Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:06:49PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi Dominic > > On 2023-02-27 15:50:05 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > Hi,

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 04:54:33PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > > On 20-02-2023 13:09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > If the release team would be willing to grant an exception to the policy > > to get this done, we can get this wrappe

Bug#1031587: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#1031587: Handling of the request-tracker4 -> request-tracker5 transition in bookworm

On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:12:15AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: Dominic Hargreaves , Debian Request Tracker > Group > Control: block 1030749 by -1 > > https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html#sof

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

[dropping pkg-request-tracker-maintainers] On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:10:57AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves writes: > > > If it is to stay in Debian indefinitely, I'd suggest we still remove > > libgnupg-perl and drop support from libgnupg-interface-perl[1] a

Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:08:28AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 02-02-2021 08:47, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Please rebuild these packages as discussed: > > > > $ wb nmu libpar-packer-perl libdevel-cover-perl libclass-xsaccessor-perl > > libcomm

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 10:26:55AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:45:42AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > IMnsHO it's a bad idea to remove gnupg1 any time soon. While it > > certainly should not be used for encryption, it's still needed when > > dealing with older

Re: Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:45:42AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves wrote... > > > Do the gnupg1 maintainers agree that it should be removed from bullseye? > > IMnsHO it's a bad idea to remove gnupg1 any time soon. While it > certainly should not be used

Don't ship gnupg1 with bullseye

Hi all, With the upload of request-tracker4 4.4.4+dfsg-1, there are (if is correct) no more runtime dependencies on gnupg1 in unstable. $ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org "dak rm -Rn gnupg1" ... Checking reverse dependencies... #

Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 08:38:40PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > Hi, > > On 31-01-2021 21:50, Niko Tyni wrote: > > please consider approving 5.32.1. I think it would be > > better to release bullseye with that than a Debian-specific 5.32.0 with > > the patches from

Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 09:13:42PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 07:35:04AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > The pseudo excuses [1] report quite some autopkgtest regressions. Can > > you please check them, fix them if relevant or explain why they are not > > relevant for

Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:21:21PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Dominic, > > On 28-01-2021 22:05, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >>> 5.32.1 would need a binnmu of a few leaf packages > >>> (libpar-packer-perl libdevel-cover-perl libclass-xsaccessor-perl >

Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:21:54PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > (Your bug title is wrong, as you can't use that version anymore as it's > already in experimental ;) ) > > On 28-01-2021 00:39, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > My preference is to upload 5.32.1 in whole as it'

Bug#981232: unblock: perl/5.32.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock This is a pre-approval request. As I wrote in https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2021/01/msg00296.html we'd like to get 5.32.1 into bullseye if possible. I should have probably

Re: Perl 5.32.1 RC1

Adding the release team. See comment below. On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:31:12AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Today I packaged up 5.32.1~rc1 and have uploaded it to experimental. > > I would like to include the relevant changes into bullseye, by > cherry picking the followin

Bug#968912: transition: perl 5.32

On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 09:13:50AM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2020-10-15 22:29:53 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2020-10-15 18:27:08 +0100, Niko Tyni wrote: > > > These are resolved now, and all known regressions found in our test > > > rebuilds are marked as blocking this

Bug#968912: transition: perl 5.32

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org Hi, perl 5.32 has been in experimental since June and I think it's going to be ready for sid/bullseye within the next month or so - this is the

Bug#962237: perl_5.28.1-6+deb10u1 uploaded

Ouch - I just completely missed your previous response on this until I was reminded by your rescheduling email today. Uploaded now, hope it's in time. Best Dominic

Bug#962234: stretch-pu: package perl/5.24.1-3+deb9u7

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:46:03PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 22:02 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Upstream released fixes for three regexp-related security issues > > on Monday: > > > > https://

Bug#961443: buster-pu: package perl/5.28.2

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:44:29AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 12:14:27AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Further to the above, we now have a no-dsa security issue to push ou

Bug#962234: stretch-pu: package perl/5.24.1-3+deb9u7

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 08:46:03PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 22:02 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Upstream released fixes for three regexp-related security issues > > on Monday: > > > > https://

