Hi Release Team
Now final fix was released by upstream. I have prepared 2.2.13-4
containing the attached changes in respect to 2.2.13-3 currently in
squeeze. I would like to upload it to unstable.
It fixes #606540, by changes done in youtube.com again.
Thanks for your work towards releasing
On 12/12/2010 03:59 AM, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
Hi,
On 12.12.2010 07:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Any news here? Can't you put the dependency back so that we get
this finally properly fixed? Do you prefer an NMU?
My package has been up at mentors.debian.net for sponsorship for
almost a week now.
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 12.12.2010, 14:18 +0800 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
I'm saying this is not RC in my opinion, it's wishlist. The rest is up
to the grub maintainers.
Cheers,
Julien
For me, it's a grave regression that can put a production environment
into big troubles, and it would
Thomas,
am Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:48:56AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
I also agree that this needs to be resolved before the release and in my
opinion this bugs severity should be at least important, if not critical
because it will break Xen dom0 functionality of existing systems
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 12.12.2010, 13:10 +0100 schrieb Philipp Kern:
are grub1 installations (which were the default for Lenny AFAIK) auto-upgraded
to grub2 during the dist-upgrade? If not, it shouldn't break existing Xen
dom0s?
At some point during the release cycle on all my testing machines,
Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:12:15 +0100
with message-id 4d04ca2f.6090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606820: unblock: sdl-mixer1.2/1.2.8-6.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #606820,
regarding unblock: sdl-mixer1.2/1.2.8-6.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Mehdi,
thank you for your mail.
If you were aware of the mentors.debian.net package and the discussion
then why ask the question in the way you asked it? I have received no
further replies to my last message and certainly nothing that would made
me reconsider my position. If anything I should
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package python-apt
This release fixes a bad memory leak, a release-critical bug, helps in
case of a strange bug, and fixes a few things in the test suite. For
you
On 12/12/2010 02:24 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
Mehdi,
thank you for your mail.
If you were aware of the mentors.debian.net package and the
discussion then why ask the question in the way you asked it? I
have received no
Sometimes, it's good idea to give people time to prepare their
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 23:14 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 11/30/2010 06:49 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 16/11/2010 22:06, Jari Aalto wrote:
Hello Release Team,
Please consider latest 6tunnel for inclusion:
Can you please prepare an upload to t-p-u? (See below).
FTR, I
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 10:41 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Now final fix was released by upstream. I have prepared 2.2.13-4
containing the attached changes in respect to 2.2.13-3 currently in
squeeze. I would like to upload it to unstable.
It fixes #606540, by changes done in youtube.com
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package sane-backends
In a continued effort to get the broken backends back in shape for Squeeze,
here's another bugfix for epson2, following the one in -8. The fix is
Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:12:26 +0100
with message-id 4d04f46a.5090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606868: unblock: sane-backends/1.0.21-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #606868,
regarding unblock: sane-backends/1.0.21-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 13:38 -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
I have prepared an update of pybliographer to fix #605153
(pybliographer: Use of PYTHONPATH env var in an insecure way) in
testing/squeeze and am ready to upload it to testing-proposed-updates,
provided the release team concurs.
Please
On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:43 -0600, Rob Browning wrote:
emacs23 (23.2+1-7) unstable; urgency=low
* Don't initialize the terminal twice. Previously a console-mode
Emacs would send the escape sequence to switch to the alternate
screen twice. At a minimum, this caused problems with
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 22:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I've pushed the diff to git now:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mt-om/movabletype-opensource.git;a=commit;h=66daeefb9288a35e45a0634d5419fb0cf28c8d5f
and built/basic sanity checked the resulting packages. It's quite
possibly not
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package ssl-cert, it's adds Danish debconf
translation. The keylength change is very unlikely to break
something.
ssl-cert (1.0.28) unstable; urgency=low
* Add
On 12/10/2010 01:35 AM, Antonio Radici wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package postgrey 1.32-6, it contains a fix to resolve the
serious
#594451 which breaks a lenny-squeeze upgrade of
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 12:41 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
On 10/25/2010 02:37 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
The Lighttpd version in testing logs messages for non-errors. Could
the fix be accepted into Squeeze?
Yes,
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 22:17 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Please unblock package gap. I have made this upload to fix an FTBFS on
kfreebsd-i386
and kfreebsd-amd64.
Have the resulting packages been tested on kfreebsd-*?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-
Krzysztof has uploaded it to unstable, could you unblock it for
testing?
Why have a bunch of files moved from conf-available to
conf-available2?
