reassign 276274 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 375819 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 503752 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 603707 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 609642 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 615943 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 468225 texlive-extra-utils
reassign 276275 texlive-extra-utils
stop
On
Hi Adam,
On Sa, 05 Mai 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Indeed, libkpathsea5 is now only in stable, so I'm declaring the
transition finished, at least from the release side; thanks.
Thanks a lot for your work on that!
Best wishes
Norbert
Kohda-san,
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
pdvitomp - pmpost
Okay.
I have now uploaded texlive-binaries 2011.20120507-1 to Debian
which ships pmpost binary, the above link, and replaces/conflicts/provides
jmpost.
I think we thus can remove jmpost.
Best wishes
Norbert
Hi Norbert,
On Mon, 7 May 2012 11:40:07 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
pdvitomp - pmpost
Okay.
I have now uploaded texlive-binaries 2011.20120507-1 to Debian
which ships pmpost binary, the above link, and replaces/conflicts/provides
jmpost.
Kohda-san,
On Mo, 07 Mai 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Yes you are right. I found a few more packages which
should be removed.
ptex-base and jbibtex-base are completely included in
texlive-lang-cjk so should be removed.
Yes, these are all up to the maintainers.
I believe that mendexk
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 08:48 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
If I understand correctly jbibtex-bin is (will be) removed,
then I'd like to know what is the situation of jbibtex-base.
jbibtex-base is completely included in texlive-lang-cjk
as follows:
$ diff -ur /usr/share/texmf/jbibtex/bst/
Hi, all.
At Fri, 04 May 2012 09:02:49 +0900 (JST),
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Thu, 03 May 2012 20:48:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:45 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
- okumura-clsfiles, ptex-jisfonts and vfdata-morisawa5 now appear to be
virtual
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 20:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Cc:ed maintainers, please comment on the relevant note below which
corresponds to your package.
For context, these four packages are broken by the transition of the new
libkpathsea + texlive stack to testing, which I'm trying to
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 22:51 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
testing and breaking it in unstable in the process - texlive people,
does that sound okay?
Definitely.
After a few more removals and a small breakage (scalable-cyrfonts-tex)
the new
Hi Adam and all,
On Fri, 04 May 2012 23:21:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
After a few more removals and a small breakage (scalable-cyrfonts-tex)
the new texlive stack is now in testing. I missed aging a catdvi
upload, which is keeping libkpathsea5 in testing still, so I'm not
closing the
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:45 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
- okumura-clsfiles, ptex-jisfonts and vfdata-morisawa5 now appear to be
virtual packages provided by texlive-lang-cjk, so I've assumed the old
source packages should be removed from testing
Yes from my side, but the maintainers
Cc:ed maintainers, please comment on the relevant note below which
corresponds to your package.
For context, these four packages are broken by the transition of the new
libkpathsea + texlive stack to testing, which I'm trying to finalise.
I'd like to get that out of the way over the weekend, if
Hi Adam,
On Thu, 03 May 2012 20:48:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:45 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
- okumura-clsfiles, ptex-jisfonts and vfdata-morisawa5 now appear to be
virtual packages provided by texlive-lang-cjk, so I've assumed the old
source packages
Hi Adam,
On Thu, 03 May 2012 20:53:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For context, these four packages are broken by the transition of the new
libkpathsea + texlive stack to testing, which I'm trying to finalise.
I'd like to get that out of the way over the weekend, if not before, so
speedy
Hi, all.
At Fri, 04 May 2012 09:02:49 +0900 (JST),
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Thu, 03 May 2012 20:48:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:45 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
- okumura-clsfiles, ptex-jisfonts and vfdata-morisawa5 now appear to be
virtual
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 22:51 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
testing and breaking it in unstable in the process - texlive people,
does that sound okay?
Definitely.
I've been looking at some test runs for this. In brief:
- okumura-clsfiles,
Hi Adam,
- okumura-clsfiles, ptex-jisfonts and vfdata-morisawa5 now appear to be
virtual packages provided by texlive-lang-cjk, so I've assumed the old
source packages should be removed from testing
Yes from my side, but the maintainers have to give their word.
- cadabra depends on
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Is there *makempx (pmakempx etc.)?
script, I copied it from jmpost package into texlive-binaries
Hmm, I think this is unnecessary. From tlptexlive web page
it is declared pmetapost is included.
And I tested pmpost of the latest tlptexlive.
On 27.04.2012 10:05, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
What do you think? Should I upload to unstable now or should
I wait until the testing transition is over once?
I'll take a look afterwards. Thanks for your work!
But please test them, esp with respect
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
testing and breaking it in unstable in the process - texlive people,
does that sound okay?
Definitely.
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp,
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 19:09 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 04 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Norbert and all, I'm afraid we should prepare dummy packages
to make upgrade smoothly at some point.
Is it TeXLive packages that build dummy packages?
Of course I'll build dummy package
Hi Adam, hi Kohda-san
On Do, 26 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I guess the intention is that jmpost and jbibtex-bin simply go away?
(They're also built from ptex-bin, but don't appear to have any reverse
dependencies.)
Kohda-san? I am not sure, I would say yes.
We're getting close to
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:12:49 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Do, 26 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I guess the intention is that jmpost and jbibtex-bin simply go away?
(They're also built from ptex-bin, but don't appear to have any reverse
dependencies.)
Kohda-san? I am not
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:50:04 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
I guess we can remove jmpost but, for safety, please wait
a while, I'll check it deliberately.
Well, it seemed pmetapost is not contained in texlive
packages so we need it theoretically but jmpost is built
from ptex-bin.
