El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 17:26:59 -03 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
escribió:
[snip]
> /me facepalms
>
> Ah, indeed, my bad! It's frameworks, not PIM. Sorry about that.
Paul, RT: my most sincere apologies. I don't know how but I got to mix
frameworks with PIM. Frameworks is indeed
Hey,
> That's totally understandable from your part. Now the test has clearly
> failed. The regression could either be in Qt or in some part of the KDE PIM
> stack (not the meta package).
ktexteditor is KDE Frameworks and not KDE PIM. For KDE PIM the argument of not
being up-to-date and not
El lun., 6 de ago. de 2018 17:23, Sandro Knauß escribió:
> Hey,
>
> > That's totally understandable from your part. Now the test has clearly
> > failed. The regression could either be in Qt or in some part of the KDE
> PIM
> > stack (not the meta package).
>
> ktexteditor is KDE Frameworks and
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 15:34:02 -03 Paul Gevers escribió:
> Dear all,
Hi Paul :-)
> To be sure, I don't want to block/delay anything here, I just want
> autopkgtests to be taken seriously. If you as the maintainer of
> ktexteditor say please ignore my test for migration, who am I to say
>
Dear all,
To be sure, I don't want to block/delay anything here, I just want
autopkgtests to be taken seriously. If you as the maintainer of
ktexteditor say please ignore my test for migration, who am I to say
you're wrong. However, you have also added that test for a reason.
On 06-08-18 15:33,
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 09:39:48 -03 Paul Gevers escribió:
> Dear Lisandro,
>
> On 06-08-18 13:35, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > On one side Maxy told me that many autopkg tests would need fixing due to,
> > if my mind does not fails, gcc 8.
>
> It may have slipped in,
Dear Lisandro,
On 06-08-18 13:35, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On one side Maxy told me that many autopkg tests would need fixing due to, if
> my mind does not fails, gcc 8.
It may have slipped in, because the autopkgtests were so much broken for
a while that I didn't check
El lunes, 6 de agosto de 2018 06:28:21 -03 Paul Gevers escribió:
> Dear all,
>
> On 06-08-18 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Could you please confirm that the autopkgtest regression for
> > ktexteditor (marked on the excuses for qtbase-opensource-src) is benign?
>
> I believe there is a
Dear all,
On 06-08-18 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Could you please confirm that the autopkgtest regression for
> ktexteditor (marked on the excuses for qtbase-opensource-src) is benign?
I believe there is a regression, at least in the autopkgtest. I filed
bug 905559 for that already.
Paul
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> Control: block 902263 by 904133
>
> Hi! Please note that this is the only package stopping the Qt transition now.
>
Hi Lisandro,
Could you please confirm that the autopkgtest regression for
ktexteditor (marked on the excuses for qtbase-opensource-src) is
Control: block 902263 by 904133
Hi! Please note that this is the only package stopping the Qt transition now.
--
El tiempo es un buen maestro, solo que lamentablemente,
asesina a todos sus discípulos.
Curt Goetz. (1888-1960).
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
11 matches
Mail list logo