Bug#962237: buster-pu: package perl/5.28.1-6+deb10u1

2b6a61a362e7538a26e25b244ca799f2 perl_5.28.1.orig.tar.xz diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index b3fe7a3ca0..d6e1f27d66 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +perl (5.28.1-6+deb10u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Multiple regexp security fixes (Close

Bug#961443: buster-pu: package perl/5.28.2

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 12:14:27AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Further to the above, we now have a no-dsa security issue to push out > to buster (and stretch, but we prefer a more traditional approach there > because of the relative size of change

Bug#962012: binnmus for perl mini-transition 5.20.3

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hi Due to the upload of perl 5.20.3, we need a small number of binNMUs, as below: wb nmu libpar-packer-perl libdevel-cover-perl libclass-xsaccessor-perl libcommon-sense-perl . ANY . -m

Bug#961443: buster-pu: package perl/5.28.2

Control: retitle -1 buster-pu: package perl/5.28.3 On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 04:58:31PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > The perl interpreter team would like to move to a model where we > attempt to keep Debian stable releases more or less in sync with > upstream maint branche

Bug#961443: buster-pu: package perl/5.28.2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: buster X-Debbugs-Cc: nt...@debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org Hi release team, The perl interpreter team would like to move to a model where we attempt to keep Debian stable releases more or less in

Bug#960856: binnmus for perl mini-transition

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hi Due to the upload of perl 5.20.2, we need a small number of binNMUs, as below: wb nmu libpar-packer-perl libdevel-cover-perl libclass-xsaccessor-perl libcommon-sense-perl . ANY . -m

Ping? nginx and the perl transition

Hello nginx maintainers. Please would you be able to look at this bug soon? I believe It's currently the main thing preventing the perl transition from completing. If not, I can try and look at it, but it might not be before the weekend and it would be good if the transition was completed by

Bug#935737: transition: perl

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 01:05:02PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Niko, Dom, > > On 25-08-2019 20:39, Niko Tyni wrote: > > Please let us know when we might get a transition slot. Both of us > > are currently rather taken by real life stuff, so would appreciate an > > advance warning if possible.

Bug#939120: buster-pu: package ircd-hybrid/1:8.2.24+dfsg.1-1+deb10u1

rom 1c6f00298ba86bc06f22efd7d3fbe9bf27a83a6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dominic Hargreaves Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 11:57:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Use dhparam.pem to avoid segfault on startup (Closes: #932774) --- debian/changelog| 6 ++ debian/ircd-hybrid.postinst | 5 + debian/ircd.c

Bug#930114: unblock: perl/5.28.1-7

On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 10:28:22AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 07-06-2019 19:51, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >> On 07-06-2019 12:56, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >>> Please pre-approve perl 5.28.1-7 which fixes a FTBFS in some environments. > >>> This doesn'

Bug#930114: unblock: perl/5.28.1-7

On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 07:22:46PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 07-06-2019 12:56, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Please pre-approve perl 5.28.1-7 which fixes a FTBFS in some environments. > > This doesn't meet the letter of the hard freeze pol

Bug#930123: stretch-pu: package libevent-rpc-perl/1.08-2+deb9u1

+ + * Team upload. + * Fix FTBFS due to expired test SSL certificates (Closes: #903124) + + -- Dominic Hargreaves Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:40:52 +0100 + libevent-rpc-perl (1.08-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Add libsereal-perl to B-D-I and Recommends. Remove diff -Nru libevent-rpc-perl-1.08/debian

Bug#930114: unblock: perl/5.28.1-7

+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +perl (5.28.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Fix FTBFS with some sbuild configurations (Closes: #930095) + + -- Dominic Hargreaves Fri, 07 Jun 2019 10:47:24 + + perl (5.28.1-6) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix NDBM autopkgtests by recreating necessary hardlinks

General policy for updating perl in stable

Dear stable release team, At the perl sprint in Hamburg, we discussed the possibility of cherry-picking all relevant bugfixes from perl 5.24.4 into stretch. We did something similar once before, I think in 5.14.2-21+deb7u1 (importing parts of 5.14.4) but I couldn't find the specific release bug

Bug#921643: stretch-pu: package libemail-address-list-perl/0.05-1+deb9u1

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:47:28PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On 2019-02-07 15:28, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Fixes CVE-2018-18898 which is exposed by request-tracker4. > > Candidate package deployed and working so far on a productio

Bug#921643: stretch-pu: package libemail-address-list-perl/0.05-1+deb9u1

+deb9u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * [SECURITY] Fix DoS vulnerability CVE-2018-18898 + + -- Dominic Hargreaves Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:18:41 + + libemail-address-list-perl (0.05-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff -Nru libemail-address-list-perl-0.05/debian/patches/CVE-2018

Bug#921642: stretch-pu: package libemail-address-perl/1.908-1+deb9u1

-1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * [SECURITY]: Fix DoS vulnerabilities CVE-2015-7686 and CVE-2018-12558 + + -- Dominic Hargreaves Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:02:13 + + libemail-address-perl (1.908-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff -Nru libemail-address

Bug#913885: stretch-pu: package libapache2-mod-perl2/2.0.10-2+deb9u1

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 08:17:44AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:57:27PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > diff -Nru libapache2-mod-perl2-2.0.10/debian/changelog > > libapache2-mod-perl2-2.0.10/debian/changelog &

Bug#915052: nmu: libpar-packer-perl_1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu As is usual for a patch release of perl, we need to binnmu a small number of packages: nmu libpar-packer-perl libdevel-cover-perl libclass-xsaccessor-perl libcommon-sense-perl . ANY . -m

Bug#913885: stretch-pu: package libapache2-mod-perl2/2.0.10-2+deb9u1

/changelog2018-11-16 12:46:23.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libapache2-mod-perl2 (2.0.10-2+deb9u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * [SECURITY] CVE-2011-2767: don't allow sections in +user controlled configuration (Closes: #644169) + + -- Dominic Hargreaves Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:46:23

Bug#873309: stretch-pu: package request-tracker4/4.4.1-3+deb9u3

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 02:41:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 12:40 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > A regression was discovered in the latest security patch update for > > RT which can cause incorrect UT

Bug#873310: jessie-pu: package request-tracker4/4.2.8-3+deb8u3

On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 02:21:46PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2017-08-26 at 12:41 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > A regression was discovered in the latest security patch update for > > RT which can cause incorrect UT

Bug#873309: stretch-pu: package request-tracker4/4.4.1-3+deb9u3

passwords could trigger an error + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> Fri, 25 Aug 2017 23:50:45 +0100 + request-tracker4 (4.4.1-3+deb9u2) stretch; urgency=medium * Handle configuration permissions correctly following diff -Nru request-tracker4-4.4.1/debian/.git-dpm request-tracker4

Bug#873310: jessie-pu: package request-tracker4/4.2.8-3+deb8u3

passwords could trigger an error + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> Sat, 26 Aug 2017 00:04:25 +0100 + request-tracker4 (4.2.8-3+deb8u2) jessie-security; urgency=high * Fix FTBFS due to base.pm changes (Closes: #864302) diff -Nru request-tracker4-4.2.8/debian/.git-dpm request-tracker4

Bug#867490: stretch-pu: package perl/5.24.1-3+deb9u1

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:41:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 20:52 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > We would like to apply the following fixes to perl in stretch for the > > next point release: > > >

Bug#864745: jessie-pu: package perl/5.20.2-3+deb8u6

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:24:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control; tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 00:14 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > In July 2016 we released a security update for perl to fix an optional > > module loading related vulnerab

Bug#864745: Update on base.pm jessie point release

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:01:21PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> (2017-07-06): > > + debian-perl as it possible affects how we deal with FTBFS module > > packages. > > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:46:39AM +0200, Cyril

Bug#867490: stretch-pu: package perl/5.24.1-3+deb9u1

532, #864544) + * Backport upstream patch fixing regexp "Malformed UTF-8 character" +crashes. (Closes: #864782) + * Apply upstream base.pm no-dot-in-inc fix (from 5.24.2-RC1) +(Closes: #867170) + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> Fri, 23 Jun 2017 21:31:26 +0100 + perl (5.24

Bug#864745: Update on base.pm jessie point release

+ debian-perl as it possible affects how we deal with FTBFS module packages. On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:46:39AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Dominic, > > Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> (2017-07-04): > > 1) this commit is identical to those now in upstream rele