In the source pkg? So lighttpd.install could use
debian/conf-available/* instead of
Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:34:31 +
with message-id 1292182471.3595.1269.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606258: unblock: distcc/3.1-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #606258,
regarding unblock: distcc/3.1-3.2
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:35 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 05:44, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
On 12/06/2010 07:17 PM, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
And, it even (silently) turn the package into a source format 3.0
which isn't acceptable at this point of the
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:17 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
2010/11/27 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
If the debdiff included the above file, then I suspect lists.d.o dropped
the mail for being over-sized.
I see. But this patch includes image file. Therefore, the patch is big.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:14:18PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 22:17 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
Please unblock package gap. I have made this upload to fix an FTBFS on
kfreebsd-i386
and kfreebsd-amd64.
Have the resulting packages been tested on kfreebsd-*?
I
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 20:16 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-
Krzysztof has uploaded it to unstable, could you unblock it for
testing?
Why have a bunch of files moved from conf-available to
conf-available2?
In the source pkg? So
Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:09:35 +
with message-id 1292184575.3595.1432.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#606509: unblock: gap/4r4p12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #606509,
regarding unblock: gap/4r4p12-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:18:32PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Can you please check again and re-upload?
Hi,
for some reason I didn't get the rejection email; the package has just
been uploaded and I got a mail confirming that everything is OK :-)
Thanks for taking care of the unblocking.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
That's fine, but I do question why it had to been done now... the old
method worked fine, and by changing it during freeze the diff has been
made quite noisy for no visible benefit, making reviewing it more work.
* Mehdi Dogguy [2010-12-06 23:38 +0100]:
On 12/06/2010 02:20 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
I uploaded deborphan 1.7.28.1 four days ago to sid and 1.7.28.2 recently
to delayed/7.
...
FTR, I unblocked deborphan/1.7.28.1.
Thanks, today .1 migrated to testing.
I'll have a look at
Hi Adam
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 03:44:57PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 10:41 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Now final fix was released by upstream. I have prepared 2.2.13-4
containing the attached changes in respect to 2.2.13-3 currently in
squeeze. I would like
Hi,
Though splashy has been removed from testing, lenny users with this package
will see their upgrade severely affected.
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 10:52:59AM +0100, Christian Meyer wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I tried to provide
Can someone from the release team please take a look at #555668. I
think this bug can be marked squeeze-ignore or downgraded.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mgltools-utpackages
Fixed RC bug #592417.
unblock mgltools-utpackages/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers
Hi there!
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 12:15:40 +0200, Clytie Siddall wrote:
The updated (completely reviewed) Vietnamese translation for the debconf
file:
translated and submitted by:
Clytie Siddall
Vietnamese Free-Software Translation Team
I am sorry, I did not see that there was a pending
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:40, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:35 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
I will contact the author and let him decide.
Any news on that?
It seems that both you and Mehdi don't receive the author's mail. His
mail has
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
As a side note, because -6 was never uploaded, -7 should have been built
using dpkg-buildpackage -v, so that the .changes for -7 included the
stanza from -6. This is to ensure that the BTS knows that the emacs23
package now in unstable
Please ignore my last correspondence, it seems that my upload keeps
having problems, I will recreate teh package and re-upload it (I hope
for the last time) tomorrow.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Dec 01, Neil McGovern ne...@debian.org wrote:
I'm currently wondering why #598135 is RC. Would someone care to
explain what I'm missing? :)
Causes data loss.
I am working on a new package with this fix and the changes stuck in
2.5.2-2 because of libdb5.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
reopen 605205
retitle 605205 unblock mokomaze/0.5.5+git8+dfsg0-0.2
thanks
Please unblock mokomaze/0.5.5+git8+dfsg0-0.2. Almost all of the icons
in .1 are blank in buildd-built packages due to a missing build-dep on
librsvg2-common. The sponsor for .1 probably did not use sbuild/pbuilder
to build
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 605205
Bug #605205 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org} [release.debian.org] RM:
mokomaze/0.5.5+git8-1
retitle 605205 unblock mokomaze/0.5.5+git8+dfsg0-0.2
Bug #605205 [release.debian.org] RM: mokomaze/0.5.5+git8-1
Changed Bug title to
The debdiff is attached.
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence lawre...@debian.org - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
diff -u pybliographer-1.2.12/debian/changelog
pybliographer-1.2.12/debian/changelog
--- pybliographer-1.2.12/debian/changelog
+++ pybliographer-1.2.12/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
42 matches
Mail list logo
