Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi folks,
>
> Now that casulana is set up and knows how to build installation images,
> Steve gave me a green light for a new alpha release. We've been having
> a few issues on dillon (see previous mails on debian-boot@), but maybe
> I'm not going to
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> Since linux vs. fat/efi is no longer an issue, I'm tempted to prepare
> a new d-i release soonish. I'll probably freeze udebs in the upcoming
> hours or days, and try to figure out what to do with packages sitting
> in unstable for the time
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> I've just pushed a patch in D-I bumping the linux kernel ABI for the
> latest linux migration to testing, and therefore pondering when to
> schedule a release. I'm thinking somewhen before the end of October
> would be nice, if feasible on the
Quoting Jonathan McDowell (nood...@earth.li):
> I continue to be impressed at the fine work the release team do for
> Debian. Based on conversations at DebConf I'd expected a much longer
> period of instability and lack of updates to testing. While I understand
> we're not out of the woods yet
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hello release team,
Now that linux is built on all archs, we're able to contemplate a d-i
release. I'm wondering whether enabling all block-udeb entries from the
freeze hints file would be appropriate to make sure that no last moment
update reaches
Quoting Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp):
Hi,
On Sun Apr 19, 2015 at 16:25:30 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Improvements in this release of the installer
=
* apt-setup:
- Stop enabling backports by default (#764982).
I've sent
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi people,
here's a third round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
### l10n + one compiler pacification:
wrt l10n, I'm left with two packages now:
- choose-mirror, which I have trouble compiling, no idea why. Notice
that I tried to update its embarked Mirrors.masterlist, which is
something we probably want for Jessie
- console-setup that had some more
# various keymap/options/etc. changes:
unblock console-setup/1.117
unblock-udeb console-setup/1.117
Crap. I'm just seeing this 5 minutes after uploading 1.118 with 5 more
translation updates.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(CC'ed in case you guys subscribed to -release. I am subscribed
so please no CC)
Quoting Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
So you're continuing to ruin my (hard in this case) work, spreading lies
(invasive) and confirming you're against others working on debian.
Given that Cyril is THE
+overriding 65-nonlatin.conf.
+Close: bug#772687, Thanks to Norbert Preining.
+ * Update maintscript to remove 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf during
+upgrade.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sun, 28 Dec 2014 22:36:29 +0100
+
fonts-android (1:4.4.4r2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
-sans-fallback.conf to 69 to avoid
+overriding 65-nonlatin.conf.
+Close: bug#772687, Thanks to Norbert Preining.
+ * Update maintscript to remove 65-droid-sans-fallback.conf during
+upgrade.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sun, 28 Dec 2014 22:36:29 +0100
+
fonts-android (1
updated
+ * Portuguese updated. Closes: #772582
+ * Turkish updated. Closes: #772813
+ * Brazilian Portuguese updated. Closes: #773076
+ * Thai updated. Closes: #772967
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sun, 14 Dec 2014 08:43:06 +0100
+
debconf (1.5.54) unstable; urgency=medium
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please pre-approve and later unblock package debconf
This release is an l10n update with a few translation updates for
programs and manpages. The only other change is the update of the
Quoting Michael Meskes (mes...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package watchdog
This version fixes a couple serious bugs:
And introduces debconf changes that break all existing
a working patch.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:59:09 +0100
+
shadow (1:4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* The Soumaintrain release
diff -Nru shadow-4.2/debian/control shadow-4.2/debian/control
--- shadow-4.2/debian/control 2014-04-30 22:28:06.0 +0200
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Hello dear release managers,
Something which I think is a binNMU is needed for shadow. See #758922.
Thanks a lot to Niels for the amazing help dealing with this. You
deserve such big public thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Hello dear release managers,
Something which I think is a binNMU is needed for shadow. See #758922.
Sadly, I'm half-VAC this week, so I can't really dig in to check what
I should do, and I fear forgetting about this later on.
Would you mind looking at this and eventually do what's needed: it
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2014-06-11):
I intend to upload linux version 3.14.7-1 to unstable tomorrow
(Thursday) or Friday. No ABI bump should be required.
It might be interesting to perform a d-i release when that kernel hits
testing.