Bug#865225: stretch-pu: package request-tracker4/4.4.1-3+deb9u2

On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 11:18:43PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> (2017-06-27): > > Sorry, this is not yet uploaded. I somehow got this and the anope > > bug mixed up. > > Alright, no worries; for the avoidance of

Bug#864745: Update on base.pm jessie point release

Just to confirm that 1) this commit is identical to those now in upstream release candidates. 2) This has now been filed as #867164 (sorry that this was missing before) 3) this particular bug doesn't strictly apply to stretch/sid, but we plan to fix it in sid at least for consistency and to

Bug#866389: transition: perl 5.26

On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 05:01:20PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:39:09 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > We need to distinguish among blockers and non-blockers in that list. E.g., > > "fails to run with perl 5.26" is a blocker, but "uses a deprecated feature" >

Bug#866389: transition: perl 5.26

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 03:07:39PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org > > We'd like to get Perl 5.26 in sid/buster soonish. > > As usual, we've done test rebuilds

Bug#865225: stretch-pu: package request-tracker4/4.4.1-3+deb9u2

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:25:45AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Dominic, > > Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> (2017-06-26): > > Thanks, uploaded. > > I only see the security update (4.4.1-3+deb9u1), but not the package for > this pu request (4.4.1-3+deb9

Bug#865225: stretch-pu: package request-tracker4/4.4.1-3+deb9u2

On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 11:19:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> (2017-06-20): > > I didn't manage to get the fix for #862426 sorted out for stretch > > in time and this will cause annoying breakage for new installs. > > > > It

Bug#865225: stretch-pu: package request-tracker4/4.4.1-3+deb9u2

+ + * Handle configuration permissions correctly following +RT_SiteConfig.d changes (Closes: #862426) + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> Tue, 20 Jun 2017 00:22:12 +0100 + request-tracker4 (4.4.1-3+deb9u1) stretch-security; urgency=high * Fix multiple security issues: diff --git a/

Bug#864747: stretch-pu: package anope/2.0.4-1+deb9u1

TAs (Closes: #864668) + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> Tue, 13 Jun 2017 23:04:12 +0100 + anope (2.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index c3152c5..862ce0e 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -1

Re: Bug#861591: Bug#862071: password-store: FTBFS when built in a path with >= 74 characters

On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:43:21PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > gregor herrmann wrote: > > > > This is due to GNUPGHOME needing to fit within sockaddr_un.sun_path. > > > > Also #861591, where the same happens. > > > > I'm not sure how RC-ish this should be, as build paths by our usual > > tools

Bug#858779: [request-tracker-maintainers] RFS: rt-extension-customfieldsonupdate-1.02-1

On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 08:20:04PM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote: > hi, > > To fix RC bug #857748, I've upload updated package to mentors, > which include changes only: > - new upstream version > - use libmodule-install-rtx-perl >

Bug#854198: [request-tracker-maintainers] Bug#854198: Packages that are now part of request-tracker4 must be removed from testing

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 01:10:14AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > > #852258 rt-authen-externalauth: FTBFS: Your installed version of RT > (4.4.1-2) is too new > #851987 rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue: Obsolete with RT 4.4 > #851986

Re: piuparts blocking testing migration

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:03:40AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 22:38:16 +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I must have missed the memo, but according to > > > > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?packa

piuparts blocking testing migration

Hi, I must have missed the memo, but according to https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ircd-hybrid this package is not migrating because of a piuparts failure. In fact, the failure is not caused by irc-hybrid directly, but because of this bug in openssl:

Bug#830200: transition: perl

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:23:24AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 00:34:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > Hi Dom! > > > > On 19/09/16 17:52, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > On W

Bug#830200: transition: perl

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:52:12PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:03:41PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > openbabel was ACCEPTED today but it failed to build > > > > - on mips: > > "c++: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)" > >

Bug#830200: transition: perl

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:55:34PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > We'd like to have Perl 5.24 in stretch. > > Packages have been in experimental since May, and we've been doing > test rebuilds with those. Issues are tracked with the usertag > debian-p...@lists.debian.org / perl-5.24-transition and can

Bug#830200: Bug#825011: libdata-alias-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.24: undefined symbol: LEAVESUB

