Bug#1027959: transition: libkiwix

Hi, On 6/19/23 18:36, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Let's do this one properly during the trixie release cycle. What's the status here? I think we're ready to go. libzim is sorted (the ABI change was reverted, unstable is now at 8.1.1). I just uploaded libkiwix 12.0.0-2 (to fix 2 RC bugs)

Bug#1027959: transition: libkiwix

Hi, On 1/5/23 04:48, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: I'd like to do the transition for libkiwix (and sibling libzim) in time for bookworm, it's fully self-contained. I uploaded src:zimlib 8.1.0 to unstable last week, which unintentionally had a breaking change in it (sorry!). libkiwix 12.0.0 is

Bug#1027959: transition: libkiwix

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: lego...@debian.org Hi, I'd like to do the transition for libkiwix (and sibling libzim) in time for bookworm, it's fully self-contained. I uploaded src:zimlib 8.1.0 to

Bug#1017886: transition: zimlib

Hi, On 8/28/22 11:18, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: I'd like to do a transition of libzim 7->8. I've done local rebuilds of all the reverse dependencies, python-libzim needs a patch (ready in experimental), and all the rest (zim-tools, libkiwix, kiwix-tools, kiwix) will need binNMUs. Please go

Bug#1017886: transition: zimlib

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: lego...@debian.org Hi, I'd like to do a transition of libzim 7->8. I've done local rebuilds of all the reverse dependencies, python-libzim needs a patch (ready in

Bug#1016393: transition: libkiwix

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: lego...@debian.org Hi, I would like to upgrade libkiwix from v10 to v11. The two reverse dependencies are kiwix and kiwix-tools. All three packages look good in

Bug#1004717: transition: libkiwix and libzim

Hi, On 2/1/22 23:57, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: Please go ahead Thanks, everything has been uploaded. -- Kunal

Bug#1004717: transition: libkiwix and libzim

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: lego...@debian.org Hello, libkiwix and libzim have new major versions with SONAME bumps, requiring a transition. Both are maintained by the same upstream and basically in

Bug#976811: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#976811: transition: php8.1

Hi, On 1/19/22 14:08, Bryce Harrington wrote: On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:58:52PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Bryce, On 19-01-2022 10:28, Bryce Harrington wrote: With [4] applied, I'm seeing the following dumped on armhf: ## https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/mediawiki/jammy/armhf

Bug#976811: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#976811: transition: php8.1

Hi, On 1/16/22 11:52, Paul Gevers wrote: On 12-01-2022 21:16, Paul Gevers wrote: Priority may lay with the mediawiki* regression on i386: "Internal Server Error" doesn't sound great, and other non-horde package. Did anybody already take a look at this [1, 2, 3]? It's the last thing before

Bug#976811: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#976811: transition: php8.1

Hi, On 1/8/22 13:38, Paul Gevers wrote: php-wmerrors [7], owfs [8]. These two need upstream update. I see no activity and no bug reports. Can somebody please update these packages or file appropriate bugs? Filed #1003432 for php-wmerrors, and am working on it upstream since it's more

Bug#976811: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#976811: transition: php8.1

Hi, On 1/1/22 00:01, Paul Gevers wrote: It seems I don't understand how PHP packaging works. I scheduled rebuilds of several packages that were yesterday on the tracker page [1] when that still only had the phpapi-* listed. Several packages can't be build yet it seems (because they depend

Bug#963988: transition: zimlib and libkiwix

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition zimlib and libkiwix are ready to be upgraded to their latest upstream major versions. Since both are maintained by the same upstream and basically in sync with each other, I thought it

Bug#930089: unblock: mediawiki/1:1.31.2-1

My original mail didn't make it to the debian-release mailing list due to the size of the debdiff, so here it is, without the attachment. -- Kunal On Thu, 06 Jun 2019 13:40:46 -0400 Kunal Mehta wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: relea

Bug#913705: transition: zimlib

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I'd like to upgrade zimlib to v4 to get up to date with upstream once again. The only dependency affected is libkiwix, which will

Bug#861628: unblock: mediawiki/1:1.27.3-1

11.0 -0700 @@ -1,10 +1,17 @@ +mediawiki (1:1.27.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Imported Upstream version 1.27.3 (security release), that +actually contains the fix for CVE-2017-0372 (Closes: #861585) + + -- Kunal Mehta <lego...@member.fsf.org> Mon, 01 May 2017 13:20:11 -0700

Bug#859754: unblock: mediawiki/1:1.27.2-1

1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Improve NEWS file (Closes: #852862, #854352) + * Imported Upstream version 1.27.2 (security release), fixing +CVE-2017-0363, CVE-2017-0364, CVE-2017-0365, CVE-2017-0361, +CVE-2017-0362, CVE-2017-0368, CVE-2017-0366, CVE-2017-0370, +CVE-2017-0369, CVE-2017

Bug#828097: Possible to keep old tidy?

Hi, The upgrade of tidy to the newer version breaks what MediaWiki expects (see test failures: ), and updating MediaWiki to be compatible with the newer tidy isn't an option either: