On 11/21/2010 02:26 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 17:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 12:18 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
The Conflicts: statement will make
sure that php-pear = 5.3 is installed before php-net-smtp 1.4.2, which
is the current issue
interdiff is attached. Please allow this fix to reach Squeeze
so that upgrading from Lenny with php-net-smtp can be done without issue.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -r -u php-net-smtp-1.4.2/debian/changelog build-area/debian/changelog
--- php-net-smtp-1.4.2/debian/changelog 2010-05-10 04:39
On 11/18/2010 05:28 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 15:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
* Added a Conflicts: php-pear ( 5.3), and now depends on php-pear (=
5.3) because otherwise upgrading path from Lenny is borken (Closes:
#602865).
[...]
-Depends: php-pear, php-net-socket
Hi,
Seems that the upgrade path for php-net-smtp and php-pear is broken if
php-pear upgrades AFTER php-net-smtp. As per:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602865
How can I solve this? Should I add a Pre-Depends: php-pear (= 5.3.3-2)
in php-net-smtp? I don't really like
to change your mind about unblocking.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
P.S: If there is room for reconsidering the decision (which I do not
believe given the current thread), yes, 0.32.5-1 in SID is stable and
ready, and I still believe unblocking it is the way to go.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
.
On 11/08/2010 11:48 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:47:54PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
As it stands, it's unreasonable to even try working on the 0.30.x branch
for Squeeze, given the short amount of time remaining. I feel very sad
about it, but as there's no way
On 10/20/2010 02:30 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
After further discussion, and looking at the security issues which
upstream acknowledge being fixed in 5.3.3, please go ahead with the
upload to unstable.
Since Raphael said he wouldn't have time to work on PHP after after
October starts, I was
- Original message -
# Added fifth parameter to openssl_encrypt()/openssl_decrypt() (string
$iv) to use non-NULL IV. Made implicit use of NULL IV a warning. (Sara)
By looking at http://php.net/openssl_encrypt:
this function is currently not documented
but anyway, this must be a non
give me the green light so that I include these 2 patch in a new
upload to SID, aiming at an unblock for Squeeze.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Can we move forward and discuss what should be done now, rather than
discussing the past?
Thomas
It's been more than 10 days, and I still have no answer to what I will
be allowed to change/fix. Each time I've been asking things about DTC to
the RT, is it normal that I
Hi Neil!
First, I have listen to you in the this week in Debian podcast. It was
fun. I wish I was living in Cambridge with 9 other DDs, I feel alone
here in Shanghai (lucky, Li Daobing lives here now)! :)
Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Firstly, please accept my apologies for the lack of
have attached the relevant part of the diff file between 0.4.9-6 and
0.4.9-7 (which doesn't include the debian/changelog modification).
It would be great if this fix could reach Squeeze. Please unblock. Thanks.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--- mysqmail-0.4.9.orig/mysqmail-dovecot-logger.c
+++ mysqmail
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/06/2010 01:09 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/06/2010 09:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Having no comments on my plans with v0.32.x when telling some RT
members in August, I thought it was fine.
I won't be able to write a proper reply to your
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:17:54AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I know what I wrote, I know what has been written to me. I've been told
that my message has been forwarded to the release team (however, it
never has been written to me that it has been forwarded to a public
, I can't see a case where we would need it
more early (but I do see issues if it's decided later). That way, anyone
working on some SID packages would be able to have the name of Wheezy+1
wired-in if needed, before Wheeze is frozen, and get a chance to avoid
an unblock...
Thomas Goirand (zigo
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 05:10:30PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, my request is quite simple. Could the name for the release after
Wheezy be chosen when Squeeze is release?
Nah. And it's not that likely that you could do something useful with it
anyway. (Given
Neil Williams wrote:
Most of these packages go backwards in time, not forwards. We
can test that previous releases work with the tools - future releases
are likely to break stuff and you may well need new options or new
behaviour to work with future releases.
Certainly had this problem with
...).
Please unblock this 0.5.13-1 bugfix, #598387 really needs to be fixed.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -u -r dtc-xen-0.5.11/debian/changelog dtc-xen-0.5.13/debian/changelog
--- dtc-xen-0.5.11/debian/changelog 2010-10-02 23:07:08.0 +0800
+++ dtc-xen-0.5.13/debian/changelog 2010-10-02 23:07
for the huge kernel work, and try to take the above as a
constructive critic, so that we can work together faster, nicer, better,
and above all: *together*.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
- Original message -
2010/10/1 Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr:
Bastian, if the RT says no, is there a way to convince you to reverse
your decision, and have pv-grub back in the binary package?
Also, I currently don't know if you re-enabled the blktap2 package in
your last
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:56:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Now, I hope someone from the release team will answer this: if we build
a new xen-pv-grub package, will it be accepted by the RT, even if we are
late, as the lack of pv-grub in the xen-utils can be considered
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:56:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Now, I hope someone from the release team will answer this: if we build
a new xen-pv-grub package, will it be accepted by the RT, even if we are
late, as the lack of pv-grub in the xen-utils can be considered
Ian Campbell wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 02:49 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:56:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Now, I hope someone from the release team will answer this: if we build
a new xen-pv-grub package, will it be accepted by the RT
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/09/2010 09:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
1) Why not using the patch target from
/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make?