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:52:43AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > block 830200 with 834795 > block 830200 with 834796 > block 830200 with 834797 > block 830200 with 834798 > block 830200 with 834799 > block 830200 with 834800 > thanks > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:10:09AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > >

Re: RC bug status for perl packages (re '.' in @INC removal)

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 06:34:01PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 25/07/16 17:20, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Hello, > > > > As you will see from the below DSA, a class of vulnerabilities in > > perl programs has been announced today. We

RC bug status for perl packages (re '.' in @INC removal)

Hello, As you will see from the below DSA, a class of vulnerabilities in perl programs has been announced today. We have fixed the worst parts of this in Debian, but ultimately we'd like to (in keeping with upstream's intentions for 5.26) remove the current directory from the module search path

Re: Further perl-related candidates for stable-updates

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 06:15:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 23:24 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > The update to Perl in the recent stable point release included a fix > >

Further perl-related candidates for stable-updates

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > The update to Perl in the recent stable point release included a fix > which broke backward compatibility, leading to issues in the > libdevel-declare-perl package and, in turn, in other packages using > Devel::Declare, such as

Bug#826622: jessie-pu: package libdevel-declare-perl/0.006017-1+deb8u1

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:02:16PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 09:11 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > As per #826563 the recent perl update broke libdevel-declare-perl. > > I've uploaded 0.006017-1+deb8u1 which I recommend is released through > &g

Bug#827058: jessie-pu: package libcss-dom-perl/0.15-1+deb8u1

-0.15/debian/changelog 2016-06-11 19:32:57.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libcss-dom-perl (0.15-1+deb8u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Apply upstream patch to work around Encode changes included in +perl and libencode-perl stable updates (Closes: #826993) + + -- Dominic

Bug#827046: jessie-pu: package libnet-ssleay-perl/1.65-1+deb8u1

+with openssl 1.0.1t-1+deb8u1 (Closes: #789344) + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:26:36 +0100 + libnet-ssleay-perl (1.65-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff --git a/debian/patches/disable_33_x509_create_cert.patch b/debian/p

Bug#826714: jessie-pu: package biber/1.9-3+deb8u1

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 10:00:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 10:34 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > As per #826667 the last perl update unfortunately broke biber too > > (at least it causes a test failure; the actual cause is a bit unclear, > >

Bug#826714: jessie-pu: package biber/1.9-3+deb8u1

medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix breakage triggered by point release update of perl + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> Tue, 07 Jun 2016 16:56:10 +0100 + biber (1.9-3) unstable; urgency=medium * cherry pick upstream fix for hyphenation fixes (Closes: #773872) diff -Nru bibe

Bug#826622: jessie-pu: package libdevel-declare-perl/0.006017-1+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu As per #826563 the recent perl update broke libdevel-declare-perl. I've uploaded 0.006017-1+deb8u1 which I recommend is released through the stable-updates channel. Thanks for the

stable-updates fix for Bug#826563: perl: Apparent regression in TryCatch

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:54:23PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Thanks Niko for analysis. The sequence of events went like this: > > 1) a commit (which fixed a segfault, but broke compatibility) was >committed to the upstream development branch > 2) upstream testing det

Re: Bug#826563: perl: Apparent regression in TryCatch with stable update

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:15:30PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:36:10PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Package: perl > > Version: 5.20.2-3+deb8u5 > > Severity: serious > > Control: affects -1 libtrycatch-perl > > > We've noticed some code using the TryCatch module

Bug#819758: Bug#822336: Bug#819758: Bug#822336: perl: Stable update taking patches from 5.20.3

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 08:31:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags 819758 -moreinfo +confirmed > > [CC += the p-u bug] > > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:35 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > On Mon, 23 May 2016 09:27:44 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >

Bug#819758: Bug#822336: perl: Stable update taking patches from 5.20.3

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 08:21:44PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Release team: please consider #819758 as being a request for the attached > patch (which includes the previously-submitted change); there is more > rationale about the patches included in [1] - but the shor

Bug#819758: Bug#822336: perl: Stable update taking patches from 5.20.3

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:31:18PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: [test branch for perl 5.20.3 changes] > Looks good. I like the separate merges. > > Grouping together > fixes/5.20.3/preserve_record_separator.diff > fixes/5.20.3/test_count_base_rs.diff > more explicitly might be nice but that's