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi folks,
you aren't crazy (or maybe you are, given the mailing lists you're
reading, but that's another topic), I'm considering 2 uploads this week!
d-i → sid
=
It's been a while since I've been wanting to upload d-i to unstable, but
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com (2013-08-20):
Dear release team,
src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
ttf-liberation transitional
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:46:28 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Dear release team,
src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
We've had a quick chat about this, and our preference would be for
the option you've termed ugly. Now that we've stopped using the
three part versioning, it seems more logical for wheezy to be
Debian 7 and for the issue files to reflect
(/me subscribed to -release)
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
On 2013-06-01 6:01, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
We've had a quick chat about this, and our preference would be for
the option you've termed ugly. Now that we've
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org):
On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote:
As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD
because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non
release critical...
Just for the record, I'm not happy about
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi folks,
unfortunately I haven't been able to keep up with announcing timelines
like I tried to do during betas, but here we are: d-i wheezy rc2
should be happening during (or right after) this very weekend.
Things I'd like to see merged:
-
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 10:38:55 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Ah, I missed a Catalan update because translators didn't update the
PO-Revision-Date properly.
This is a fix for ŀl -- l·l which Catalan translators did
everywhere
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
- translation-staus: Christian, any chance you could fix the script
that generates that file?
I hacked it so that it now no longer stops after processing one
package (anna). There is something I don't really understand that make
a loop stop after
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (o...@debian.org):
Hi -boot, -release and Julien,
as far as I read the flow of bugs on -boot, debootstrap is still affected by
#703889 which really needs fixing for a sane Wheezy. The patches stacked on
the debootstrap git repository (which drop the InRelease
+
+ [ Debconf translations ]
+ * French (Christian Perrier).
+ * Danish (Joe Hansen). closes: #703059.
+ * German (Holger Wansing). closes: #703069.
+ * Japanese (Kenshi Muto). closes: #703018.
+ * Portuguese (Miguel Figueiredo). closes: #703066.
+ * Hebrew (Omer Zak).
+ * Brazilian Portuguese
of the above change.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:34:29 +0100
+
debootstrap (1.0.46) unstable; urgency=low
* Team upload.
diff -Nru debootstrap-1.0.46/debian/control debootstrap-1.0.47/debian/control
--- debootstrap-1.0.46/debian/control 2012-12-27 14:42
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
This upload allows pbuilder to build a build chroot, so it seems fine,
but, not being a wizard with debootstrap and archive stuff, I'd
appreciate someone to confirm that fixing this is OK and fixing it the
way it has been proposed
Dear release team,
Yeah, I know: l10n uploads shouldn't be allowed anymore. I concur with
this stance and fully understand it.
Still, I'd like to ask for one very very very last exception fot
tzdata.
Indeed, the last upload added a few debconf-translatable strings
(timezone names) without any
Quoting Holger Levsen (hol...@layer-acht.org):
Hi Christian,
On Mittwoch, 20. März 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I have an upload ready that includes MIchael Vogt's patch and moves
gpg from Recommends to Depends.
does it include the -f option as needed for live-$something? (see
I just installed a new wheezy machine as my brand new garage build
server and got hit by #703146. No way to create cowbuilder/pbuilder
chroots.
The patch in #703146 does indeed fix the issue.
Shouldn't this definitely go in wheezy?
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
I just installed a new wheezy machine as my brand new garage build
server and got hit by #703146. No way to create cowbuilder/pbuilder
chroots.
The patch in #703146 does indeed fix the issue.
Shouldn't this definitely go in wheezy?
I
.but soon might be not so soon, so NMU
are welcome.
--
Christian Perrier
Chef du service Informatique Individuelle et Départementale
Direction des Réseaux et de l'Informatique
ONERA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Quoting Pierre Chifflier (pol...@debian.org):
I will indeed remove the files from the source. I just did a minimal
diff for the inclusion in testing, to make sure the .swf file is not
included in binary packages, and make the source repackaging stuff in a
second step.
I'm afraid you *have*
Quoting Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
Pierre Chifflier pol...@debian.org
glpi
I looked briefly at the RC bug for glpi (#694642). It seems that an
embedded Flash file provided with the package has a security issue.