Sorry, I tried patch-stamp instead as I wrongly remembered, it
didn't work, I got pissed, so did like that (too fast, thinking
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, this has been unblocked and migrated.
Regards,
Adam
Thanks a lot Adam.
Now there's only php-xml-parser to have unblocked for this series of PHP
5.3 corrections, and we'll be good to go for all the php PEAR packages
that I maintain or depend-on. I'm
Philipp Kern wrote:
Seems most of the PHP disaster is actually due to non-communication on
the public -release list?
Hi,
If you wish to discuss this topic, you are welcome to do so, but not in
this thread please (and feel free to add me as Cc:, I'd be happy to read
as well, as I read -release
fix my
packages first, then only, try to help others). I'll have more time to
organize a Chinese mini-debconf with the release of Squeeze in mind, and
focus on the forthcoming FOSSASIA, as I live in Shanghai, China.
Whole heartedly,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
P.S: Because this is *very* important
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 23:17 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
- I have missed the deadline only for few days (12 days, right?). Before
that, the RT had more relaxed rules since the debconf10 announcement,
which was a surprise for some.
We apparently have different
Hi Mehdi,
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/06/2010 12:04 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
My last upload removes the use of a deprecated return value of new by
reference. Please unblock php-xml-parser to have the issue fixed.
The patch seems ok but:
1) build-stamp: configure-stamp
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi team,
I've been trying to fix issues in php-xml-serializer. I think I managed
to fix the PHP 5.3 deprecation issue, however, after my last upload to
SID, I realized that there was still quite some issues in it, noticeably
that the package is still sending some docs
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/09/2010 09:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
1) Why not using the patch target from
/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make?
Sorry, I tried patch-stamp instead as I wrongly remembered, it
didn't work, I got pissed, so did like that (too fast, thinking
wrongly
this addition in debian/rules:
rm -rf debian/$(package)/usr/share/php/docs;
rm -rf debian/$(package)/usr/share/php/tests;
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:22 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
* Removed some unwanted /usr/share/php/{docs,tests} files that shouldn't
be in there (they are already in /usr/share/doc/php-mail-mime anyway).
You mean {doc,test}.
No, I really meant what I wrote. The new
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:02:02PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I took over maintainership of libnusoap-php after the current maintainer
loosely sent an RFA in the middle of the freeze only few months after he
had his packages in the archive, because he was pissed
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Please, get your propaganda out of here. I understand why he was
pissed off.
I quite feel sorry about the issue too, and maybe even a bit guilty.
I'll try my best to ask things in a better way next time, trying to
avoid sensitivity of maintainers.
I tried everything, and he
Hi team,
I've been trying to fix issues in php-xml-serializer. I think I managed
to fix the PHP 5.3 deprecation issue, however, after my last upload to
SID, I realized that there was still quite some issues in it, noticeably
that the package is still sending some docs in
includes a security fix, I would be great if it was given
a higher priority by the release team (btw, I've set urgency=high).
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
that the release team would do an
interdiff and that I shouldn't attach it. As I'm not sure of what I've
read (or not), I still attached one to this message, please let me know
what I should do for the next requests.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, September 2, 2010 05:25, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
You're still unconditionally removing /etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf without
checking whether the user has modified it, however.
[...]
Now, if I was to calculate the md5sum of the /etc/cron.d
the swf file wasn't properly removed (maybe because of a Git
usage mistake), this time it's ok.
* Removed upstream swf file that didn't build from source (Closes: #591968)
* Now depends on libapache2-mod-php5 | php5-cgi (Closes: #591947)
* Standards-Version is now 8.9.1.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand
.
* Bumped Standard-Version to 3.9.1.
Note that I didn't write it in the changelog, but this also fixes
#591970 (because the swfupload library was included in the
examples/images-organizer folder).
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:14 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
+ echo Warning: tumgreyspf.postinst had found an old
/etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf,
+ echo and will be deleting it as this version
;a=summary
As I believe this is an important bug/feature fix, I think version 4.0.1
should be unblocked.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
the new package we've
been working on before 10.10 is out in few month, which was the
motivation of Clint Byrum).
Let me know,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
My tumgreyspf packag suffered from 2 issues:
- when there was no mail traffic, the cron.daily had errors, which sent
a mail to the system root user.
- the postinst script created a system user in /home, which
Julien Cristau wrote:
These packages haven't been uploaded in 2 or 3 years before last week, I
don't think when we're frozen is the right time to fix that.
Cheers,
Julien
Hi Julien,
The thing is, I've been made DD only last June, and there was so many
packages that was pending for upload
, and
modifies an eventual old setup to this new value using the usermod with
-d to setup the new home (LP: #610810).
I have attached an interdiff as well, which isn't too big. Please allow
these fixes to reach Squeeze by adding a freeze exception for this package.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -u
a chown the
way it should have been to begin with).
