.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote (26 Dec 2012 09:58:31 GMT) :
unblock fuse/2.9.0-2+deb7u1
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (27 Dec 2012 22:02:54 GMT) :
On 12/27/2012 10:48 PM, intrigeri wrote:
I'm absolutely not sure what is the best thing to do now:
1. unblock the embedded python-gnupg copy to the current copy of
Wheezy's python-gnupg + small change that supposedly improves
Hi,
(Disclaimer: I'm neither part of the release team nor speaking on
behalf of it.)
Therefore I would like to seek preapproval of grml-debootstrap/0.54.
Looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint
to enabling bitmapped fonts: just
+removing the no-bitmaps.conf symlink is not enough, the corresponding
+symlink for yes-bitmaps.conf needs to be added too.
+Thanks to Andreas Metzler ametz...@debian.org for the patch.
+Closes: #684923.
+
+ -- intrigeri intrig...@debian.org Tue, 11
Hi,
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 22:40:05 GMT) :
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:30:14 intrigeri wrote:
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (12 Dec 2012 01:16:15 GMT) :
There were no reply from maintainer in #688574 so perhaps it would
be better to set Daniel as owner of this bug...
Please do it if you
that can break without notice, in the
future, when the depended upon library is updated.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hi,
Yann Leboulanger wrote (12 Dec 2012 07:57:30 GMT) :
On 12/12/2012 01:37 AM, intrigeri wrote:
Looks like this should be added to the embedded code copies list,
regardless of the minor diff:
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
This can also be in Gajim itself, and I'll do
or unstable.
Since the discussion has drifted to full removal from the archive,
I'd like to point out that a removal from testing only was requested.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
I'm requesting removal of vserver-debiantools from Wheezy.
Background is at #693275.
Maintainer's approval is in message #22 there.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
Ola Lundqvist wrote (12 Dec 2012 05:35:25 GMT) :
Please remove vserver-debiantools as well.
Requested in #695755, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (14 Nov 2012 23:58:44 GMT) :
Simon Kelley wrote (12 Nov 2012 21:05:35 GMT) :
I'd strongly suggest moving to 2.63-4, rather than backporting.
The changes for the security fix are not trivial, and probablity of
introducing a bug backporting is much larger that the probablity
this satisfies the current freeze policy:
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
Also, any pointer to the place where I can learn about the
testing-updates suite?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
.
[1] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
(Cc'ing the maintainer, who may have his opinion on the matter.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
of an embedded
library should be unblocked. Why is this update needed? Is the version
embedded in testing / in unstable (based on) the same as the one
packaged in python-gnupg?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
: as the upcoming maintainer
of kismet in Debian, do you want to commit to maintain 2008-05-R1-4.3
in stable once Wheezy is released? (as in: dealing with security
issues, fixing RC bugs through stable updates, answering bug
reports, etc.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
Hi,
Nick Andrik wrote (12 Dec 2012 15:18:54 GMT) :
2012/12/12 intrigeri intrig...@debian.org:
OK. I think the key question then becomes: as the upcoming maintainer
of kismet in Debian, do you want to commit to maintain 2008-05-R1-4.3
in stable once Wheezy is released? (as in: dealing
policy, no?
Yes. But it's better to leave room in unstable for potential bugfixed
packages that are meant for Wheezy (at least so that they can mature
in there, get some exposure to testing, before the unblock request is
considered).
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
the bugs that were pointed in review...
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt wrote (17 Aug 2012 20:28:23 GMT) :
Do we (you) know how much of
69 files changed, 680 insertions(+), 276 deletions(-)
is actually related to the subversion 1.7 changes?
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
too ;)
I wasn't really looking for a maintainer opinion, I was pointing out a
bug that IMO needs to be fixed.
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote (01 Dec 2012 12:59:46 GMT) :
tags 688966 + moreinfo
FWIW, it's unclear to me what additional information is being
requested, so it might be unclear for the submitter too: he was asked
to provide a debdiff, and subsequently did.
Sorry if I missed something.
Cheers!
--
copies list,
regardless of the minor diff:
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
architectures simultaneously.
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
shouldn't migrate.
