Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

to get them to build ; there might be something fishy on the buildds). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

On 09/02/09 at 11:10 -0700, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:20:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 09/02/09 at 16:33 +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote: * dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote

Re: Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

On 05/02/09 at 14:12 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]: On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter machines do work, though. Failed again with the same exact segfault. Do you want me to upload a manual build

Please give back ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-9 on hppa and alpha

during the build. Manual builds on porter machines do work, though. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: HPPA and lenny

is running for 1.5 hours. Is this normal to take so long? (PA7200 100MHz) Well. I can wait. Yes. If it builds successfully, please try with the lenny kernel as well. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG

Re: Bug#502823: iodine: piuparts test fails: /var/lib/dpkg/info/iodine.postinst: line 27: ./MAKEDEV: No such file or directory

On 20/10/08 at 19:20 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:28:07 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: During tests using piuparts of all packages in lenny, I ran into the following problem: Thanks for your tests and the bug report! Setting up udev (0.125-7) ... unable

please unblock ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-8

(Sorry, the hppa bug isn't fixed, that's about another RC bug) ruby1.9 (1.9.0.2-8) unstable; urgency=high * Added patch: 930_zero_tainted.dpatch backport of upstream r17612. Closes: #501408 (RC bug). -- Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:15:33 +0200 I'll upload

status of ruby1.9 on hppa

you want? In the meantime, I'll start to implement (A) (ie, uploading an hand-built ruby1.9, and the other missing ruby packages on hppa). This is not a regression from the the current situation (outdated ruby1.9 packages that can crash the buildd anyway). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED

please accept wireshark 1.0.2-3+lenny1 from testing-proposed-updates

[ Disclaimer: I'm not the maintainer ] Hi, wireshark 1.0.2-3+lenny1 was uploaded to tpu, fixes #497878, but was never accepted in testing. Could you please accept it? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D

Re: remove sympa from lenny?

-maintaining it, but maybe we should try to convince Stefan to accept co-maintainance now. Maybe we could even avoid a sympa problem before the squeeze release. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F

ruby1.9 needs a force, not just an unblock

Hi, ruby1.9/1.9.0.2-7 was unblocked by luk, but it needs a force hint since it's not built on hppa. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

please give-back ruby-gnome2/0.17.0~rc1-6 on hppa, mipsel, s390, sparc

Hi, Please give-back ruby-gnome2/0.17.0~rc1-6 on hppa, mipsel, s390, sparc The failure looks like a transient one, caused by unsatisfiable build-deps. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F

please unblock libdb-ruby/0.6.5-2

Hi, Please unblock libdb-ruby/0.6.5-2. It fixes #498700 by adding transitional packages. (It probably has to go through NEW first.) Debdiff attached. Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D

Re: please unblock libdb-ruby/0.6.5-2

On 28/09/08 at 14:19 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:21:16AM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, Please unblock libdb-ruby/0.6.5-2. It fixes #498700 by adding transitional packages. (It probably has to go through NEW first.) please ping us again when ftp

Re: Bug#497829: remove sendxmpp from lenny?

in debian. libxmpp4r-ruby has a similar script that works fine, but it is not packaged separately from the -doc package. See /usr/share/doc/libxmpp4r-ruby-doc/examples/basic/jabbersend.rb in libxmpp4r-ruby-doc. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber

Please unblock ruby1.8/1.8.7.72-1 (Was: permission to upload ruby1.8 1.8.7p72?)

On 09/09/08 at 20:35 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: So, question: can I prepare and upload 1.8.7p72? Yes, please upload. Uploaded. Please unblock ruby1.8/1.8.7.72-1 Cheers, Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

permission to upload ruby1.8 1.8.7p72? (Was: serious problems with ruby1.8 and ruby1.9)

Hi, It has almost been a week, with no answer from the release team. I'm very concerned that this will reduce the time this package will be tested before the release. The question is: can I prepare and upload 1.8.7p72? Thank you. On 02/09/08 at 18:50 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi

please give-back ruby1.9 1.9.0.2-6 on alpha

Hi, Please give-back ruby1.9 1.9.0.2-6 on alpha. It failed on goetz, but 1.9.0.2-4 was built fine manually on a developer machine, so I would prefer if you could retry -6 on a (different) buildd before I do a manual build. Thank you -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas

