Sebastien, Thanks for the hard work!!!
From,
Daniel and the 1000s of other Debian Gnome users. :-)
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Hi,
After a week of hard work we have made a lot of progress, so I hope this
time it'll be ok for release time :
* Architectures :
We have full builds on these 10
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
After a week of hard work we have made a lot of progress, so I hope this
time it'll be ok for release time :
Curses. So much for the easy answers.
* Architectures :
We have full builds on these 10 architectures :
- alpha
-
On 2004-05-22 Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote:
[...]
* gnutls 7-10 transition
The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
packages.
Hrm; is this going to screw up d-i?
[...]
I doubt that (but I am not involved with d-i). debootstrap already
installs
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:30:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
* gnutls 7-10 transition
The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
packages.
Hrm; is this going to screw up d-i?
debootstrap
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 12:09:37PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:30:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
* gnutls 7-10 transition
The transition has been made in experimental for cups, gnome and related
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
The m68k build is in progress (gtk+2.0 and a part of gnome2.6 have been
built).
Unfortunately, in progress doesn't mean it'll work. Python-gtk2
failed on m68k:
Byte-compiling python modules...
dsextras.py
Byte-compiling python
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:22:56PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le sam, 22/05/2004 à 18:09 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
The m68k build is in progress (gtk+2.0 and a part of gnome2.6 have been
built).
Le sam, 22/05/2004 à 18:29 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
Of course not. But I'm not really involved with gnome, and it was in the
list provided to me when I asked what packages needed to be built...
No problem. In fact it's on the list of stuffs to build (still good to
test ...) but not a
Hi,
After a week of hard work we have made a lot of progress, so I hope this
time it'll be ok for release time :
* Architectures :
We have full builds on these 10 architectures :
- alpha
- arm
- hppa
- i386
- ia64
- mips
- mipsel
- powerpc
- sparc (on http://people.debian.org/~phython/)
-
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
* tests
Some upgrade tests from gnome 2.4.1 sarge to gnome 2.6 experimental
have been successfully made. Upgrades from unstable to experimental have
been tested too with success.
Is there anything else expected from the
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:29:06PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
* tests
Some upgrade tests from gnome 2.4.1 sarge to gnome 2.6 experimental
have been successfully made. Upgrades from unstable to experimental have
Le ven, 21/05/2004 à 13:29 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
What about upgrades gnome woody - gnome 2.6? Seems to me that this is
the most important upgrade to test.
Some basic tests have been made, it's the same as 1.4 - 2.4 upgrades.
I'll do some more tests on this but there is no
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:29:06PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
* tests
Some upgrade tests from gnome 2.4.1 sarge to gnome 2.6 experimental
13 matches
Mail list logo