I have no clue at all if this .swf file is of critical use for GLPI
Quoting Stephen Kitt (st...@sk2.org):
On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:49:44 +, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 00:22 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
And after discussion with Christian and -devel/-mentors, the updated
package is available at
Hello dear release team,
It seems that this package is now safe to unblock as Thijs mentioned
on Jan 2nd, so this mail is sent as a gentle ping, while I'm using
some time to review bugs fixed in sid and not yet in wheezythis
one being the first I review this way..:-)
--
signature.asc
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Because of samba upstream bug #9042, upgrading from samba 3.5 and, I
#9026, not #9042
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package samba
As explained in the pre-approval request, this version fixes a
regression that may lead to upgrade failures for printer servers.
unblock samba/3.6.6-4
--
/changelog (révision 4183)
+++ debian/changelog (copie de travail)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+samba (2:3.6.6-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix printers tdb migration by including an upstream fix
+from 3.6.7 (upstream bug #9026)
+Closes: #696675
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sat, 05
particularly fixes the
+handling of 'legagy BIOS bootable'.
+Thanks to Jérémy Bobbio for providing the patch and analysis.
+Closes: #673042
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Tue, 01 Jan 2013 14:44:03 +0100
+
parted (2.3-11) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload to fix
.
+(Closes: #684863).
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Tue, 01 Jan 2013 19:19:15 +0100
+
libnfnetlink (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Max Kellermann ]
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- libnfnetlink-1.0.0.orig/src/rtnl.h
+++ libnfnetlink-1.0.0/src/rtnl.h
@@ -32,5 +32,6 @@
struct
Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System (ow...@bugs.debian.org):
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #681016 [release.debian.org] [release.debian.org] unblock:
dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-8
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #681016 to the same tags previously set
retitle -1
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
On Sat, 2012-12-29 at 19:41 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
By going through the RC bug list, I find #688435 which has been
supposedly fixed by an upload to t-p-u of dotlrn 2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2
So, my guess is that the only needed thing
Le 20/12/2012 15:27, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Hi,
over the last few months, release managers (d-i + “regular” release
team) have been quite open to various improvements in d-i components,
but it looks like we really should concentrate on finalizing things
for wheezy.
Things like improved
Quoting intrigeri (intrig...@debian.org):
What's happening on this front? Any alternative possibility to get
better support for Burmese script, in a way that is easier to review
for the release team?
I completely forgot about this. Sadly, this upload by Daniel Glassey
happened from outside of
Quoting Ian Campbell (i...@hellion.org.uk):
As I see it there are three options:
* Fix in Sid and request a freeze exception for Wheezy. For
reference the current debian/changelog between Wheezy and Sid
(which doesn't include #693263 yet) is appended.
* Fix in Sid
Quoting Roger Leigh (rle...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sysvinit
The attached debdiff includes a correction to the init script
dependencies for the three bootclean
Quoting Michael Gilbert (mgilb...@debian.org):
Hi,
Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with
incomplete copyright files. Some examples:
http://bugs.debian.org/690394
http://bugs.debian.org/690371
http://bugs.debian.org/690370
Now, these are mostly easy fixes and of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package hddtemp
This version fixes #680877 that interrupts installation of Xfce
systems from scratch with an unnecessary debconf question.
Even though this is not a release
: #629729).
+ * debian/rules: Replace unrecognized option --copy-prefix with --destdir and
+pass the correct path.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:48:21 +0200
+
gtkrsync (1.0.4) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release with updated documentation for rsync 3.0
Quoting Modestas Vainius (mo...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
I would like to ask for unblock of 2.8.9-1 for wheezy. Wheezy currently has
2.8.9~rc1 which is a feature complete release
Quoting Andreas Beckmann (deb...@abeckmann.de):
On 2012-09-20 07:30, Christian PERRIER wrote:
You have an outstanding call for translations for the changes that
modified these debconf templates. Please wait for it to complete and
[...]
I can for instance make sure you get these 8 needed
Quoting Alexander Golovko (alexan...@ankalagon.ru):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
Please unblock bacula-* packages, it fixes multiple bugs, include
CVE-2012-4430, crashes and debian policy violations:
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote:
This new version fixes some debconf template translations.