Re: please give-back ruby1.9 1.9.0.2-6 on alpha

On 04/09/08 at 08:55 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, Please give-back ruby1.9 1.9.0.2-6 on alpha. It failed on goetz, but 1.9.0.2-4 was built fine manually on a developer machine, so I would prefer if you could retry -6 on a (different) buildd before I do a manual build. It failed again

serious problems with ruby1.8 and ruby1.9

). - That's about all I'll have time to (properly) do anyway, and Daigo Moriwaki is also in VAC. So, question: can I prepare and upload 1.8.7p72? Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | ruby

Re: hppa in lenny? (Was: Freeze exceptions related to libdb-ruby)

to work on that. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hppa in lenny? (Was: Freeze exceptions related to libdb-ruby)

to be a good stable arch. So far, I haven't heard any official position from the release team about that, and we are 3 weeks away from the release according to Neil's talk. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2008/07/msg00044.html Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: Freeze exceptions related to libdb-ruby

). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: request for freeze exception for libxmpp4r-ruby

On 09/08/08 at 12:11 -0300, Philipp Kern wrote: On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 02:17:01PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I'd like to upload et get libmxpp4r-ruby 0.4-1 in lenny. * Current version in unstable/testing is a git snapshot from a few days before the 0.4 release. It sounds much more

Re: Freeze exceptions related to libdb-ruby

they're triggering an unresolved kernel bug. I thought that only the ruby1.9 source package was triggering the kernel issue. Do other packages trigger it as well, even with the old version of ruby1.9 that could still be compiled on hppa? That would be new (and interesting) information. -- | Lucas

request for freeze exception for libxmpp4r-ruby

planning to upload. Diffstat and diff of the upstream sources (I don't plan any packaging changes): http://blop.info/pub/xmpp4r.diffstat http://blop.info/pub/xmpp4r.diff If you agree to allow it, please unblock libxmpp4r-ruby/0.4-1 (I still need to upload it). Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum

Re: please push ruby1.9 1.9.0.2-4 to testing

(since all the ruby1.9-depending packages are also building packages for ruby1.8, it's going to be painful to remove the ruby1.9 binaries). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

please push ruby1.9 1.9.0.2-4 to testing

. (it requires help from hppa porters). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

binNMUs for libinotify-ruby

for that, but you can read #483947 for details. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

please unblock ruby1.8

Hi, Please unblock ruby1.8 1.8.7.22-2 and bump its urgency (it's 6 days old already). Only change is a backported upstream fix for CVE-2008-2376. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

archive rebuilds differences compared to normal buildds

by that. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

to revert this change. I would personally prefer if this change was reverted and done after lenny. We don't really need 84 new RC bugs... -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Possible problems in your Debian packages

, Please clear the dep-wait on liborbit0 for glotski (hppa). (I already asked on #debian-release, so maybe someone will have done it in the meantime). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F

Bug#484129: release.debian.org: packages in tasks should be fixed in priority and removed in last resort after discussion

in the release cycle: it makes it less likely that we release without a package that many users need, because it was removed too late in the release cycle, and it allow bug fixers to focus on bugs that we really, absolutely need to fix to be able to release. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#484129: release.debian.org: packages in tasks should be fixed in priority and removed in last resort after discussion

useless to remove packages from testing that early. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

killing left-over processes from ruby1.9 build failures crashes the kernel on hppa (Was: Bug#478717: ruby1.9: FTBFS on hppa: make[1]: *** [all] Segmentation fault)

on ayous. (Obviously, it built fine previously, since it's in testing). Couldn't we force ruby1.9 into testing, even if hppa is out of sync? At this point I really don't think it's a ruby1.9 issue, and ruby1.9 is tied to another transition (perl5.10, I think). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL

Re: Testing migration doesn't check build-depends?

fail later. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

please requeue ruby1.9 1.9.0.1-1 on hppa

is requeueing the failed builds. Couldn't we partially automate that, like automatically requeueing each (package,version) once? That would put some additional load on the buildds, but will also save a lot of manpower. Thank you -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net

http://release.debian.org/ wishlist

be a really nice and useful contribution from a user. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: Noise

On 22/02/08 at 02:30 -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote: Le February 21, 2008 07:05:45 pm Neil McGovern, vous avez écrit : On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:32:25PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote: Le February 21, 2008 05:12:09 pm Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit : OMG, we were talking about

Re: proposal of release goal: buildability with future gcc versions

plan include a move to gcj-4.3 as well? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposed release goal: Switch to dash as /bin/sh to speed up the boot

On 19/01/08 at 16:49 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [Lucas Nussbaum] Wouldn't it be better to first try to report and solve all the issues we can easily report and solve? That is: This is the kind of feedback I was interested

