Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-12 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-01-11 23:10, Robert Millan wrote: On 11/01/2014 21:32, Niels Thykier wrote: As for #712848, the latest comment sent by Petr suggested that the test might be incorrect when applied to kqueue. I guess you are referring to comment #25 here? Quote: [...] Seems like no one picked

Re: gdm3

2014-01-12 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-01-12 00:01, Robert Millan wrote: On 11/01/2014 22:54, Robert Millan wrote: Do you have an idea of the consequences of making it linux-only? If it is just using (e.g.) xdm instead of and kFreeBSD losing a couple of packages, it will probably not be much of an issue. But then, I

Processed: block 734650 with 735053

2014-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 734650 with 735053 Bug #734650 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.18.2 734650 was blocked by: 734651 734650 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 734650: 735053 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-12 Thread Robert Millan
On 12/01/2014 09:24, Niels Thykier wrote: It was filed as serious and then downgraded by Julien on July 9th. Indeed, buildd.d.o lists no build problems at all. So at first glance I would expect the tests to have been disabled/ignored. Assuming this is no a simple error-hiding tactics, then

Bug#734650: transition: perl 5.18.2

2014-01-12 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: I've just uploaded perl_5.18.2-1 to experimental. Dominic is going to run a test rebuild of at least the perl related packages next, but we don't expect regressions. Affected packages that we know of are (hope I got this right)

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-12 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Robert Millan wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:35:56 GMT) : For example, I've been trying to assess the state of GNOME in general by trying to find bugs myself. I will report my findings soon, however this is clearly not optimal. My quick kick the tires testing is much less reliable than day-to-day

Bug#720426: pu: package openssl/1.0.1e-2

2014-01-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 03:34:03PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I wouldn't bother trying to get those to stable if I didn't think they were important. So can someone please do something about this request? Ping? This bug is now almost open for 5 months. There are basicly 2 very

Bug#735060: marked as done (nmu: evince-hwp_0.1.1-2)

2014-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:39:33 +0100 with message-id 52d2b735.9000...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#735060: nmu: evince-hwp_0.1.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #735060, regarding nmu: evince-hwp_0.1.1-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Re: Release sprint results - team changes, auto-rm and arch status

2014-01-12 Thread Robert Millan
On 12/01/2014 13:52, intrigeri wrote: Hi, Robert Millan wrote (12 Jan 2014 12:35:56 GMT) : For example, I've been trying to assess the state of GNOME in general by trying to find bugs myself. I will report my findings soon, however this is clearly not optimal. My quick kick the tires

Bug#734650: transition: perl 5.18.2

2014-01-12 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:40:23PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: I've just uploaded perl_5.18.2-1 to experimental. Dominic is going to run a test rebuild of at least the perl related packages next, but we don't expect

Bug#733266: pu: package whois/5.1.0

2014-01-12 Thread Marco d'Itri
If there are no objections, I will upload 5.1.1~deb7u1 to proposed-updates. FYI, I have no plan to systematically feed back to stable the database entries for the new gTLDs, since they will not be active for many months at least. -- ciao, Marco diff -Nru whois-5.1.0/config.h

Bug#735088: nmu: sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-8

2014-01-12 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-8 . ALL . -m Rebuild against glew 1.10 This was missed during the glew transition, probably because the package is not up to date on a few architectures. But

Bug#733266: pu: package whois/5.1.0

2014-01-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 18:00 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: If there are no objections, I will upload 5.1.1~deb7u1 to proposed-updates. Ack, looks okay to me. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Processed: Re: Bug#734672: pu: package subversion/1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u5

2014-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #734672 [release.debian.org] pu: package subversion/1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u5 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 734672: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734672 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#734672: pu: package subversion/1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u5

2014-01-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 22:10 -0500, James McCoy wrote: Subversion's transition to the non-versioned ruby-svn package didn't make it into Wheezy. Since ruby1.8 is planning on being removed for Jessie, the libsvn-ruby1.8 → ruby-svn transition should be backported to

Bug#735088: marked as done (nmu: sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-8)

2014-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:06:52 +0100 with message-id 52d2d9bc.8080...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#735088: nmu: sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #735088, regarding nmu: sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#735088: nmu: sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-8

2014-01-12 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2014-01-12 19:06, Niels Thykier wrote: For a package that has FTBFS on 2-3 release architectures for over 150 days with no reaction from the maintainer and no reaction to its uninstallability so far, I wonder if we should not be asking its maintainer if they are still interested in that

Bug#734672: marked as done (pu: package subversion/1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u5)

2014-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:31:09 -0500 with message-id 20140112193109.gc3...@cerberus.jamessan.com and subject line Re: Bug#734672: pu: package subversion/1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u5 has caused the Debian Bug report #734672, regarding pu: package subversion/1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u5 to be marked as

Bug#735118: nmu: gvfs_1.18.2-2

2014-01-12 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, gphoto2 in unsable has an annoying bug where the gvfs gphoto2 backends segfaults (this is #625872). This bug is apparently fixed in gphoto 2.5 (in experimental) but apparently

Bug#735118: marked as done (nmu: gvfs_1.18.2-2)

2014-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Jan 2014 22:20:19 +0100 with message-id 52d30713.1030...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#735118: nmu: gvfs_1.18.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #735118, regarding nmu: gvfs_1.18.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: libxfont_1.4.5-3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxfont_1.4.5-3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxfont_1.4.5-3_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxfont_1.4.5-3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: libxfont_1.4.1-4_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxfont_1.4.1-4_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxfont_1.4.1-4_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libxfont_1.4.1-4_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Processed: Re: Bug#734830: opu: package mapserver/5.6.5-2+squeeze3

2014-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #734830 [release.debian.org] opu: package mapserver/5.6.5-2+squeeze3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 734830: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734830 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#734830: opu: package mapserver/5.6.5-2+squeeze3

2014-01-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 22:04 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 02:59:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 05:07 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: The MapServer project has released stable updates for every major release

Bug#734829: pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2

2014-01-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 22:03 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 03:01:56PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 04:51 +0100, Bas Couwenberg wrote: The MapServer project has released stable updates for every major release

Processed: Re: Bug#734829: pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2

2014-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #734829 [release.debian.org] pu: package mapserver/6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 734829: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734829 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2uvi-0004ob...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2uw1-0004ug...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2zch-0001zh...@franck.debian.org

gcc armel status and armel architecture defaults

2014-01-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Hi, the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds. Please could somebody from the arm porters look into this? If I remember correctly we had some issues with the arm soft float port already with gcc-4.7 and gcc-4.8. Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would it

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2zqp-0004bj...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2zqy-000469...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2zfk-00077g...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2ztz-0001eo...@franck.debian.org

Re: gcc armel status and armel architecture defaults

2014-01-12 Thread Wookey
+++ Matthias Klose [2014-01-13 05:51 +0100]: Hi, the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds. Please could somebody from the arm porters look into this? If I remember correctly we had some issues with the arm soft float port already with gcc-4.7 and

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2a85-0003yr...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_armel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2a8n-00044o...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2amb-0006re...@franck.debian.org

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_5.6.5-2+squeeze3_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2ams-0006xb...@franck.debian.org

Re: gcc armel status and armel architecture defaults

2014-01-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would it be better to default to some newer arm version like armv5t? There is one Debian derivative, QtMoko, which is one of the few usable distributions on the Openmoko Freerunner (gta02).

NEW changes in stable-new

2014-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mapserver_6.0.1-3.2+deb7u2_armel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w2bif-q3...@franck.debian.org