The current version at testing don't have all the debconf translations
done (only 48/50), and this new version
Quoting Daniel Hartwig (mand...@gmail.com):
Is there potential to see pkgsel use apt-get instead of aptitude
(following the same change in tasksel)? There is already a patch
committed. I'll give this more of a test this week with some induced
errors during the installation.
I hesitated
will be worked on
+after Wheezy release (Closes: #679846).
+ * Also drop all debconf templates and their translations.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:25:06 +0200
+
pleiades (1.3.4~I20120531-dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control
diff -Nru pleiades-1.3.4
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp):
This mail has to goals:
- get a release team approval about this possible upload to t-p-u
- give Yamane-san a last chance to react to all
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp):
This mail has to goals:
- get a release team approval about this possible upload to t-p-u
- give Yamane-san a last chance to react to all this..:-)
Then, should I make pleiades package
Quoting Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp):
This mail has to goals:
- get a release team approval about this possible upload to t-p-u
- give Yamane-san a last chance to react to all this..:-)
Then, should I make pleiades package for t-p-u?
(of course, send debdiff to list before
, its behaviour violates the
+policy. An alternative solution will be worked on
+after Wheezy release (Closes: #679846).
+ * Also drop all debconf templates and their translations.
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:25:06 +0200
+
pleiades (1.3.4~I20120531-dfsg
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debconf
Version 1.5.45, that missed the freeze by two days, has one
translation update and the following change by Colin Watson to fix
some parsing problems with
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
I've set age-days for this round, and I'll modify the testing summary
page to help be build comprehensive unblock/unblock-udeb/age-days
requests for next ones.
(keeping -release CC'ed to avoid cutting the thread but that's more a
-boot issue)
Do you
Quoting Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org):
One last thing: in our Git, I have already a debian/po/es.po update. I
didn't upload the package with it, because of the urgency=high. Was this
the correct thing to do (eg: plan for a later upload then unblock), or
should I have include the template
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mantis
This NMU, made unfortunately without ACK from the maintainer, fixes a
pending Czech translation of debconf templates.
unblock mantis/Accepted 1.2.11-1.1
--
Quoting Thomas Goirand (z...@debian.org):
Thomas, it seems that you forgot to answer this question from
Julienwhich, in turn, leaves the unblock request unadressed. Any
chance that you can do so?
I didn't forget. That's because we are still waiting for new debconf
translations from
Quoting Nicholas Bamber (nicho...@periapt.co.uk):
Ansgar,
I have not finished testing your patch but I have a few questions.
Firstly it raises a new lintian error requiring a Pre-Depends on dpkg
(= 1.15.6~). I know that this is more of an issue for Ubuntu and that
Ubuntu won't
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fontconfig
Keith Packard apparently forgot to ask for unblock so I'm doing it on
his behalf.
This upload mostly upudates 3 debconf translations.
Keith added
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 13:19:57 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
The new Keystone package, currently
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nbd
This NMU, made with maintainer's agreemet, is meant to complete a
debconf translation for the Czech language.
unblock nbd/1:3.2-1.1
-- System Information:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package prey
This NMU (made without maintainer approval...but without maintainer
reaction either...) adds a Czech debconf translation.
unblock prey/0.5.3-7.1
-- System
Quoting Markus Frosch (mar...@lazyfrosch.de):
retitle 683618 unblock: icinga-web/1.7.1-4
thanks
Hello Release Team,
we had to upload a new release 1.7.1-4 which fixes a problem with a
breaking postrm script when ucf isn't installed anymore.
So I'd like to extend the unblock request to
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package prey
This NMU (made without maintainer approval...but without maintainer
reaction either...) adds a Czech
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package samba
The -3 release switches to xz compression (default compression level)
for deb packages (#683899).
I didn't exactly use the patch provided by Ansgar in the
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
The deadline should be pretty clear, and should let time for doc /
translation updates, especially on the installation guide front.
Christian, could you perform your l10n coordination magic bits?
I'll send yet another call for updates, but I don't
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ntfs-3g from testing-proposed-updates.