Bug#821208: (mini)transition: perl 5.22.2

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 08:10:07PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > From my memory and notes, this needs the extra-depends parameter for > the binNMUs to get the new perl version into the buildd chroots: > > wb nmu libpar-packer-perl libdevel-cover-perl libclass-xsaccessor-perl >

Bug#822336: perl: Stable update taking patches from 5.20.3

Source: perl Version: 5.20.2-3+deb8u4 As discussed with Niko in recent weeks, I believe we should be importing all relevant patches from maint releases of perl into Debian stable. This provides Debian stable users with many important bugfixes that have been reviewed and tested upstream already.

Bug#819758: jessie-pu: package perl/5.20.2-3+deb8u5

+++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +perl (5.20.2-3+deb8u5) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Apply patch from Niko Tyni fixing debugperl crashes with XS +modules (Closes: #816280) + + -- Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> Fri, 01 Apr 2016 22:13:30 +0100 + perl (5.20.2-3+deb8u4)

Bug#810887: jessie-pu: package libcgi-session-perl/4.48-1+deb8u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org, t...@security.debian.org We're working on a fix for #810799 which is a regression in Debian stable triggered by the recent perl DSA (it

Bug#809561: jessie-pu: package perl/5.20.2-3+deb8u2

Control: retitle -1 jessie-pu: package perl/5.20.2-3+deb8u3 On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 04:16:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 14:03 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Please find attached a proposed patch for #798727 i

Bug#809561: jessie-pu: package perl/5.20.2-3+deb8u2

- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/debian/encode-unicode-bom-doc.diff @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +From c6c7ea3c32d8de7bec4e4e155db9b54b9315ebf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> +Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:45:28 + +Subject: Document Debian backport of Encode::Unicode fix + +Bug-De

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 12:49:50PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > We're almost there. The last britney run reported: > > * ppc64el: cyrus-dev, libccs-perl, libcyrus-imap-perl, libdcmtk4-dev, > libperl5.20, libvtkgdcm-java, libvtkgdcm2.4, linux-perf-4.2, oar-restful-api > > Of those:

Bug#796345: [Debian-ha-maintainers] redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:19:58AM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> writes: > > > From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including > > libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2 would not >

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 11:10:54PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > Niko has uploaded 5.22.1-RC3 to experimental and we should see > 5.22.1 final in a few days. > > I'm rebuilding all the packages involved in the perlapi transition > against 5.22.1, and spotted a couple of is

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 12:43:07PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 11:10:54PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > Niko has uploaded 5.22.1-RC3 to experimental and we should see > > 5.22.1 final in a few days. > > > > I'm rebuildin

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

at 11:14:20PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 13/12/15 13:43, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > As I already mentioned, redhat-cluster currently FTBFS, and has done > > since August, so I don't think we should block on that. > > We can't remove it from testing as l

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

addresses; please ignore the previous versions of this message] On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:14:20PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 13/12/15 13:43, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > As I already mentioned, redhat-cluster currently FTBFS, and has done > > since August, so I don't

Bug#796345: redhat-cluster/libdlm + lvm + perl transition

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:56:41PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > [adding redhat-cluster and lvm maintainers to thread. This discussion > is about trying to start the perl 5.22 transition, which has been > 'about to happen' since August - so obviously those of us who car

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:22:13PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 03/12/15 13:15, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrot

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 02/12/15 17:48, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > >>>

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:09:09AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > >

Bug#796345: Status report on perl 5.22 transition readiness (30th Sept)

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:24:29AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 30/10/15 14:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > That'd only leave us with the apache bug. > > > > There's a patch available for that now, right? > > Yes. It has been included in the

Re: Bug#740998 closed by Michael Gilbert <mgilb...@debian.org> (Bug#740998: fixed in ndisc6 1.0.1-2)

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 01:36:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > ndisc6 (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* QA upload. >* Set maintainer to the Debian QA Group (see #713004). >* Add conflicts between rdnssd and network-manager (closes: #740998). This bug just hit

problems with rdnssd and network-manager both installed in jessie

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 05:45:05PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2015-10-11 at 16:50 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 01:36:05AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > > > ndisc6 (1.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium >

  1   2   3   4   >