Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_mips-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
On 4/20/21 4:33 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> What's the status of #987207? If that also requires changes in the
> package, it would be good to include them as well.
Indeed, turned out to be less severe, but I agree it's a good idea to pick it
up too.
I took the liberty of uploading this
Processing changes file: clamav_0.103.2+dfsg-0+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 987307 - moreinfo
Bug #987307 [release.debian.org] unblock: nodejs/12.21.0~dfsg-4
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
987307:
package release.debian.org
tags 987038 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: clamav
Version:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 987038 = buster pending
Bug #987038 [release.debian.org] buster-pu:
[ Holger Levsen, 2021-04-21 ]
> we should add autopkgtests to debian-edu-doc to ensure each document
> has been built for the three formats pdf, epub and html.
>
> another condition is that every debian-edu-doc-* package should
> contain at least one document, unless the package has
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #987178 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock:
monitoring-plugins/2.3.1-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
987178: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987178
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Bug #987307 [release.debian.org] unblock: nodejs/12.21.0~dfsg-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
987307: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 2021-04-21 12:56:51 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package nodejs
Please remove the moreinfo tag once the new version is
Package: release.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I would like to request an unblock for version 3.67 of tasksel.
This migration has been discussed with release managers already, and has been
given their agreement.
It fixes recently spotted issues with input methods / ibus in various
languages,
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:42:30 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock epix
has caused the Debian Bug report #987270,
regarding unblock: epix/1.2.19-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:37:36 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock lyskom-elisp-client
has caused the Debian Bug report #987328,
regarding unblock: lyskom-elisp-client/0.48+git.20200923.ec349ff4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:34:28 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock pgpool2
has caused the Debian Bug report #987311,
regarding unblock: pgpool2/4.1.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: Bernd Zeimetz , Moritz Muehlenhoff
, Adam Borowski
Dear release team,
I've uploaded version 14.2.20-2 of Ceph. This is the last point release
from usptream, including the
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2021 22:33:08 +0200
with message-id <85e08887-7064-8718-f95f-489403374...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #985885,
regarding unblock: ceph/14.2.18-1 (CVE-2020-27839)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lyskom-elisp-client
0.48+git.20200923.ec349ff4-3 fixes two important/release critical
bugs: #985871 and #987260.
Changes:
1. Only support Emacs flavor "emacs",
にゃあ！
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 21:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Can you please let us know if/when you're available?
> May 1 CD, Press
> May 8 CD, Press
> May 15 CD
> May 22 CD, Press
> May 29 (CD)
All should be fine for me. It's not like one can do much other
interesting things currently.
On 2021-04-20 20:52:09 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> I'm certainly happy to defer to your judgement here, given our previous
> experience with clamav updates in stable. I was simply trying to
> ascertain the scale of the update involved, but fear I may have just
> confused the discussion;
[Holger Levsen]
> I'll guess I'll invent something myself then...
What about looking for selected keywords like 'Debian Edu', 'Skolelinux,
"$(lsb_release -c -s)" or similar by grepping the documentation files,
to ensure the content is somewhat relevant? And perhaps linting the
HTML
Hi ftpmasters, Adam,
On 09-04-2021 20:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team,
[...]
> We propose to aim for a release date in May. Would either of the
> following work for you and do you have any preference?
> - May 1
> - May 8
> - May 15
> - May
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2021 21:13:24 +0200
with message-id <20210421191324.ga23...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#987294: nmu: rust-sniffglue_0.11.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #987294,
regarding nmu: rust-sniffglue_0.11.1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2021 20:43:14 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#987319: unblock: tasksel/3.67
has caused the Debian Bug report #987319,
regarding unblock: tasksel/3.67
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi Paul,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:56:01PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I guess that's about the best we can do for such -doc packages. I
> realize it's slightly "unfair" because of the different treatment we
> have in the current freeze, but I wonder if adding autopkgtest (to test
> as-installed
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 23:07:43 +0200):
> Hi,
>
> Holger Wansing wrote (Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:38:34 +0200):
> > > Ideally of course, you'd be able to test in unstable that
> > > the solution actually works before we accept them in testing. Is that
> > > feasible?
> >
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 987267 unblock: neutron/17.1.1-4
Bug #987267 [release.debian.org] unblock: neutron/17.1.1-3
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: neutron/17.1.1-4' from 'unblock:
neutron/17.1.1-3'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Hi,
Version -4 add this commit:
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/services/neutron/-/commit/4840df25084d28bd010e46e97cb4f4866379392e
Did some crap yesterday, backporting the fix from another branch, had to
fix...
Please unblock neutron/17.1.1-4
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pgpool2.
[ Reason ]
The new version fixes a bug which prevents the counter of open
connection from being reduced when a query is canceled.
[ Impact ]
If the bug is
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:59:13 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock rdma-core
has caused the Debian Bug report #987251,
regarding unblock: rdma-core/33.1+git20210317-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2021 13:34:36 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#987305: unblock:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418/418.197.02-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #987305,
regarding unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418/418.197.02-1
to be marked as done.
This
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nodejs
[ Reason ]
Fixing bug #987301: please add Breaks: node-babel-runtime (<< 7)
[ Impact ]
Problem for users having node-babel-runtime when upgrading
from buster
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-nvidia-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418
The new upstream version 418.197.02 fixes a CVE and a crash in X.org,
both
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc:
car...@debian.org,j...@debian.org,roucaries.bast...@gmail.com,ro...@debian.org
Dear release team,
Please unblock package imagemagick
Initially both 8:6.9.11.60+dfsg-1.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gstreamer1.0
GStreamer 1.18.4 is a bugfix release on top of 1.18.3, which is currently in
testing/unstable. 1.18.4 is currently waiting in experimental until the
38 matches
Mail list logo