Kohda-san
Well, it seemed pmetapost is not contained in texlive
packages so we need it theoretically but jmpost is built
from ptex-bin.
jbibtex-bin is also built from ptex-bin as Adam wrote.
If needed I can include pmetapost and pxdvi in the builds of texlive-binaries,
the patches are
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:08:58 +0900, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Kohda-san
Well, it seemed pmetapost is not contained in texlive
packages so we need it theoretically but jmpost is built
from ptex-bin.
jbibtex-bin is also built from ptex-bin as Adam wrote.
If needed I can
Kohda-san
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Then we could include simply pmetapost and pxdvi in texlive-binaries and
replace/conflict with the other packages?
WDYT?
Yes I think so. But pxdvi is already packaged as xdvik-ja
Well, then I only incude pmetapost ... it all
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:26:39 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
I Sasaki-san receiving these emails?
Yes I've cc'ed the mail to him.
Best regards, 2012-4-27(Fri)
--
Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda kohda AT debian.org
Department of Math.,
Kohda-san,
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
Well, then I only incude pmetapost ... it all depends on what we
Some question concerning implementation of that:
- include pmpost binary
- include pmakempx script from former jmpost package (?)
- conflict/replace/provide: jmpost
Is this
Hi Norbert,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:52:36 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Some question concerning implementation of that:
- include pmpost binary
- include pmakempx script from former jmpost package (?)
- conflict/replace/provide: jmpost
Is this enough? Do we need a link jmpost - pmpost?
Kohda-san,
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Is there *dvitomp (pdvitomp etc.)?
pdvitomp - pmpost
Is there *makempx (pmakempx etc.)?
script, I copied it from jmpost package into texlive-binaries
Basically I think (or I prefer) there is no need to
link jmpost -
Hi Norbert,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:53:21 +0900, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Is there *dvitomp (pdvitomp etc.)?
pdvitomp - pmpost
Okay.
Is there *makempx (pmakempx etc.)?
script, I copied it from jmpost package into
Kohda-san,
On Mi, 04 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Also #666293 (dvi2ps), which I missed before.
I remembered that dvi2ps caused problem when we upgraded
to kpathsea5.
It looks the maintainer is not active recently but I found
the upstream has released new version which is based on
Hi Norbert,
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:09:04 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 04 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Also #666293 (dvi2ps), which I missed before.
I remembered that dvi2ps caused problem when we upgraded
to kpathsea5.
It looks the maintainer is not active recently but I
block 666067 with 666293
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 07:50 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:09:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
There have been four build failures from the binNMUs so far - catdvi
(#666169), dvi2dvi (#666172), ptex-bin (#666170), texfam (#666171).
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 666067 with 666293
Bug #666067 [release.debian.org] transition: libkpathsea6
666067 was blocked by: 666172 666170 666169 666171
666067 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 666067: 666293
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Hi Adam,
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:04:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 07:50 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:09:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
There have been four build failures from the binNMUs so far - catdvi
(#666169), dvi2dvi (#666172),
On 29.03.2012 02:16, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 28 Mär 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It looks like libkpathsea changed SONAME in unstable in a recent
upload.
Yes.
texlive maintainers - have the reverse dependencies been test
rebuilt
with the new library version?
No.
That would have
Hi Adam,
That would have been somewhat useful /before/ the packge was uploaded to
unstable. :-(
Hahahahaha, sure, I can also wait another two years.
And BTW, how often has an upgrade of poppler broken TeX without prior warning?
And recently wasn't it also zlib that did some incompatible
On 29.03.2012 09:19, Norbert Preining wrote:
That would have been somewhat useful /before/ the packge was
uploaded to unstable. :-(
Hahahahaha, sure, I can also wait another two years.
fwiw, if you'd requested binNMUs while the new texlive-bin was in
experimental, we'd have been happy to
Hi Adam,
Hahahahaha, sure, I can also wait another two years.
fwiw, if you'd requested binNMUs while the new texlive-bin was in
experimental, we'd have been happy to schedule them for you. I'm not sure
why you think that would have taken so long.
Call me ignorant, but I don't know
block 666067 with 666169 666172 666170 666181
thanks
On 29.03.2012 10:59, Norbert Preining wrote:
Let me know if something goes weird.
There have been four build failures from the binNMUs so far - catdvi
(#666169), dvi2dvi (#666172), ptex-bin (#666170), texfam (#666171).
Regards,
Adam
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 666067 with 666169 666172 666170 666181
Bug #666067 [release.debian.org] transition: libkpathsea6
666067 was not blocked by any bugs.
666067 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 666067: 666172, 666170, and 666169
thanks
On Do, 29 MÀr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
There have been four build failures from the binNMUs so far - catdvi
(#666169), dvi2dvi (#666172), ptex-bin (#666170), texfam (#666171).
ptex-bin is replaced by texlive-binaries, no problem with that, it
will be removed anyway soon.
The others I
Hi Adam, thanks for your work!
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:09:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
block 666067 with 666169 666172 666170 666181
thanks
On 29.03.2012 10:59, Norbert Preining wrote:
Let me know if something goes weird.
There have been four build failures from the binNMUs so far -
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Tags: pending
X-Debbugs-Cc: texlive-...@packages.debian.org
Hi,
It looks like libkpathsea changed SONAME in unstable in a recent
upload.
texlive maintainers - have the reverse dependencies been test
On Mi, 28 MÀr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It looks like libkpathsea changed SONAME in unstable in a recent upload.
Yes.
texlive maintainers - have the reverse dependencies been test rebuilt
with the new library version?
No.
Best wishes
Norbert
47 matches
Mail list logo