Re: Proposed release goal: Switch to dash as /bin/sh to speed up the boot

://release.debian.org/lenny-goals.txt . Also, I've used it when uploading 0-day NMU for build failures using dash. So I hope it is really confirmed :-) See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=qa-ftbfs-dash;[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas

Re: Proposed release goal: Switch to dash as /bin/sh to speed up the boot

bugs. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Idea for dealing with transitions

avoid the frustrating case where a maintainer is spoiling the RT's efforts. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

binNMUs for libbinio1c2 - libbinio1ldbl transition

Hi, A number of packages need to be binNMUed for the libbinio1c2 - libbinio1ldbl transition. An example is adplug: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libadplug0c2a: Depends: libbinio1c2 (= 1.4) but it is not installable -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas

binNMUs for the libcommoncpp2-1.5.3-0 - libcommoncpp2-1.6-0 transition

Hi, Some packages need to be binNMUed for the above transition. An example is libccscript3: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libccscript3-1.1-0: Depends: libcommoncpp2-1.5.3-0 but it is not installable -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net

bts.turmzimmer.net not updated anymore?

Hi, It seems that the RC bugs list on bts.tz.net is somehow broken. For example, on http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?bydist=both , #453227 should not be displayed. Another example is http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?bydist=any and #427353, #427352 and #441684. Thank you -- | Lucas

Re: rebuild of lenny

On 02/12/07 at 13:32 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: Lucas Nussbaum wrote: 9base 1:2-7 Failed 40.098059s UNKNOWN this is, as the last time, still not reproducible. Seriously, I don't want to spend time investigating the various failures at this point. The list was sent to the release team

rebuild of lenny

the list of failures. I don't plan to do anything about them for now (like bug filing), since it seems too early to focus on the few lenny-specific issues, and the other ones (those affecting lenny+sid) are already filed thought my sid rebuilds. Friendly, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: rebuild of lenny

(Ccing -release@, remember it's not a discussion list) On 01/12/07 at 23:17 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 10:30:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, FYI, since we discussed this during the QA meeting: I just rebuilt all packages in lenny. 226 packages are failing

[binNMU] libgpevtype

Hi, Please binNMU libgpevtype 0.50-3 everywhere so that it gets built against libmimedir-gnome0.4 (instead of libmimedir-gnome0.3). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

QA meeting final date and passport info

)? Please tell us from which airport(s) you could come. (It's on the wiki, but it's easier to have all the info in the mail :) As I will be totally offline for a week during November, please Cc tbm, or use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you, [0] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianQAExtremadura2007 -- | Lucas

binnmu req: gnome-chemistry-utils

Hi, please binnmu gnome-chemistry-utils to build it against libopenbabel2 (instead of libopenbabel1). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

binmu req: libghemical

Hi, libghemical needs to be binnmued to depend on libmopac7-1 instead of libmopac7-0. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

binNMU request: gst-plugins-good0.10

Hi, gst-plugins-good0.10 needs to be binNMUed to depend on libcdio7 instead of libcdio6. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

hint taktuk and kanif into testing

Hi, Could someone hint taktuk/3.3-1 and kanif/1.1-1 together into testing? hint taktuk/3.3-1 kanif/1.1-1 *should* do it;) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

parmetis (non-free) needs a binNMU

Hi, The following packages have unmet dependencies: libparmetis3.1: Depends: libmpich1.0c2 but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

libfwbuilder needs a binNMU

... to be rebuild against libsnmp15: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libfwbuilder7: Depends: libsnmp10 (= 5.3.1) but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG

rhythmbox needs a binNMU

Hi, rhythmbox needs a binNMU to be built against libtotem-plparser7: The following packages have unmet dependencies: rhythmbox: Depends: libtotem-plparser1 (= 2.17.5) but it is not installable E: Broken packages -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net

[binNMU] hpijs and others (Was: Bug#444572: Dependency libsmp10 has been removed from sid)

do you think? The problem is that the maintainer probably won't do anything about that, except ask for a binNMU himselves. So, if you can ask for a binNMU yourself, you avoid the case of an inactive/busy maintainer. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net

Fw: Finding a date for the Debian QA meeting in extremadura

Hi, I forgot to Cc -release@, and there might be people interested that don't read [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Forwarded message from Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 23:54:20 +0200 Subject: Finding a date

libacpi Architecture: mismatch (Was: Some of your Debian packages might need attention)

with them? Hi Nico, The package is not supposed to build on arm and hppa (since it's using Architecture: i386 ia64 amd64), but some parts of the infrastructure think it should be built there (dak? britney?). Release team, what's the correct way to deal with that? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL

[binNMU] source-highlight

source-highlight needs a binNMU: source-highlight: Depends: libboost-regex1.34.0 (= 1.34.0~rc2-1) but it is not installable -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

[binNMU] ocaml-sqlite

Hi, ocaml-sqlite needs a binNMU. libsqlite-ocaml-dev: Depends: libsqlite-ocaml (= 0.3.5.arch.4-9) but it is not going to be installed Depends: ocaml-nox-3.09.2 but it is not installable This causes ocamldbi to FTBFS. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[binNMU] gorm.app

Hi, gorm.app needs a binNMU: gorm.app: Depends: gnustep-back0.11 (= 0.11.0) but it is not installable Depends: gnustep-gpbs (= 0.11.0) but it is not going to be installed -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED

[binNMU] facile

Hi, facile seems to need a binNMU for an ocaml transition: libfacile-ocaml-dev: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.09.2 but it is not installable This causes kdeedu to FTBFS currently. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG

[binNMU] renaissance

Hi, renaissance needs a binNMU: librenaissance0-dev: Depends: gnustep-back0.11 (= 0.11.0) but it is not installable Depends: gnustep-gpbs (= 0.11.0) but it is not going to be installed -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber

Re: Release goal: enforce the use of testsuites when available

? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: TS for Release Assistents

for bugs older than 21 days, or older than a month? Also, it would be great if this could be extended to the release goals. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

QA and Release teams meeting in Extremadura?

Hi, Following Andreas Schuldei's mail on d-d-a, I've exchanged a few mails with Martin Michlmayr, who organized last year's meeting, and we'll try to co-organize a meeting this year. There's already a wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianQAExtremadura2007 If you are interested in

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Xfce plans for the lenny cycle

, number of popcon installs, etc. Also, it could do some pre-processing, like running debdiff, making it easier to answer simple requests. if this is considered useful, this could be a nice project for SoC 2008... Cheers, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net

please unblock libxmpp4r-ruby 0.3-2

, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

please remove jukebox-mercury from etch

. It's not supposed to be considered stable. No, it's in sarge, etch and sid, according to http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jukebox-mercury.html Hmmm... Then somebody moved it. Do you know the steps required to remove it? -- Brian -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas

Re: (Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive

On 18/01/07 at 10:16 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:03:35PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: All logs are available on http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/01/16/ I love these automated QA tests, thanks for that! What do we do with that ? In another

Re: binNMU request for mysql-ruby

On 16/01/07 at 23:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:40:24PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: A binNMU of [mysql-ruby] is needed, so that it picks up new constants in libmysqlclient15-dev. i386 is affected for sure - I'm not sure about other archs: since the i386

(Bad) results of running piuparts over the whole archive

Hi, First of all, I am sorry to come up with this so late in the release process. While it is very easy for me to generate data (it only took a few hours to generate this data using ~30 nodes from the Grid'5000 platform), I am clearly not able to process it as fast as it is generated. I really

Re: binNMU request for mysql-ruby

On 16/01/07 at 23:22 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:40:24PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: A binNMU of [mysql-ruby] is needed, so that it picks up new constants in libmysqlclient15-dev. i386 is affected for sure - I'm not sure about other archs: since the i386

binNMU request for libmysql-ruby

... Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binNMU request for libmysql-ruby

On 10/01/07 at 15:40 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi, A binNMU of libmysql-ruby is needed, so that it picks up new constants in libmysqlclient15-dev. Oops, the source package is named mysql-ruby, not libmysql-ruby. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net

please unblock libmmap-ruby and libruby-extras

. I wouldn't make a fuss if you refuse to unblock libmmap-ruby. libruby-extras would be really nice to have in etch, however. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: gcj-4.1_4.1.1-20 and gcc-4.1_4.1.1-21 for testing

On 11/12/06 at 09:14 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: Please consider for testing: gcc-4.1: 4.1.1ds2-20 is for four weeks in the archive without regressions report to the BTS, -21 fixes important bugs for non-release archs. Maybe Lucas could rebuild the testing archive with the -20 or -21

Piuparts testing status update

for these packages are available on http://ox.blop.info/bazaar/buildlogs/20061114.important/ I went through the other failures, I don't think I've missed too many of them. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F

Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2

, read https://www.grid5000.fr/ -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Rebuilding all etch packages inside etch, round 2

to the outside world is firewalled to protect the outside world, but DNS do work, so tests take a very long time to fail. It would be really nice if those tests could first check if they can reach the remote site, and only run the tests if this is OK. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas

Coordination of pre-release QA work ?

others could help, etc ? [0] http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/Reports/Draft Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

<    1   2