Indeed, so I guess this bug should be closed.
Once this is done, the only RC bug against love that affects testing
is #690394 -- do you intend to fix it through t-p-u?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
to be that it's not getting implicitly defined via
_GNU_SOURCE, because the existing definition is in the wrong place - it
should be before the first #include.
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
a écrit :
Is there a bug report for that? I couldn't see anything in the BTS.
Hi,
I am asking the FTP team to confirm whether the file is copyrightable
or not before opening a bug.
What was the outcome of this discussion?
Was a bug open as a result?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key
?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
of an orphaned package that was
only updated through NMU during the last 4 years.
Let's ask the past maintainer and the potential adopter:
do you think kismet 2008-05-R1-4.3 should be shipped with Wheezy?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
this.
Did this ever get resolved upstream?
Any news on that?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
)
Shouldn't #454778 be closed by this upload too, then?
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85fw3jjkw3@boum.org
Hi,
Milan Zamazal wrote (04 Dec 2012 09:56:12 GMT) :
Please unblock speechd-el 2.5-3 in unstable as it fixes release critical
bug #694676. The complete diff against 2.5-1 currently in testing is
attached. Thanks.
(Disclaimer: I'm not a release team member,
merely trying to help by reviewing
Hi,
gregor herrmann wrote (27 Nov 2012 17:33:35 GMT) :
nmu libimager-qrcode-perl_0.033-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libimager-perl
= 0.90
with IMAGER_API_VERSION 5 (cf. #692979).
Please see #692979 for the details why we think a binNMU is the best
way to fix the API problem for Wheezy,
/cairo-dock/revision/1085
Same here.
I'm not competent to review the code changes, so I won't.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
..)
But well, this was uploaded already, so whatever..
Other than that, I'm not good enough at Python/Qt to pretend having
reviewed the code changes in full details, but they do seem pretty
minimal, and limited to fixing the bug, so it should be good enough
for Wheezy.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi,
Dominique Lasserre wrote (27 Nov 2012 18:17:33 GMT) :
please unblock (and sponsor) package apt-build 0.12.44.
This version contains two bug fixes:
Thanks!
Looks good to me (but I'm not part of the release team).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
for removal from
testing, and maintaining this package in backports during the
Wheezy lifetime.
Thank you for your work on apt-cacher-ng!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri
Hi Kees,
intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 16:09:53 GMT) :
I am not sure I exactly get the usecase for this unblock request.
Is it developers who will need the -dev package to compile their new
software with seccomp features in? (Those probably can easily install
1.0.0-1 from the backports
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
current testing's gpa?
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
for Burmese script, in a way that is easier to review
for the release team?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
to be processed
if the proposed changes were limited to fixing the bugs that need to
be fixed.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hi Dominique,
Dominique Dumont wrote (13 Nov 2012 19:50:40 GMT) :
So I won't do it, I'll close this bug in a few days.
(This is a gentle reminder.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
by this new request.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
intrigeri wrote (24 Nov 2012 10:40:08 GMT) :
I'll be happy to review the 1.27-1..1.27-2 debdiff once you show it.
Oops, I forgot two things: first, thank you for coming back with a -2
proposal! And second, I'm not sure this is needed nor appropriate in
debian/changelog:
* Unblock #690281
://github.com/markstos/CGI.pm/pull/23
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
Micha Lenk wrote (23 Nov 2012 20:52:39 GMT) :
Debdiff is also attached.
Looks good.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
with the CKT_NSS_TRUSTED_DELEGATOR flag in certdata.txt are installed.
I hope that helps with some clarity for that upstream change. :)
Perfectly fine with me, much appreciated!
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
, this is starting to look like a pre-approval request more
than a unblock one, since the actual package to unblock has not been
uploaded yet. So, I guess it might be dealt with slightly faster if
the bug against release.d.o was formally put into the right category.
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG
Hi,
The upload fixes bug #690409 (wrong handling of conffile move),
I think this unblock request should wait until it's clarified on
#690409 that the absolute extension path is updated or .dpkg-dist
appears through every supported upgrade path.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
Hi,
Anton Gladky wrote (11 Nov 2012 22:00:06 GMT) :
So, probably, backports are much better alternative for gmsh in
this case.
