Hi Paul
Am 18.12.22 um 22:20 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 18-12-2022 22:06, Peymaneh wrote:
I have uploaded 0.19.0-1 of golang-github-smallstep-certificates[1] to
unstable which cannot move to testing, because its build
dependencies[2][3] are stuck in unstable. Its build dependencies are
stuck
Hi Peymaneh
On 18-12-2022 22:06, Peymaneh wrote:
I have uploaded 0.19.0-1 of golang-github-smallstep-certificates[1] to
unstable which cannot move to testing, because its build
dependencies[2][3] are stuck in unstable. Its build dependencies are
stuck because they cause regressions for
Dear release team,
I would like to ask you for help to get some packages unstuck.
I have uploaded 0.19.0-1 of golang-github-smallstep-certificates[1] to
unstable which cannot move to testing, because its build
dependencies[2][3] are stuck in unstable. Its build dependencies are
stuck because
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:insighttoolkit4 4.13.3withdata-dfsg2-4
Bug #1024343 [release.debian.org] insighttoolkit4: releasability with bookworm?
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'src:insighttoolkit4'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1024343
Control: reassign -1 src:insighttoolkit4 4.13.3withdata-dfsg2-4
Control: tags -1 sid trixie
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: retitle -1 insighttoolkit4: do not release with trixie
On 2022-11-23 22:26:19 +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
>
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1002902
Bug #1017926 [release.debian.org] RM: node-request-capture-har/1.2.2-2
1017926 was not blocked by any bugs.
1017926 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1017926: 1002902
--
1017926:
Control: block -1 by 1002902
On 2022-08-22 21:57:20 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Yadd,
>
> On 22-08-2022 17:31, Yadd wrote:
> > node-request-capture-har is a wrapper around deprecated node-request
> > (#1002901). Its reverse-dependency (node-yarnpkg) has already been
> > removed from testing.
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 15:21:55 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1024989: transition: simbody
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024989,
regarding transition: simbody
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1008495
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-tinyobjloader.html
Bug #1008495 [release.debian.org] transition: tinyobjloader
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Hi Sebastian,
* Sebastian Ramacher [2022-12-18 13:07]:
Sorry, this transition was completely missed. Please go ahead.
Thanks. I'm going to push rc10 through exp/NEW first, which has been
released in the mean time.
Cheers
Timo
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:17:55 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1005128: nmu: hugin_2021.0~beta1+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005128,
regarding nmu: hugin_2021.0~beta1+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:16:26 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1004121: nmu: libgsf_1.14.47-1+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004121,
regarding nmu: libgsf_1.14.47-1+b1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1008495 [release.debian.org] transition: tinyobjloader
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1008495: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008495
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Timo
On 2022-03-27 19:27:22 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear release team,
>
> I'd like to transition tinyobjloader for its new soname.
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:05:51 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1016604: transition: svt-av1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016604,
regarding transition: svt-av1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:04:33 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1024675: transition: openturns
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024675,
regarding transition: openturns
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:02:42 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1022003: transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.6: Status update +
prepared to start
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022003,
regarding transition: gssdp/gupnp 1.2->1.6 (+ rygel 0.42.0)
to be marked as done.
This
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1026254 [release.debian.org] Transition KDE PIM 22.12
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> block -1 by 1025863
Bug #1026254 [release.debian.org] Transition KDE PIM 22.12
1026254 was not blocked by any bugs.
1026254 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: block -1 by 1025863
Hi Patrick
On 2022-12-17 13:56:33 +0100, Patrick Franz wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: delta...@debian.org,
19 matches
Mail list logo
