* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [120425 14:47]:
fwiw, the next sensible weekends (i.e. ignoring the one in a couple of
days time) are May 5/6th - which is a three-day holiday weekend in the
UK - and 12/13th, which is the York BSP. I could do the latter but
would prefer the
Clint firstly thanks for transitioning ubuntu 12.04 to 5.5 that gives me
all the more reason to upgrade my vps's that are currently on 10.04
Is there a slated release date for 5.6? if what clint is saying is true
in regards to oracle not supporting 3 versions it would be better to
drop 5.1
Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org writes:
On 12824 March 1977, Niels Thykier wrote:
The Debian GNU/Hurd port can almost completely be installed from the
official mirrors, using the standard Debian Installer.
Not sure if that means we have imported packages (which are not
showing up on my
On Wed, 25, Apr, 2012 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Steve McIntyre spoke thus..
That will help, but then the issue is more a problem with downloading
the images. I've got a full mirror at home, which helps immensely with
jigdo downloads.
I can try and arrange to have a full local mirror at the BSP
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:22:18PM +0100, Mark Hymers wrote:
On Wed, 25, Apr, 2012 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Steve McIntyre spoke thus..
That will help, but then the issue is more a problem with downloading
the images. I've got a full mirror at home, which helps immensely with
jigdo downloads.
I
Hello,
Currently, react (19 days old), xmlm (17 days) and xen-api (11 days) are
stuck in unstable. One reason is the following: xen-api depends on xmlm
and they must go together, and xen-api depends on (a new binary package
of) openvswitch, which FTBFS (and has been for 32 days).
Is there
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:18:38PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Hello,
Currently, react (19 days old), xmlm (17 days) and xen-api (11 days) are
stuck in unstable. One reason is the following: xen-api depends on xmlm
and they must go together, and xen-api depends on (a new binary package
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:18:38PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Is there anyone working on fixing openvswitch? Or can the dependency in
xen-api be dropped, and reintroduced later, when openvswitch works and
has migrated to testing?
I hadn't noticed that Open vSwitch had FTBFS (it seems that
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 09:44:32AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:18:38PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Is there anyone working on fixing openvswitch? Or can the dependency in
xen-api be dropped, and reintroduced later, when openvswitch works and
has migrated to testing?
On 26/04/12 08:38, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
To make your life easier Nicholas couldnt you pull the 5.5 packages from
ubuntu and start transitioning using those packages?
Jonathan,
I am working on modernizing debian/rules and generally understanding
the package and triaging etc. People who
Proposed debdiff for coolkey 1.1.0-6+squeeze1 is attached.
Patches are the same from coolkey 1.1.0-12 in testing, but
added to debian/patches using dpatch since 1.1.0-6 used dpatch.
Same source tarball coolkey_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz in testing and stable.
- -Maitland
[ATTACHMENT ~/coolkeyspu.debdiff,
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 17:16 -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
Proposed debdiff for coolkey 1.1.0-6+squeeze1 is attached.
I think something may not have gone according to plan there. What was
actually attached was just:
plain text document attachment (coolkeyspu.debdiff.asc)
-BEGIN PGP
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:08:44AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 09:44:32AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:18:38PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Is there anyone working on fixing openvswitch? Or can the dependency in
xen-api be dropped, and
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 19:09 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mi, 04 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Norbert and all, I'm afraid we should prepare dummy packages
to make upgrade smoothly at some point.
Is it TeXLive packages that build dummy packages?
Of course I'll build dummy package
Hi Adam, hi Kohda-san
On Do, 26 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I guess the intention is that jmpost and jbibtex-bin simply go away?
(They're also built from ptex-bin, but don't appear to have any reverse
dependencies.)
Kohda-san? I am not sure, I would say yes.
We're getting close to
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:12:49 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Do, 26 Apr 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I guess the intention is that jmpost and jbibtex-bin simply go away?
(They're also built from ptex-bin, but don't appear to have any reverse
dependencies.)
Kohda-san? I am not
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:50:04 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
I guess we can remove jmpost but, for safety, please wait
a while, I'll check it deliberately.
Well, it seemed pmetapost is not contained in texlive
packages so we need it theoretically but jmpost is built
from ptex-bin.
Kohda-san
Well, it seemed pmetapost is not contained in texlive
packages so we need it theoretically but jmpost is built
from ptex-bin.
jbibtex-bin is also built from ptex-bin as Adam wrote.
If needed I can include pmetapost and pxdvi in the builds of texlive-binaries,
the patches are
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:08:58 +0900, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
Kohda-san
Well, it seemed pmetapost is not contained in texlive
packages so we need it theoretically but jmpost is built
from ptex-bin.
jbibtex-bin is also built from ptex-bin as Adam wrote.
If needed I can
Kohda-san
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Then we could include simply pmetapost and pxdvi in texlive-binaries and
replace/conflict with the other packages?
WDYT?
Yes I think so. But pxdvi is already packaged as xdvik-ja
Well, then I only incude pmetapost ... it all
Hi all,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:26:39 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
I Sasaki-san receiving these emails?
Yes I've cc'ed the mail to him.
Best regards, 2012-4-27(Fri)
--
Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda kohda AT debian.org
Department of Math.,
Kohda-san,
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
Well, then I only incude pmetapost ... it all depends on what we
Some question concerning implementation of that:
- include pmpost binary
- include pmakempx script from former jmpost package (?)
- conflict/replace/provide: jmpost
Is this
Hi Norbert,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:52:36 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
Some question concerning implementation of that:
- include pmpost binary
- include pmakempx script from former jmpost package (?)
- conflict/replace/provide: jmpost
Is this enough? Do we need a link jmpost - pmpost?
Kohda-san,
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Is there *dvitomp (pdvitomp etc.)?
pdvitomp - pmpost
Is there *makempx (pmakempx etc.)?
script, I copied it from jmpost package into texlive-binaries
Basically I think (or I prefer) there is no need to
link jmpost -
I intend to upload linux-2.6 to unstable this weekend. This includes
various important fixes from upstream stable version 3.2.16, a few more
bug fixes, and the addition of 'EFI stub' support on x86 (cherry-picked
from 3.3). There should be no ABI bump.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
I haven't lost my
Hi Norbert,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:53:21 +0900, Norbert Preining prein...@logic.at wrote:
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Is there *dvitomp (pdvitomp etc.)?
pdvitomp - pmpost
Okay.
Is there *makempx (pmakempx etc.)?
script, I copied it from jmpost package into
26 matches
Mail list logo