You may want to close this bug, then.
Cheers!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
in
a security-sensitive area. I'm still curious and feeling like this
should be documented somehow, but I'll happily let others decide how
important this concern of mine is important for Debian.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
/,
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
of the release team.
Merely trying to help a bit.)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
not a blocker, though.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
, but I've read it all, and it seems to make sense.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
, and I hope this
package is not too much of a pain to maintain in stable backports.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
... and I would not bet that's enough.
Simon, are you interested in listing the commits that are needed,
on top of 2.62-3, to fix CVE-2012-3411 without breaking anything?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
current testing's gpa?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release
Hi,
unblock fonts-liberation/1.07.2-6
Looks good, since the ttf-liberation transitional package ships
compatibility symlinks.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Adam D. Barratt wrote (04 Aug 2012 09:56:26 GMT) :
For the record: the new package is therefore currently in NEW.
Still true.
Kees Cook wrote:
I'd like to have this 1.0.0 version in Debian for easier development
work for people wanting to use libseccomp going forward.
I am not sure I exactly
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
that debian/control was not updated to match
e.g. the bumped versioned dependency on Config::Model. Perhaps it's
not an isolated case.
+ migriate older configurations without user interaction (cme migrate
s/migriate/migrate/
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org
)
^^
Missing space
+1. luksOpen with the new name, change the target name to the new one
+2. chroot into it(now, the living target name is the same as it in
^^
Missing space
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https
from the new Mozilla certdata, but the way
debian/changelog is phrased leads me believe the only changes is
adding CA certificates, which apparently is not the case.
Otherwise, looks good to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
tags 692928 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote (10 Nov 2012 22:37:17 GMT) :
unblock apt-listbugs/0.1.9
The request does not help me understand how the proposed update is
supposed to meet the current guidelines for freeze exceptions [1].
Please clarify.
[1]
the
shortest path to code that behaves the same as it used to, but is
accepted by a recent Perl interpreter).
[Release team might want to stop here.]
I think the code would be a bit more robust / future-proof if it
localized @_ before assigning to it. Paul, what do you think?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
according to popcon
= low risk.)
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
diff -Nru parcimonie-0.7/bin/parcimonie parcimonie-0.7.1/bin/parcimonie
--- parcimonie-0.7
alternative makes sense to me.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
Hi,
Julien Cristau wrote (19 Sep 2012 17:42:01 GMT) :
Looks sane to me, other than the init_is_upstart inlining in the
udev init script I mentioned on IRC.
If I understand this sentence right, this is a blocker.
Gentle ping, then: Steve, what's happening on this front?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
Adam D. Barratt wrote (20 Oct 2012 11:37:48 GMT) :
Actually, don't bother with the bugs. I've just added unblocks for the
three packages.
Thanks a lot, this saved me a bit of time:
I was going to file the unblock requests today :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
gregor herrmann wrote (14 Oct 2012 16:27:31 GMT) :
@intrigeri, are you uploading the packages or do you want me to do it?
I'll do it later this week.
Thanks to everyone involved in unblocking this complicated situation!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
-0.51/debian/changelog 2012-07-08 15:19:29.0 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libio-async-perl (0.51-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Re-order alternative build-deps to something suitable
+for current testing/sid buildds (Closes: #680832).
+
+ -- intrigeri intrig...@debian.org
+++ libio-socket-ip-perl-0.16/debian/changelog 2012-07-08 15:05:30.0 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libio-socket-ip-perl (0.16-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Re-order alternative build-deps to something suitable
+for current testing/sid buildds (Closes: #680809).
+
+ -- intrigeri
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois wrote (08 Jul 2012 22:29:28 GMT) :
Surely, waiting one extra day to let 0.51-1 migrate to testing would
have been appreciated…
I'm sorry if the way I acted creates more work for you.
I was not aware of this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
I've a hard time understanding what the current status of this
transition is. Anyone willing to sum up?
(I'm interested in it as it blocks #619602 - ITP: theunarchiver.)
Bye,
--
intrigeri intrig...@boum.org
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR
201 - 278 of 278 matches
Mail list logo