Please allow this important bugfix to reach Squeeze. Trivial-simple
interdiff is attached.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -u dkimproxy-1.2/debian/control dkimproxy-1.2/debian/control
--- dkimproxy-1.2/debian/control
+++ dkimproxy-1.2/debian/control
improvements that are pushing for a freeze exception here.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c73a1c2.8060...@debian.org
William Pitcock wrote:
neno...@petrie:~$ sudo yum -c ak-bootstrap.conf
--installroot=/home/nenolod/bootstraptest install centos-release yum
ak-bootstrap 100% |=| 1.1 kB
00:00
primary.xml.gz 28% |=== | 328 kB
00:13 ETA
Luk Claes wrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry that it took us so much time to make a working yum package,
but we were quite overloaded with our work, taking over all the
customers of another web hosting company (taking all our time doing
support). Anyway, I could today take the time
, the version above is ok. Anyway, we would
need to close the ITA number, so we would need to update the package
whatever happens.
Thomas Goirand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
extended
testings.
Thomas Goirand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Vincent Danjean wrote:
3) perhaps, try to push what is available in lenny backport into a
point-release
of lenny. This will depends on how many bug fix are present, how intrusive
the changes are, the release maintainers opinion, ...
For me, 3 is not the more important. Work on
://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1
Thomas Goirand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
didn't check for it enough...
Thomas Goirand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Even though Debian is not RPM based, it's very important to have a
working Yum package in Debian, just to be able to setup all sorts of yum
based distribution in a chroot for setting-up VMs.
Unfortunately, it seems that the current maintainer of Yum in Debian
haven't been active for a long
contacted the people from RedHat (m...@redhat.com, that was
marked as upstream contact), maybe they would be interested in helping.
Thomas Goirand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
adding Loic as Cc:
as he seems to be the one that cares about all this, and I guess Andres
shouldn't be in the loop anymore (as per what he said).
Thanks you 2 for your replies, and a big up (especially to you Luck),
for all the (impressive) work on the Lenny release.
Thomas Goirand
P.S: Loic
Luk Claes wrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
The stable release of this package has some bugfixes and needs to be
uploaded to Lenny:
* New spanish debian template translation thanks to Francisco Javier
Cuadrado fcocuadr...@gmail.com (Closes: #510468)
* Backported a MySQL insertion security fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The stable release of this package has some bugfixes and needs to be
uploaded to Lenny:
* New spanish debian template translation thanks to Francisco Javier
Cuadrado fcocuadr...@gmail.com (Closes: #510468)
* Backported a MySQL insertion security
it was quite a bad thing to
keep it in Debian.
Please unblock dkimproxy 1.0.1-8 asap so both problems can be corrected.
Interdiff between the 2 versions is attached.
Thanks to all member of the release team for the huge work,
Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I asked advices to my sponsor, and he told me best was to ask the
release team for an opinion.
dkimproxy just got released with a new version that seems worth updating
to. Attached is a diff between the currently in testing and the new
version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This update is mainly done because of a debconf translation update. As
there was some new lintian warnings, I did also improved the package
itself. The interdiff is attached!
Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6
to (currently in
SID) 0.29.14 in our git web here (special branch of the Git especially
for bug fixes to be backported in Lenny):
http://git.gplhost.com/gitweb/?p=dtc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable-0.29
Thanks,
Thomas Goirand
P.S: If the gitweb is not enough and you want me to attach diff files
.
Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJBgfvl4M9yZjvmkkRAni4AKDV3w0gtlvNgcGsX2nTfmKPznPYkwCfbiJJ
6WHRZ3f6SK3oOcWQeG8h4s8=
=RLoW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
the 2 versions is attached.
Thanks,
Thomas Goirand
diff -u libapache-mod-log-sql-1.100/debian/changelog libapache-mod-log-sql-1.100/debian/changelog
--- libapache-mod-log-sql-1.100/debian/changelog
+++ libapache-mod-log-sql-1.100/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+libapache-mod-log-sql (1.100-14
as this has already been discussed in this list.
Regards, and thanks for the work in Lenny,
Thomas Goirand
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
* Added missing man page for dtc_kill_vps_disk.
Nothing's added but bug corrections, and a bit of doc (README.Debian is
bigger, and there's a new manpage that was missing).
The diff is attached.
Thanks for your time and the work in Lenny,
Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Please allow dtc 0.29.10-1 to enter lenny, it fixes a RC bug, and quite
lot's of issues from upstream which is myself...). Here's a cut-past of
the debian/changelog:
* New upstream release with corrections for Lenny, backported from the
master
for the keys in /var/lib/dkimproxy
+
+ -- Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:08:09 +0800
+
dkimproxy (1.0.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
* The previous version was introducing a bug in the init script (a space
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment
::CBC module
libapache-mod-log-sql - Use SQL to store/write your apache queries logs
Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGDSxTl4M9yZjvmkkRAvZEAKCPgLBCtn2KXzyZ4sagmMoUnJYKWgCcC/73
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Just sending a quick mail to ask if it was possible to upload this
package (libapache-mod-log-sql) from Unstable to Testing. I've been
using it in production since quite a long time now, and it seems to work
rather well. I'd be very happy if
501 - 573 of 573 matches
Mail list logo