(I'm unsure whether this is really an unblock, here)
This upload is meant to be sure that the Czech debconf translation
goes
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
1:2012.1.15AR.5-3 would have migrated if there was no udeb block,
1:2012.1.15AR.5-4 contains l10n updates.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package glance
This NMU upload fixed the Portuguese debconf translation.
unblock glance/2012.1.1-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
Quoting Daniel Baumann (daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net):
On 08/01/2012 12:29 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
I don't think that's agreed upon. If anything default options
should be used.
i don't think so, see debconf bofh.
the bottom line is that -9 compresses better than -6, and that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package auctex
This NMU upload was meant to include two pending debconf translations
(Spanish and Slovak). I didn't get the maintainer's approval for it
(nor did I get any
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org (14/07/2012):
I guess it means the unblock is granted, just waited for d-i beta 1.
Does it mean we can already upload eglibc/2.13-35, and that only the
changes between 2.13-34 and 2.13-35 would be considered for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package phpldapadmin
This upload add two debconf templates translation (and, well, a
Standards version bump that would have better been left aside but I
think it's
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
Cyril Brulebois, le Tue 17 Jul 2012 11:37:50 +0200, a écrit :
I think I'd rather avoid uploading a new d-i at this point, and just
get new images built once the gnome bugs are fixed.
Christian, maybe you could call for fixing the translations
+
+ -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:23:57 +0200
+
nginx (1.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
[Cyril Lavier]
diff -Nru nginx-1.2.1/debian/nginx-naxsi-ui.templates nginx-1.2.1/debian/nginx-naxsi-ui.templates
--- nginx-1.2.1/debian/nginx-naxsi-ui.templates 2012-06-17
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
Just some informations:
Adam D. Barratt, le Mon 25 Jun 2012 21:42:23 +0100, a écrit :
alsa-{base,driver,lib,utils}
espeakup
These are for software speech support.
And we can probably say that espeakup is under D-I team control,
isn't it?
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
That leaves us with the follow list which need categorising:
I didn't see eject which is providing a udeb that's used by D-I (to
allow for a menu entry to eject the CD from its tray).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
And we can probably say that espeakup is under D-I team control,
isn't it?
It's under the d-accessibility team, but you and I are the usual
uploaders, yes.
Not sure I ever uploaded (no time to check this right now). By the
way, if you could
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk):
I didn't see eject which is providing a udeb that's used by D-I (to
allow for a menu entry to eject the CD from its tray).
That's already present in the list - under can be handled by britney -
so I assume the udeb's been around for a
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (11/06/2012):
It's likely that a mass upload is needed for l10n purposes. Also, I
think that a beta is the moment where I should decide about which
languages I drop
(http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2012/06/09
Hello dear release team,
The Samba Team was planning to ship Samba 3.6.6 (their stable
release with many bugfixesbut *only* bugfixes) as of May 25th.
However, a late notice of a possible security issue was discovered
during that week and the Samba release manager delayed the release
until
Quoting Neil McGovern (ne...@debian.org):
This would be too late for the freeze, which will be happening in June.
*that*, I know..:-)
So, I would like to pre-ask for a freeze exception for samba in case
wheezy is frozen before July 2nd. Of course, it would be better to do
that with a
Dear fellow developers,
I would hereby kindly ask you (once again) to consider more
coordination with the i18n teams when preparing uploads for packages
when these introduce changes to debconf templates: either new
templates, modified ones (even for trivial changes), etc.
The i18n teams are
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hello folks,
I'm wondering how many changes still need a commit in the various d-i
git repositories (ISTR at least Phil wanted to commit more changes), and
also which of them want an upload.
It's likely that a mass upload is needed for l10n
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Interesting question. I was indeed convinced that the patch made its
way to 3.6 but it apparently didn't. Upstream bug tracker doesn't say
a word about 3.6 or about the patch not being relevant
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
Interesting question. I was indeed convinced that the patch made its
way to 3.6 but it apparently didn't. Upstream bug tracker doesn't say
a word about 3.6 or about the patch not being relevant for 3.6.
I'm checking this with upstream
Quoting Axel Beckert (a...@debian.org):
Hi,
JFYI:
Matthias Klose wrote:
see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python2.6-removal;users=debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
the only blocker is packaging of zope2.13. feedback from the zope2
packagers is
outstanding.
1 - 100 of 739 matches
Mail list logo
