds, parse logs and file bugs
Required skills: basic Ruby knowledge (or willingness to learn)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 701232 pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-16
Bug #701232 [release.debian.org] pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-15
Changed Bug title to 'pu: package xorg-server/2:1.7.7-16' from 'pu: package
xorg-server/2:1.7.7-15'
thanks
Stopping processing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was k...@debian.org).
usertag 701232 - pu
Usertags were: pu.
Usertags are now: .
usertag 701232 opu
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 678569 + pending
Bug #678569 [release.debian.org] transition: openconnect 4
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
678569: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678569
Niltze!
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 05/07/2013 08:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-05-06 17:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
In this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-cloud/2013/05/msg2.html
we have been discussing how we could have
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I'd like to move the libdvbpsi's latest release (currently available in
experimental)
to unstable, that would imply a SONAME bump.
The transition is expected to be very small, it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
please schedule a binNMU for php5-midgard2. It still depends on
libmidgard2 which is no longer built by midgard2-core.
nmu php5-midgard2_10.05.7-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: opu
Hi,
This is a follow up on one email thread from debian-release list:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/05/msg00182.html
Please apply the attached patch to php-mdb2 package
Control: retitle -1 pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.15-1~deb7u1
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 10:01 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 03/19/2013 20:10, Julien Cristau wrote:
Not sure there's still time for this. Might need to defer to 7.0.1
instead, but in
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.15-1~deb7u1
Bug #700205 [release.debian.org] pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.14-1
Changed Bug title to 'pu: libquvi-scripts/0.4.15-1~deb7u1' from 'pu:
libquvi-scripts/0.4.14-1'
--
700205:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 667906 with 707399 707441 701393 707509 707164 701397
Bug #667906 [release.debian.org] transition: libffi6
667906 was not blocked by any bugs.
667906 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 667906: 707164, 701393, 707399, 701397,
Svante Signell, le Thu 09 May 2013 16:25:46 +0200, a écrit :
Why do you expect anything to be different now compared when the freeze
happened, _several months ago_, in zero time?
Please avoid this level of language, it can't bring anything good to the
discussion.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 21:47 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi Samuel,
On 06/05/13 21:35, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Mon 06 May 2013 21:20:57 +0100, a écrit :
In that case would there be 150-200 RC-severity bugs introduced right
away by its inclusion?
I would
Quoting Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org:
I remember talk about potentially dropping the ia64 port after wheezy
was released, but don't know about the current status.
All Wheezy ia64 RC bugs have been fixed (except the problem with the
ruby package; the fix is still in the works).
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 17:42:08 +0200, Stephan Schreiber wrote:
Quoting Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org:
However if this is planned it might be worth doing so soon: on ia64
about 2750 source packages depend on libunwind7 which changed its soname
to libunwind8.
I can't find any problem
Your message dated Thu, 9 May 2013 19:01:03 +0200
with message-id 20130509170103.ge12...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#707548: nmu: php5-midgard2_10.05.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #707548,
regarding nmu: php5-midgard2_10.05.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 16:39 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Thu 09 May 2013 16:25:46 +0200, a écrit :
Why do you expect anything to be different now compared when the freeze
happened, _several months ago_, in zero time?
Please avoid this level of language, it can't bring
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
usertags 707550 = pu
Usertags were: opu.
Usertags are now: pu.
tags 707550 + squeeze
Bug #707550 [release.debian.org]
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 06:31:08PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 09.05.2013 17:56, schrieb Roger Leigh:
The transitional package does need a version higher than the initscripts
Breaks: sysklogd ( 1.5-6.2)
so a 1.5-7 would be OK. This could be done as a separate sysklogd
package or as
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.4.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
I've got a few patches for reportbug to:
- update the suite/codename mapping
- fix a possible test failure
- change the checkversions.get_versions_available function to
- not do arch/dist filtering itself, getting madison to do
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 18:13 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
for the time being, I think I'll concentrate on preparing wheezy r1. I
also think we can live without a d-i release in the next few weeks, so
possible transient breakages in udeb-producing packages right now
shouldn't be much of an
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello good release-team people--
I would like to propose trac 0.12.5-3 (or some variant of it if you
prefer) as a canididate for the next wheezy point release.
We have 0.12.3-1 in wheezy, so
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (09/05/2013):
No-one came forward with one so far, so I've disabled all of the
block-udeb hints (with the exception of win32-loader, at the
maintainer's request).
Thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Am 06.05.2013 08:25, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Am 05.05.2013 23:22, schrieb Ondřej Surý:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
it's that time
Am 09.05.2013 17:42, schrieb Stephan Schreiber:
Quoting Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org:
I remember talk about potentially dropping the ia64 port after wheezy
was released, but don't know about the current status.
All Wheezy ia64 RC bugs have been fixed (except the problem with the ruby
Processing control commands:
reassign 707164 python-virtualenv
Bug #707164 [src:python-cffi] python-cffi: FTBFS: Python 3.3 tests failed
Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-cffi' to 'python-virtualenv'.
No longer marked as found in versions python-cffi/0.6-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
Hi,
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 04:01 +, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
diff -Nru keystone-2012.1.1/debian/changelog
keystone-2012.1.1/debian/changelog
--- keystone-2012.1.1/debian/changelog2013-02-19 16:11:56.0
+
+++ keystone-2012.1.1/debian/changelog2013-05-10
On Fri May 10 2013 01:05:55 PM CST, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
Hi,
Was this upload discussed with anyone on the release team beforehand?
With the release team no, with the security team,
yes (with Luciano).
Why isn't this change, and the corresponding noise of renaming
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 13:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On Fri May 10 2013 01:05:55 PM CST, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Was this upload discussed with anyone on the release team beforehand?
With the release team no, with the security team,
yes (with Luciano).
The
38 matches
Mail list logo
